Chanel was started by a woman though.
Fashion crimes against humanity - Stuff you should never have to see in public
- Thread starter JambledUpWords
- Start date
Hate to say this but a shitload of them just love to see women suffer, especially if they're closeted. One of my aunts was a model and went through this shit with a really-totally-hetero-straight-bro-man in the industry that thought her anorexia was just so kawaii and fucked her in the head so bad that she's still a neurotic trainwreck 20 years later. They separated after he came out and now he's in a uwu wholesome 100 cuddly gay relationship pretending like he's always been this person and didn't nearly psychologically torture a woman to death.
Edit: Yes, I know it's personal but it's not identifying in any way nor is it embarrassing. Don't worry about it.
Last edited:
I see, yes. Maybe not all are pedos, because this reminds me of when I myself was underweight. Some men really didn't like me going up in weight, so I guess. There are fucked people on both sites.
Dangerhair
kiwifarms.net
"Monkey Fur" / high pile fleece jackets, in an oversized fit and universally awful poop brown colour that goes with nothing.
I think they're descended from expedition clothing. With that, you want a baselayer, midlayer, and shell.
The baselayer is a merino wool, synthetic microfleece, or a poly blend (no cotton because while it breathes, cotton absorbs), crew, mockneck or 1/4 zip long sleeve shirt designed to warm and wick moisture.
The midlayer, depending on how cold it is, can be a slickface fleece, synthetic or down puffer; and be a vest, jacket or hooded jacket.
The shell is either going to be a Gore-Tex or similar hardshell, softshell, or insulated shell (or in extreme temperatures, a parka).
Synthetic insulation used to suck compared to down, so there was nothing between a full on down puffer (good ones are expensive, and they're useless if they get wet), or a heavy synthetic puffer, so high-loft Polartec fleeces were a thing. They're bulky, static-y, stick to everything if you try to pull them off, and don't have the greatest warmth-to-weight ratio. Bulky layers are no good because they throw off fit- if your clothes are too loose, you have more space to keep warm and get drafts; too tight and your layers get compressed and don't insulate or wick as well.
In the 2000s-2010s, synthetic insulation (stuff like Primaloft) got a hell of a lot better and replaced both cheap down and high-pile fleeces. Technical fleeces now usually have a rib or grid pattern on one side to increase surface area and therefore warmth, and are slick-faced to make them easier to put on and take off and cut down static.
Then, for some reason, someone thought the ugliest, baggiest, poofiest fleece in the ugliest colour would be amazingly fashionable.
I think they're descended from expedition clothing. With that, you want a baselayer, midlayer, and shell.
The baselayer is a merino wool, synthetic microfleece, or a poly blend (no cotton because while it breathes, cotton absorbs), crew, mockneck or 1/4 zip long sleeve shirt designed to warm and wick moisture.
The midlayer, depending on how cold it is, can be a slickface fleece, synthetic or down puffer; and be a vest, jacket or hooded jacket.
The shell is either going to be a Gore-Tex or similar hardshell, softshell, or insulated shell (or in extreme temperatures, a parka).
Synthetic insulation used to suck compared to down, so there was nothing between a full on down puffer (good ones are expensive, and they're useless if they get wet), or a heavy synthetic puffer, so high-loft Polartec fleeces were a thing. They're bulky, static-y, stick to everything if you try to pull them off, and don't have the greatest warmth-to-weight ratio. Bulky layers are no good because they throw off fit- if your clothes are too loose, you have more space to keep warm and get drafts; too tight and your layers get compressed and don't insulate or wick as well.
In the 2000s-2010s, synthetic insulation (stuff like Primaloft) got a hell of a lot better and replaced both cheap down and high-pile fleeces. Technical fleeces now usually have a rib or grid pattern on one side to increase surface area and therefore warmth, and are slick-faced to make them easier to put on and take off and cut down static.
Then, for some reason, someone thought the ugliest, baggiest, poofiest fleece in the ugliest colour would be amazingly fashionable.
Last edited:
- Highlight
- #606
Septum rings are a mistake. I can't look a person with it without thinking of them as a literal cow.
Also fake pockets. I have a theory that big retailers are hand in hand with Big purse to not put pockets in women's clothing in order to up the sales of purses
Also fake pockets. I have a theory that big retailers are hand in hand with Big purse to not put pockets in women's clothing in order to up the sales of purses
I keep seeing low cut bell bottoms pants everywhere again and WHY?
unless it’s styled well within a look leave those in the 70’s and late 90’s
I firmly believe low cut pants flatter no one’s shape but I’m willing to change my opinion.
unless it’s styled well within a look leave those in the 70’s and late 90’s
I firmly believe low cut pants flatter no one’s shape but I’m willing to change my opinion.
Bell bottoms are going to be a tough one to bring back. They just... look awkward. Plus, unlike some other styles that have traversed decades, bellbottoms still feel exclusively like "I am dressing up for a costume party". Low rise jeans will try to come back, but most people are too fat. It also doesn't go well with the big booty obsession.
Speaking of which! Amazon for some reason wants me to know that these fugly "butt lifting" leggings are tiktok trendy?
I like some athlesiure because am lazy, but sweet baby Jesus, neon will never be OK. Theoretically this is meant to be exclusively gym attire but come on... you know it won't be lol. The autistic marketing is kind of funny tho.
You know the butts in these irl will not look like this. F.
Speaking of which! Amazon for some reason wants me to know that these fugly "butt lifting" leggings are tiktok trendy?
I like some athlesiure because am lazy, but sweet baby Jesus, neon will never be OK. Theoretically this is meant to be exclusively gym attire but come on... you know it won't be lol. The autistic marketing is kind of funny tho.
You know the butts in these irl will not look like this. F.
With my body type, I find low cut to be the most comfortable and flattering as it doesn't cut into the abdomen. Being short with wide hips be like that. It helps that I'm not fat.
Nothing says sexy like a 28 year old woman dressing like a insecure 15 year old on her first date after a confused trip to Target.
Here's some additional context:
They look like your asshole is sucking in your pants.
From a male perspective, the plaid miniskirt + stockings + mary jane pumps combo is one of the most quintessentially sexy things a woman can wear - yet here she has somehow found a way to make it unsexy and laughable.
Also is this creature Miley Cyrus?
That is indeed miley
Simple Mary Jane flats and lose the garter, this might be an okay outfit.
The dark colors are an improvement on the spastic neons but I agree. Looks like a permanent wedgie. I'd feel insane walking around with my ass crack contoured
Mealy Mouth Spittle
kiwifarms.net
I guess I'm just too old to get it, but I will never be convinced that having a bubble butt is a good look. I can respect toned asses, but if it looks like you are trying to shoplift a couple of dodge balls in your leggings, it just looks weird and gross to me. The Hottentot Venus is certainly not an aspirational look for me.
LOWERCASE LETTERS
kiwifarms.net
I fucking hate how 99% of the women who wear spandex are lardasses who should be shrouded in the most thick, opaque bolts of cloth available.
Orange Rhymer
kiwifarms.net
You're missing out on a modern fetish.
Those rhinestones are pretty bad for the environment, but I guess between thots and the natural environment, thots are the most vulnerable and voiceless victims.
Similar threads
