Wow, turns out I was partially right based on what the leaks have shown
. Why did my dumb guess come true?
Disney's Cruella - because we need sympathize with the animal abuser
- Thread starter Scarlett Johansson
- Start date
. Why did my dumb guess come true?
WTF IS THIS??????!!!!!!!!!
It’s supposed to be a diss-track to Cruella not a fucking tribute
White people bad.
But Girlboss tho.
so rodger is indian and anita is black? at least cruella's still white...way to do dumbasses you race lifted the characters we're now not meant to like acording to the logic of these live action remakes.
Would have been smarter just to race swap Cruella.
RumblyTumbly
kiwifarms.net
This is the problem with bad prequels.
You don't have to explain EVERY SINGLE ASPECT of everything we know about a character. Cruella's motivation for targeting Dalmatians for fur coats NEVER needed to be explained. She's a obsessive whack job that likes the spotted pattern. That's all we need. Trying to "answer all the questions" just makes the character you're highlighting less interesting.
Look at Han Solo. Wasn't he much better when he was the cynical rogue that had all these references to all these adventures before we met him? Did we really need a prequel movie to show us explanations for all we know about Han crammed into a two hour film?
EDIT:
More dumb stuff from the film.
View attachment 2210942View attachment 2210943
Christ on a cracker. So basically they did to Cruella what they did to Maleficent.
All women are heroes and the female Disney villains dindunuffin. Gotcha.
You don't have to explain EVERY SINGLE ASPECT of everything we know about a character. Cruella's motivation for targeting Dalmatians for fur coats NEVER needed to be explained. She's a obsessive whack job that likes the spotted pattern. That's all we need. Trying to "answer all the questions" just makes the character you're highlighting less interesting.
Look at Han Solo. Wasn't he much better when he was the cynical rogue that had all these references to all these adventures before we met him? Did we really need a prequel movie to show us explanations for all we know about Han crammed into a two hour film?
EDIT:
More dumb stuff from the film.
View attachment 2210942View attachment 2210943
Christ on a cracker. So basically they did to Cruella what they did to Maleficent.
All women are heroes and the female Disney villains dindunuffin. Gotcha.
Last edited:
TheAmbiguousLurker
kiwifarms.net
>Breaks into a company's building
>Steals a priceless necklace
>Destroys company property
>Grafitti's her name on people's property
>Kidnaps a woman's pets
"We don't have anything to charge her with, Mam."
>Steals a priceless necklace
>Destroys company property
>Grafitti's her name on people's property
>Kidnaps a woman's pets
"We don't have anything to charge her with, Mam."
well this looks like something ill only watch when im too mellowed out on weed/booze to care. I always check my watch history thinking wtf is big mouth and the live action Alice and wonderland in here? then I remember Oh yeah, I was so strung out last night i found one funny and the other trippy to watch.
Did they just forget the lyrics to the fucking song????
The Valeyard
kiwifarms.net
Another ginger erased in the name of diversity.
TheAmbiguousLurker
kiwifarms.net
I don't get it, is the movie saying Roger made the song as thanks for Cruella giving him the dog or as an insult to the woman that, as per the narration, he unjustly blames for him getting fired?
I'm telling you guys Hollywood hates gingers
I was never going to watch this and looks like my "Disney's Harley Quinn" hunch was right.
And here I thought the Trolls movie had the most retarded trauma reason I've ever seen and heard!
Great fucking snakes.
And here I thought the Trolls movie had the most retarded trauma reason I've ever seen and heard!Jasper and Horace being in love with her makes sense. Aside from being criminals, risking it all to steal fucking puppies for some fur hag is weak on its own. It's not worth justifying this movie's existence though.
It's funny isn't it? This need to understand and coddle villains is coming from the "Everyone deserves a second chance! Understand and express your feelings so we can all make the world better!" crowd who more often than not is caught doing the exact opposite to certain people. Like twist villains.
Anita is a reporter in this? She's a fashion designer too. So not only could they not keep her ginger but wouldn't let the black chick be into fashion too? Disney stop putting lead paint chips into the writers' food.
Can't even get real dalmatians to push her off the cliff smh.
I'm dying.
I'm dying.
Now this might be the sexist in me but have you noticed Disney is more focused on making their female villains more sympathetic than their male villains? Perhaps the Lion King prequel will lay on more of the Shakespeare motif but aside from Scar, Disney had a chance to show an origin story for Jafar instead of just doing a live action remake of Aladdin. With Disney planning on another adaptation of Peter Pan, I doubt it will give much development to the character of Captain Hook. And to be fair the relationship of Hook and Peter has been interpreted through different live action versions so I won't be surprised Disney comes up with something completely stupid.
Last edited:
The Valeyard
kiwifarms.net
A Scar prequel would try to make him sympathetic by having him be a victim of homophobia since he is "queer-coded" in the original cartoon according to SJWs.
It's even funnier because it's a non-white man (he doesn't look white?) writing a tribute song to a rich white bitch we're supposed to root for.
Rome's rightful successor
kiwifarms.net
This might be the greatest unintentional comedy in a long time.
Seriously, I think I just saw the most funniest scene in a movie in years.
Similar threads
The Hindenburg on which Rooster Teeth rests its hopes, dreams and future
It's about time the LGBTQ get rights
