Fat Acceptance Movement / Fat Girlcows -

NototiousUnit

kiwifarms.net
Quote from Sonalee's new video about how not being attracted to fatties isn't a sexual preference, it's fatphobia.

" So my challenge to you is, don’t hide behind the excuse of sexual preference, if you’re going to tell me the list of reasons why you don’t date x person for y reasons, just name it for what it is, say that you’re fatphobic, say that you’re anti-Black, say that you’re dealing with a certain kind of racism against a certain nationality or ethnicity. Let me know that you’re xenophobic, let me know that you’re transphobic, let me know that you’re struggling with misogyny, let me know that you don’t date people with addiction because you’re really affected by addiction stigma, let me know that you’re whorephobic and that you don’t date sex workers. Let me know that you’re anti-Native and you don’t date indigenous people, let me know that you don’t date people who are not upper-caste, Hindus, let me know that you’re actually a really elite classist and you don’t date poor people, let me know that you’re actually super ableist and that’s why you don’t date disabled people, let me know that you’re super-duper islamophobic and that is why you don’t date Muslims. Don’t hide behind the sexual preference label, don’t hide behind this understanding that you are hardwired to not be attracted to Muslims."

Link to full video/transcript

It's really not this deep Sonalee!!! For someone who claims they exist outside the gender binary she is dead set on enforcing binaries on everyone else. Not wanting to be in a relationship with a sex worker does not mean you are "whorephobic" (jesus fucknig christ), it doesn't mean you hate them, you just don't want to have sex with them! Why is she so salty that no one wants to fuck her??
 

Man vs persistent rat

A good egg is a nice person
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
This fat bitches who feel entitled for hot men to fuck them trend that has emerged this year is the worst. The 'advocacy' is Lucas Werner levels of transparent. How about you turn around that 'looks prejudice' example and go to pound town with some hideous fat guys. You can catfish countless of them on Tinder, it's not hard.
 

Clovis

An oasis of horror in a desert of boredom
kiwifarms.net
[...]With kids it's a bit more of a problem though since parents now no longer know what a healthy weight looks like. Obviously no parent is out there memorizing height and weight charts, and they just rely on other kids to determine what's normal. Kids that are normal for their age and height typically get concern from other parents since they look like skeletons compared to Lardboy next door.
I agree, it's become normalised and mostly it's down to people not taking personal responsibility, but I thought this was interesting:
https://www.theatlantic.com/health/...-was-easier-to-be-skinny-in-the-1980s/407974/
The authors examined the dietary data of 36,400 Americans between 1971 and 2008 and the physical activity data of 14,419 people between 1988 and 2006. They grouped the data sets together by the amount of food and activity, age, and BMI.

They found a very surprising correlation: A given person, in 2006, eating the same amount of calories, taking in the same quantities of macronutrients like protein and fat, and exercising the same amount as a person of the same age did in 1988 would have a BMI that was about 2.3 points higher. In other words, people today are about 10 percent heavier than people were in the 1980s, even if they follow the exact same diet and exercise plans.
 

Twinkie

True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
That "study" is based on surveys aka self-reported data. People are notoriously shit at accurately tracking/reporting their calories and activity. Of course it got a lot of press though because it's reassuring millennials to think it's not your fault you're fatter than people in the 1980s.
 

rocknrollmartian

kiwifarms.net
The authors examined the dietary data of 36,400 Americans between 1971 and 2008 and the physical activity data of 14,419 people between 1988 and 2006. They grouped the data sets together by the amount of food and activity, age, and BMI.

They found a very surprising correlation: A given person, in 2006, eating the same amount of calories, taking in the same quantities of macronutrients like protein and fat, and exercising the same amount as a person of the same age did in 1988 would have a BMI that was about 2.3 points higher. In other words, people today are about 10 percent heavier than people were in the 1980s, even if they follow the exact same diet and exercise plans.
Interesting article, but I think some of the reasons for the disparity are probably faulty self-reporting as well as not accounting for as much incidental exercise in the 1980s and earlier (like kids walking back and forth to school or having paper routes or just playing outside, women and men doing rigorous housework instead of hiring out housecleaners and maintenance people, etc.). Little things that were more common in 1971 would help someone burn 50 or 100 calories here or there like hanging clothes out to dry instead of throwing them into a dryer, ironing, handwashing dishes, vacuuming with a heavy Hoover instead of running a Roomba, etc., and many people were doing those sorts of things multiple times a day. Further, how many women were in the workforce in 1971 versus 2008, and how many men shifted from active blue-collar jobs to white-collar jobs during that time period as well? There are so many variables at play. It seems the article wants to make fatter people passive victims by focusing on antidepressants, hormones in meat (which is rather overblown imo), and artificial sweeteners.

I think if a cohort of people were selected to live an early 1970s lifestyle full of everyday activity and standard homemade food, most would drop 10 pounds relatively effortlessly. This reminds me of the Supersizers Go... series:

 
Last edited:

LetThemEatCake

kiwifarms.net
Every study where they actually physically track everything that goes in a person's mouth and their exercise, then also ask them to record it and how much they move comes out to the same fact; people underestimate what they eat by a factor of iirc, a third, and overestimate how much they exercise by half.

The premise of the UK show Secret Eaters was just this - get some people who cannot understand why they are fat, get them to report what they eat, while secretly filming their every move to reveal they were pigging it at every opportunity and lying through their teeth about it, or simply eating so mindlessly they didn't even realise how much food they really took it on a daily basis.
 

rocknrollmartian

kiwifarms.net
Every study where they actually physically track everything that goes in a person's mouth and their exercise, then also ask them to record it and how much they move comes out to the same fact; people underestimate what they eat by a factor of iirc, a third, and overestimate how much they exercise by half.

The premise of the UK show Secret Eaters was just this - get some people who cannot understand why they are fat, get them to report what they eat, while secretly filming their every move to reveal they were pigging it at every opportunity and lying through their teeth about it, or simply eating so mindlessly they didn't even realise how much food they really took it on a daily basis.
The Brits have the best shows. Also, I actively track my food every day on Cronometer or My Fitness Pal and still fall into this trap, and I know that sometimes I must accidentally underestimate the calories in things I do log, especially non-chain restaurant entrees.
 
Quote from Sonalee's new video about how not being attracted to fatties isn't a sexual preference, it's fatphobia.

" So my challenge to you is, don’t hide behind the excuse of sexual preference, if you’re going to tell me the list of reasons why you don’t date x person for y reasons, just name it for what it is, say that you’re fatphobic, say that you’re anti-Black, say that you’re dealing with a certain kind of racism against a certain nationality or ethnicity. Let me know that you’re xenophobic, let me know that you’re transphobic, let me know that you’re struggling with misogyny, let me know that you don’t date people with addiction because you’re really affected by addiction stigma, let me know that you’re whorephobic and that you don’t date sex workers. Let me know that you’re anti-Native and you don’t date indigenous people, let me know that you don’t date people who are not upper-caste, Hindus, let me know that you’re actually a really elite classist and you don’t date poor people, let me know that you’re actually super ableist and that’s why you don’t date disabled people, let me know that you’re super-duper islamophobic and that is why you don’t date Muslims. Don’t hide behind the sexual preference label, don’t hide behind this understanding that you are hardwired to not be attracted to Muslims."

Link to full video/transcript

It's really not this deep Sonalee!!! For someone who claims they exist outside the gender binary she is dead set on enforcing binaries on everyone else. Not wanting to be in a relationship with a sex worker does not mean you are "whorephobic" (jesus fucknig christ), it doesn't mean you hate them, you just don't want to have sex with them! Why is she so salty that no one wants to fuck her??
Not wanting to date a person with an addiction is not "addiction stigma." It's common sense to not want to get involved with someone, set out on self destruction. You would have to be insane or an enabler to date someone with an addiction.
 

LetThemEatCake

kiwifarms.net
Not wanting to date a person with an addiction is not "addiction stigma." It's common sense to not want to get involved with someone, set out on self destruction. You would have to be insane or an enabler to date someone with an addiction.
The suggestion is nobody's sexual preferences, attractions or lack thereof should ever be respected, because people's sexual choices are by nature deeply political and therefore many of them are wrong and if you have the wrong politics, you need to be punished, or perhaps reeducated. By Sonalee, or some equally deranged fat brown lump with identical beliefs, of course.

She's about a hair all the way through that screed of suggesting people who don't want to date someone they simply find physically unattractive, or religiously/culturally incompatible, be shoved into a camp and lectured and beaten daily until they agree to fuck whoevern she deems politially correct. Such as super-morbidly obese, utterly insane hams like her.

The whole issue of consent is missing from all this. Odd, for a so-called sexual therapist. Not odd for a SJW lunatic at all, though. Consent is for me, and not for thee, if thee falls on the wrong end of the progressive stack, or is simply someone who doesn't want to fuck them for love or money. They are always entirely self-serving in the final analysis, despite their claim to be more invested in social justice. Social justice for Sonalee and her ilk means getting who and what they want without having to earn any of it.

She's like a cult leader whose primary goal is to design a belief system that means they get to fuck all the followers when and if they wish and the followers can't really object because objecting means they're committing a sin. Except thankfully Sonalee is so transparent, uncharismatic and physically offputting she hasn't got a hope in hell of accomplishing this.
 
Last edited:

Ogg66

kiwifarms.net
Not wanting to date a person with an addiction is not "addiction stigma." It's common sense to not want to get involved with someone, set out on self destruction. You would have to be insane or an enabler to date someone with an addiction.
But But thats a bigoted sense, in all things now to be most woke you have to go with those you would avoid as not to be a bigot, so you must go with a smack addicted 500lb plus troon who has severe violent outbursts, you or I normal people do not have a choice in it. Actually if not going with a waste of space looser who has no self-regard makes me a bigot then I will wear that badge as it means fuck all any more.
 

ricecake

Immunocompromised Cougar
kiwifarms.net
New TikTok video from Anna. In this video Anna says that she might be "Asexual" or "Demisexual." She must be doing this to for attention. However, with how fat she is, I don't doubt that she has little to no sex drive.

Link to video: https://www.tiktok.com/@glitterandlazers/video/6746022633139080454?langCountry=en
Maybe she reads the Farms and saw the speculation that she is a virgin lol.

The comments on that are pretty mixed. Could it be that tweens are cynical of the "Alphabet People"? Is there light at the end of this goddamn tunnel?
 

Sinners Sandwich

Eid Htrad Redav Eid !
kiwifarms.net
WTF does 'demisexual' even mean? Fucking millenials and their nonsense terms. NOBODY CARES, Anna.
It means needing to befriend a person & getting to know them before having sex.

There is also demigirl/demiboy but apparently that's something different. I don't want to know what it means. It's just more dumb snowflake shit.
 

LetThemEatCake

kiwifarms.net
Demi means half so, they're suggesting that preferring to know someone a bit before you fuck them makes you 'half' sexual, where as anyone who will fuck someone they don't know well is by implication more sexual, fully sexual?

Odd understanding of sex.

I suspect these terms are used by people who are simply unfamiliar and deeply uncomfortable with sex in all its forms and thus it has become a theoretical thing for them only, more talked about and used to cover for the fact they are simply virgins, inexperienced or deeply, seriously uncomfortable with the idea. People who have sex don't need to put weird, offputting, opaque labels on themselves like this. Tumblr shut-ins whose sexual knowledge is limited to anime tropes on the other hand ...