Manosphere Hannah Wallen - A Voice For Men contributor

[Too Many Crooks]

Discontented with slinging mud on "A Voice for Men", Wallen put up her own shitty website:

http://breakingtheglasses.blogspot.com/

Here, she rails against the "evils" of feminism in the same disingenuous manner that SJW radfems whine about "the patriarchy".

Her Twitter : https://www.twitter.com/Oneiorosgrip

Her YouTube :
https://m.youtube.com/channel/UC_7Bt0vnvdJqAwF8Ow8iT0g?

Her Twitter is full of strawmanning and anti-feminist whining full of numerous logical fallacies, while her YouTube surprisingly shows that she's not a man posing with a woman's name. Anyway, she sits in front of a camera whining about how terrible feminism is while she still benefits from it. Basically like an alternate version of Anita Sarkeesian. Except video games aren't brought up much.

To me, female MRAs are an interesting type of lolcow. It's easy to mock the crazy guys on Sluthate or Red pill... but what makes women act this way, I wonder?

 

[GL99]

Discontented with slinging mud on "A Voice for Men", Wallen put up her own shitty website:
To me, female MRAs are an interesting type of lolcow. It's easy to mock the crazy guys on Sluthate or Red pill... but what makes women act this way, I wonder?

A couple of reasons, I'd wager.

The first, of course, is internalized misogyny. Whether it's abuse from a mother or a bunch of "mean girls" growing up, some women for whatever reason believe what the manosphere says about them, and insist it must be true for all women, everywhere. It's a pity, and I can spare some sympathy for them...but not all that much. At some point any person who's been abused as a child, male or female, has to decide to either rise above that abuse or allow it to define them. The self-loathing women of the manosphere, much like its other residents--MGTOWs abused or raped by female caretakers, or their distaff counterparts, like radfems abused by their fathers--have chosen the latter.

The second reason, however, is far more calculated. Frankly, I'm torn between admiring its cunning and detesting its immorality and lack of dignity. It is exploiting the simple fact that most, if not all, manospambots are thirsty fools who'll mindlessly embrace any women who mouths the platitudes they want to hear...which makes them a nearly limitless source of both validation and cold, hard cash for any women willing to tell them that women suck. Wallen probably gets off on the laughably effusive praise showered on her by the simps (a favorite manospambot term--ironic they use it on others when it describes them much better) at AVFM. They hail her as some unparalleled sage when all she does is repackage the same tired misogynist bromides that were already old when her sisters repeated them for the ten thousandth time. If I were an attention whore, I could get as much of it as I could possibly want by baiting these rejects and giving them a tiny sliver of the validation they so desperately crave. The return on investment is truly impressive. A handful of crappy blog entries on a semi-regular basis and you'll get a legion of slavering fanboys bearing single-minded devotion usually found only amongst the thralls of famous actors or billion-subscriber Youtube personalities.

It's also quite easy to make money doing that. Women like Karen Straughan and "Dr." Helen pretty much support themselves through those means. It's astonishing just how many paypal donations you can get, or how many morons are willing to buy your laughably stupid books, if you happen to be a female who strokes their egos and reassures them that yes, women really ARE bad and useless and terrible, and you should never listen to any woman...except, of course, the woman talking to you right now, whose overpriced and under-researched drek you should shell out all your money for.

These gals certainly provide a good deal of laughter, though given the reasons described above, only some of it seems at their expense; the bulk of it at the expense of the larger manosphere which enables them.

 

[DrChristianTroy]

I would talk about how she's wrong about feminism. Or how she's wrong and, apparently, doesn't realize there's a medium ground. Basically all the typical MRA criticisms. Then I saw her YouTube avatar.

Just the most unflattering image. Now I just kind of feel bad for her.

 

[chimpburgers]

She gives me an unsettling feeling when I look at her face. She sounds like a more obscure version of girlwriteswhat (Karen Straughan).

 

[Too Many Crooks]

LOLwhat?

F in history class?

That awkward moment when you're as nasty as the idiot you're whining about:


I like to think of people like this as a reverse-CWC.

In their eyes, women (especially feminists) are JERKS, oppressing men, who in her eyes, are misunderstood, "rational nice guys" (TM) who are harassed, emasculated, and put-down incessantly by those "dang, dirty feminists".

...Or maybe Hannah Wallen was a jilted lesbian for most of her adult life.
Or her high school crush dated a feminist instead of a "nice girl" like her.

 

[DrChristianTroy]

"#FeministsAreUgly"

I know I'm harping but damn is this an ugly ass picture.

 

[AnOminous]

"#FeministsAreUgly"

I know I'm harping but damn is this an ugly ass picture.

That is like dudeface beyond Wu squared.

 

[Too Many Crooks]

"#FeministsAreUgly"

I know I'm harping but damn is this an ugly ass picture.

Ugly on the inside & out, man.

Anyway, it turns out that she has a bootlicker.

https://www.twitter.com/arcadiaoccult

 

[DrChristianTroy]

Ugly on the inside & out, man.

Anyway, it turns out that she has a bootlicker.

https://www.twitter.com/arcadiaoccult

"Witchcraft activist"
God damn that has to be a joke.

 

[Too Many Crooks]

"Witchcraft activist"
God damn that has to be a joke.

Sadly this bozo is for real. If you looked at his Patreon, he wants other people to pay the rent of the store he wants to open or some BS.

He said that witchcraft enlightened him so he found out that feminism was a cult

Anyway, Hannah Wallen is still salty and hypocritical.


"Hurr durr patriarchy!!!1!"

 

[K>C]

She's such a sad person, like a MRA version of Dan Burros.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dan_Burros

 

[Too Many Crooks]

Apparently, racist, anti-Semitic eugenicist Margaret Sanger is representative of every feminist.

Therefore "all feminists are as nasty as Sanger", as far as Wallen is concerned.


She has such a hate boner for feminists, there's GOTTA be a lame Freudian excuse somewhere. Because damn

...Ooh, here's a game. Replace "feminist" with a term for another marginalized group so you can see how crazy Wallen really is when you read her BS.

 

[Crack]

Hannah sounds like she's wholesale adopted far-right attitudes/rhetoric. Her Facebook page, which I've stuck at the end, gives more insight into her more broad political views, which are typically anti-government, anti-Obama, anti-government-healthcare. She posted positively about Ted Cruz a few years ago. But the difference clearly is that she runs a channel and a blog to further push these views.

She was one of the "victims" of the cleanout of the dark corners of Reddit
http://breakingtheglasses.blogspot.com.au/2015/07/letter-to-reddits-admins-on-subject-of.html

Spoiler: Reddit

I started using this site because I found it to be an effective and fun communication tool with which I could reach out to others who have similar interests.

We won't adopt a particular worldview if it becomes the only one permitted on Reddit.

The sections removed weren't that many.

f you want to limit Reddit to just another of several social sites dominated by one small, ideologically restricted portion of the population, you're doing it right.

She thinks everyone's secretly an MRA.

When women disagree with men
http://breakingtheglasses.blogspot.com.au/2015/06/the-feminist-derailing-fallacy.html

Spoiler: Women aren't allowed opinions

This is how American feminists manipulated the public and legislators into accepting a change from the genderless Family Violence Prevention and Services Act of 1984 to the female-specific, feminist research and training funding Violence Against Women Act of 1994. When men's advocates call for equal funding for assistance for men, feminists treat it as an attempt to siphon funds away from female victims they've convinced legislators and the public are more numerous and more in need.

Because domestic violence proportionally occurs against women far more often. Yes, men are victims, but like most government programs, they tend to work with addressing the majority's problem first.

The only way for nonfeminists to have open discussion that is not dominated by feminist rhetoric and feminist sensibilities is to simply have it; to refuse to allow such accusations to shut us down.

That's not what Hannah is doing, at all.

Responding to men's advocates discussing men's issues by deflecting to "toxic masculinity" is not an offer of information or effort to find a solution.

Calling women inferiour and allowing arguments based on entitlement is okay, according to Hannah.

and the continuation of oppressive discrimination against men into the 21st century

If feminists ever want to persuade intellectuals to accept the claim that feminism is not primarily about hating men they must first stop targeting men and boys with such dehumanizing labels.

How do women dehumanise men, and, how can she stand on that argument given the way MRAs talk about women?

On Abortion
http://breakingtheglasses.blogspot.com.au/p/blog-page.html

Spoiler: Might not be everyone's cup of tea - spergy

Offer a logical, reasonable explanation which proves that the reason being given for the abortion would be accepted as a legally valid reason to end the life of a grown man or woman.

Whatever someone's views on abortion, many abortions across the world are performed in jurisdictions which require a reason. The lives of many people are also ended in many countries, including by the US Military, which I note she is a strong supporter. The issue then becomes, who determines what is valid, and is one persons' valid another? One example is civilian casualties in the various conflicts that have occurred over decades, and that the US Military knew it was killing civilians on occasion that had nothing to do with terrorism. They felt this was justified. As a strong supporter of Veterans, does Hannah say this is justified? If investigated as a war crime (which it will never be) would it be found to not be? And here's another one for Hannah; some people that have been executed by the state for crimes in the USA have later been found to be innocent and pardoned. So does she justify their execution under her standard because at one point there was a just reason, even though they were innocent?

Further, it does not justify the 99% of abortions done strictly for the convenience of the mother, not due to any handicap or other gestational issue.

In the USA, the majority are done for economic reasons, being the mother/family is unable to afford a further child. Abortion rates are lower in countries with public healthcare and maternity/paternity support.

Oh and as far as one can see, if a woman was raped, Hannah thinks they should still be denied an abortion.

https://www.facebook.com/hannah.wallen.3

She also opposes public healthcare, but keep posting appeals to raise money for the sick/disabled to access private help. Go figure.

 

[Too Many Crooks]

Thanks for the info, @Crack .

A lot of far-right wing women hate feminism, probably because it's classified as liberal, therefore bad.

...Jeez, after reading that blog entry, she probably thinks everything is a malevolent conspiracy orchestrated by feminists. What the hell is her problem?? It's so singularly obsessive.

But I'm not surprised that she's whining about the "Reddit Revolt", either.

 

[Too Many Crooks]

Because you're not a self-loathing woman at ALL, you sexist clown:


The world will be a better place, and nothing of value would be lost!

 

[Trombonista]

Because you're not a self-loathing woman at ALL, you sexist clown:


The world will be a better place, and nothing of value would be lost!

If "internalized misogyny" ever needs an image on Wikipedia, then either these two tweets or Hannah's face would suffice.

 

[Too Many Crooks]

Hannah Wallen still hates women, news at 11.

Context: She mocks women who are writing about rape, sexual assault, etc. by saying feminism is awful, it's toxic, it's hateful, people who support it are ugly.

So much irony, huh?


And how is that a typical feminist, you stupid cunt?

Spoiler: stupidity

 

[Emiya Kiwitsugu]

If "internalized misogyny" ever needs an image on Wikipedia, then either these two tweets or Hannah's face would suffice.

She ironically proves the point made by feminists and many other similar groups about having the oppressor's viewpoint internalized in members of the oppressed group.

I think that's really my favorite thing about these sort of cases, such as red pill women or white supremacist blacks, in that they ultimately do more damage to their cause than help due to their very existence proving a point for their opposition.

 

[K>C]

Chuck her in ISILland for a few weeks and I'm sure she'll run back towards the West or whine about Salafis being Misandrists.

 

[DrChristianTroy]

Hannah Wallen still hates women, news at 11.

Context: She mocks women who are writing about rape, sexual assault, etc. by saying feminism is awful, it's toxic, it's hateful, people who support it are ugly.

So much irony, huh?

Quick question, how is writing about rape/sexual assault/etc being pro-feminism? Whether it's women or men writing it I think we can all agree that rape is pretty awful.

Another thing, why would they let her write on a site called A Voice For Men? Isn't a woman writing on the site, by nature, not the voice for men? I may be out of line but the site seems pretty flawed in their mission statement.