- Joined
- Oct 17, 2019
If I had an inner monologue I wouldn't type to think and my life would be boring.
This but for some reasons when it happens the voice is always whoever my most recent SO was.Constantly, the weird part is I can deliberatly/accidently contruct a simple opposing personality for counter perspectives or when I need a conversation to articulate my thoughts more effectively. Very useful for online debate because you can usually anticipate the simpler objections to a degree.
Very awkward because I had to learn not to articulate the conversations quite early on.
I remember asking myself the question "what would it be like to see through my brother's eyes?" when I was a little tyke and it kind of broke my mind trying to conceptualize it. It didn't help that I was coming off a particularly nasty flu that gave me (then) terrifying hallucinations akin to Alice in Wonderland Syndrome.I bet the author would trip out if somebody asked him how we know we experience sounds, colours and other sensory inputs the same way. If somebody asked me to describe what red looked like I'd only be able to point to things that are red, or make a list of things that aren't red.
Of course, I assume these are things most fourteen year olds have already thought about.
In terms of a medium, I've seen it described like a picture book and I'd describe it like a movie or a comic book.I honestly don't understand how people can create visual scenarios in their mind. Do they actually see the thing they're visualizing in their heads, and if so, is it incredibly detailed or extremely vague? Am I just exceptional?
It's literally like watching a movie or playing a video game. Reading a good book is for me hallucinating for 11 - 16 hours.In terms of a medium, I've seen it described like a picture book and I'd describe it like a movie or a comic book.
Vague, not detailed. Only important things, and even then faces are like half in shadow.I honestly don't understand how people can create visual scenarios in their mind. Do they actually see the thing they're visualizing in their heads, and if so, is it incredibly detailed or extremely vague? Am I just exceptional?
I honestly don't understand how people can create visual scenarios in their mind. Do they actually see the thing they're visualizing in their heads, and if so, is it incredibly detailed or extremely vague? Am I just exceptional?
The inability to do this is called aphantasia. In my case the level of detail varies, but usually is pretty vague. This can be improved with practice and is probably important to be a good artist. When I was doing art I was better at it than I am now. Hypnagogic visions, however, can be quite vivid and very imaginative but are impossible to hold in one shape for long. I can also usually see random landscapes when I close my eyes which are occasionally quite vivid, and sometimes the imaginary sunlight is bright enough to make me sneeze. These never hold their shapes either, but rather than transmuting into new forms, I simply move through them as if I am riding in a car I cannot see moving at 40-70 miles per hour. The imaginary landscapes are almost always rural and practically never have people or cars. I prefer it that way; humanity and its creations are so ugly.I honestly don't understand how people can create visual scenarios in their mind. Do they actually see the thing they're visualizing in their heads, and if so, is it incredibly detailed or extremely vague? Am I just exceptional?
Hear soundlessly (as above), except for mathematical symbols, which I mostly see instead (there are also incoherent but distinct sounds for each symbol).Since there's lots of talk of verbalizing/visualizing:
When you write, do you hear or see the words in your mind?