One of the Guardian Film critics wrote a review of Roman Polanski's latest film, 'an officer and a spy'. It's based on a book by Robert Harris who's been a long term collaborator of Polanksi.
archive.fo
At one point it was going to be a major production, but now it's just a typical state funded French movie. Largely because #MeToo happened, and people started to figure drugging and raping a 13 year old girl, wasn't okay even in the 70's and you were an artiste.
The Article seems to have gone below the radar, as the writer uses the term 'statutory rape', which for starters isn't a term that's used by most UK journalists to refer to cases with a massive age imbalance, and secondly was the result of a generous plea bargain which didn't really cover what Polanski actually did to the girl. Also the article implies that Polanski is comparing himself to Dreyfus as being the victim of an Anti Semitic motivated charge, something the writer doesn't seem to disagree with.
I think it's going to go below the radar, the guardian haven't opened the article for comments, probably worried about anti antisemitism.
An Officer and a Spy review – Polanski's iron-heeled inquest into 189…
archived 31 Aug 2019 12:09:39 UTC
At one point it was going to be a major production, but now it's just a typical state funded French movie. Largely because #MeToo happened, and people started to figure drugging and raping a 13 year old girl, wasn't okay even in the 70's and you were an artiste.
The Article seems to have gone below the radar, as the writer uses the term 'statutory rape', which for starters isn't a term that's used by most UK journalists to refer to cases with a massive age imbalance, and secondly was the result of a generous plea bargain which didn't really cover what Polanski actually did to the girl. Also the article implies that Polanski is comparing himself to Dreyfus as being the victim of an Anti Semitic motivated charge, something the writer doesn't seem to disagree with.
I think it's going to go below the radar, the guardian haven't opened the article for comments, probably worried about anti antisemitism.