Feminism and the LGBT Community with Respect to Transgenderism - A vain (and autistic) attempt to improve Tranny Sideshows

Who's to blame for the Trans Epidemic?

  • Jews

    Votes: 67 17.3%
  • Leftism

    Votes: 90 23.2%
  • The Patriarchy

    Votes: 11 2.8%
  • Gays

    Votes: 18 4.6%
  • Porn

    Votes: 104 26.8%
  • The Industrial Revolution and It's Consequences

    Votes: 98 25.3%

  • Total voters
    388

OneMillionRPM

iunno
kiwifarms.net
Joined
Aug 18, 2017
Forgive me if this has been brought up elsewhere in this thread, but stuff like this often makes me wonder if the radical feminism of the mid-10’s that played a role in Gamergate was actually a major contributor to the current trans fad, at least on the MtF side of things.

Not saying I ever agreed with the anti-GG crowd by long shot, but I’ve always found it interesting that most of the AGP troons that now inhabit nerdy communities are almost the exact "sexually entitled misogynist" stereotype that they were accusing men in general of being. Like on some unconscious level, they knew that since popular opinion was siding with these women, they could save themselves by claiming that they, too, were women.
That's what I've been thinking too, especially since I noticed a huge surge in trannies right around 2014 when GG happened. I like to call it the Transplosion. Just look up a tranny's profile on some forum using the Wayback Machine, 2014-2015 is usually the point where they put pronouns in their sig/title/wherever or changed their gender listing to female.
 

Fougaro

Glow in the dark K/DA Popstar
kiwifarms.net
Joined
Jul 25, 2016
To elaborate what I once said in the tranny thread and what other users have noticed themselves, the root of the troondemic, and almost all of our socioeconomic problems in general, is the fact that the western civilised world in this day and age bases its entire philosophy, politics and values on equality as the be-all-end-all (as opposed to stability or freedom on the political trichotomy, but that's another tale for another time). When equality becomes the cornerstone of your religious dogma, you'll find yourself in a position where you have no arguments for granting rights to some people, but denying them to others. You can't argue in favour of gender equality or gay rights, but exclude trannies out of this. If you believe that men and women are equal, you have no argument for why trans-women shouldn't be considered as real women.

This is also why you see people already advocating for giving children more rights, the attempted normalisation of paedophilia, granting voting rights to non-citizens and so on. It didn't end when workers were demanding rights, it didn't end when humanity as a whole fucked up by introducing universal suffrage, it didn't end when feminists were throwing their first tantrum, it didn't end with gay rights and it won't end with trannies. Mr. Bones' Progressive Ride never ends.
Will this all go away if we reinstated gender roles? What is your ideal solution to the troon problem?
Any answer to the tranny question is due to the above mentioned reasons impossible and purely theoretical. Feminism, troonism, race grifting and all that will continue as long as the government has the money to enable all of this. Theoretically though, there are two solutions, none of which most people are going to like.

One of them would indeed be a return to patriarchy, to shape society and laws in accordance to biological reality. That is only going to happen after a cataclysmic black swan event that changes the west's core value from equality to stability.

The other equally unpopular, if not more so, option would be to base the argument for women's (or anyone's) rights on freedom rather than equality, which understands that rights are inseparable from responsibilities. Women get the same rights, but also the same responsibilities and expectations as men. In practice it would mean no alimony, no child support, no family "courts", no gender quotas and no one having to listen to any whining about "toxic masculinity" or "fratboy culture". If you're a woman that lives in a shithole that still has conscription, you're in the army now. Women in such an alternate reality would be allowed to both succeed and fail at their own merits. If they can't compete with men on an equal playing field, they won't get any quotas, programs or gibs, but instead they'd be told to either get good or get back in the kitchen. To summarise: Society would, contrary to our timeline, treat women as actual adults instead of systematically infantilising them. In such a scenario you could have your cake and eat it too by giving women rights and not humouring trannies.

But as said, it is all purely theoretical and we live in a world under the Bacon Flag of Victory. For better, but mostly for worse.
What exactly have TERFs accomplished?
Nothing from what I've seen and they probably never will at the end of the story. TERFs are, as far as I'm concerned, the female equivalent of MRAs: Fighting a futile battle and achieving nothing except for ultimately becoming a laughing stock.
 
Last edited:

Ser Prize

kiwifarms.net
Joined
Nov 20, 2019
I've encountered a similar problem in a video game related hobby of mine. It's lonely when you're the only chick sometimes - there's a number of people there with similar interest to me who I value a lot at least, good men, but sometimes the conversation turns to lego or something else and I'm lost. At least the chat I go to just sees me as one of the dudes and we have a fun time joking around, which is nice. :heart-full:
Trust me, it's no better when you're the lone right wing guy in a hobby that caters almost exclusively to liberals. I've had people straight up admit they were scared to even talk to me because of all the rumors.

My fault for being autistic and liking roleplay I guess.

What I said could be referring to Digibro too but he was actually losing views for a while before the tranny shit, it's really hard to believe that he used to be one of the top dogs of the anime community. Who I was actually referring to was Pedantic Romantic, he started dating this tranny communist named Zeria who convinced him to go trans and got more political probably through her influence. What's funny is that Zeria never got many views except for the occasional breakout video that'd get over 100K so the writing was already on the wall that if you made your anime channel overtly political, most people just aren't going to bother watching it. They both quit making videos and the last I heard of Pedantic, he was posting pictures of his ass on twitter for attention. I don't really talk to other weebs a whole or pay attention to the anime community as a whole but I'm pretty sure it's the more moe side that is degenerate and the route of everything people hate about anime online and I'm not really into moe shit a good 90% of the time. I will agree with you that I'm tired of seeing males with female pfp and v-tubers rigs though, it makes them look like closeted trannies whether they are or not and even right-wingers do it.

Terfs are crazy bitches and a lot of them are obsessed with their own ability to give birth even though they hate men. I don't get how your feminism works when the thing you're super proud of and talk about all the time requires the help of a man. I'm pretty sure the neurotic behavior that comes out of radical feminists is frustration from not getting dick or being in any kind of relationship that can calm them down and mellow them out but they refuse both and it just makes them worse. Like, look at the more sex-positive ones, they're not as outwardly angry and crazy because they still get dick but trust me, that insanity will come later when no men worth a shit actually want to be in a relationship with them. I've seen some people in the other thread and even this one who this talking point might piss off and I can only think to respond in one way: "Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha"
As much as I like some vtubers it has certainly played into the rise of trannyism. Know the signs, everyone, of a weeb-to-tranny.
Sign A: smug/sexy anime girl avatar
Sign B: watching lots of moeshit
Sign C: playing female characters in video games.
I don't know why these signs are so accurate but they always seem to be.

As for feminists being angry and crazy it's as I said: feminism is a whole ideology based around coping and over-compensating. They can't live in a world where men and women have their own strengths and weaknesses. They HAVE to live in a world where "a woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle". It's all compensation.
 
Last edited:

Nigger Respecter

kiwifarms.net
Joined
Nov 16, 2020
I voted for the gays but really mean the whole LBGT movement the past couple of decades that created the slippery slope for accepting degeneracy. Combine that with post modernism and the general leftist belief that nothing means anything, and suddenly you have guys trying to turn their fetish into everyone else's problem plus autistic internet-drowned teenagers that think "what even IS gender, man" is enough reason to do whatever they want and (most importantly) to piss their parents off who are pretty much always against their shitty kids' behavior.

Most modern feminists are entirely on board with trannies joining their ranks. The TERFs are pretty much all ugly box-shaped broads that have no power whatsoever, but it is hilarious to see them seethe. I find most of their arguments against trannies to be nonsense, but it is interesting how much they really aggravate the shemales.

In all honesty I really don't give a shit if some guy wants to tuck his dick between his legs and prance around in a little skirt. The issue is that suddenly in the last few years, everyone on the left is acting like they have openly supported this behavior their entire lives and anyone that hesitates at all to accept it is a wildly hateful bigot. Then they use this as evidence that trannies are oppressed. It's truly wild
 

2manycats

Fully charged
kiwifarms.net
Joined
May 23, 2020
Forgive me if this has been brought up elsewhere in this thread, but stuff like this often makes me wonder if the radical feminism of the mid-10’s that played a role in Gamergate was actually a major contributor to the current trans fad, at least on the MtF side of things.

Not saying I ever agreed with the anti-GG crowd by long shot, but I’ve always found it interesting that most of the AGP troons that now inhabit nerdy communities are almost the exact "sexually entitled misogynist" stereotype that they were accusing men in general of being. Like on some unconscious level, they knew that since popular opinion was siding with these women, they could save themselves by claiming that they, too, were women.
This, so much this. I brought it up in the TERFs thread, but it bears repeating here that the radfems of today are saying the exact same things you'd expect the idpol supporting side of the GG debate to say. Back then all of the online left seemed to be on the same page, at least when it came to their desire to force creators to make their works conform to leftist sensibilities, but when suddenly a bunch of men started claiming to be women and women started claiming to be they/thems (iirc Zoe Quinn, THE leading figure of their side, now uses they/them pronouns and claims to be non binary despite the whole narrative centring around her being a woman) a bunch of them went "wait a minute, something's not right" and decided to split off into their own faction, siding only with the free speech supporters when it benefits them. If the trans issue had never been a thing the radfems wouldn't give a damn about free speech, they'd be up to their same old tricks of censoring anyone who talks shit about feminism or any of the supposed victims of "harassment" and "sexism". (I'm not saying it isn't harassment to make genuine violent threats against someone, but to the easily offended there's no real difference between death/rape threats and "here's why I disagree").


As for feminists being angry and crazy it's as I said: feminism is a whole ideology based around coping and over-compensating. They can't live in a world where men and women have their own strengths and weaknesses. They HAVE to live in a world where "a woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle". It's all compensation.
And what bothers me about this is that despite men and women on average being different, there are always exceptions to the rule - some women will have a preference for more male-typical activities and careers regardless of stereotypes or what the so called "patriarchy" says (myself included - huge tabletop gaming nerd, feel the most at home in front of a computer), but rather than celebrating those unconventional people, feminists seem to want to pretend that the only thing holding back all these women who'd rather be housewives or work in a female dominated field like nursing or education is the mythical patriarchy and not their own preferences. And when you factor in the whole intersectionality thing it gets even more ridiculous - a few game companies seem to be donating lately to a charity called "Black Girls Code" which, as the name suggests, wants to get more black women working in tech. No idea how they're going to achieve this goal, but it's ridiculous to pretend that your typical hood girl who's more interested in makeup and dancing is suddenly going to want to become a game developer just because some activist group tells her it's an option.
 

Ser Prize

kiwifarms.net
Joined
Nov 20, 2019
I voted for the gays but really mean the whole LBGT movement the past couple of decades that created the slippery slope for accepting degeneracy. Combine that with post modernism and the general leftist belief that nothing means anything, and suddenly you have guys trying to turn their fetish into everyone else's problem plus autistic internet-drowned teenagers that think "what even IS gender, man" is enough reason to do whatever they want and (most importantly) to piss their parents off who are pretty much always against their shitty kids' behavior.

Most modern feminists are entirely on board with trannies joining their ranks. The TERFs are pretty much all ugly box-shaped broads that have no power whatsoever, but it is hilarious to see them seethe. I find most of their arguments against trannies to be nonsense, but it is interesting how much they really aggravate the shemales.

In all honesty I really don't give a shit if some guy wants to tuck his dick between his legs and prance around in a little skirt. The issue is that suddenly in the last few years, everyone on the left is acting like they have openly supported this behavior their entire lives and anyone that hesitates at all to accept it is a wildly hateful bigot. Then they use this as evidence that trannies are oppressed. It's truly wild
They had you fooled, then. It was never "about what we do in the bedroom". It was about taking these things and making it your problem.

I hope we have all learned from this.
 

NeoGAF Lurker

An Niggo
kiwifarms.net
Joined
Aug 15, 2016
The endgame of feminism is trannies. If they ever cared about equal rights to begin with, feminism ditched that objective decades ago in favor of amassing more female privilege. It’s to the point where women have it objectively easier and better than men in 2021.

Feminism is also at the forefront of everything about gender (which was a made up word to blur the lines between the sexes) being a social construct, leaving the door wide open for trannydom. At the time, it was so dumpy lesbians wouldn’t want to be lumped in with most other women. I keep hearing how much smarter women are than men from radfems but in their vast reserves of wisdom, they never conceived that someone besides themselves could game the system.

Chickens coming home to roost and all that. Radfems demand that society accept their lies and delusions for 60 years and now they chafe like their fat legs when they get told to accept the lies and delusions of trannies. I wish I could feel sorry for them but I don’t. They’re just on the losing end of progressivism, like so many other groups over the decades.
 

polyester

kiwifarms.net
Joined
Jan 26, 2020
but rather than celebrating those unconventional people, feminists seem to want to pretend that the only thing holding back all these women who'd rather be housewives or work in a female dominated field like nursing or education is the mythical patriarchy and not their own preferences.

Yeah, this saying is probably largely true (not sure who first said it):

Feminists are gender-atypical women who refuse to accept that most women are not like them.
 

Leafy is Here

kiwifarms.net
Joined
Jan 31, 2021
On the topic of troons in nerdy hobbies, I can see why a terminally online male who plays a nerdy game would see advantages in trooning out.

Slight PL but I once saw a girl enter a survival game and right away the guys started making weird flirty comments, giving her free stuff, and even buying her in game items with real money. Even the moderators were doing it too. And she sure didn't seem to mind either.

Part of me feels that’s why so many guys in these male dominated nerdy hobbies troon out. They see how women get treated, say “huh, wish I could get that much attention for existing.” And troon out. Of course it all backfires in the end because of their autism and inability to pass.

I am not saying all women play video games just to grift lonely men lmao. But I’ve definitely noticed the imbalance.
 

Kevin Roberts

Coolest Bitch in Town
kiwifarms.net
Joined
Oct 9, 2020
Every wawe of feminisms had its goals. First was about equality, which is fine. Second was mostly about strong women, again, nothing against that. Third was mostly against discrimination, again nothing wrong with this one. But the last was making a minority (sexual, gender and non-white) supergroup along with making batshit crazy theories around "women as prizes and objects" in every single medium known to men.

Also love "Feminism don't need men". Well, good luck with that tightly closed pickle jar, honey. You can have all the dildos, strap-on girlfriends and all, but only a real man knows how to open a tightly closed jar, along with other things. ;)
 

NeoGAF Lurker

An Niggo
kiwifarms.net
Joined
Aug 15, 2016
Second was mostly about strong women, again, nothing against that.
That’s not quite the case. Second wave feminism crashed and burned because the Andrea Dworkin/Catharine MacKinnon mindset of all heterosexual sex being rape wound up being at the forefront of feminism in the 1970s and 1980s. Plus the “lavender menace” of lesbians getting pissy that women weren’t turning gay and lining up to lick their hairy clams caused a lot of infighting. Second wave feminism is every bit as defective as the current feminism wreaking havoc now.
 

Lovecraft's Cat

Cat Lives Matter
kiwifarms.net
Joined
Dec 12, 2020
I'm back with some light spergé
"REEE muh patriarchy"

This is why some people think trannies are what feminists fucking deserve, by the way. Glinner is a massive sperg but he has, perhaps unwisely, sacrificed a lot to fight trannies, let him sell his dumb shirt.
Troons and Terfs are like Yin and Yang; within each one is a piece of the other, and both are needed for perfect harmony
 

Lovecraft's Cat

Cat Lives Matter
kiwifarms.net
Joined
Dec 12, 2020
Sounds more like a troon-terf-incel trifecta.
Where would the incels factor into the equation? Would they be the Jews to the terf's US and the troon's USSR?
As, always, the penis is guilt free and totally not responsible for its own actions 🙄
I never implied that. All I said is that the online troon and terf communities are made for each other. Besides, terfs are just as toxic an troons, and troons are just as man-hating as terfs.
 

Ted Gazynski

kiwifarms.net
Joined
Sep 8, 2019
Every wawe of feminisms had its goals. First was about equality, which is fine. Second was mostly about strong women, again, nothing against that. Third was mostly against discrimination, again nothing wrong with this one. But the last was making a minority (sexual, gender and non-white) supergroup along with making batshit crazy theories around "women as prizes and objects" in every single medium known to men.

Also love "Feminism don't need men". Well, good luck with that tightly closed pickle jar, honey. You can have all the dildos, strap-on girlfriends and all, but only a real man knows how to open a tightly closed jar, along with other things. ;)
“Equality between the sexes” is a nice sounding slogan. It’s impossible in the real world. No matter how equal you make social institutions, differences will continue to be expressed because men and women are fundamentally different.

A healthy society recognizes sex differences and shapes institutions around them.

I find the most annoying thing about feminists to be the incessant victimary whining and their historical oppression mythology in which men lived great lives and were given a ton of freedom while women were miserable slaves. It’s all based on English upper-class feminism from the early modern era, in which absurdly privileged women wrote about how terrible it was that wealthy men wanted to marry them while 95% of women and men worked themselves to death in service of their luxurious existence.

There was an interesting strain of feminism back then that emphasized the good aspects of femininity and wanted to “feminize” society and elevate the unappreciated work that women put into building society, but it got totally subsumed by liberal feminism that just wanted to get women into factories to feed the industrial machine.
 

Ted Gazynski

kiwifarms.net
Joined
Sep 8, 2019
Where would the incels factor into the equation? Would they be the Jews to the terf's US and the troon's USSR?

I never implied that. All I said is that the online troon and terf communities are made for each other. Besides, terfs are just as toxic an troons, and troons are just as man-hating as terfs.
Never heard of a terf who raped kids or wanted to groom them into chopping off their genitals lol.
 

Noir drag freak

kiwifarms.net
Joined
Dec 27, 2020
“Equality between the sexes” is a nice sounding slogan. It’s impossible in the real world. No matter how equal you make social institutions, differences will continue to be expressed because men and women are fundamentally different.

A healthy society recognizes sex differences and shapes institutions around them.

I find the most annoying thing about feminists to be the incessant victimary whining and their historical oppression mythology in which men lived great lives and were given a ton of freedom while women were miserable slaves. It’s all based on English upper-class feminism from the early modern era, in which absurdly privileged women wrote about how terrible it was that wealthy men wanted to marry them while 95% of women and men worked themselves to death in service of their luxurious existence.

There was an interesting strain of feminism back then that emphasized the good aspects of femininity and wanted to “feminize” society and elevate the unappreciated work that women put into building society, but it got totally subsumed by liberal feminism that just wanted to get women into factories to feed the industrial machine.


To be fair, the Industrial Revolution changed the relations of how upper class was men and women relate to each other. The cult of domesticity was a response to it.
 

YourFriendlyLurker

kiwifarms.net
Joined
Oct 24, 2021
The other equally unpopular, if not more so, option would be to base the argument for women's (or anyone's) rights on freedom rather than equality, which understands that rights are inseparable from responsibilities
I can't agree with this male vs female, cause it's outdated. The further we go, the less we need such things as physical strength and that is actually the core difference between the sexes. The war in 1 BC was about physical strenth, now you can use drones. In 1 BC you needed to work in a field or go to war to get food and shelter, now you can basically work from your home and never leave your flat at all. The economic border between the sexes slowly being erased and this trend will only continiue.

I would say that the option would be to go with mother nature and reward the strongest, not the weakest. Imo this disbalance is the core reason of degeneracy we see nowadays. From economic point of view it means less taxes for enterpreneurs and the employed people, and less weallfare for those who won't work. The jobless lazy troon shouldn't use taxpayers' money for engaging in his fetish, he is uselesss for the society, why should a middle-class guy who works his shifts pay for those stunts? The hundreds of refugees from different shitholes who want only wellfare should GTFO, they bring nothing but problems. Same is with colour/gender quotas, we live in XXI century ffs, in the west the eduation is equally assessible for everyone regardless if you have dick and what colour it has. Git good and get job, that shit is easy.

The universal, natural truth is that no one is equal, there is someone stronger and someone smarter. The progress is possible only when you reward the best (while simultaniously help the weakest to stand on their own feet). But modern west implemented unnatural narrative that it's the weaskest we should give a priority. It creates the situation of negative sewlection, it demotivates people to grow, why would your skill when you declare youself She/Xim, chop off your dick and get employed on the quota? Why became better if you can become worse and get everything for free?
 

Noir drag freak

kiwifarms.net
Joined
Dec 27, 2020
I can't agree with this male vs female, cause it's outdated. The further we go, the less we need such things as physical strength and that is actually the core difference between the sexes. The war in 1 BC was about physical strenth, now you can use drones. In 1 BC you needed to work in a field or go to war to get food and shelter, now you can basically work from your home and never leave your flat at all. The economic border between the sexes slowly being erased and this trend will only continiue.

I would say that the option would be to go with mother nature and reward the strongest, not the weakest. Imo this disbalance is the core reason of degeneracy we see nowadays. From economic point of view it means less taxes for enterpreneurs and the employed people, and less weallfare for those who won't work. The jobless lazy troon shouldn't use taxpayers' money for engaging in his fetish, he is uselesss for the society, why should a middle-class guy who works his shifts pay for those stunts? The hundreds of refugees from different shitholes who want only wellfare should GTFO, they bring nothing but problems. Same is with colour/gender quotas, we live in XXI century ffs, in the west the eduation is equally assessible for everyone regardless if you have dick and what colour it has. Git good and get job, that shit is easy.

The universal, natural truth is that no one is equal, there is someone stronger and someone smarter. The progress is possible only when you reward the best (while simultaniously help the weakest to stand on their own feet). But modern west implemented unnatural narrative that it's the weaskest we should give a priority. It creates the situation of negative sewlection, it demotivates people to grow, why would your skill when you declare youself She/Xim, chop off your dick and get employed on the quota? Why became better if you can become worse and get everything for free?

I had a friend that said the reason why so many troons tend to be losers is that they couldn’t compete in the rat race for the middle class suburban lifestyle. Since they’re barely tolerated in the white aspirants middle class, they decide to slum it in the gay community as queers. My friend is a female who would had been liberal in other decades, but she’s tried of troons and their demands. She would rather nuke it just to spite them. I don’t blame her.


I get what you’re saying and agree. But the hierarchy has become steep. I want to blame the suburbs because I think that the creation of youth culture was a product of how suburbs force families to have two generational households. It also increased alienation in both children and parents. That’s another topic for another thread.
 

KingCoelacanth

Click here to change your title
kiwifarms.net
Joined
Sep 10, 2017
I was thinking about it and TERFs actively support the troon agenda, don't they?
When its election day, and they look between the progressive pro-trans candidate(s) and the conservative anti-trans candidate(s), TERFs are always voting for the progressive, aren't they?
Whenever you see some politicians promoting troon nonsense, just keep in mind that they're getting all the TERF votes. TERFs will never vote for an anti-trans candidate, they will always vote progressive.