Enter's New Worst Movie Ever: Where The Dead Go To Die -

[chimpburgers]

He never says that he's not reviewing a SpongeBob episode because MoBrosStudios or Pieguyrulz already reviewed it, so I never understood why he wouldn't tackle things like Food Fight on his channel. It's a bit hypocritical of him in my opinion or at least he's just using some inconsistent kind of logic there.

 

[Teddy]

Minor critique, he needs a haircut.

I don't understand why Enter even revealed himself in the first place. He does not seem like he would be comfortable with people online knowing how he looks.

 

[chimpburgers]

Minor critique, he needs a haircut.

I don't understand why Enter even revealed himself in the first place. He does not seem like he would comfortable with people knowing how he looks.

I think he's really let himself go since his first ever appearance on camera. He didn't have as much hair in that video quite honestly as he does now and it really kinda gets in the way of the image that he uses in his videos too.

He didn't have as many awkward pauses in this video than he did in the other one though.

 

[Blindrainbow]

So I take it Enter just flat out ignored the film's creator comment?

 

[Soul Craving Dead Dog]

He never says that he's not reviewing a SpongeBob episode because MoBrosStudios or Pieguyrulz already reviewed it, so I never understood why he wouldn't tackle things like Food Fight on his channel. It's a bit hypocritical of him in my opinion or at least he's just using some inconsistent kind of logic there.

So far he seems to have applied that rule only toward movies reviewed by the Nostalgia Critic.

So I take it Enter just flat out ignored the film's creator comment?

Looks like it, he replied to a comment an hour after the author published his. He either didn't notice it or ignored it.

Also:

Spoiler: Classic enterbot sperging

 

[chimpburgers]

They're treating him worse than a murderer. Sperging at its best.

 

[The Jumping Dwarf]

I love how they're saying the creator should be killed for making a movie Enter didn't like.

 

[Teddy]

Great. Now his fans are probably going to attack the creator. Just wonderful.

 

[chimpburgers]

Enter didnt have a response for the creator's comment but he replied to other comments.

 

[Eldritch]

geez, this movie looks like it was made in Garry's Mod.

Edit: I just watched the first 27 or so minutes. I-Is this covered by the first amendment? can I watch this? Could I be fined or raided? Is this type of thing supposed to be allowed on youtube?

 

[Anus]

I-Is this covered by the first amendment? can I watch this?

Yes. It's not actual footage of murder or child rape, so you're good. And only footage of actual child rape is illegal. Real footage of murders is just morally dubious in the eyes of the law.

Could I be fined or raided?

No, not unless the judicial system is REALLY corrupt now.

Is this type of thing supposed to be allowed on youtube?

YouTube are really finicky when it comes to this kind of stuff, but I'm thinking that since it's animated they'll let it slide. Unless it shows nudity. They allow fake gore but not nudity of any type.

 

[Simplicity111]

YouTube are really finicky when it comes to this kind of stuff, but I'm thinking that since it's animated they'll let it slide. Unless it shows nudity. They allow fake gore but not nudity of any type.

Oh, there's definitely nudity in this movie though.

 

[The Jumping Dwarf]

Are you guys really trying to flag the movie?

Come on. Don't sperg like the Enterbots. It's just a crappily-animated film.

 

[Eldritch]

Just give me a timestamp and I'll see if I can flag it.

A little kid fucks a dog in the first, like, 15 minutes, so...

 

[chimpburgers]

Guys, don't worry about flagging anything. Let YouTube take of it themselves. It's much better to step back and let that shit happen on its own. They don't need us meddling in those affairs just like there's no weening necessary for there to be things for us to laugh at.

 

[The Jumping Dwarf]

I thought the point of this board was to make fun of Enter and his fans, not to act just like them.

 

[chimpburgers]

Flagging is how you bring it to YouTube's attention in the first place. There was a shock video compilation (including footage of a kid fucking a chicken) that made it through the cracks for a year before I flagged it. Fucker thought that just because he put it through a line-art filter he could get away with it.

But don't you think there are gonna be other people who will do just that anyway? I don't even know why we're talking about this publicly here and I just wanna get back to what we were talking about before.

 

[The Jumping Dwarf]

Oh fine. Though I don't see how I'm acting like Enter or his Enterbots.

You're trying to flag a movie because it's bad and gross and evil and contains awful, awful stuff such as poorly animated nudity. Exactly the same thing as Enter and the Enterbots are doing.

The movie is somewhat notorious. If it violated the YouTube ToS it'd already have been removed.

 

[Eldritch]

The movie is somewhat notorious. If it violated the YouTube ToS it'd already have been removed.

Aw, yeah, it has a whopping 8,000 views.
who are we to moralfag in the face of that many adoring fans?

 

[Swiggity Swooty]

I want to know how the hell Enter even found out about this movie to begin with and what pushed him to sit through more than a few minutes.
It seems more boring than offensive.