I loved Dragonlance and I hadn't heard of a new series by those two, so the news that it's getting axed because of faggotry is pissing me off.
Fucking kinder.
Fucking kinder.
I coudn't even imagine they would. Dragonlance the setting with all its autistic detail is not woke, not trendy, kind of awkward, and too different from the highly popular books. With the book characters leaving traditional player characters not much to do in the storyline and a fuck-you catastrophic event happening every generation and wiping everyone's accomplishments, it was pointless to revive outside of a couple sourcebooks per D&D edition (stamp a seal of approval on some fan's homebrew War of the Lance rules and collect the money).
But the novels still sell, and despite not being woke, they aren't all too "problematic" either. So why not sell more novels?
Yes, but what is there to sell to fans then?You could...make the players the focus and not have catastrophes ruining player accomplishment things.
They mention love potions in the lawsuit, which I believe is a case of the stopped clock being right. Weis got good mileage out of Charm Person in the original trilogy, but you can't repeat that for credit and with human-intelligence characters.I'm actually quite curious what this "sensitivity editor" forced them to change.
Yes, but what is there to sell to fans then?
Dragonlance the tabletop game has one thing unique and awesome to it, and that is the main randomized storyline of the War of the Lance, with the player characters being the heroes (custom or pregenerated). However, what most people like about the setting is the novelization with its set storyline, characters, and epic stakes. So there are several ways to play Dragonlance, and proponents of one may be autistically opposed to the others:
- DL modules as intended, custom characters: fans of Heroes will be pissed they don't get to play their favorites, accusations of valor theft
- DL modules as intended, Heroes: fans of Heroes will be pissed at other players' inauthentic portrayal
- custom scenario set during the War: nothing really matters except the broken column
- custom scenario set after the War: sightseeing tour after the festival
- villain party, defeat the heroes: pissed fans
- villain party, power struggle within the empire: unsatisfying, Spring Dawning will call you a dumbfuck in cleartext.
- knights! excellent idea, too bad D&D's class-based system fucks you over.
Here's the problem, again:
Dragonlance's intense plot makes the conceptual space too small for a sandbox setting - it's more like a single game. This is hard to sell to a new audience. Existing fans of the novels need to be on the same page regarding what they are going to play. And superfans who already have twenty different campaign ideas lined up don't need a sourcebook.
I'm not saying it's completely impossible to play a Dragonlance game, I'm saying it's hard to sell roleplaying supplements for it. The highest level of support Dragonlance the campaign setting could reasonably have is a couple of fan-written sourcebooks per D&D edition with a stamp of approval and classic art.
They mention love potions in the lawsuit, which I believe is a case of the stopped clock being right. Weis got good mileage out of Charm Person in the original trilogy, but you can't repeat that for credit and with human-intelligence characters.
- DL modules as intended, custom characters: fans of Heroes will be pissed they don't get to play their favorites, accusations of valor theft
- DL modules as intended, Heroes: fans of Heroes will be pissed at other players' inauthentic portrayal
- custom scenario set during the War: nothing really matters except the broken column
- custom scenario set after the War: sightseeing tour after the festival
- villain party, defeat the heroes: pissed fans
- villain party, power struggle within the empire: unsatisfying, Spring Dawning will call you a dumbfuck in cleartext.
- knights! excellent idea, too bad D&D's class-based system fucks you over.
Dragonlance's intense plot makes the conceptual space too small for a sandbox setting - it's more like a single game. This is hard to sell to a new audience. Existing fans of the novels need to be on the same page regarding what they are going to play. And superfans who already have twenty different campaign ideas lined up don't need a sourcebook.
Dark Sun would be more likely imo than Ravenloft to get axed. I adore Ravenloft and Gothic Earth and would be heartbroken if they went that route. I can certainly see them doing something dumb with Ravenloft and some of their other IPs.I'm really sorry to hear it. Especially since the trilogy they were writing was meant to be the endcap for the entirety of their work on the setting.
I'm actually quite curious what this "sensitivity editor" forced them to change. It has been a really long time since I read the original core books, but I remember very little that rose beyond PG-13 in terms of violence and nudity/sex. (Everything always faded to black or cut away the very rare times sex came up.)
It's really sad to see how infiltrated by the woke elements WOTC has become. They became a classic example of the infiltrate and then destroy SJW mantra.
As others have mentioned, I thought Ravenloft or Dark Sun would be purged first.
It's on Youtube.I spent several years trying to forget that abortion of a movie existed...thanks.
It's on Youtube.
Who can forget such classic characters, like, uh, Hero Guy, Wizard Guy, the Dwarf, the Annoying Thing, and Bad Guy.
(sersly, the Dragonlance movie is fun as fuck to watch while drunk with friends.)
I'm surprised they weren't canceled already. At least a decade ago the NPCs on rpg.net were talking about how one of the authors did an imitation of a gully dwarf using retard stereotypes or something at some convention and they were all falling over each other to condemn him like he just ate a baby.I'm gonna be totally honest here, I always knew Dragonlance would get axed by the woke WOTC eventually but I also thought Ravenloft would get axed first.
Shame, because Ravenloft is my favorite D&D setting and Dragonlance is pretty good too. My Dad always was a huge fan of old-school Dragonlance back in the 80's.
The wokeness just hit when Orc joke came back & SJw just wanted go back around to try kill D&D.I coudn't even imagine they would. Dragonlance the setting with all its autistic detail is not woke, not trendy, kind of awkward, and too different from the highly popular books. With the book characters leaving traditional player characters not much to do in the storyline and a fuck-you catastrophic event happening every generation and wiping everyone's accomplishments, it was pointless to revive outside of a couple sourcebooks per D&D edition (stamp a seal of approval on some fan's homebrew War of the Lance rules and collect the money).
But the novels still sell, and despite not being woke, they aren't all too "problematic" either. So why not sell more novels?