Nah, I think is just more of the same stuff as last week; remember when he was complaining about glowies on Twitter who didn't appreciate Graeme's CP stash on as many levels as Graeme does? "They just want girls as sex slaves; I want girls as lovers" etc?This is him building the ground on which he can claim he’s not a pedo because he “can’t” be attracted to those he doesn’t have a close emotional bond with. But maybe that only applies to humans, because he has posted ad nauseam about how much he loves fucking cartoon ponies.
Graeme's attraction to children is a matter of public record, and he can't really deny it at this point. If Graeme were smarter, I'd say this was Graeme building the grounds on which he can claim he's "one of the good pedos"; i.e. one of the pedos who doesn't hurt children, no no, he loves them and cares for them deeply, so he does. You see that kind of argument constantly with internet NOMAPs and unrepentant offending MAPs, too.
But I don't think Graeme has thought that far ahead. I think it's just a combination of virtue signaling, and Graeme being a naive, sentimental romantic, who has neither had a relationship with anyone outside of his own immediately family, nor has ever been in the position to have casual sex with a girl he only vaguely fancied.
Then again, who is the one family member Graeme seems to have genuine affection for...?





