Gabriel Sickel / KhordKitty / KhordiKit / ThisIsGabe / PianoKat / Xyniroz / Ghörfn / yiffyiff123 / Deborah Kay Butler / Buttercuppedbun - Deadbeat Wannabe-Actor MGTOW Pedo-zoophile - Divorced father of 2 sons. Tried grooming them as infants to be cub furries. Tried to groom a 17yo into sex. Ex-wife cucked him for a pedo. She took the kids. He fucked the family dog.

[PK Shitstorm]

You are all questioning why a cat would want attention. You should know better.

Guess you finally admitted to being an attention whore, thats the first step towards recovery

There is no fight. There is a just an endless supply of people trying to convince me that I don't deserve to use my first Amendment rights.

Have you consider that perhaps speaking every single thought you ever had on your life on the internet is not a good idea?
Most of those people are probably just trying to offer you advice but you take that as a direct attack on your persona

You all project emotions like sadness and anger onto me because you're all so emotionally invested in a virtual reality that doesn't exist. It's kind of sad but it's also kinda of the perfect argument for simply destroying the internet as we know it

Some people just like to laugh at weirdos in the net that go ballistic upon being told they're retarded, it ain't that deep my dude you don't need 3 years of soul searching to figure that one out.
Most of us lead a perfectly functional life outside the net, unlike you

You don’t know what it’s like to have your name dragged in the mud

Because most of us will never do stupid shit like abusing our children

 

[Wheezy Asthmatic]

" nOtHiNg I sAiD iS gIvEn ThE bEnEfIt Of ThE dOuBt "

Hey remember how all of us believed Gabe when he outed his friend Nick as a pedophile & then I offered to have the thread locked + remove his IRL name if he stfu & focused on getting his kids back?

Goooood tiiiiimes.

I guess he's starting his MGTOW arc now

 

[Sneed's Feed And Seed]

Honestly the funniest part is that his ex wife DID have cameras in the house but he constantly disabled them.

He was well within his rights to. California is a "two party consent" state when it comes to recording.

 

[Pizdec]

Meow meow meow meow

Bro I'm not reading your autistic sperging, lmao.

 

[KhordKitty]

And as far as bring female goes...don't fucking go there

I will. Most studies have proven that 10% of all sexual assault accusations made by woman are provably false. This is according to most studies. Yet you want to ignore the fact a single false accusation destroyed a whole town in Oklahoma and got people literally MACHINE GUNNED IN A CHURCH by American citizens less then 100 years ago, were never given justice and you want to pretend that those 10% of mens lives who are RUINED must be ruined in silent.

I will go there, stay there forever until you understand that those 10% of false accusations have a consequences. It's evil being rewarded and good being punished, the whole purpose of cancel culture, whole purpose of this website, and YOUR purpose.

And as someone who tried to groom both his children AND a teenager who suffered from child sexual trauma...no.

Never happened because it's BY DEFINITION not grooming. Let me educate you if you are able to learn. The definition of grooming is the emotional manipulation of a victim with the purpose of having them do an illegal act:

Say the illegal act that the child AND teenager were manipulated into doing! If you're unable to name the illegal act then the term grooming is not only being misused but an insult against REAL victims of grooming.

If you're going to pretend I ever abused anyone, best thing you can do is stop abusing the english language. You should know better. Use the word grooming as it's defined by the dictionary, like I AM DOING. I am literally the only one here using grooming as it's defined! You should learn words meaning before you abuse them.

You have a bad reputation because YOU earned it

Right, because when Dick Rowland tripped and fell while entering an elevator, it was HIS FAULT for starting the riot that caused the Greenwood Oklahoma church to be machine gunned with innocent children screaming on the inside of it! It was HIS fault for being falsely accused of sexual assault in the newspaper. It was HIS ACTIONS of stepping in that elevator that caused the largest act of racial ethnic cleansing since the civil war in American history. GREENWOOD WAS DESTROYED because of Dick Rowland according to your logic.

Right, Dick Rowlands actions really earned it. Nice logic. Makes sense. Too bad it's flawed beyond measure. There is no logic in cancel culture: Just chaos and malice made by a group of objectively psychotic bloodthursty psychopaths. Tusla Farmers of 1921 and the KiwiFarmers of 2020, logically identical, identical in their blind rage.

You are just assmad that you

Did you literally just ignore my paragraph about projection of emotions? That was like, the first thing that I said upon my return and you're literally proving every word I said to be true. Nice projecting. I already asked how I could prove I'm not motivated by emotion and no one was able to answer the question prior, I don't expect anyone to answer it now.

You are a monster.

Dick Rowland was considered a monster too and that's why the 100 year old cover-up happened, because people were too stupid to think for themselves, You are NO exception.

disgusting person finally got a taste of what you truly deserve

Your sexism has permanently impaired that part of your brain that comprehends the concept of cost and reward benefits.

When my ex slanders me on KiwiFarms, there is no cost because #BELIEVEALLWOMAN is in the foundation of the thinking that destroyed the town of Greenwood, Oklahoma. It's the thinking that resulted in the execution of black children as they screamed, bullets passed through them as they preyed in a Church in the United States of America before being thrown in ditch covered in the blood of their family and classmates, forgotten for 99 years.

When my ex slanders me on KiwiFarms, there is MAXIMUM REWARDS. During such a stressful time this is the absolute #1 best possible time to get wishes of comfort and emotional support. What better way to get rewarded with emotional support then slandering someone you don't like publicly. That ex made you upset, you should make them upset! Makes sense. Feels good They obviously can't prove false accusations to be false because no one was there. There weren't cameras anywhere. You can say anything happened, everyone will believe you and reward your false victimhood status with ENDLESS emotional support and the motivation to lie grows stronger and stronger and stronger.

Cost and reward benefit. There is no cost to her publicly slandering me and a maximum benefit.

Under no circumstances can any part of your brain understand that I'm being truthful, moral, because your sexism is so intense that you're unable to believe that a woman would literally betray the truth of every single REAL victim by claiming false victimhood status PUBLICLY. But that's exactly what's happening and that's clearly something I don't think you'll ever understand.

I am only victim here and I really don't like that.

Honestly the funniest part is that his ex wife DID have cameras in the house but he constantly disabled them

Not during the marriage. That was post separation, made for the female caregiver, and while it was installed I was training to give out Obama-phones at the time in poor neighborhoods.

thats the first step towards recovery

While I love attention, I don't do actions with the motivation of gaining attention as a consequence. I am a naturally born entertainer. My need for attention was undoubtedly a reason I became a professional actor. I dare you find an actor who hates to be seen.

Have you consider that perhaps speaking every single thought you ever had on your life on the internet is not a good idea?

Define good. Is good being uncancellable and pasteurized? Yeah, you can keep that good. I'll do me.

Some people just like to laugh at weirdos in the net that go ballistic upon being told they're retarded

That's called bullying. It's not new. Both of my parents suffered it, my siblings suffered it, it's one of those things that really don't serve any purpose in society. There is no way to fight bullying so I don't let it bother me.

Most of us lead a perfectly functional life outside the net, unlike you

Yes, comparing satellite photos of a house to a photograph of a 2 year old playing with water is a perfectly functional life. Totally.

Feel free to tell me how I'm not leading a perfectly functional life. I have a good job, a good home, great friends, cool hobbies, got some accomplishments in the belt, and I love making other people happy. I dare you to try and find the dysfunction.

Because most of us will never do stupid shit like abusing our children

So you're trying to prove that public slander is ok just because you believe the public slander? Yeah ok.

I offered to have the thread locked + remove his IRL name if he stfu & focused on getting his kids back?

No, you told me to disassociate with the fandom, go dark and that basically means removing 99.99% of all of my contacts. How about: No.

Some how you're trying to add positive value to the advice Dick Rowland got when he was told to leave town for his own good. KiwiFarms and TuslaFarms have the identical cancel culture mindset: "We lie, so you should leave, thx"

Bro I'm not reading your autistic sperging, lmao.

And you're responding to it, clearly you care. How thoughtful.

 

[Leonard Helplessness]

Gabriel is posting quite a lot. I hope he enjoys making an ass of himself as much as we enjoy mocking him for doing so. I got as far as the first paragraph of that one post on the last page before stopping at something I found very fascinating.

Literally everybody is telling me to stop speaking. Everybody. Every single person I know to whom I've ever talked to in regards to KiwiFarms has told me I should stop speaking. Even you are all pressuring me to stop speaking. You're not pressuring each other to stop speaking, just me. That's what I've noticed:

People are not telling you that you cannot post here; they are telling you that you should not post here. They are telling you this because there is nothing you could possibly post here that would improve the public's perception of you, and in fact, every post you make here is making things worse for you. You are correct that the First Amendment guarantees your right to act the fool and burn your reputation to ash in front of the entire world, but the right to do such a thing does not make it a good idea. This is particularly true when you are saying things that you think will make you look good, but a combination of ignorance and poor character causes them to have the opposite effect. Your wild ranting does you no favors no matter where you post it.

Talk is cheap; it will do you very well to understand that. If you want to actually improve your reputation, do so via actions. Do not talk about those actions; let them speak for themselves. It will take awhile; that is how the world works. In the words of some rich fucker, "It takes 20 years to build a reputation and five minutes to ruin it."

As a reminder, Gabriel, this thread exists because you could not keep your mouth shut. A random person made a post mentioning you and including some screenshots of things you had said, and people laughed for a few minutes before moving onto something else that amused them. You would never have been noticed by us again had you not registered an account here in an ill-conceived attempt to defend yourself. Your attempts to clear your name were so terrible and self-defeating that we took a specific interest in you, and a separate thread was launched specifically to discuss your eccentricity and foolishness. You, by the way, are this thread's top contributor.

You have dug yourself a hole, Gabe, and your friends are begging you to stop digging, but in response you only scoff and redouble your efforts. I would pity you, if not for that your terrible behavior has damaged so many lives in addition to your own.

 

[StrawberryDouche]

I will. Most studies have proven that 10% of all sexual assault accusations made by woman are provably false. This is according to most studies. Yet you want to ignore the fact a single false accusation destroyed a whole town in Oklahoma and got people literally MACHINE GUNNED IN A CHURCH by American citizens less then 100 years ago, were never given justice and you want to pretend that those 10% of mens lives who are RUINED must be ruined in silent.

Citation needed.

Are you contending that 51% of all "studies" purport to show that 10% of sexual assault cases made by women are false? Doesn't it then follow that 49% of all "studies" refute that figure? Do they report that figure to be higher or lower than 10%? I'm going to need you to show your work, son.

I happen to know a little something about these stats, so come correct.

 

[Lady Pigroach]

Oh look, the dog raping pedophile is back.

Hi Gabeee!

 

[PK Shitstorm]

While I love attention, I don't do actions with the motivation of gaining attention as a consequence. I am a naturally born entertainer. My need for attention was undoubtedly a reason I became a professional actor. I dare you find an actor who hates to be seen.

You start by denying doing shit for attention, then immediately say you do, what kind of mental gymnastics do you practice? ill grant you that you're a natural born entertainer, otherwise you wouldn't be here

Define good. Is good being uncancellable and pasteurized? Yeah, you can keep that good. I'll do me.

"Good" as in not loosing your children, also love how you ignored the second part of that comment

That's called bullying. It's not new. Both of my parents suffered it, my siblings suffered it, it's one of those things that really don't serve any purpose in society. There is no way to fight bullying so I don't let it bother me.

Seems like you completely ignored the second part of that comment too, because we both agree, but there's a clear divisive line between bullying someone at middle school or work for being a little quirky and shaming a sexual predator

Yes, comparing satellite photos of a house to a photograph of a 2 year old playing with water is a perfectly functional life. Totally.

I don't see how that would discredit someone having a normal life? anyone can do that if there's anything to gain from it, its not like that's next level obsessive hacking you know?

Feel free to tell me how I'm not leading a perfectly functional life. I have a good job, a good home, great friends, cool hobbies, got some accomplishments in the belt, and I love making other people happy. I dare you to try and find the dysfunction.

You lost your children lol

So you're trying to prove that public slander is ok just because you believe the public slander? Yeah ok.

Its not slander if you lost your court case

 

[Just A Butt]

Literally everybody is telling me to stop speaking. Everybody. Every single person I know to whom I've ever talked to in regards to KiwiFarms has told me I should stop speaking. Even you are all pressuring me to stop speaking. You're not pressuring each other to stop speaking, just me. !

lol shut the fuck up.

 

[Samoyed]

Citation needed.

Are you contending that 51% of all "studies" purport to show that 10% of sexual assault cases made by women are false? Doesn't it then follow that 49% of all "studies" refute that figure? Do they report that figure to be higher or lower than 10%? I'm going to need you to show your work, son.

I happen to know a little something about these stats, so come correct.

he's getting that number from a youtube debater who likes horse pp.

also the irony here:

person a: "women should get justice for bad stuff that's happened to them"

chord, the dude whose pretends to act like a cat and has raped a female minor:

all wooman lie

 

[Lady Pigroach]

reeeee that teenager I showed my pp to was lying!!

 

[KhordKitty]

They are telling you this because there is nothing you could possibly post here that would improve the public's perception of you

I am not trying to improve any perception, I'm just fact checking it. I am one who believes the truth is way more interesting then any lies. I am a podcast host, and your expecting me to not talk about my life and views? Seriously. What type of expectation is that?

If I cared about improvising my perception then I'd actually go clothing shopping. Seriously, I think all of my clothes are crap that I got for a gift, work clothes, or stuff left over from former roommates. If I cared about my perception I'd freggan brush my hair more instead of letting it go crazy. If I cared about my perception I'd probably making a youtube series trying to prove I was the wokest cat in the world. It'd be tragic and fruitless cuz there is no point is trying to be well liked all the time by being a fake.

As a reminder, Gabriel, this thread exists because you could not keep your mouth shut.

Actually, no. The poster was a victim of a real sexual assault so when they were informed about the false accusation they believed it to be true as a way to try and make some sort of a karmatic gesture. Hell, I love Karma, its deeply a part of my fursona backstory and the people who engage in sexual assaults are some of the most evil people in society.

I have no control over false rumors. But I can control how I react to it. I can fact-check. I don't give two shits about my reputation. Back in 2018 on KiwiFarms I was fact checking then and I'm fact checking now.

Of COURSE you have a problem with fact checking, you're basically in the league of yellow journalists. I'm your worst enemy because the truth I reveal is SLIGHTLY LESS SENSATIONALISTIC!

I would pity you, if not for that your terrible behavior has damaged so many lives in addition to your own.

How has it damaged anyones lives exactly?

Citation needed.

False accusation of rape - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

but there's a clear divisive line between bullying someone at middle school or work for being a little quirky and shaming a sexual predator

The definition of a sexual predator is someone who is trying to do a criminal act. What is the criminal act? Again, the only abuse that is happening is you're abusing the english language. You don't even know what the words grooming or sexual predator actually mean!

I don't see how that would discredit someone having a normal life?

Stalking toddlers is abnormal. You're trying to tell me John Wayne Gacy was a normal dude cuz he dressed up as a clown at parties? Rich.

You lost your children lol

None of my choices resulted in that.

Its not slander if you lost your court case

I haven't lost any court case.

reeeee that teenager I showed my pp to was lying!!

Sexual preditors and groomers are trying to do a crime. To use those terms you need to know what the crime is. What is the crime exactly?

 

[Lady Pigroach]

statutory rape
soliciting a minor for nudes online
flashing your dongle at people

 

[Lion]

i love when clowns never learn and come back

 

[PK Shitstorm]

The definition of a sexual predator is someone who is trying to do a criminal act. What is the criminal act? Again, the only abuse that is happening is you're abusing the english language. You don't even know what the words grooming or sexual predator actually mean!

the crime? Showing your dick to a minor

Stalking toddlers is abnormal. You're trying to tell me John Wayne Gacy was a normal dude cuz he dressed up as a clown at parties? Rich.

Pretty sure the only one stalking toddlers here is you

None of my choices resulted in that.

So you're telling me NONE of that was your fault? that you're completely and absolutely blameless in any of this? pretty sure you must do something horribly wrong to loose your children like that, otherwise they wouldn't had taken them away

I haven't lost any court case.

What about loosing your children? isn't that a court case?, granted not a big flashy court case but a small private one

Sexual preditors and groomers are trying to do a crime. To use those terms you need to know what the crime is. What is the crime exactly?

the crime? Showing your dick to a minor.
lol at this nigger using wikipedia as a source at least use the proper sources wikipedia uses not the article.
What's the matter my guy? you made a name of yourself by posting bibles of word salads and now you're not even answering to half the shit we are posting? are you conceding we are right or are you getting winded? come on puppet, dance for us

 

[Knojkamarangasan_#4]

Literally everybody is telling me to stop speaking. Everybody. Every single person I know to whom I've ever talked to in regards to KiwiFarms has told me I should stop speaking. Even you are all pressuring me to stop speaking. You're not pressuring each other to stop speaking, just me. That's what I've noticed:

People say "Oh, I saw it on KiwiFarms so it must be true!" and yet none of them think that Yellow journalism can exist in the 21st century. The tabloid format with poorly researched and mostly inaccurate hearsay made with sensational headlines is only one of the major traditions that has been going on for centuries. The race massacre in Tulsa, Oklahoma was a direct consequence of yellow journalism. In yellow journalism: (almost) All parties win.

The victims of the falsehoods can't defend themselves so they go into hiding or are pressured to do so. The sellers of the newspapers and the journalists themselves both get commended for their bad writing because it results in higher sales. And the masses are given the satisfaction of believing a real good-vs-evil dichotomy somehow existed, the exposure of evil was serving the greater good.

This good-vs-evil dichotomy is very clear in this thread. Obviously if I found out someone was a pedophile, a zoophile, a child abuser, women abuser or worse I'd want them to be publicly exposed pronto. Fandom doesn't need any more perverts. People wanting to punish and expose evil is a very very good thing!

So far the entire argument that I'm a pedophile is based solely on the fact that I clicked "Watch this user" on an artist who drew, what I consider to be, the most fantastic piece of furry I've ever seen in my life.

View attachment 1443041

It features a character named Stoaty made by a furry artist from Finland named Mikachu who I was a skype contact with about a decade ago. I wanted to show support for this artist because I admired the lighting job and again I have never seen a more awesome picture made by any furry EVER. I saw no harm in pressing "Watch" for this artist because it was fantastic art and I hadn't the foresight to think a group of internet trolls would try to claim that I liked all of the OTHER disgusting fetish art the artist drew too.

This forum is basically centered around cancel-culture before it was popular. Just like all the stupid annoying call out posts which say "Everyone should block the people who watch this Twitter because that user said something that sounded ambiguously racist in March 21st 2012 at 6:25am in the morning! Let's CANCEL THIS BASTARD!"

Exact same logic applies here. By showing support to the artist who drew someone, Mikachu, who I believe is one of the most talented toon-style artists in the fandom somehow all of you believe I need to be cancelled JUST BECAUSE the artist who made this picture ALSO makes other art that is objectively deplorable.

Just because John Doe wants to watch the twitter of someone who likely said something ambiguously racist on March 21st 2012 at 6:25am in the morning, SOMEHOW John Doe needs to be publicly crucified

Just because I watch an artist doesn't mean I approve of all of their art, and just because John Doe watched the Twitter of someone who once said something ambiguously racist 8 years ago doesn't mean that John Doe has a Klu-Klax-Klan outfit sitting in the closet!

I admit, sometimes Donald Trump will say something that I totally agree with. It's true. A quote will pop out, and my mind will say "Okay, this is extremely agreeable. I have no problem with this!" Does it mean I'll vote for the guy? No, I'm voting for Joe Biden. That's a fact.

But if I show approval for a single quote from Donald Trump, that is an invite to be publicly executed because of the cancel-culture norm: "You can't endorse any quote, film, art, or product from anyone UNLESS you approve of every quote, film, art, or product they have ever made!"

KiwiFarms has adopted this same psychologically disturbed cancel-culture logic.

Why do I have to approve of all of the objectively deplorable art of Lando just because I've fallen deeply in love with one picture?
Why would I need to wear a MAGA hat just because I found one agreeable quote he said once?
Why does John Doe have to unwatch the Twitter of someone who said something ambiguously racist in 2012?
Why does Kevin Hart have to be removed as Oscar host because he said some homophobic material in the past?

It's all for the exact same reason: The purveyors of cancel-culture are THIRSTY FOR BLOOD and believe you can ONLY associate and endorse people who have ONLY created universally palatable art/quotes/actions/products. Nobody can measure up to this standard obviously.

If you're reading this, in YOUR closet is a group of skeletons that you don't want to get there because you KNOW that no single person who can live their life with universally palatable actions. Like a horde of rabid jackals you descend on the pray because they happen to be victims who, for a second, FAILED to self-censor an unpalatable art/quote/action/product. A DEPLORABLE association!

KiwiFarms is a hub for cancel culture, whose foundation is to create an upper class of those who have hidden their unpalatable actions to oppress a lower class of those who haven't hidden their unpalatable actions.

Of COURSE your closet is full of skeletons. Of COURSE is no crime you're accusing people of that you haven't done yourself. OF COURSE you and everyone you've ever met will never measure up to the standard of uncancellablity.

As I said in the last post, this forum is the perfect argument for the abolishment of the internet as a whole. A sea of degenerate deplorables calling everyone degenerate deplorables endlessly in a cycle to try and claim the title of moral arbiter because ONLY the moral arbiter has power.

The power of turning an innocent 19-year old black shoeshiner from Tulsa Oklahoma named Dick Rowland into some type of INSANE MOLESTING DANGEROUS RAPIST using nothing more then the power of words, gullibility and completely nonsensical nonevidence.

Yellow journalism and cancel culture is extremely dangerous. It has the power to reward the evil and punish the good using misinformation, false narratives, and creating a new Religion where every single person must measure up to a unobtainable standard while being trained to search and destroy for anyone who also can't met that standard. This is the epicenter of that objectively insane mindset.

This whole thread has one message: "Cancel Khord Kitty!" and just like those amoral Tusla journalists you will continuously be awarded for your lack of journalistic standards. As you falsify a good-vs-evil narrative out of thin air out of pure entertainment sake you'll ALWAYS be rewarded for doing so.

And if anyone thinks its extremely inappropriate for me to compare myself to a black person, lemme show you something I discovered last night:

View attachment 1443077

This is a record of my 5th great grandfather, William Duncan, from the 1786 Pennsylvania Septennial census. After her or his parents traveled through the underground railroad he ended up at the last station: Lancaster, PA and then traveled to Middletown, PA to settle down and start a family. He is listed as a free man because all African Americans who weren't slaves were on their own list. Being needlessly oppressed and vilified is kind of in my DNA at this point.



Why do you keep reading? You must really want to see it or else you wouldn't be commenting.



Though there is no proof, there doesn't need to be proof. No proof was needed to get Dick Rowlands life "cancelled". All that was needed was yellow journalism. How interesting: 99 Years later human nature HASN'T CHANGED.

Let's compare 1921s Tusla Oklahoma and 2020s KiwiFarms.

1. Using no evidence yellow journalism is utilized to publicly accused someone of a sexual assault that never happened.
2. People react with horror because while the voiceless victim gets framed as the evil perpetrator and the evil journalists become take the role of the Godly "Cancel squad".
3. Good becomes evil as evil becomes good, and the masses will never be given the truth because only one side has a voice: The yellow journalist who is motivated by pure sensationalism and greed, but never with integrity or truth.
4. Repeatedly the target of the harassment, accusations, and scorn is recommended to go into hiding, to leave town, to get away, FAR AWAY as fast as they can because there is no hope left for them.
5. Using the yellow journalism and false slander: rumors become the "new facts" and are used to try and justify eternal harassment and scorn.
6. Proof is purely circumstantial, one side is ignored, and once side is promoted to a mass audience as the "gossipal" truth.
7. The yellow journalists are endlessly rewarded because their writings as so sensational that they result in a mass uptick in viewership thanks to the boundless entertainment value.
8. The impassioned masses mindlessly play a game of Telephone where false rumors are morphed with every single rotation of the rumor mill.
9. Reality is warped beyond recognition as morality is sacrificed because the endless supply of gullibility of the masses.
10. Because men are naturally pumped full of more testosterone through their adrenal glands they are traditionally in a power position and ALWAYS it's healthy and encouraged to distrust everyone in a power position. So literally the word of a biological woman is more powerful then any evidence.

All it took was the word of elevator operator Sarah Page to justify the firebombing and destruction of Greenwood, Oklahoma. And now all of you are taking the word of my ex, who is undoubtedly being untruthful to justify my public crucifixion?

What exactly am I supposed to do against a machine-gun fire of complete lies? What did Dick Rowland do?

Dick Rowland escaped in fear from the bloodthursty, cancelthursty, mindless mobs, greedy sales-oriented yellow journalists, subjective moral arbiters, chronically bias, and dangerously gullible dumbasses.

As people repeatedly beg me to escape from this particular NEW incarnation of bloodthursty, cancelthursty, mindless mobs, greedy views-oriented yellow journalists, subjective moral arbiters, chronically bias, and dangerously gullible dumbasses I keep thinking the same damn thing:

You really think I'm going to singlehandledly destroy cancel culture by REWARDING IT? That's really stupid. 99 years after Tusla Oklahoma AMERICAN SOCIETY HAS NOT CHANGED A DAMN BIT!

99 years of African-Americans and descendants of African-Americans running away in fear from the blood-thrusty psychopathic liars who are hiding in sheeps clothing. The one giant danger in Tusla wasn't really the journalists and their newspaper:

It was the boundless ability of mankind to replace truth with lies, punish good, reward evil, and to place their full trust in those with malice intent.

Not much difference between a 1921 Tusla Farmer and a 2020 KiwiFarmer. Both are equally amoral as they fool themselves into thinking otherwise.

We are not your personal therapist or some shit, just some losers laughing at a retarded dogfucker/pedo/pathetic and shitty dad who feels the need to write paragraphs of text defending himself from literally everything said when said things are based on actual facts and evidence.

And lmao "cancel culture" is the farthest from what the farms is. People here just document stuff for fun, fucking with people is actively discouraged. And even people here may disagree on the whole doxxing thing but that's a debate for another day, I just consider myself for example to be an observer and nobody would care much about this thread if it wasn't for the fact that Gabe feels the need to keep it going. You if anyone has caused this thread to keep getting pages. I know I shouldn't get MATI talking to a crazy person but just .

Then again, I guess we are to Gabe what the farms is to tooter in a way. One of the few outlet where he get to vent however he please to an eager audience so who knows
Also stop writing Jake Alley type rants about so much but so little substance, it's just dumb.

Man imagine if that ancestor way back would know his descendant would one day dance around pretending to be a giant cat that fucks a woman in a bunny costume, molesting dogs and being a shit dad, Maybe slavery wouldn't be so bad if it had prevented that outcome? Eat shit furfag.

 

[Leonard Helplessness]

I am not trying to improve any perception, I'm just fact checking it. I am one who believes the truth is way more interesting then any lies. I am a podcast host, and your expecting me to not talk about my life and views? Seriously. What type of expectation is that?

I have come to expect very little of you other than that you will continue making decisions that are so poor that they make me laugh. This is why it delights me that you have returned to your thread.

You claim to be fact checking, but even the worst journalists in the industry will try to cite sources and evidence when they set out to fact check something. When someone in this thread accuses you of doing something terrible, your typical response is either to deny it (which is hearsay) or to say that your actions are not actually bad (which is to confess to them).

As for the lives you have damaged: Your children are growing up without their father. This is very widely known to be damaging to childrens' development, and the courts would not have granted Deb sole custody had they not determined that it would be even more damaging to them to be in contact with you. Deb is having to raise your children alone, at the same time that she is trying to rebuild her life after she let you into it and you tore it to pieces.

I have known many people who grew up without their fathers. Even when their mothers remarried and their stepfathers were kind and loving, those people are scarred for life. You have failed the children whom you brought into the world, and no amount of child support will repair that, assuming (charitably) that you are even paying it.

 

[StrawberryDouche]

False accusation of rape - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Hi. A Wikipedia page is not "a study", and therefore cannot be a majority of them.

God, you're such an oily, vacant little failure.

 

[KhordKitty]

statutory rape
soliciting a minor for nudes online
flashing your dongle at people

She was the legal age of consent, so statutory rape doesn't apply.
I have never done that, nor is there any evidence that I have ever done that. Do you know the date or time of the crime?
Not a crime, they asked me to do it.

i love when clowns never learn and come back

I can't learn from people who don't want to use the actual definitions of words.

the crime? Showing your dick to a minor

Which crime # is that? Federal or state?

Pretty sure the only one stalking toddlers here is you

You must of never read the OP.

So you're telling me NONE of that was your fault? that you're completely and absolutely blameless in any of this?

Absolutely.

pretty sure you must do something horribly wrong to loose your children like that, otherwise they wouldn't had taken them away

Which is perfectly logical thinking! I thought the exact same thing until I got to see the system on the up-close. Criminal law and family law don't function in the same way at all. It's different. I can't give out details.

at least use the proper sources wikipedia uses not the article

Yeah, acting proper to trolls. Really funny.

Eat shit furfag.

Keep hiding behind your computer knight. Keep cancelling, you're on a roll.

your typical response is either to deny it (which is hearsay) or to say that your actions are not actually bad (which is to confess to them)

Because you can't prove a negative. If something never happened then you can't prove it never happened. You need to address proof that it did happen.

If I say "I WAS WITH YOUR MOTHER LAST NIGHT IN HER BEDROOM!" you wouldn't suddenly be expected to prove that I wasn't in her bedroom. That's not the way court or logic works. You have to first prove the act happened in order to then disprove it.

Disproving a negative is an impossible task. Remember the people trying to prove there were no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq? Yeah, they were completely fucked because proving a negative is impossible.

Yet you expect me to prove a negative.

at the same time that she is trying to rebuild her life after she let you into it and you tore it to pieces.

How did I tear it to pieces?

no amount of child support will repair that, assuming (charitably) that you are even paying it.

I already said multiple times there is no order. She is literally lying and your sexism is so strong you can't even believe it to humanly possible that a MAN would tell the truth.

I have known many people who grew up without their fathers. Even when their mothers remarried and their stepfathers were kind and loving, those people are scarred for life

Yeah I know. I have already done absolutely everything humanly possible , legal, moral, and ethical to do the right thing. There is nothing more that can be done from my end. Absolutely everyone who is privy to the details knows and agrees with that.

If you really think a court order exists asking for child support, why don't you ask them to show you it? If it really exists then they'll do it without hesitation. If not, then you got duped!

Hi. A Wikipedia page is not "a study", and therefore cannot be a majority of them.

It's 20 studies on a list. Would you prefer 20 links or a comprehensive list?