nWo 4 LyFe
True & Honest Fan
- Feb 3, 2013
Funny, you are saying that Youtube enforcing their TOS should not be allowed (because it restricts speech on their platform) but now you're saying it should be. You can't have it both ways.Youtube is obviously free to enforce their terms of services. Only an idiot would think that an argument to enforce, change or alter laws means that a company would not be able to enforce their own terms of services. If increased protection for free speech would run contrary to youtubes terms of service obviously they'd either have to change those terms (and be fully allowed to enforce whatever new tos they had) or they'd have to take on greater accountability for whatever current tos they have in order to met the increased standards. Terms of service are not some unchangeable laws of nature you absolute nitwit, they are changed constantly.
And what conspiracy do I believe? I've only seen you and one other right-wing retard on here talk about "blue anon", so I am guessing this is the new meme on /pol/As for a blue anon, it refers to people who whines about "conspiracy theories" while mindlessly believing whatever conspiracy theories are fed to them.