JY's Tampon
kiwifarms.net
and many years after Rhys dies archaeologists will dig up his grave and find the unmistakable bones of a man.
Dr. Rachel McKinnon / Dr. Veronica Ivy / Rhys McKinnon / Rachel Veronica McKinnon / Foxy Moxy / SportIsARight - failed out of a tenured job, fat man who competes in womens sports, bougie landlord, ex"platonic life partners" with a fat pedo- moved home to canada in 2021
- Thread starter sperginity
- Start date
-
Sister services, email, and search will continue to be negatively effected by the attacks. I made a thread to talk about it, if you're into networking.
Some troon also told James Ellington that he should read the analysis () Rhys has done:
View attachment 982102
View attachment 982101
View attachment 982105
Bitch looks like Wallace Shawn with lipstick. Nice 12head.
Real ballet involves an incredible level of dedication and athleticism. There is no way a walking joke of a zero effort troon like this puts any more effort into it than he does passing.
He's almost certainly just a molester.
If there is a hell, though, Rhys' torture will be having to see every mean tweet and not be able to block anyone.
the perfect punishment for him.
JY's Tampon
kiwifarms.net
Rhys is calling for the Troon Gestapo to report his fellow cyclists for being meanies.
https://twitter.com/rachelvmckinnon/status/1187030866075230208?s=20
for those looking to report a male cyclists bullying women here is the link. http://legacy.usacycling.org/safesport-report
https://twitter.com/rachelvmckinnon/status/1187030866075230208?s=20
for those looking to report a male cyclists bullying women here is the link. http://legacy.usacycling.org/safesport-report
Someone should report him for bullying Dawn over not touching him on the podium. They won't -- but I wish they would.
I love it.. every tweet he splurts out gets so many negative comments. He's got 100k people blocked... I bet every tweet of his is just his tweet and then loads of "This tweet is unavailable"
I wonder what USA Cycling would consider to be social media misconduct?
Would, for example, publicly celebrating the tragic death of a young lesbian to cancer be considered misconduct? Telling gay people that their sexuality is "immoral"? Bullying a woman for the heinous crime of not hugging him after a race? Trying to sic his internet following on women who defy him? Hmm.
GiantPalouse
kiwifarms.net
Well, I wrote them! Mentioned the British Columbia Human Rights Tribunal acknowledgement of biological differences between males and females, and had they checked McKinnons FB and twitter for hateful comments towards gays, lesbians and women.…and that the public is becoming aware of the legal fiction by which males are competing in women's sports. Sex liars. Sport cheats. I'll see if they respond
Ballet is a massive target for paedos.
You've got 10 minute YT videos like this where it's just 9 year old girls stretching in tight leotards
Vaganova Ballet Academy Stretching and flexibility exercises
Наш сайт: http://в-танце.рф Группа Вконтакте: vk.com/1v_tance Instagram: 1v_tance
www.youtube.com
Fine if you are also a 9 year old girl, but most of the people watching it are going to be paedos like him.
There are also a bunch of things in ballet like 'no underwear allowed' (because it's visible underneath the tight leotards), and they'll pretty much toss you out (at the highest professional level) if your breasts are too big.
A lot of girls stop ballet at puberty because you are in this skin suit, effectively.
They have the same rules for gymnastics, and a lot of parents complained that their daughters were required to wear tight leotards with no underwear. This only changed recently, and purely to validate tranny fee-fees, not because anyone ever gave a shit about what girls felt:
7.8 To ensure that male to female trans gymnasts are not identifiable, the rules for any domestic competition open to female gymnasts must permit any participants to wear gymnastics shorts or tights without deduction. No deductions are permitted where an item of clothing worn by a female to male trans athletes such as a chest binder is visible when worn with a leotard or unitard.
Regarding Dr Reeeeeeees, and his shitty philosophy, an actual philosophy Prof (http://www.open.ac.uk/people/jep34), from a University ranked literally 1000 places higher than Reeeeees' craphole has weighed in.
Dr Jon Pike's research specialism is the philosophy of sport, so that makes him well qualified to counter Reeeees' crap
(((Jon Pike))) on Twitter
“1) I’ve been trying to work out the philosophical position on trans inclusion in sport of Rachel Mckinnon and I think I have made some progress. Here’s a thread:”
twitter.com
1) I’ve been trying to work out the philosophical position on trans inclusion in sport of Rachel Mckinnon and I think I have made some progress. Here’s a thread:
2) It’s important to notice that RMs position in favour of trans-inclusion is not, in the end, an empirical or contingent matter. Despite spending some time on empirical data, RM’s position is not constrained by scientific data. It's an in principle position.
3) But it’s important to notice that RM is not against separate classes for men and women. There is a (fairly) respectable position in sport ethics, supported by Tännsjö, Foddy and Savulescu, for assimilation of sex classes. This is not RMs position.
4) There are cases where there is no justification for sex classes in sport: i) equestrian sport ii) target sports (but not archery). We can argue about these...
5) In most other cases, physiological sex differences make it the case that separate categories are fair. If you want to argue that physiological sex differences do not make a difference with respect to sport X, then notice what you are arguing for:
6) you are arguing that sport X is like equestrian sport or like shooting. This is not an argument for trans-inclusion, in sport X or anywhere else.
7) RM separates out the question of sex classes in sport from the question of trans-inclusion/exclusion (TI/TE) RM thinks that Rawls’ Original Position applies to the question of TI/TE. But that can’t be quite right.
There are a lot of side reasons for thinking this use of Rawls is mistaken (below) but here is the main one:
9) The justification of sex classes must be prior to the question of TI or TE policies. Persons in the OP must know facts about human biology in order to know about the justification of sex classes.
10) (see TJ 119: persons in the OP are “presumed to know whatever general facts affect the choice of the principles of justice”
11) If sex classes are justified, they are justified only on the basis of physiological facts about humans. Tännsjö et. Al. deny that they are justified. I think they are justified – and would be established in the original position on the basis of physiological general facts
12) Either RM thinks sex classes are justified, or she doesn’t. If she doesn’t then she is an assimilationist along the lines of Tännsjö. TI/TE policies are irrelevant.
13) If sex classes are justified on the basis of physiological facts about humans then those facts are facts about the performance differentials between males and females.
14) If they are justified in this way, TI/TE policies are also irrelevant, because the physiological difference rule them out. Remember, sex classes are justified, because of physiological differences.
15) RMs view that TI/TE policies can be decided in the OP is mistaken. Illicitly, it ignores the prior question which is whether sex classes are justified.
16) Careful readers of Rawls will notice that there is a lot left out here. RM’s account is open to the ‘basic structure objection,’ ignores the idea that POPs act from a ‘sense of justice,’ or bear the ‘strains of commitment’, or are subject to a ‘stability condition.’
17) But this is enough to be going on with.
1
19) In the interests of philosophical consistency, of course, RM should adopt and campaign for an assimilationist position, like that of Tännsjö. All the best with that.
Note how he carefully avoids calling Rhys he (because he'd get fired) and she (because he's not a fucking liar), in favour of 'RM'.
Uh oh. A man called him out on his faulty argument. What's Rhys gonna do now? He only argues with women.Ballet is a massive target for paedos.
You've got 10 minute YT videos like this where it's just 9 year old girls stretching in tight leotards
Vaganova Ballet Academy Stretching and flexibility exercises
Наш сайт: http://в-танце.рф Группа Вконтакте: vk.com/1v_tance Instagram: 1v_tance
Fine if you are also a 9 year old girl, but most of the people watching it are going to be paedos like him.
There are also a bunch of things in ballet like 'no underwear allowed' (because it's visible underneath the tight leotards), and they'll pretty much toss you out (at the highest professional level) if your breasts are too big.
A lot of girls stop ballet at puberty because you are in this skin suit, effectively.
They have the same rules for gymnastics, and a lot of parents complained that their daughters were required to wear tight leotards with no underwear. This only changed recently, and purely to validate tranny fee-fees, not because anyone ever gave a shit about what girls felt:
7.8 To ensure that male to female trans gymnasts are not identifiable, the rules for any domestic competition open to female gymnasts must permit any participants to wear gymnastics shorts or tights without deduction. No deductions are permitted where an item of clothing worn by a female to male trans athletes such as a chest binder is visible when worn with a leotard or unitard.
Regarding Dr Reeeeeeees, and his shitty philosophy, an actual philosophy Prof (http://www.open.ac.uk/people/jep34), from a University ranked literally 1000 places higher than Reeeeees' craphole has weighed in.
Dr Jon Pike's research specialism is the philosophy of sport, so that makes him well qualified to counter Reeeees' crap
(((Jon Pike))) on Twitter
“1) I’ve been trying to work out the philosophical position on trans inclusion in sport of Rachel Mckinnon and I think I have made some progress. Here’s a thread:”
Note how he carefully avoids calling Rhys he (because he'd get fired) and she (because he's not a fucking liar), in favour of 'RM'.
IF he responds (and he might be too chickenshit to do it since it is a man who is clearly his superior in his own field no less), I bet he will claim that Twitter isn't the "proper" place to have this debate and say that this guy isn't fully versed in trans ethics. But he won't tag the guy to reply. Hopefully someone will retweet and tag this guy so he can see Rhys' response.
Thank you Dr. Pike for having the courage to critique this argument. Let's hope his university supports free speech as much as Rhys' does. Let's also see if Rhys tries to get his cult to email the university and get him fired. Wonder how much hypocrisy Rhys will display on this one?
He’s so fucking exceptional, I’m astonished he can walk upright.
Great job shithead, you’ve inadvertently provided normies with the means of mass emailing their outrage to the sport authorities.
Run, Forest! Run!
This is your best one yet. A true masterpiece!!
Arigato!
As someone who relishes bullying, it's odd he doesn't understand his own reactions have a lot to do with how much he gets tweaked. His blazing eyes and tight-lipped seriousness is like catnip to trolls.
Brain Problems
kiwifarms.net
Part of me thinks it's all part of his personality disorder. The amount of shit he steps into has to be on some level the by-product of subliminal masochistic desire because no man would willingly make an ass of himself on such a dramatic scale (get it because he's fat lol) so consistently without there being some sort of sexual aspect to it. Freud would have written a whole new book after getting a taste of BigMac.
That or he's just a complete and utter asshole autist that cannot understand how normal humans are supposed to behave.
This is so awesome..
This is just dumb..
This is just dumb..
My money's on the patented IDOTS response: Pike will be accused of IGNORING DECADES OF TRANS SCHOLARSHIP!
I found this in the thread, can anyone confirm whether Rhys has raced in a male category this year? Maybe on his little US tour of velodromes this summer? I don't specifically remember him doing so and I agree with Jon Pike that it doesn't really sound like something he would do.
By the way, thanks to everyone for your work in this thread, both cataloging Rhys and gathering the pertinent responses to Rhys, like the Jon Pike thread above.
This freakish troon's perpetual state of meltdown is fascinating to watch.
Last edited:
He wrote a lot of tweets to ask the simple question of "if what RM says is true about sex based performance differences, why have women's sports at all?", and imo rhys is going to pick some non-central issue in the tweets to argue with ("what rawls really meant was blah blah blah" or something) if he doesn't just ignore it or chimp out about the questioner being a cis white male. If rhys was honest he would say that the purpose of having women's divisions is so he can win a medal and be a World Champion, he can't win any other way. NPD cases like him see everything and everyone around them as a means to an end.Regarding Dr Reeeeeeees, and his shitty philosophy, an actual philosophy Prof (http://www.open.ac.uk/people/jep34), from a University ranked literally 1000 places higher than Reeeeees' craphole has weighed in.
Dr Jon Pike's research specialism is the philosophy of sport, so that makes him well qualified to counter Reeeees' crap
(((Jon Pike))) on Twitter
“1) I’ve been trying to work out the philosophical position on trans inclusion in sport of Rachel Mckinnon and I think I have made some progress. Here’s a thread:”
Note how he carefully avoids calling Rhys he (because he'd get fired) and she (because he's not a fucking liar), in favour of 'RM'.
If I got a chance to question rhys, I would ask him to explain why women's sporting records never surpass men's sporting records.
Hey, also- I found that dr fond of beetles has caught rhys lying about his medical history by piecing together the dates of things that rhys claimed happened.
tl;dr
Rhys claims he got SRS in late teens, then claims he came out/transitioned at age 30.
Claimed to have had his SRS before 2015, but claimed to be "forced to suppress testosterone" in 2018.
So he is full of shit in a very documented way, hopefully journalists start harping on this when they talk to him.
-
- Tags
- rat king
Similar threads
- Poll
Chronic suicidal homeless parasite, ungrateful leech and serial lease-bailer. Don't count on her to keep her side of bargain
"I AM A WOMAN!" ~ Male Women's Roller Derby Champion ~ Misgender sperg
