Yellow Shirt Guy
kiwifarms.net
She's probably a textbook narcissist.
She's probably a textbook narcissist.
I always find it really funny when people think saying mean things on the internet is classified as hate speech and can be persecuted by the law.That's because you all aren't self-centered batshit nutters thinking of the next grift/burst of publicity/people you can pose in photos next to.
View attachment 164290
You just know this bitch was rifling through closets and catalogs picking out what to wear (and what she can do to make Avery really stand out) when she's at a podium addressing Congress about "muh hate speeches", rather than having an actual concern for her safety or for that of her child. Her vanity project has exposed them to this and she's lapping it up; that's a level of psychopathy even the Goobergrope girls didn't possess. They at least pretended to be scared and tried to make up shit about it. This one is openly chomping at the bit for every scrap of publicity she can get.
Oh gosh golly I bet that child can truly understand the potential consequences and has enough information to make a mature and informed decision on their own.Sadly there are more mothers like this. There is a woman who wants to transition her daughter with DOWN SYNDROME.
Yes, give a child who has tons of medical issues testosterone to fuck her even more up.
![]()
Excepect more insane troon parents (or mothers) in the near future
I always find it really funny when people think saying mean things on the internet is classified as hate speech and can be persecuted by the law.
No, people are free to say mean things on the internet because free speech (unless it violates the terms of whatever website but then people just go other places and do it) the law does not protect your delicate feelings
Expect more insane troon parents (or mothers) in the near future
Sadly there are more mothers like this. There is a woman who wants to transition her daughter with DOWN SYNDROME.
Yes, give a child who has tons of medical issues testosterone to fuck her even more up.
![]()
Expect more insane troon parents (or mothers) in the near future
This reminds me of that one case (I don't remember it very specifically though I think I read about it on here, I'll paraphrase) with the female caretaker of a mentally-disabled man claiming that the man had expressed his love for her and wanted to have sex, or something similar, through non-verbal forms of communication.Sadly there are more mothers like this. There is a woman who wants to transition her daughter with DOWN SYNDROME.
Yes, give a child who has tons of medical issues testosterone to fuck her even more up.
![]()
Expect more insane troon parents (or mothers) in the near future
Oh gosh golly I bet that child can truly understand the potential consequences and has enough information to make a mature and informed decision on their own.
Like Tommy.
Sadly there are more mothers like this. There is a woman who wants to transition her daughter with DOWN SYNDROME.
Yes, give a child who has tons of medical issues testosterone to fuck her even more up.
![]()
Expect more insane troon parents (or mothers) in the near future
The European Union is in fact in the process of making it a crime. Facebook and Twitter are totally on board with it. So, bad news for any Eurofag Kiwis.
How is that even possible? Where I live, the intellectually disabled can't even sign contracts or get legally married. Is the kid high functioning enough to decide, or what? They look like 15 at best, so I'm guessing it's the mom deciding for the kid ?
I don't know jack shit about laws on that, so I'm just really confused.
It's because in some countries parents can decide on medical treatment for young people up to 18 with little or no input from the kid and conversely they can approve non-essential treatment to satisfy a kid's whim.
One of the reasons the approval of the Family Court is required for trans teens to commence hormones here (and was previously required to commence puberty blockers) is because back in the day disabled kids were routinely sterilised without regard to the severity of the disability or the extremity of the procedure used. Trans advocates want that requirement removed, which will leave the disabled vulnerable once again.
Anna Stubblefield. There was a (long, but very interesting) article about her case in the New York Times, and it's well worth a read. Thanks, Kylie Brooks thread!This reminds me of that one case (I don't remember it very specifically though I think I read about it on here, I'll paraphrase) with the female caretaker of a mentally-disabled man claiming that the man had expressed his love for her and wanted to have sex, or something similar, through non-verbal forms of communication.
Of course, he had never consented at all; it was discovered the lady made it all up when they attempted to interrogate the man without her around and nothing resembling the sorts of messages she claimed to have received appeared. She was arrested.
Somehow a Pence presidency is not looking so bad after all, if only he would make this illegal. And that says a lot.
Make it illegal that parents can subject kids to bodily modification unless really necessary (life in danger etc), because holy shit this is going all downway.
So yeah, it's somewhat ironic that they want to overturn protections which were put in place primarily to protect vulnerable children and prevent parents from being able to make irreversible decisions without external scrutiny.
Sadly there are more mothers like this. There is a woman who wants to transition her daughter with DOWN SYNDROME.
Yes, give a child who has tons of medical issues testosterone to fuck her even more up.
![]()
Expect more insane troon parents (or mothers) in the near future