Stephs 6 iron.
kiwifarms.net
I'm afraid I don't believe you. You've already argued there wasn't £10k+ in costs. Now the bills have emerged, you're agreeing there was. I've done the math. Your employers were covering your costs. That's exactly why you offered your crowdfunder elsewhere. Why would you have done that if the costs being covered didn't include the injunction?
The money only really started coming in as a result of the fight against Hayden - in order to fight Hayden. The funder had been limping along until then. Green withdrew as soon as the story came out so I'm not sure any came in to fight her. And if any came in to fight Tombstone Teeth then that is what you were obliged to do with it. Offering that money to someone else for another cause without checking with donors - particularly if outside RadFem Land - is unethical, too. Kind Catholics and RadFems aren't sugar daddies. These crowdfunders aren't personal treasure chests. In this case it is not the fact the crowdfunders are needed that's scandalous - in some cases they're not needed at all if people just stopped trying to achieve status and attract supply by declaring themselves the radfem Erin Brockovich; it is how radical feminists, many in parlous circumstances, are being used as cash cows that's scandalous.
Your computer is the same as mine. Mine cost more than £2k eight years ago. Keyboards are about £200, you have to pay for the mouse, too. Memory costs extra as does size of screen. They're expensive pieces of kit, used by journalists because they're what everyone in newsrooms use - because of design software. You said you were giving up any journalism gigs with the new job. It's incredibly badly paid anyway. I can't afford a Mac now and if I could I wouldn't be asking people to pay my legal bills.
As for the news NSJH was also posting at the same time as Real Mutha when Yalland and Farrow were both apparently otherwise engaged... well, that only increases the pointers to Mutha being Adrain. Although the embarrassing gotcha that went wrong - yet again - about Phat B being at court is probably the biggest clue after leaking correspondence to which he has no right.
Similarly, there are pointers to Stephs 6 Iron being Harry. Which is particularly saddening if it is. Shitposters just wouldn't have the insider knowledge that account does. It does seem also to pick out Scottow and I for particular rancour, both of us having stood up for a woman we felt had been treated badly. Some of the things it says sound like knowledge from conversations I've had with Harry. Sad if that is Harry. It seems so bitter.
Joani, stop snorting all that beak you paranoid mess.
What insider knowledge have i displayed on here since you're supposedly an investigative journalist?
I've posted a few screenshots from Twitter and given a few opinions, and just generally joined in with the piss taking of Harrop, Tony and Caroline.
Do you think Harry the Fowl would be daft enough to shitpost on here when there's a litigious arsehole watching, desperate to sue him for saying nasty things online?
subtle, tony