Disaster False Victimhood Is Driving Young White Men To Murder -

CatParty

Boo
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net

On November 11, 1918, Germany surrendered to the Allies, ending World War I. For the ensuing decade, one of the most potent tropes of the German right wing was that the surrender was a “stab-in-the-back” of a still-fighting German Army by the seditious, socialist-led Weimar government. The stab-in-the-back myth — it was entirely fabricated — was infused with anti-Semitic and gendered undertones: Weak, effete, decadent Jewish politicians had emasculated the German volk.
That sense of false victimhood fueled much of Nazi racial theory. The Jew was a “parasite” on the Aryan nation, a pathogen weakening, sickening, and emasculating the masses. When it came to justifying German colonization of Eastern Europe, it enabled a kind of reverse logic: The Germans were in fact the natives of the East, living under the oppression of Slavic rule. The Nazis were not foreign settlers, but liberators.
A similar sense of false victimhood today drives much of white racial violence across the world. It is the feeling that one is a victim of society, in spite of all evidence to the contrary. It is the feeling that once-marginalized groups — women, immigrants, people of color — are now replacing white men at the top of the social hierarchy. It is a feeling that, when taken to its extreme, can justify hate and violence.
And it’s a feeling that is becoming disturbingly common among my cohort of young white men.

Can people imagine a false victimhood and use it to justify mass violence?


All that talk of Aryan victimhood was, of course, patently untrue. In a country full of young, disaffected men who had always been told that serving the German nation was their highest calling, only to feel humiliated in surrender, it’s no surprise that this mythology of false victimhood caught on. The interwar period was fertile ground for proto-fascist pseudo-intellectuals, as Pankaj Mishra wrote, and they trafficked in visions of restoring society to a supposedly natural state in which the Aryan man ruled unencumbered over family and country.
Catering to a population of armed men who felt alienated by changing social norms, immigration, and changing political winds, this message quickly fueled violent demonstrations and warmongering.
That same language is now all over recent mass killings by young white men. The Pittsburgh shooter wrote of the Jewish American refugee agency HIAS bringing “invaders” into the US. The Charleston shooter cited “black on white crime” as his radicalizing cause. The charged Christchurch shooting suspect titled his manifesto“White Genocide.”
These killers come squarely from the tradition of white nationalism, a movement that emerged in the aftermath of the civil rights movement as a way to retheorize white supremacy after its day-to-day power was eroded in the 1960s. Whereas racists once described the white race as the natural ruler of the world, that logic was now flipped: Whites had become the race under attack, whose culture was at threat of extinction. Just as the Nazis once did, white nationalists turned the colonizer into the colonized.
So what happens when a group of people feel like they have been colonized by another, without it actually ever happening? Can people imagine a false victimhood and use it to justify mass violence?
That’s exactly what the political scientist Mahmood Mamdani found in his seminal book on the Rwandan genocide, When Victims Become Killers. Seeking an explanation for the wide participation of ordinary Hutus in genocide, Mamdani explored how — through Belgian colonial violence and enforced ethnic hierarchies — the majority Hutus came to see the Tutsi minority not as fellow “people of the soil,” but foreign settlers. It was this feeling — that the genocide was against settlers — that allowed people to so readily participate in it, to feel liberated by it. The fact that the Tutsis were not actually settlers at all, and had also been oppressed by European colonization, did not prevent the proliferation and realization of this violent false victimhood.

To men like this, sex is a fundamental male right.


The erosion of white privilege and power is not the only source of today’s false victimhood among white men. Gender is also a radicalizing factor, just as it was in Weimar Germany.
Take the man alleged to have driven a minivan into pedestrians in Toronto, killing 10 people. He wrote on Facebook that he was part of the “Incel Rebellion,” a movement of sexually frustrated young men who believe the only solution to their perceived inherent inability to attract women is to kill them. Like many in the online incel community, the Toronto suspect had praised another woman killer, who murdered several people — including two women outside a sorority house — near the campus of the University of California, Santa Barbara, in 2014. In a manifesto written before the attack, he claimed to be retaliating against women for the sex he felt he was being denied.
To men like this, sex is a fundamental male right. When they feel women have denied it to them, they identify as victims. In spite of all evidence to the contrary, they feel that the world has made it unfair for them, and they want revenge.
The parallels between gender-motivated killers like the men in Toronto and UC Santa Barbara, with racially motivated killers like the Charleston and Christchurch shooters, are clear. Their manifestos sometimes even use the same language. The Christchurch shooter’s manifesto raved about “the decline in [white] fertility rates and the destruction of the traditional family unit,” echoing both a long-standing white supremacist (and Nazi) obsession with birthrates and family structure, but also a contemporary young white male fixation on the alleged erosion of monogamy.
This is no coincidence: Many of these killers were radicalized in the same communities. The Christchurch shooter posted his manifesto on 8chan, a forum whose roots go back to the Gamergate saga, where male gamers harassed female video game enthusiasts who challenged sexism in the industry. “Incels are just a part of the broader alt-right and manosphere ideological stance,” the researcher Amarnath Amarasingam told Vice — “racist, sexist, xenophobic, nationalistic.”
This white male victimhood discourse is not limited to obscure online communities: It is increasingly prevalent in mainstream culture. Jordan Peterson, the best-selling author and psychologist, has cultivated a fandom of young men who agree with him that “the masculine spirit is under assault.” Ben Shapiro, host of one of Apple’s most downloaded podcasts, has insisted that “the next race war will come not from racist whites, but from racist blacks and Hispanics.” Just this week, Tucker Carlson — one of America’s most-watched cable hosts — claimed that Democratic immigration policy is dedicated to “changing the population.”
To their acolytes, these figures are exposing the way modern, liberal society is oppressing white men; to their critics, they are trading in the same false victimhood snake oil of interwar Europe’s fascist “intellectuals.”

When you’ve had the biggest slice of the pie for so long, yielding even a crumb feels like a crisis.


It’s probably not a coincidence that this latest iteration of false victimhood is catching on in the shadow of the Great Recession. Now matter how good a given unemployment or wage growth number looks, the generation that came of age in the aftermath of 2008 knows that that precarity can sneak up from anywhere. No privilege — not even that of white men — feels safe. And so when movements from #MeToo to refugee rights and Black Lives Matter demand that those truly marginalized by society get more of its fruits, you can be sure that opportunists will be telling white men that these gains can only come at their expense.
The power of this thinking is that, for all its logical perversion and ignorance of history and truly existing social conditions, it rings true to white men based on the relative power we once held. A group that once enjoyed economic, social, and sexual dominion over everyone else does not easily reckon with the realities of, for the first time, having to yield some social footing to others. When you’ve had the biggest slice of the pie for so long, yielding even a crumb feels like a crisis.
Of course, this dynamic is not unique to white men today. And it’s not limited to the West, either. In India, a resurgent Hindu nationalism asks the upper castes why untouchables should benefit from affirmative action. In Brazil, President Jair Bolsonaro was swept into power by an upper-middle class angry with the welfare state that empowered their black maids to talk back to them. In Russia, the nationalism that Lenin so feared has been mobilized for mass political support, targeting “national-traitors.”
In this new age of precarity, it is elites who are most potently mobilizing the politics of victimhood. When there are pitchforks at the barricade, even the lords of the castle want to identify as “anti-establishment.”
So what is to be done? The vast majority of white men will never turn to mass violence, but a wide culture of false victimhood gives a dangerous feeling of legitimacy to those who do pick up arms. Class traitors within the midst of white men of course have a key part to play in challenging the signature tone of entitlement and self-victimhood in conversations about everything from affirmative action to dating.
But ultimately, the only way to beat false victimhood will be a politics that gets beyond the us–them dichotomies of identity. The renewal in the West of a vision for social and economic rights for all, built around class struggle, is encouraging. The best way to beat counterrevolution, after all, is with the real thing.
 

ZeCommissar

Cutest commissar this side of the segmentum
kiwifarms.net
The author is partially right. Victimhood is a big problem in our society. People who live in comfortable first world nations feel like they are the victim of some power that controls a big swath of their society. Racial victimhood where everyone believes whitey/blackey/joooooooooz are evil is also fucking everything up.

What they fail to mention is that the left is extremely notorious for this shit as well. People just making problems up that literally dont have a effect on a single fucking soul (trans bathrooms as a example.)

Of course he had to end it with some communist bullshit. The author is also too exceptional to realize that they are just contributing to the problem.
 
Last edited:

GrungyLawnChlorinate

confirmed hairless and stable
kiwifarms.net
The belief that you are a victim of society, despite all evidence to the contrary, is a driving force for violent white nationalists across the world.
Article attacks white people who complain about being constantly attacked in the media, claiming attacks it is currently executing aren't happening. Supreme gaslighting, projection, and diversion from the hacks at Buzzfeed.
 

SunLightStreak

Elite Illuminati Task Force Agent for Cow Control
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net

On November 11, 1918, Germany surrendered to the Allies, ending World War I. For the ensuing decade, one of the most potent tropes of the German right wing was that the surrender was a “stab-in-the-back” of a still-fighting German Army by the seditious, socialist-led Weimar government. The stab-in-the-back myth — it was entirely fabricated — was infused with anti-Semitic and gendered undertones: Weak, effete, decadent Jewish politicians had emasculated the German volk.
That sense of false victimhood fueled much of Nazi racial theory. The Jew was a “parasite” on the Aryan nation, a pathogen weakening, sickening, and emasculating the masses. When it came to justifying German colonization of Eastern Europe, it enabled a kind of reverse logic: The Germans were in fact the natives of the East, living under the oppression of Slavic rule. The Nazis were not foreign settlers, but liberators.
A similar sense of false victimhood today drives much of white racial violence across the world. It is the feeling that one is a victim of society, in spite of all evidence to the contrary. It is the feeling that once-marginalized groups — women, immigrants, people of color — are now replacing white men at the top of the social hierarchy. It is a feeling that, when taken to its extreme, can justify hate and violence.
And it’s a feeling that is becoming disturbingly common among my cohort of young white men.

Can people imagine a false victimhood and use it to justify mass violence?


All that talk of Aryan victimhood was, of course, patently untrue. In a country full of young, disaffected men who had always been told that serving the German nation was their highest calling, only to feel humiliated in surrender, it’s no surprise that this mythology of false victimhood caught on. The interwar period was fertile ground for proto-fascist pseudo-intellectuals, as Pankaj Mishra wrote, and they trafficked in visions of restoring society to a supposedly natural state in which the Aryan man ruled unencumbered over family and country.
Catering to a population of armed men who felt alienated by changing social norms, immigration, and changing political winds, this message quickly fueled violent demonstrations and warmongering.
That same language is now all over recent mass killings by young white men. The Pittsburgh shooter wrote of the Jewish American refugee agency HIAS bringing “invaders” into the US. The Charleston shooter cited “black on white crime” as his radicalizing cause. The charged Christchurch shooting suspect titled his manifesto“White Genocide.”
These killers come squarely from the tradition of white nationalism, a movement that emerged in the aftermath of the civil rights movement as a way to retheorize white supremacy after its day-to-day power was eroded in the 1960s. Whereas racists once described the white race as the natural ruler of the world, that logic was now flipped: Whites had become the race under attack, whose culture was at threat of extinction. Just as the Nazis once did, white nationalists turned the colonizer into the colonized.
So what happens when a group of people feel like they have been colonized by another, without it actually ever happening? Can people imagine a false victimhood and use it to justify mass violence?
That’s exactly what the political scientist Mahmood Mamdani found in his seminal book on the Rwandan genocide, When Victims Become Killers. Seeking an explanation for the wide participation of ordinary Hutus in genocide, Mamdani explored how — through Belgian colonial violence and enforced ethnic hierarchies — the majority Hutus came to see the Tutsi minority not as fellow “people of the soil,” but foreign settlers. It was this feeling — that the genocide was against settlers — that allowed people to so readily participate in it, to feel liberated by it. The fact that the Tutsis were not actually settlers at all, and had also been oppressed by European colonization, did not prevent the proliferation and realization of this violent false victimhood.

To men like this, sex is a fundamental male right.


The erosion of white privilege and power is not the only source of today’s false victimhood among white men. Gender is also a radicalizing factor, just as it was in Weimar Germany.
Take the man alleged to have driven a minivan into pedestrians in Toronto, killing 10 people. He wrote on Facebook that he was part of the “Incel Rebellion,” a movement of sexually frustrated young men who believe the only solution to their perceived inherent inability to attract women is to kill them. Like many in the online incel community, the Toronto suspect had praised another woman killer, who murdered several people — including two women outside a sorority house — near the campus of the University of California, Santa Barbara, in 2014. In a manifesto written before the attack, he claimed to be retaliating against women for the sex he felt he was being denied.
To men like this, sex is a fundamental male right. When they feel women have denied it to them, they identify as victims. In spite of all evidence to the contrary, they feel that the world has made it unfair for them, and they want revenge.
The parallels between gender-motivated killers like the men in Toronto and UC Santa Barbara, with racially motivated killers like the Charleston and Christchurch shooters, are clear. Their manifestos sometimes even use the same language. The Christchurch shooter’s manifesto raved about “the decline in [white] fertility rates and the destruction of the traditional family unit,” echoing both a long-standing white supremacist (and Nazi) obsession with birthrates and family structure, but also a contemporary young white male fixation on the alleged erosion of monogamy.
This is no coincidence: Many of these killers were radicalized in the same communities. The Christchurch shooter posted his manifesto on 8chan, a forum whose roots go back to the Gamergate saga, where male gamers harassed female video game enthusiasts who challenged sexism in the industry. “Incels are just a part of the broader alt-right and manosphere ideological stance,” the researcher Amarnath Amarasingam told Vice — “racist, sexist, xenophobic, nationalistic.”
This white male victimhood discourse is not limited to obscure online communities: It is increasingly prevalent in mainstream culture. Jordan Peterson, the best-selling author and psychologist, has cultivated a fandom of young men who agree with him that “the masculine spirit is under assault.” Ben Shapiro, host of one of Apple’s most downloaded podcasts, has insisted that “the next race war will come not from racist whites, but from racist blacks and Hispanics.” Just this week, Tucker Carlson — one of America’s most-watched cable hosts — claimed that Democratic immigration policy is dedicated to “changing the population.”
To their acolytes, these figures are exposing the way modern, liberal society is oppressing white men; to their critics, they are trading in the same false victimhood snake oil of interwar Europe’s fascist “intellectuals.”

When you’ve had the biggest slice of the pie for so long, yielding even a crumb feels like a crisis.


It’s probably not a coincidence that this latest iteration of false victimhood is catching on in the shadow of the Great Recession. Now matter how good a given unemployment or wage growth number looks, the generation that came of age in the aftermath of 2008 knows that that precarity can sneak up from anywhere. No privilege — not even that of white men — feels safe. And so when movements from #MeToo to refugee rights and Black Lives Matter demand that those truly marginalized by society get more of its fruits, you can be sure that opportunists will be telling white men that these gains can only come at their expense.
The power of this thinking is that, for all its logical perversion and ignorance of history and truly existing social conditions, it rings true to white men based on the relative power we once held. A group that once enjoyed economic, social, and sexual dominion over everyone else does not easily reckon with the realities of, for the first time, having to yield some social footing to others. When you’ve had the biggest slice of the pie for so long, yielding even a crumb feels like a crisis.
Of course, this dynamic is not unique to white men today. And it’s not limited to the West, either. In India, a resurgent Hindu nationalism asks the upper castes why untouchables should benefit from affirmative action. In Brazil, President Jair Bolsonaro was swept into power by an upper-middle class angry with the welfare state that empowered their black maids to talk back to them. In Russia, the nationalism that Lenin so feared has been mobilized for mass political support, targeting “national-traitors.”
In this new age of precarity, it is elites who are most potently mobilizing the politics of victimhood. When there are pitchforks at the barricade, even the lords of the castle want to identify as “anti-establishment.”
So what is to be done? The vast majority of white men will never turn to mass violence, but a wide culture of false victimhood gives a dangerous feeling of legitimacy to those who do pick up arms. Class traitors within the midst of white men of course have a key part to play in challenging the signature tone of entitlement and self-victimhood in conversations about everything from affirmative action to dating.
But ultimately, the only way to beat false victimhood will be a politics that gets beyond the us–them dichotomies of identity. The renewal in the West of a vision for social and economic rights for all, built around class struggle, is encouraging. The best way to beat counterrevolution, after all, is with the real thing.
wow this is Intersectional AF! To devote an entire article to this inane crap is truly breathtaking.

Buzzfeed already layed off a number of people back in January. I am already reading articles saying they may be in even more trouble at this moment. Truly astounding that they would sink into this deep dark level of rage-for-clicks depravity.

Anyone want to take bets on whether or not they will last until early 2020?

This blog post from CJR is very insightful about the mess that they are in right now:

https://www.cjr.org/business_of_news/buzzfeed-future-jonah-peretti-union.php

The wet dream of a lot of these "journalists":

As for the journalists and other staffers recently let go, they’re now finding their way in an industry that has pivoted to search, pivoted to social, pivoted to video, and is now pivoting to instability. At a post-layoff get-together, one former reporter says, “All of us were commiserating that we were getting freelance offers [from other outlets]. But we want jobs and some fucking health insurance….It’d be nice to have a billionaire throw money at us and leave us alone.”
 

Stoneheart

kiwifarms.net
one of the most potent tropes of the German right wing was that the surrender was a “stab-in-the-back” of a still-fighting German Army by the seditious, socialist-led Weimar government.
Thats not a Trope! We had enough Gas shells to kill every French Person in existence,
The Article also doesnt talks about why WW1 happened. Thats important, germany was fighting against Terrorism, and the fuckn french and Anglos were supporting Terrorism in this war.
 

Dutch Courage

Curious Onlooker
kiwifarms.net
Not to condone the behavior of Incels, Aryans, mass shooters, or any other manner of disturbed individual, I will say this:

The smug dismissiveness with which the frustrations of white males is met with in the media (that "despite all evidence to the contrary" has to be inserted in the capsule summary of the linked article is typical) neither helps dispel those frustrations, nor make anyone safer.

Society has changed immensely in the last 50 years, and white males in particular have been expected to just suck it up. If they whine about it, then they are mocked and reminded of the privilege they hold. If they try to explain their frustrations, they are met with accusations of racism, sexism, homophobia, or believers in white supremacy.

Whether or not these changes in society were inevitable or desirable is not really a discussion available for civil debate. They must be accepted and more are coming.

White males, from childhood on, are instilled with guilt for the sins of their ancestors (even when their ancestors had nothing to do with the sins with which they are accused), are told that they receive unfair advantage over others, are told that even when they are not racist or sexist, they are institutionally racist or sexist, and are reminded that the minority is hellbent on outnumbering them and rendering them impotent.

This is bound to have effects on white men. It shackles with them guilt they did not earn, sanctions that affect their lives and livelihood that were not deserved, and social scorn that would be punished if it were directed at any other identity group. Some white men respond by becoming complete betas, living a life of shame. Others get righteously pissed off, but simmer in private about it. Some whine aloud about it. And a small number, feeling they have nothing to lose (and are probably right), simply reach the cracking point, and go shoot up some place.

When that happens, it merely serves to prove to everyone else how undesirable white males are. What a beautiful world it would be without them.

The society who demonizes a gender or race, for whatever reasons, shares in the culpability of what happens in response. That is why a diverse society must be colorblind in all directions including toward whites and white males. The left in America refuses to even consider the issue, let alone acknowledge this basic truth. Diversity only works in societies that are melting pots (like America used to be) instead of a hodgepodge of identity groups. The latter is destined to a violent future.

So, expect incels and shooters and the rest to become even more pissed off, and expect them to try to outdo each other in atrocities. And the left will be equally to blame.
 

CatParty

Boo
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
Not to condone the behavior of Incels, Aryans, mass shooters, or any other manner of disturbed individual, I will say this:

The smug dismissiveness with which the frustrations of white males is met with in the media (that "despite all evidence to the contrary" has to be inserted in the capsule summary of the linked article is typical) neither helps dispel those frustrations, nor make anyone safer.

Society has changed immensely in the last 50 years, and white males in particular have been expected to just suck it up. If they whine about it, then they are mocked and reminded of the privilege they hold. If they try to explain their frustrations, they are met with accusations of racism, sexism, homophobia, or believers in white supremacy.

Whether or not these changes in society were inevitable or desirable is not really a discussion available for civil debate. They must be accepted and more are coming.

White males, from childhood on, are instilled with guilt for the sins of their ancestors (even when their ancestors had nothing to do with the sins with which they are accused), are told that they receive unfair advantage over others, are told that even when they are not racist or sexist, they are institutionally racist or sexist, and are reminded that the minority is hellbent on outnumbering them and rendering them impotent.

This is bound to have effects on white men. It shackles with them guilt they did not earn, sanctions that affect their lives and livelihood that were not deserved, and social scorn that would be punished if it were directed at any other identity group. Some white men respond by becoming complete betas, living a life of shame. Others get righteously pissed off, but simmer in private about it. Some whine aloud about it. And a small number, feeling they have nothing to lose (and are probably right), simply reach the cracking point, and go shoot up some place.

When that happens, it merely serves to prove to everyone else how undesirable white males are. What a beautiful world it would be without them.

The society who demonizes a gender or race, for whatever reasons, shares in the culpability of what happens in response. That is why a diverse society must be colorblind in all directions including toward whites and white males. The left in America refuses to even consider the issue, let alone acknowledge this basic truth. Diversity only works in societies that are melting pots (like America used to be) instead of a hodgepodge of identity groups. The latter is destined to a violent future.

So, expect incels and shooters and the rest to become even more pissed off, and expect them to try to outdo each other in atrocities. And the left will be equally to blame.
incels isn't even a real thing. they are their own biggest enemy to believe they are "involuntarily celibate". that why they are all lolcows and we mock them
 

SunLightStreak

Elite Illuminati Task Force Agent for Cow Control
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
The article isn’t saying white people can’t be victims, it’s saying they’re rarely victimized just for being white, relatively speaking. If you’re upset you’re being shit on for being racist, just stop being racist.
Or just stop falling for this clickbait crap and realize the people writing this are trying to keep their jobs/health insurance to keep from living in their parents basement.

incels isn't even a real thing. they are their own biggest enemy to believe they are "involuntarily celibate". that why they are all lolcows and we mock them
So true. Incels don't exist. They are a myth created by really sad guys who should just develop a better view on life. Seriously, the blue pill is a much better experience. The red is just dark irrational trash.
 

Dutch Courage

Curious Onlooker
kiwifarms.net
incels isn't even a real thing. they are their own biggest enemy to believe they are "involuntarily celibate". that why they are all lolcows and we mock them
I agree; a lolcow is a lolcow. I mock any twerp, and incels, by definitions, are twerps. However, my post was addressing the phenomenon itself, so I used the words the media uses. Insofar as there is something called "incel", it is a side-effect of the overall disenfranchisement of white males in general. I didn't say they weren't stupid...
 
Fucking goddamn white males falsely think they're under attack for being pieces of shit, which they inherently are. While we enjoy their male tears and their white fragility, nobody ever even said anything about them so why are they crying? Why are you hitting yourself, white men? Why are you hitting yourself?

The article isn’t saying white people can’t be victims, it’s saying they’re rarely victimized just for being white, relatively speaking. If you’re upset you’re being shit on for being racist, just stop being racist.
Holy shit way to miss the point. "Hey white people who are mad that we keep saying white people are mad for no reason, have you considered not being shit?".

How about fuck you.
 

Cool kitties club

Kiwi Farms unofficial pet e-catboy
kiwifarms.net
It’s probably not a coincidence that this latest iteration of false victimhood is catching on in the shadow of the Great Recession. Now matter how good a given unemployment or wage growth number looks, the generation that came of age in the aftermath of 2008 knows that that precarity can sneak up from anywhere. No privilege — not even that of white men — feels safe. And so when movements from #MeToo to refugee rights and Black Lives Matter demand that those truly marginalized by society get more of its fruits, you can be sure that opportunists will be telling white men that these gains can only come at their expense.
What does the recession have to do with #metoo or BLM? Those to movements were primarily social not economic. Something tells me this article just had buzzwords jammed in to gain the algorithm or seem smart.
 
Tags
None

About Us

The Kiwi Farms is about eccentric individuals and communities on the Internet. We call them lolcows because they can be milked for amusement or laughs. Our community is bizarrely diverse and spectators are encouraged to join the discussion.

We do not place intrusive ads, host malware, sell data, or run crypto miners with your browser. If you experience these things, you have a virus. If your malware system says otherwise, it is faulty.

Supporting the Forum

How to Help

The Kiwi Farms is constantly attacked by insane people and very expensive to run. It would not be here without community support.

BTC: 1EiZnCKCb6Dc4biuto2gJyivwgPRM2YMEQ
BTC+SW: bc1qwv5fzv9u6arksw6ytf79gfvce078vprtc0m55s
ETH: 0xc1071c60ae27c8cc3c834e11289205f8f9c78ca5
LTC: LcDkAj4XxtoPWP5ucw75JadMcDfurwupet
XMR: 438fUMciiahbYemDyww6afT1atgqK3tSTX25SEmYknpmenTR6wvXDMeco1ThX2E8gBQgm9eKd1KAtEQvKzNMFrmjJJpiino