Horrorcow Elise Sutton - Female Supremacy -

[DykesDykesChina]

Spoiler: Semi-NSFW

No, this is not an illustration titled "Roosh V's Worst Nightmare" but in fact an introductory picture to Elise Sutton's "Female Superiority" page.

Once I learned about the natures of both men and women and once I learned about the natural dominance and supremacy of women over men, it became the key to unlocking and understanding all submissive desires within men. It matters not how these desires are expressed through different fantasies. The root and the core of these are all the same. Namely, the desire of the male gender is to be dominated and ruled by the female gender. Therefore, no expression of this submissive nature surprises me or shocks me. I have heard it all from my male clients and I have seen it all through my own participation in the Female Domination lifestyle.

When done in the bedroom, Femdom can be a nice kink. When transformed into a worldview, it becomes a gender-swapped version of Return of Kings.

Men want to worship the female by tending to her physical and sexual needs (body worship) and men want to be made into a domesticated servant to their wives. But the common thread to all these sexual and submissive desires is the longing for loving female authority. To me, that is the true definition of Female Domination. Female Domination is Loving Female Authority. That is what most men want and need. All these specific fetishes or desires are the outward expressions of a man's need for loving female authority.

What bothers me especially about this is how it mixes good old kinky BDSM with batshit insane stuff, so that in the mix it has become entirely impossible to seperate the wheat from the chaff. Sort of like Ray Kurzweil and other Singularitards mix solid science with utter crazyness to create an inseperable mixture of gold and shit.

 

[A-Stump]

I don't think this has enough steam to really go anywhere.

 

[Saney]

you tried but you failed get the fuck out,

View attachment 5090

Bad thread it may be, but that's just unnecessarily antagonistic.