Thread for discussing the ongoing tensions between Russia and the Ukraine.
Russia currently has 150,000 troops readying up.
Nothing has popped off yet.
Russia currently has 150,000 troops readying up.
Nothing has popped off yet.
We are waiting for Putin's State of the Federation address tomorrow. There are unconfirmed reports that Russian TV channels have been advised to move to Donetsk and "wait".Thread for discussing the ongoing tensions between Russia and the Ukraine.
Russia currently has 150,000 troops readying up.
Nothing has popped off yet.
If Russia wanted actual war with Ukraine, they'd just do it. The last conflict showed how Ukraine is completely incapable of war, how most Ukrainians would rather flee the country than fight and how Ukraine was reliant on literal neo-nazi militias to do most of the work.CRP told me there'll be no war because the exchange rate isn't going up or down. But maybe this is Russia making it seems like there's no war so they can more effectively surprise attack Ukraine. Very smart. The fact that it looks like there won't be war means that there'll be war.
Even retards should understand that preparations for war take some time. "Just do it" isn't something an army can do. Well, right now Putin seems to be positioning the army for a potential attack. Whether he goes for it - is a different story but this is something he has never done before.If Russia wanted actual war with Ukraine, they'd just do it. The last conflict showed how Ukraine is completely incapable of war, how most Ukrainians would rather flee the country than fight and how Ukraine was reliant on literal neo-nazi militias to do most of the work.
it's a really bizarre situation - Donetsk/Luhansk are completely unsustainable and untenable. Russia's in no position for a prolonged conflict, and the real prize: Crimea; was taken swiftly and effortlessly.Even retards should understand that preparations for war take some time. "Just do it" isn't something an army can do. Well, right now Putin seems to be positioning the army for a potential attack. Whether he goes for it - is a different story but this is something he has never done before.
Not to mention that a fair number of them, especially in the east, would much prefer to be part of Russia anyhow. I have a fair number of friends from/living in the Crimea and literally all of them were happy about the annexation.The last conflict showed how Ukraine is completely incapable of war, how most Ukrainians would rather flee the country than fight and how Ukraine was reliant on literal neo-nazi militias to do most of the work.
Can say for Luhansk only - they have Moscow prices but their salaries are lower than in the Russia "proper".it's a really bizarre situation - Donetsk/Luhansk are completely unsustainable and untenable. Russia's in no position for a prolonged conflict, and the real prize: Crime; was taken swiftly and effortlessly.
an invasion of Ukraine feels unrealistic, even with 150,000 men banging their shields on the border.
I have a fair number of friends from/living in the Crimea and literally all of them were happy about the annexation.
Ukraine announced some time ago that it would be receiving armaments form the US, including rockets/missiles that would be able to strike Russia. Russia of course is going to respond to that.it's a really bizarre situation - Donetsk/Luhansk are completely unsustainable and untenable. Russia's in no position for a prolonged conflict, and the real prize: Crime; was taken swiftly and effortlessly.
an invasion of Ukraine feels unrealistic, even with 150,000 men banging their shields on the border.
it's less to do with position and ressource than the retaking of russian territories. It's putin way of pandering to the nationalist. Also, it would be a middle finger to the USA, a way of saying we can do what we want and there is nothing you can do.it's a really bizarre situation - Donetsk/Luhansk are completely unsustainable and untenable. Russia's in no position for a prolonged conflict, and the real prize: Crime; was taken swiftly and effortlessly.
an invasion of Ukraine feels unrealistic, even with 150,000 men banging their shields on the border.
in all fairness I doubt Putin ever cared about the agricultural output of Crimea - it was all for Sevastapol.Can say for Luhansk only - they have Moscow prices but their salaries are lower than in the Russia "proper".
And yeah, Putin took Crimea without considering the N Crimean channel. That shows the level of his "foresight".
but this just proves my point that Luhansk and Donetsk are unsustainable, because there's going to be more retaliation than they can handle. It's too much to ask for especially when considering the state of the Russian economy.Ukraine announced some time ago that it would be receiving armaments form the US, including rockets/missiles that would be able to strike Russia. Russia of course is going to respond to that.
Also ask yourself if the sources saying that Russia is asking for war are the same sources that tried to claim Russia was paying the taliban to kill american soldiers
I agree, it just seems like a lot of effort for just "pandering." Again, I feel like taking only Crimea would've been a lot more successful and cleaner, but now we have ultranationalist militias skirmishing with each other kicking up shit. It really reflects poorly on everyone.it's less to do with position and ressource than the retaking of russian territories. It's putin way of pandering to the nationalist. Also, it would be a middle finger to the USA, a way of saying we can do what we want and there is nothing you can do.
For the invasion, it's unlikely with the stacking of NATO troop in the baltic and the swift remilitarisation of Japan
You miss my point. I'm saying the stacking of Russian troops is a response to aggression from NATO, supplying Ukraine with armaments that can strike Russia. There are also talks of adding Ukraine to NATO, which make war with Russia much more likely.but this just proves my point that Luhansk and Donetsk are unsustainable, because there's going to be more retaliation than they can handle. It's too much to ask for especially when considering the state of the Russian economy.
no, we're on the same page - my point is just that I don't feel like Luhansk and Donetsk were a productive outlet for Russian interests + defence.You miss my point. I'm saying the stacking of Russian troops is a response to aggression from NATO, supplying Ukraine with armaments that can strike Russia. There are also talks of adding Ukraine to NATO, which make war with Russia much more likely.
I don't think Russia really wanted the civil war to go on, and the outlet I watched which subbed videos from the area claimed that the Russian government had leaders of the rebellion assassinated to prevent further escalations.no, we're on the same page - my point is just that I don't feel like Luhansk and Donetsk were a productive outlet for Russian interests + defence.
I'm sympathetic to the position Russia's in, I know they have to fight hard and aggressive if they want to survive, I just don't see this as a productive front.
Western media will be hostile to Russia regardless, but the Donbass was really unnecessary and gave Western governments far more reason than they needed to escalate Western influence in Eastern Europe.
The Donbass felt like a clumsy and poorly planned response in contrast to the well executed annexation of Crimea. Crimea is also likely far better suited to aiding in the defence of Russia than the Donbass ever would be.
How does this change the presidential elections, however? Its not like there are more of these pro-russian Ukrainians, its just that the pro-russian part of ukraine is now more pro-russian and less populated while the anti-russian parts of Ukraine are now more anti-russian and more populated. Couldn't they simply say "We'll let you vote again, but we'll have a remapping of districts to reflect population change" or something similar26 electoral districts currently belong to the occupied territories. Worst-case scenario: massive growth of the pro-Russian faction, two provinces have pro-Russian leadership, and the presidential election goes to the pro-Russian candidate. Ukrainian administration would rather eat a grenade than accept Donbas on these terms, but this is exactly what Russia was insisting on.
Currently, pro-Russian people in the occupied territories do not vote. They have not voted since Yanukovych eked out a victory over Tymoshenko. If they were to vote in the presidential election, their votes would go to the pro-Russian candidate. Meanwhile, the number of votes the pro-Western candidate would get would not change.How does this change the presidential elections, however? Its not like there are more of these pro-russian Ukrainians, its just that the pro-russian part of ukraine is now more pro-russian and less populated while the anti-russian parts of Ukraine are now more anti-russian and more populated. Couldn't they simply say "We'll let you vote again, but we'll have a remapping of districts to reflect population change" or something similar