Baloney Face
Full of baloney.
Trans racial has been a very common phenomenon all along, only the terminology is new.if transgender okay, why isn't transracial okay?
It used to be called "passing for white".
Trans racial has been a very common phenomenon all along, only the terminology is new.if transgender okay, why isn't transracial okay?
Especially since race has even less biological correlations (none, according to really woke scientists) than sex.if transgender okay, why isn't transracial okay? just explain it.
because its exactly the same, pretending to be something you have never actually been, all based on outward stereotypes. "i like basketball & hip hop so i'm black"
Because critical theory and identity politics are really dumb and inconsistent. They must be totally expunged from academia.everybody needs to keep asking them this question.
look at what they did to rebecca tuvel for addressing this point. even being pro-troon didn't save her from the mob. this question infuriates them & its their weak link. they can't reply. they can't even come up with a :dumb: answer for this one.
if transgender okay, why isn't transracial okay? just explain it.
I'm not sure if this counts but Casimir Pulaski.
Pulaski was a Polish cavalryman who came to America to fight the British during the Revolutionary War. Pulaski, and the Hungarian Michael Fabriczy, are regarded as "The Fathers of American Cavalry". Pulaski died in the Battle of Savannah and the fate of his remains was always a debated thing. Some said he was buried at sea, while others alleged he was buried at different places. In 1996 some team excavated human remains from one such location and did all kinds of tests on it. They said the hip of the skeleton looked feminine so now, Casimir Fucking Pulaski, is alleged to be intersex and if you go to his wiki page it says he was LGBT.
View attachment 1240015
I only include this because trans acolytes like to talk about intersex people and shit and Casimir Pulaski doesn't deserve this kind of character assassination.
![]()
Casimir Pulaski, Polish Hero of the Revolutionary War, Was Most Likely Intersex, Researchers Say
Disputed remains were the right height and age and showed injuries consistent with the general’s life. There was just one catch: “The skeleton looked very female.”www.nytimes.com
This makes me irrationally angry.
1. Malcom was exceptional, watch his documentary, and don't pretend he was the smartest knife in the drawer.
2. He was a gay, black man in the 80s, who was also homeless. He was genuinely the epitome of oppressed and now some white faggot trannies are trying to coopt his experience as a gay, black man who was murdered. I don't like LGBT peoples too much, but Malcom was a kind human being who was taken advantage of too many times in his life.
There's some pretty fun examples of transracial people in the race faker thread, by the way. Four of them are transgender on top of being transracial.i notice zach made fun of sarah ditum but like every other troon, he still couldn't answer the question.
if transgender okay, why isn't transracial okay? just explain it.
because its exactly the same, pretending to be something you have never actually been, all based on outward stereotypes. "i like basketball & hip hop so i'm black"
what :else: could it be?
many of us white folks can now whip out DNA certificates proving we are 5% african american or whatever. but i guarantee you i am 0% female. yet they 'accept' the one with no actual percentage. why is that?
everybody needs to keep asking them this question.
look at what they did to rebecca tuvel for addressing this point. even being pro-troon didn't save her from the mob. this question infuriates them & its their weak link. they can't reply. they can't even come up with a :dumb: answer for this one.
if its obvious that transracialism/transgender have nothing in common, they should logically be able to explain why.
have at it, zach. but try not to be a raving trashy florida racist as you explain further.
She literally transitioned just so she could go to medical school and join the army. From wikipedia:Either way, it's generally hard to tell about people in the past. James Barry is a tough one. I do lean on the side that say they were a dude, or at least, intersex. It's usually easier to tell who was gay than who was trans.
The teenage Barry was educated with the prospect of becoming a tutor, but given a lack of evidence of any work history, the Bulkleys appear to have struggled to find Barry any suitable tutoring positions.[12] A conspiracy appears to have developed between Barry, Mary-Ann Bulkley and some of the late James Barry's influential, liberal-minded friends (General Francisco de Miranda, Dr Edward Fryer, who had become Barry's personal tutor, and Daniel Reardon, the family's solicitor) to enable the teenage Barry to enter medical school.[13] The University of Edinburgh was chosen and Mary-Ann and Barry boarded a Leith smack on 30 November 1809.[14] And so, Margaret Anne Bulkley became James Barry, nephew of the late James Barry RA the Irish romantic painter and remained known thus for the next 56 years.
I assume she didn't want to be outed even after death for fear that if news of her real sex spread, people might remember her as a degenerate pervert instead of a respectable surgeon. That's just a theory, though. All we know for sure is that her initial transition seemed unrelated to dysphoria.In a letter chiding John Bulkley, Barry's older brother, for abandoning legal studies for the military, 19-year-old Barry wrote: "Was I not a girl I would be a Soldier!"
That confusion can easily be cleared up by reminding people that Marsha died in 1992, when transgender and drag queen were known to be different things.Remember -- there really wasn't much distinction between crossdressers, trans people, or drag queens. They were all considered to be "transsexual". So I think that's why people get confused.
Many transpeople still act like their birth sex, they just convince themselves they don't even though it's obvious to everyone else. Prime example:If you want an actual answer, transgenderism is technically an illness in which a person with a male anatomy has a more female-oriented functioning brain so these two don't fit. I'm not saying it is like this, only that this is how gender disphoria is understood by the somehow sane members of the trans-activism community. Yes, there is not such a thing as a "female" or "male" brain, but certain behaviours specific to those genders do exist, and it's more than the brain, but a combination of factors involving the brain.
Now, transracial is a different thing because there isn't a "black brain" or a "polynesian brain" or an "asian brain". Not to say that race is also a very arbitrary definition, unlike gender. The characteristics associated with certain ethnic groups are either cultural or environmental. Or both, but not biological.
Now, you're telling me transpeople can't say this? Well, I guess it's because they don't want to admit they're sick and most people, like Zach are just pretending to be trans.
They need counselling. Despite agps squealing that it's murder, counselling is the first and last step for every other mental illness. Curious as to why it's not the case for agps.It exposed me to Blanchard's typology and a lot of the hard-to-swallow truths about the transgender community, namely that there is a clear delineation between transgender people based on sexual orientation i.e. AGP vs. homosexual transsexual (plenty of studies lend credence to Blanchard's typology but the real smoking gun, for me personally, was James Cantor's MRI study). Prior to this I just thought they were a group of odd but relatively harmless people who probably got exposed to too much estrogen or testosterone in the womb which turned their male brain into a lady brain or vice-versa (this is actually true for homosexual transsexuals to an extent, but they are a minority within the trans community, and regardless the structure of the homosexual-transsexual brain more closely mirrors the structure of (cis) homosexual males as opposed to heterosexual females).
That aside, I'm still not 100% sure how to approach this topic policy-wise. One of the few things I'm adamant about is not enabling transition in kids under 18, mainly because most of these kids are homosexual trannsexuals and will more likely than not become comfortable with the gender they were born as at some point in their adolescence, which we have plenty of evidence in favor of from Kenneth Zucker's research. The other thing that bothers me is the (admittedly TERF) talking point of the consequences of predatory AGP's being allowed into women's spaces. I've tried to keep a nuanced understanding of AGP, namely that it's more akin to a full-blown sexual orientation rather than a simple fetishistic disorder, that the process from transvesitic fetishism -> MtF is long, complex, unique, and not exactly a concious "choice" of the autogynephile
But at the end of the day: the primary motivation for transition among AGP's across the board is the steady care packages of dopamine they derive from the sexual thrill of 'becoming' a woman. This means that everything from someone "correctly gendering" them to the act of them buying tampons at CVS is a sexual act that arouses them. Similarly, joining an all women's gym or a women's only spa is also an inherently erotic activity for the AGP, wherein they make people (very often cis women, who AGP are primarily sexually attracted to) unwitting performers in their inverted sexual fantasies.
Now comes the hard part. AGP's throw full-blown narcissistic rage-fits when their preferred "gender identity" is not acknowledged in exactly the way they want it to be. If an AGP is denied access to a women's space, or is "misgendered" etc., events can transition (heh) into a violent, possibly deadly encounter depending on how deep the narcissistic wound you gave them digs into their ego. This is why I'm skeptical of the types of 'compromise' that many sexologists are willing to pursue when it comes to the Trans Question. Blanchard suggests that we grant AGP's a partial legal recoginition when it comes to their preferred gender identity, i.e. changing gender on license, letting people who are accepting of AGP sexuality humor AGP's as much as they want. But this will also be met with a ban on AGP's regarding strictly-women's spaces, as well as a more widespread social understanding of how autogynephilic sexuality operates. While I think this proposal is the perfect balance between respect for the AGP's preferred way to live, as well as individual-rights to not unwittingly be dragged into someone else's sexual fantasies, this will never be accepted by the mainstream in any significant way. AGP's simply will not stand for anything other than "treated EXACTLY like natal women under all circumstances" or else you're committing a heckin erasure/bigoted violence.
And this is a shame too, because Blanchard is a world-renowned sexologist with an h-index of 65, but despite the widespread acceptance of his ideas in the field he's been working in for 4+ decades, the mainstream is far more skewed towards manichean moralism when it comes to discussions on this topic, i.e. trans people are an oppressed group and the activists behind the movement are always right no matter what. It's difficult to communicate any of these ideas in a public setting without getting death threats galore, just look at Jesse Singal. And I know this post is an autistic, adderal driven wall of text so I'm gonna close this up nicely: Trans people are humans just like you and me, they deserve respect, and in many cases someone not being allowed to transition is disasterous for their mental health, but at the same time it is simply not acceptable to let unwitting normies become part of their sexual roleplaying. We need to figure out a way to honor the dignity of AGP's while also communicating that it's completely fucked to drag oblivious normies into their fetishistic roleplay
I think this will be unpopular, but I have always had a theory, and this is the only place I can say it without the woke mob going after me.
I don't doubt many of them have gender dysphoria as a real psychological issue. I would like say people like Iron Liz.
But I think actual dysphoria cases are even smaller than people think. Consider the fact that even though they are still a minority the cases of trans people have skyrocketed with woke culture enabling them, I feel like there must be something else at play. If it was just dysphoria, something in their brains they were born with, their numbers would be steady not growing.
I suspect there is another cause, especially for those that don't suffer from dysphoria (that is the belief they have always been women) yet are transexuals: Envy. I would put people like CWC in this category.
This also explains why most of them are MTF, which outnumber FTM by a lot. It's not that women can't have envy (obviously). But it's rather that men are envying something very specific.
The fact of the matter is that many men, like incels, tend to resent the fact that Young attractive women have a lot of male attention, because, let's face it, a lot of men especially the younger ones are desperate and thirsty. So you see them in real life and places like twitch with many loser men treating women like literal goddesses. Be society, biology, or whatever, men are expected to go after women.
So they think Women have it much easier.
But, unlike incels, instead of resenting women, they try to become one. CWC resented all the hardwork he had to make for his "love quest". Why should he "suffer" so much when people can have a "love quest" for him?
I read an article of one transgender that said that he liked to pretend to be a woman in WOW, for all the extra attention, and that convinced him to transition.
They don't seem to get how most women don't get that attention, and that being a woman isn't easy as they think. So they delude themselves to think that transitioning will make them as privileged as the 1% of women (attractive celebrities, literal supermodels, and instathots) all while ignoring the fact that most women don't get that much attention. They don't see the plain-looking receptionist or, maid or office worker.
Their delusion is to think that transitioning will give them something not even most actual ciswomen can't have.
They have an idealized idea of what being a woman is, so that's why you see them using fantasy names. And that's why many of them are "lesbians". In reality, they are still attracted to women, it's just that they want to have the supposed privileges they think women have.
offence archaeologists
same reason why drug addicts see rehab as abuse. They enjoy wallowing in their disgusting fetish.They need counselling. Despite agps squealing that it's murder, counselling is the first and last step for every other mental illness. Curious as to why it's not the case for agps.