Enterbots Ecclytennysmithylove -

[chimpburgers]

Say anything bad about Enter in any way shape or form on Deviantart, and you're guaranteed to have a run in with this woman. She frequently comments on a lot of the posts Enter makes and agrees with most of what he has to say. She's also into Doctor Who and is in her 20s.

If I had screenshots of her conversations with Baltimoreian and L-H Reviews, I'd post them because they would really give people a good idea of just how much of a fangirl she is of the guy.

 

[Simplicity111]

http://ecclytennysmithylove.deviantart.com/art/Animated-Atrocity-Amish-Guy-497820464

This is an example of her sperging at Family Guy being offensive. Like that's never happened before!

 

[The Jumping Dwarf]

As I've said before in another thread, I already knew this person from TV Tropes. I didn't know about her Enterbot side, though. This is interesting.

 

[ProRosen]

... She's also into Dr. Who and is in her 20s. ...

I would correct you on how Doctor Who isn't contracted in most situations, but then I would just seem autistic.

 

[Jewelsmakerguy]

Say anything about about Enter in any way shape or form on Deviantart, and you're guaranteed to have a run in with this woman. She frequently comments on a lot of the posts Enter makes and agrees with most of what he has to say. She's also into Doctor Who and is in her 20s.

If I had screenshots of her conversations with Baltimoreian and L-H Reviews, I'd post them because they would really give people a good idea of just how much of a fangirl she is of the guy.

So like most of the internet then?

Either way, did we really need another annoying Enterbot?

 

[Piga Dgrifm]

She has her own series called Bad Scenes From Good Episodes, just in case you need to sperg about something that only lasts a couple minutes at most: http://ecclytennysmithylove.deviantart.com/gallery/52808459/Bad-Scenes-From-Good-Episodes The one that she has up so far is on a Family Guy cutaway that lasts less than 30 seconds.

 

[Simplicity111]

I just saw this. Let this dead thread be revived!

 

[KFC]

I just saw this. Let this dead thread be revived!

@JakeAnderson733 Thank you! This is great. Eccly is an Enterbot who goes generally unnoticed, and you were so right in calling her out. Her post is a huge contradiction; to think for yourself, you need to let this 20-something basement dweller think for you.

Also, who the hell is she to say "Idiots, it's time to grow up. This is the real world."? For one, we're talking about a guy who whines about cartoons on the internet. Two, this is the internet. Cyberbullies are definitely serious, but trolls are different. There's a difference between someone cyberstalking you, telling you to kill yourself, and some random douche calling you a faggot on DeviantArt then ultimately moving on to his next target.

 

[JakeAnderson733]

@JakeAnderson733 Thank you! This is great. Eccly is an Enterbot who goes generally unnoticed, and you were so right in calling her out. Her post is a huge contradiction; to think for yourself, you need to let this 20-something basement dweller think for you.

Also, who the hell is she to say "Idiots, it's time to grow up. This is the real world."? For one, we're talking about a guy who whines about cartoons on the internet. Two, this is the internet. Cyberbullies are definitely serious, but trolls are different. There's a difference between someone cyberstalking you, telling you to kill yourself, and some random douche calling you a faggot on DeviantArt then ultimately moving on to his next target.

You're very welcome. I agree, that post has a lot wrong with it. Anyways, I continued talking to her and she actually learned from what I said.

 

[NostalgiaJazzAdmirer]

So how does this warrant a thread again? She just sounds like any other Enter fan except she likes live action.

 

[Simplicity111]

So how does this warrant a thread again? She just sounds like any other Enter fan except she likes live action.

She's the worst out of all of them (excluding 03bgood) due to her near-dictatorial attitude. That's why if you're wondering.

 

[NostalgiaJazzAdmirer]

She's the worst out of all of them (excluding 03bgood) due to her near-dictatorial attitude. That's why if you're wondering.

I'm not seeing any proof on this thread, just a scene of her saying people who disagree can't think for themselves, which I'll admit is stupid, but it does not warrant this level of attention.

Edit: And she apologized for it too.

 

[Simplicity111]

I'm not seeing any proof on this thread, just a scene of her saying people who disagree can't think for themselves, which I'll admit is stupid, but it does not warrant this level of attention.

Edit: And she apologized for it too.

She also had an argument with Baltemorian on Deviantart that caused him to wipe all of his MrEnter related journals, and makes quite a few laughable deviations.

 

[NostalgiaJazzAdmirer]

I assume you have print screen shots of it?

 

[Simplicity111]

I assume you have print screen shots of it?

Well, there's this, if you need something.

 

[Reverend_Lovejoy]

She seems really egotistical, she posts pictures of her cats and the things in her house on deviantart. She can create artwork, but she'd prefer to review scenes (not episodes, scenes) on Deviantart and post pictures that only have meaning to her.

Also, this.

 

[NostalgiaJazzAdmirer]

Posting pictures of cats and inanimate objects makes you egotistical!

 

[Reverend_Lovejoy]

Posting pictures of cats and inanimate objects makes you egotistical!

On Facebook no, on Deviantart yes.

 

[JakeAnderson733]

On Facebook no, on Deviantart yes.

What you're implying is that taking photos, as in photography (a form of art), of kittens and inanimate objects (both are frequent subjects in photography) is considered egotistical when posting them on DeviantArt (an art website).
I want you to think about what you're saying, but I might just have to tell you what that implies: you're saying that posting a certain kind of art on an art website is egotistical. I disagree with that statement. Sure, you might think her cat photos aren't good, but photography is an art form and thus perfectly allowed on DeviantArt. There's nothing wrong with posting pictures of your cats or inanimate objects on that site.

 

[Reverend_Lovejoy]

What you're implying is that taking photos, as in photography (a form of art), of kittens and inanimate objects (both are frequent subjects in photography) is considered egotistical when posting them on DeviantArt (an art website).
I want you to think about what you're saying, but I might just have to tell you what that implies: you're saying that posting a certain kind of art on an art website is egotistical. I disagree with that statement. Sure, you might think her cat photos aren't good, but photography is an art form and thus perfectly allowed on DeviantArt. There's nothing wrong with posting pictures of your cats or inanimate objects on that site.

Perhaps I was a little unclear. I'll elaborate a little.

I never said that photographs of cats, moments in her life, and photographs of items in her home are not art. They are, but they'd be better suited for being posted on Facebook. The reason for this is because you're essentially posting snapshots of your life on Deviantart for strangers to see, rather than for your friends and family to see. It's like how if I posted a video on YouTube showing me eating Christmas dinner I'd be sharing a moment of my life with people who know me personally and are interested in the meal I prepared and the company I shared it with. If I advertised the video on unrelated videos hoping that the video of me eating with my friends/family would go viral, then I'd be an egotist.