Four of them didn't wait 'til it was too late, though Terry George's accusation was nowhere near as serious as the other three who sa ccused while Jacko was alive.So I watched the whole thing. It's pretty damning. I have no doubt that MJ did it.
But I also shaking my head because how stupid his victims are. They had tons of opportunities to come forward. But they did it when it was already to late. Fucking idiots.
That's not the worst it could be. No one's stepped forward to accuse Dan Schneider of anything,
Now that's a lie.
Michael Jackson wasn't Blanket's dad. Some white guy was. Just like his other "kids".
For all we know, Blanket's real father might never've even been accused of a felony.
Jacko's reputation has improved more in death than Mao Zedong's. No one in the MSM talked about him being a pedo since he died and went to Hell, until now.
And while there's other dead pedos who aren't getting raked over the coals; such as gospel-music legend Reverend Dr. James Clevaland, who was sued for infecting an underage concubine with HIV; the Clevealand Estate isn't one of the most profitable dead-celebrity institutions of all time.
And that money -- as myself, @MirnaMinkoff, and many others have pointed out -- is going to most of the same people who covered for Jacko's many, many rapes.
Except the Estate isn't blasting the Santa Barbara County Police. They're blasting Radar Online.
Radar Online weren't the ones who discovered bloody underwear; a several-hundred dollar Larry Stevens gay sex manual named Man: A Sexual History of Man that isn't available for viewing on the Internet, nor for purchase on Amazon; legal naturist magazines filled with naked boys that only exist for the same reason magazines like Jaybird existed before the '70s; straight pornography designed to arouse curiosity and eventually horrify the discoverers, from Playboys to the brown showers tape found in Jacko's bedroom; and, assuming you clicked on the last link, the most damning of all, Jacko's semen was found only on the naturist magazines featuring little boys.
But you didn't do that, because you don't care about the truth.
But the Estate isn't taking action against the SBCP, they're taking action against Radar Online.
If any of the things I listed were planted by the cops who actually did the raid, the SBCP would be fucked harder than Eric Trump's mouth at age eleven.
Innocent doesn't mean "didn't do it". OJ Simpson, legally, is innocent of those two homicides that had his DNA over it. Lizzie Borden, legally, was innocent of murdering her parents; even though there were never any other serious suspects, and she had more motive snd better oppurtunity to do it than anyone, and she did a whole bunch of shit at the time that resembled evidence disposal.According to the "there are so many accusers" school of thought, then Schneider should be innocent, no ones accused him of anything. That's why trial by mob doesn't work.
The SBCP just said "the photos intersperced", not "the porography and erotica found in MJ's home that we catalogued didn't exist".Did you even read my freaking links? No shit the estate isn't suing the SBCP because the SBCP also acknowledged the damn report was fucking fake. Read the damn thing again - or better yet, I'll put the best part here for you:
"Some of the documents appear to be copies of reports that were authored by Sheriff's Office personnel as well as evidentiary photographs taken by Sheriff's Office personnel interspersed with content that appears to be obtained off the internet or through unknown sources," a representative of the Santa Barbara County Sheriff's Department said in an email to Billboard. "The Sheriff's Office did not release any of the documents and/or photographs to the media. The Sheriff's Office released all of its reports and the photographs as part of the required discovery process to the prosecution and the defense." The rep continued: "The documents with a header titled Sheriff's Department that contain a case number appear to be Sheriff's Office documents. The photos that are interspersed appear to be some evidentiary photos taken by Sheriff's investigators and others are clearly obtained from the Internet."
Not to mention the blog you linked me (a fucking blog??? Really?) that talks about the endless child porn found in MJ's house cites the police report I JUST proved was fucking false.
And I don't care about the truth? What the fuck gives you that idea? Because I'm defending MJ? I don't even give a shit about him. Sure, I like his music, but if you think I'm defending him because I'm a rabid MJ fan, you're incredibly mistaken. This could've been ANYONE else and I'd still have the same damn opinion. The only reason I'm passionate about it is because I've been fucking lied to by the MSM by what really happened and stupid idiots on this thread keep sayjng, "I believe the victims are telling the truth." That's practically ALL anyone here is going by. Their gut and fucking stories we HAVE to rely on to be true
The Leaving Neverland movie gave us nothing but stories from people and omitted any facts or evidence. People were pissed off as shit during the Kavanugh hearing because it was obvious Ford was lying by the facts and evidence presented, But in this same situation, people are just believing the victims with the same listen and believe bullshit. Why? Why is this case different? Because he was a weirdo? Well, you're right. He IS a weirdo. And he might've been an ass for all I know. But you can't accuse someone guilty of a crime because of it. The same principles MUST apply.
If tomorrow another victim came out and said MJ touched him and gave solid proof and evidence to prove it happened without a shadow of a doubt, of course I would believe him. But all of the "victims" who ever accused MJ DON'T have that. ALL of their stories are sketchy as shit and too many people like you believe tabloid headlines that lie in order to get clicks.
Give me a damn break.
And for the record, I don't believe in the "so many accusers" school of thought. I believe in actual investigation, from rals sources, not PR teams.
He didn't fool everyone. Most people have thought he was guilty since '93, and he bought himself outta trouble for $20 mill, in a case that didn't even involve a celebrity accuser. Most people just stopped talking about it after he died, kinda like what happened in Russia after the 9/'99 bombings even after a literal Kremlin Commie accidentally outed the whole thing as the work of the FSB before the bombings were even finished.And there was, 10 years of investigation, 2 raids, an FBI report, and an 18 month trial. He's the most investigated man on the planet. So, how did he get away with it? How did he fool everyone?
The SBCP just said "the photos intersperced", not "the porography and erotica found in MJ's home that we catalogued didn't exist".
Even the Razorfist videos where he says the items were only vaguely pedophilic doesn't involve actually looking at the books which were found in MJ's home. Here's one of 'em: its existence was discovered in the raid, reconfirmed in the trial, and you can buy it yourself if you have $400 to fork over. But before you do, ask yourself this:
- Why is the book so out of print that it's selling for $400?
- Why aren't photos from this book easily available to view online?
- Why hasn't the book been reprinted?
- Why does this book only have a first edition?
- Why do the photos Lloyd R. Stevenson displayed as excrepts in his Amazon review (please don't click on this if you live in Canada, or a country with similar laws) of the book look like the kind of photos seen in naturist magazines of adults before legalized porn killed the market in the US?
- Why would a fan give Michael Jackson a several-hundred dollar out-of-print book filled with pictures of naked boys?
- Why did Michael Jackson own several other out-of-print, quite-expensive books filled with pictures of naked boys?
- And most important: Do you live in a place where it's legal to own this book? (You'd definitely get in trouble in Canada for owning The Boy: A Photographic Essay)
As for the other books I've cited: while I advise against doing this, since the SBCP have much more serious issues to deal with than Internet slapfights, you can call them Mon-Fri, 8:00-5:00 California Time, to ask them more about the porno and drugs that were seized in the '03 raid. They're not the Skull and Bones Society.
I'm not saying The Boy: A Photographic Essay, nor Bruce Weber's Chop Suey Club, nor Boys Will Be Boys fit the American legal definition of child pornography.All the questions you're alluding to here is basically why is this book so difficult to find? Obviously because it's CP!!!
Well, I'm sorry to break it to you, but it's not. Plain and fucking simple. If it were, why the hell would this be allowed on Amazon.com? Is CP this easy to get? Fact of the matter is, whether it makes you uncomfortable or not, the book still doesn't fit the legal criteria for CP by American law which is why it was disregarded in the trial.
Name one.And there a thousands of books that have never been reprinted, only have first editions, don't have any of its pictures online, and sell for $400 or more dollars. That in no way means those books also have some great CP conspiracy surrounding it. And I do say conspiracy because these publications are still considered art books. Yes, you can try as hard as you can to make them about CP and possibly make headway, but it still doesn't prove without a reasonable doubt that MJ molested those kids if there's no other evidence against him.
I don't buy the "fan gift" story for a second. I'd believe he got those books from Santa Claus before I'd believe they were fan gifts.And you're telling me a FAN gave MJ that book anyways? He didn't even buy the damn thing himself? Wow, every MJ fan must know about his secret CP desires ?
This is the same list the guys at MJFacts went over, because it's the list from the SBCP raid, complete with Michael Ryan's Believe It or Not, which is the brown showers tape found in his bedroom.And also, if you're going to keep bringing up the same damn books to prove Michael is guilty, be fucking fair. There were LOADS of other porn involving women in his damn house. FAR MORE than those books. Not to mention when the police raided his home and searched his computer they found NO CP on it. Funny thing is, they were STILL able to find the adult porn websites he went to.
I don't know, but at least I don't have the kind that leads me to white knight a celebrity pedophile with slightly more fury than a Spanish inquisitor. That'd be really embarrassing.You want me to call the SBCP because you're too damn lazy to prove your own argument yourself? And you linked the damn contact page? What kind of autism do you have?