Democrat hardliners really are just horrible people - Hypocrites who will do anything in their quest for power

[Section230]

Right off the bat, I'm saying democrat hardliners, meaning, people who back pretty much every DNC talking point, who were happy to see Kavanaugh crucified but who now want Tara Reade destroyed. The people who hated the evil government and its intelligence agencies under Bush then celebrated those same people being used against its own political enemies. Not everyone who votes for a democrat or supports a democrat. I've done both of those things myself, and will do so in the future I'm sure.

I'm talking about the Nancy Pelosis, the Adam Schiffs, the Chuck Schumers. The Maggie Habermans and the Lawrence Tribes. The people who are fanatical believers in whatever is convenient at the moment to destroy their enemies and willing and able to ditch those principles the first moment they're inconvenient.

These people ruined countless lives under the banner of metoo, saying anyone who questioned their righteous cause just supported rape. BelieveWomen, until suddenly, whoa whoa you can't just blindly believe all women!

These pieces of shit in the DNC set up an elaborate intelligence operation to spy on and try to destroy the nominee, then president, of the opposition. The FBI literally fabricated evidence and were caught. Yet these people both celebrate the crooks in the FBI getting off, and cheered for their political enemies being swept up and having their lives destroyed by these illegal political machinations.

There's being wrong, and there's being so wrong you're harming the innocent. We've long passed that point. The democrats have repeatedly shown that nothing is beneath them in their quest for power. They will lie, cheat, and steal, and if they get caught they let themselves off the hook. They're aided by a compliant media, but even more so, they're aided by a core of fanatical believers who support them. It's not just that they wanted to destroy their political enemy by any means necessary, but they didn't care how many innocents they had to destroy on the way.

If you keep supporting the people who did this, at this point, you're supporting it. You're either for weaponizing intelligence agencies to destroy your political enemies or you're against it.

None of this means anyone should just always vote republican. But it should mean you can't support the democrats as they currently are and consider yourself a good person. Supporting terrible people because you might get what you want from it isn't noble. These people have shown themselves to be far worse than they even accuse the republicans of being.

I'm not saying Biden raped anyone, but you cannot reasonably deny this is being handled completely differently than any allegations against Trump or Kavanaugh. To deny that is to participate in gaslighting.

The ends don't justify the means, no matter how utopian democrats might believe the end state of their plans to be. If you need to completely change your principles when it's politically expedient you never had any principles.

 

[GHTD]

Democrats bad.

Republicans good.

 

[TFT-A9]

Thank you for the insightful post Captain Obvious

 

[snailslime]

i'm just going to go into centrist territory and say that you're an idiot if you're a hardliner of any party

 

[Marco Fucko]

I honestly admire that level of dedication to a certain degree. It's just raw, unadulterated realpolitik. The cucks in the peanut gallery will say shit like "I thought you said believe all victims" or "So much for the tolerant Left", but from my perspective, as someone who was raised in a working class conservative household and took an interest in libertarianism and the founding fathers, they're completely unfettered. They don't hold back proposing or enacting something they want done, meanwhile Republican officials are constantly giving these retarded speeches about free market principles or saying "yes, but..." in the public sphere. I've come to despise the Republicans, and I think they'll continue to largely be failures after Trump's run. Think about it, they have two major paths. Either they hold on to religion and free markets or embrace nationalism and populism. While the Democrats lost sight of populism in 2016, I don't think they're going to make that mistake after Trump's second term. You've got "the squad", more socialistic Dems in their 30s or 40s, which is young for politics. You also have one of 31 flavors of socialist, and while many of those are retarded ideologues there are ones who are fine with wearing a D next to their name or working for those who do.

Basically what I'm saying is the Democratic establishment is like the Alien and I'm considering switching long term. Very good energy, very chad.

 

[DocHoliday1977]

Ten bucks says Hillary will try to re invent herself as a moderate Capitalist American't non hypocritical saviour of the Democrat Socialists and those numbnuts will swallow her bullshit and walk behind like drones chanting "me too".

I was all for putting the damn rapist fag Harvey Weinstein down, but the rapists and pedos need Hillary to win and get them free from legal consequences.

 

[Scratch This Nut]

I’m tired of talking about democrats. Can we talk about centrists instead?

 

[Shield Breaker]

I don't know what the OP is hoping to accomplish, but I'm going to enjoy all the people who just read the title and make an ass out of themselves in their response.

 

[Neko GF]

Hyper-partisans are annoying and politicians are terrible people. In other words, water is wet.

 

[Pissmaster]

I’m tired of talking about democrats. Can we talk about centrists instead?

Centrists are to hardliners what straight non-trannies are to tranny communities: the demonized archenemy, despite doing absolutely nothing

 

[GnomeofDoc]

Centrists are to hardliners what straight non-trannies are to tranny communities: the demonized archenemy, despite doing absolutely nothing

Well and entirely boring. Got to get some edgy Anarcho-Guild-feudalism to be fun.

 

[Section230]

I don't know what the OP is hoping to accomplish, but I'm going to enjoy all the people who just read the title and make an ass out of themselves in their response.

Democrats bad.

Republicans good.

Got one.

Can't really paint centrists with such a broad brush, it only works if you go all in. You can nail republican hardliners for their hypocrisy too, but I don't think you can come close to the fucked up shit that the DNC has been up to lately.

 

[GHTD]

I don't know what the OP is hoping to accomplish, but I'm going to enjoy all the people who just read the title and make an ass out of themselves in their response.

Not everyone's mega-conservative on this website and it's only confirming the speds who say we're alt-right in a way where people think you have to be conservative to be active here.

 

[Cryonic Haunted Bullets]

america is gay. we should kill all politicians, and then kill everyone else just to be safe.

 

[Monolith]

Centrists are to hardliners what straight non-trannies are to tranny communities: the demonized archenemy, despite doing absolutely nothing

Good. Fuck centrists, burn the fence down.

 

[GHTD]

Hyper-partisans are annoying and politicians are terrible people. In other words, water is wet.

I mean, hyper partisans (mostly right-wing hyper-partisans) are a lot of Kiwis.

 

[TFT-A9]

Good. Fuck centrists, burn the fence down.

"STOP BEING INDIFFERENT TO MY POLITICAL AUTISM REEEEEEEEEEEEEEE"

 

[Section230]

Not everyone's mega-conservative on this website and it's only confirming the speds who say we're alt-right in a way where people think you have to be conservative to be active here.

Republican hardliners are idiots too, they just haven't been as frankly fucking evil lately.

 

[Judge Holden]

As a partial followup to my final thoughts on dumb SJW shit, I think I should say something about a phenomena I have autistically named "The obsequious instinct" "Sycophant Syndrome".

I.e. the pathological obsession shown by certain people to loudly and performatively demonstrate their support for a cause in the most extreme and obnoxious yet relatively comfortable and cheap ways they can think of, motivated not by a desire to grift money/power/social capital nor even being a sped with mental issues but solely due to the fact that they see whomever they have deemed the "higher authority" as having advocated for said cause, and thus seek to show off how in tune they are with this higher authority even when the cause in question completely contradict how they live their lives and even when their ways of demonstrating this support completely contradict the very cause.

Basically think of every hyperbolic partisan or fundie or ultranationalist or celeb worshipper you have ever encountered who had no direct stake in the shit they were going apeshit over, and indeed were happy to ignore beforehand, yet the moment a political talking head or preacher or nationalist demagogue or some worthless celeb specimen declared something or someone to be good or evil, they went absolutely feral in publically shrieking how that person or thing was the bestestest/most evilest person or thing in human history and how all who did not agree were some variety of filthy heretic conspiring against decency.

Now I know this all sounds very similar to your garden variety fanatic, but the key difference here is the total lack of any serious conviction or belief that what they are doing is right and that it is something they will cling to in the face of all rebuke from those around and above them. These specimens will chimpout over dumb shit entirely due to their belief that this is what those with moral authority over them want, even when its shit they never cared about before and will happily forget when told to stop by said moral authority.

Traditionally, the two main bodies capable of inciting such blindly aggressive support for anything they wanted no matter how dumb or evil have been governments and religions. However in the past few centuries as both governments and religions have lost a fucktunne of their old respectibility, these specimens will now congregate around media or internet personalities, conspiracy theorists, and indeed pretty much anyone who presents themselves as a worthy moral leader who knows "the truth" about everything and anything, and will at the slightest signal unleash the full force of pent up sycophantic rage that was once reserved for crusades, jihads and state sponsored genocides onto the dumbest and most petty shit imaginable.

To TLDR it, the kind of people who when told to jump by whomever they see as being "in charge" will spend weeks jumping and screeching to everyone around how jumping is the only salvation, and then the moment they are told to stop jumping they will spend weeks furiously demanding the cops break everyones knees to prevent illicit jumping from occurring. And unlike grifters and wannabe grifters they will do it for free and with little expectation of reward.

So when you see democrat hardliners, just remember that they are simply one single example of a vast multitute of speds who have always existed in every single segment of society since the dawn of civilisation.

Addendum
i. One demonstration in the difference this phenomena manifests between generations is to examine how specimens from "boomer" demographics are infinitely more likely to latch onto the political establishment of whichever party they support while the specimens of younger demographics are similarly infinitely more likely to latch onto various insurgent/non establishment groups or individuals as their morality figureheads

ii. A key factor I left out was in mentioning how should one moral authority be utterly and publically discredited, its highly likely that a specimen will simply transfer this unthinking loyalty onto the nearest substitute, even if that substitute is ostensibly extremely different and/or opposed to that which they originally followed

iii. The actual viewpoints of whomever the designated moral authority are entirely incidental. More deranged specimens will act on their own accord to "do their will" in the most extreme ways they can get away with, even when this "will" has been entirely imagined on their part.

iv. Much of this phenomena is dependent upon there being concrete targets, either to love or (far more often) to hate. These specimens are usually completely disinterested in any passive rulings regarding morality from their designated leaders, but when given a nice juicy target whom they can directly and publically use to show their piety they will go into absolute overdrive to show just what goodbois they are.

 

[Shield Breaker]

Not everyone's mega-conservative on this website and it's only confirming the speds who say we're alt-right in a way where people think you have to be conservative to be active here.

I'm not a mega conservative either. The OP sounds like a centrist or a right-leaning centrist. Instead of reading their milquetoast post about 'extremes are bad mm'kay' you're acting like a sped.