First Man review by Richard Brody - Damien Chazelle’s Neil Armstrong Bio-Pic Is an Accidental Right-Wing Fetish Object

Is the Apollo 11 moon landing right wing propaganda?


  • Total voters
    35

RadicalCentrist

kiwifarms.net
From The New Yorker:

"When “First Man,” Damien Chazelle’s drama about Neil Armstrong’s mission to the moon, premièred at the Venice Film Festival, in August, it stirred up an absurd controversy among right-wing blowhards who hadn’t seen the film but nonetheless damned it on the basis of reviews stating that the movie doesn’t depict the iconic moment when Armstrong planted the American flag on the lunar surface. It’s true that the flag-planting isn’t dramatized, but the blowhards need not worry: “First Man” is worthy of enduring as a right-wing fetish object. It is a film of deluded, cultish longing for an earlier era of American life, one defined not by conservative politics but, rather, by a narrow and regressive emotional perspective that shapes and distorts the substance of the film.
....
Throughout “First Man,” Chazelle takes pains to show that, despite Neil’s unwillingness to display his grief to others, he deeply mourned his daughter—and that, despite his stoic bearing, his grief doesn’t interfere with his work. (It’s even seen to inspire him to push himself to new peaks of endurance at a crucial moment in his training.) Though Neil’s lack of expression suggests a character flaw, it is, in Chazelle’s view, a virtuous one.

Yet Janet is clearly in pain. She complains to a friend that her life with Neil isn’t what she’d hoped it would be, saying, “I married Neil because I wanted a normal life”—i.e., she didn’t get one. Though Neil and Janet have their moments of happiness, his absorption in his work, the demands of his work, and his distant demeanor suggest severe rifts in their marriage. It’s another of Chazelle’s enduring themes—the man whose passionate devotion to his work makes the woman who doesn’t share his passion unhappy and dooms the relationship. It’s the story of his first feature, the low-budget musical “Guy and Madeline on a Park Bench,” and of “Whiplash” and “La La Land.”

The work to which Neil is devoted, the mission to the moon, is unabashedly depicted as patriotic. There’s no flag-planting, but the planted flag is seen clearly, twice; the movie doesn’t stint on the distinctive Americanism of the action onscreen (including, in a scene of Armstrong ascending from the ground to the capsule of Apollo 11 in an elevator, a point-of-view shot that reveals, majestically, the words “United States” painted, vertically, on the side of the very tall rocket). Earlier, when another space mission is successfully completed, one astronaut bellows in Mission Control, “Call the Soviets—tell ’em to go fuck themselves.” After the successful Apollo 11 moon landing, a French woman is interviewed and says, “I always trust an American. I knew they wouldn’t fail.” There’s a culture war at the core of “First Man,” or, rather, several, and Chazelle doesn’t merely suggest that they exist historically; he takes sides in them, and he does so as much with what he silences as with what he depicts.
...
Nothing in the film suggests that Neil is even aware of what’s going on in the world around him. Much of the action in the movie takes place in Jim Crow states where public facilities were segregated, but there’s no hint of this in the film; there’s no hint of where Neil stands on the pressing questions of the time. He has no black colleagues, no female colleagues; meanwhile, a female cosmonaut, Valentina Tereshkova, flew a space mission for the Soviet Union in 1963. What did he think? There’s a news report on the Armstrong family TV about the Vietnam War—but, significantly, it’s Janet who’s home while it’s on. Neil is in space at the time—as if Chazelle were suggesting that, while such people as Janet both hold down the domestic front and fret about politics, Neil is too busy to bother with any of it. (The same is true of one brief appearance of antiwar protesters, which occurs just as Neil is mourning the deaths of his own colleagues—as if contrasting those who risk death with those who wouldn’t.)

The one scene that embodies the sixties onscreen is, to my mind, among the most contemptible scenes in recent movies. It takes place midway through the action, when Congress begins to question the value of the space program. Neil is dispatched to represent nasa in a meeting at the White House, where senators fret about “taxpayer dollars,” and while there he is summoned to the phone and informed of the deaths of three astronauts in an Apollo test. The point is clear: that the astronauts are risking their lives while Congress is counting beans and playing politics.

But Chazelle takes that notion even further a few minutes later in the film, when, racked with unspeakable grief over the deaths of his colleagues, Neil drives off to be alone. “Half the country” may oppose the moon mission, but here Chazelle offers a peculiar, tendentious, and self-revealing cinematic interpretation of that phrase in the form of a montage. It shows Kurt Vonnegut, appearing in a black-and-white television clip, saying that the government would do better to spend the money on such things as making New York City “habitable.” There’s an archival clip of chanting protesters, featuring, prominently, a sign saying “¡Ayuda al Pueblo!” and footage, staged for the movie, of Leon Bridges performing Gil Scott-Heron’s 1970 song “Whitey on the Moon.”

With this sequence, Chazelle openly mocks people who thought that the moon money was spent foolishly—those pesky intellectuals, blacks, and Hispanics who go on TV or into the street demanding “gimme” while the likes of Neil and his exclusively white, male colleagues uncomplainingly put their lives on the line to accomplish historic things in the interest of “mankind.” In its explicit content, and by artful omission, “First Man” subscribes to the misbegotten political premise that America used to be greater—and that the liberating and equalizing activism of the sixties ignored, dismissed, and even undermined that greatness.
...
A work with right-wing ideas doesn’t have to be a bad film, but “First Man” comes off as propaganda by mistake, by artistic obliviousness rather than by artistic design.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Frank D'arbo

It is 5 am and You are Listening to Los Angeles
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
So is Richard Brody the left leaning Armond White?
 
I

IV 445

Guest
kiwifarms.net
There was controversy about this film, even before it was out, about not even showing the historic moment when Neil Armstrong planted the American flag on the moon.

Can’t win with anybody anymore.
 

Randall Fragg

Tran Ranch is under siege!
Global Moderator
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
Much of the action in the movie takes place in Jim Crow states where publicfacilities were segregated, butthere’s no hint of this in the film;
But the moon landings were in 1969, four years after the Voting Rights act and the Civil Rights act struck down Jim Crow as unconstitutional. And what bearing does that have on the story anyway?
It’s almost like the author is a whiny soyboy who wants something to complain about.
 

RadicalCentrist

kiwifarms.net
But the moon landings were in 1969, four years after the Voting Rights act and the Civil Rights act struck down Jim Crow as unconstitutional. And what bearing does that have on the story anyway?
It’s almost like the author is a whiny soyboy who wants something to complain about.
I suspect the truth is later on, with this odd passage -
With this sequence, Chazelle openly mocks people who thought that the moon money was spent foolishly—those pesky intellectuals, blacks, and Hispanics who go on TV or into the street demanding “gimme” while the likes of Neil and his exclusively white, male colleagues uncomplainingly put their lives on the line to accomplish historic things in the interest of “mankind.”
Brody is a very old dude. I suspect that part hits closer to home.

Of course, if we stayed in space and allocated our budget accordingly, we could have clean sustainable energy, greatly reduced pollution levels, American pride in scientific achievement instead of the latest bombed Muslim country, and sundry other benefits. Can't win them all.
 

knightlautrec

Keh heh heh heh…
kiwifarms.net
'REEEEEEE REEEEEEEEE REEEEEEEE REEEEEEEEEEE WHITE MAN ACCOMPLISHMENTS REEEEEEEEEEE REEEEEEEE REEEEEEEEEEE AMERICAN PATRIOTISM REEEEEEEE REEEEEEEEE'

Basically this article. You know, I always thought it was crazy right wing whacko thing back in the day when people used to complain about 'them America-hating City Liberals' but they really do seem to hate America in every aspect. I don't know why they can't just fuck off somewhere else if they can't take any sort of pride in American accomplishments.

America got to the Moon. Suck it douchebags.
 

A Useless Fish

A Fish with literally no value, whatsoever.
kiwifarms.net
Weren't there also complaints about La La Land being right-wing propaganda or something?

How the fuck does that work? Wasn't that just a gay ass musical? Has anyone here watched it? Was there anything in it that suggested white superiority?
 

chunkygoth

now with extra yee haw
kiwifarms.net
But the moon landings were in 1969, four years after the Voting Rights act and the Civil Rights act struck down Jim Crow as unconstitutional. And what bearing does that have on the story anyway?
It’s almost like the author is a whiny soyboy who wants something to complain about.
A lot of the action also takes place on the MOON, where as, we all know
there are no black people.
 

Iceland Heavy

kiwifarms.net
Haha, those stupid right-wing blowhards getting so bent out of shape over something so trivial- REEEEEEE WHERE ARE THE WOMEN AND BLACKS WHY WASN'T THE ENTIRE MOVIE A STRUGGLE SESSION OVER CIVIL RIGHTS AND VIETNAM
 

The Shadow

Charming rogue
kiwifarms.net
Yes, yearning for that simpler 1960s of nothing but Democratic rule, assassinations, Vietnam, hippies, political civil rights strife...yeah, that's what the Right Wing is all about!

Let's face it, only good things about the 60s were muscle cars, Vincent Price B movies and rock and roll.
 

whatever I feel like

Disney Diaper Size Fetish Enthusiast
kiwifarms.net
The Observer review complained that they spent too much time talking about going to space and doing the moon mission and not enough on stupid family bullshit. It was almost as though they were trying to get more people out to the theater while still ostensibly snubbing action and man vs. wild drama.
 

Zaryiu

kiwifarms.net
This Soyfaggot should watch the moviet came out and claimed Black Woman were so important to NASA history if he want his propaganda dose
 

Similar threads

  • Poll
Or How Movies Are Shit for Long-Form Stories
Replies
45
Views
3K
  • Poll
>TFW DESTROYING YOUR OWN SERIES ONCE JUST ISN'T GOOD ENOUGH AND YOU MAKE A PSA COMIC TELLING PEOPLE WHO WERE INVESTED IN IT TO FUCK OFF (#NO REFUNDS)
Replies
4K
Views
341K
  • Poll
Jesus & Albert Einstein reincarnated, discoverer of GOD=7_4 Theory
Replies
28K
Views
2M
Top