They want to claim Einstein because everyone knows E=MC2, (or at least know it means something super-important) but, they pass over Turing who WAS persecuted because his work isn't as well known in the public consciousness.
Shh-Einstein was Jewish, as were Kissinger, Feynman and Niels Bohr. Don't tell the revisionists.If they want to play the Nobel Prize game, and for that matter, to exclude most of the bullshit ones and only count the ones that majorly helped humanity, they'd have to face the fact that Jews are massively overrepresented in this population.
These following posts presently have over 175000 notes on Tumblr.
View attachment 57663
View attachment 57665
View attachment 57664
View attachment 57666
(A) Source
It actually is true that slave owners were paid $300 per slave—in the District of Columbia before the end of the Civil War and the passage of the 13th Amendment. Everywhere else, they just freed them.
Do Africans (outside of Egypt), Asians, Native Americans, etc not have feet?
That practice was axed at the Council of Trent.He then proceeded to tell his children (who, now it seems obvious why they were visiting a therapist) to avoid the Catholic Church because they would eat them in cannibalistic rituals.
The picture didn't load on my computer. Do you have another image?The scientific stuff is where the fun bits are. Hindu nationalists like to claim that all modern science was encoded in Hinduism, which gives us shit like this:
![]()
So you know how lazy assholes who want famous black people so bad they'll turn people black just because? All while ignoring awesome historical figures like Mansa Musa, Shaka Zulu, Jugurtha, and the Nubian Dynasties of Egypt? Particularly the dumb fucks that try to paint the Ancient Egyptians as black, even though they were about the same complexion as most of North Africa? Welp, they ain't the only people they try to do this to. They also try to do this with the Punic peoples, particularly Hannibal Barca. Even though... you know, they hailed from Phoenicia originally. Particularly around Lebanon. But hey, that's because clearly the lands of Caanan were OG black too!
For examples of this shoe eating idiocy, sift through the comments here:
And here's some pretty bad examples of such idiocy.
It's like how some people want x popular character be trans or black or whatever, instead of promoting preexisting characters with those traits, or creating new characters.And when you don't like communism, the Jews are secretly Bolsheviks...
ANd when you don't like capitalism, the Jews secretly bankroll all the major players....
Also, note that the desire to "claim" a famous historical figure as "one of yours" is directly proportional to how beneficial they were seen to society, not just how famous. As mentioned before, they want to make the famous Presidents secretly gay (Washington, Lincoln) but, the one with the most (and not great) evidence for it is Buchannan, consistently rated the WORST chief executive in US history by actual historians.
They want to claim Einstein because everyone knows E=MC2, (or at least know it means something super-important) but, they pass over Turing who WAS persecuted because his work isn't as well known in the public consciousness.
They all want to claim Beethoven, who filled concert halls, but not the dozens who never made it so big....
It's all an act in promoting what makes them look good, that's not history, that's cherry picking.
Nice Necro Bro.It's like how some people want x popular character be trans or black or whatever, instead of promoting preexisting characters with those traits, or creating new characters.
These following posts presently have over 175000 notes on Tumblr.
View attachment 57663
View attachment 57665
View attachment 57664
View attachment 57666
(A) Source
It actually is true that slave owners were paid $300 per slave—in the District of Columbia before the end of the Civil War and the passage of the 13th Amendment. Everywhere else, they just freed them.
If a planter whipped or branded or beat an Irish slave to death, it was never a crime. A death was a monetary setback, but far cheaper than killing a more expensive African. The English masters quickly began breeding the Irish women for both their own personal pleasure and for greater profit. Children of slaves were themselves slaves, which increased the size of the master’s free workforce.
Meanwhile, Irish slaves in the 1600s were worth about 5 pounds a piece. That's actually one of the big reasons that using Negro slaves in South America took off - the fact that the Irish were so cheap meant that slaveowners were killing them by the hundreds because murdering a slave for disobedience just meant you replaced them for five pounds later. Conversely a Negro slave was roughly ten times the cost and thus far less likely to be killed:
Because Irish slaves were so much cheaper, the loss of investment from torturing and killing them was not considered an effective deterrent. This resulted in the British advocating the use of Negro Slaves instead for humanitarian reasons.
I'm fucking serious, look it up. By 1637, the Irish constituted the overpowering majority of slaves in English colonies in the west.
I bring this up because not a single fucking Irishman is going to demand reparations these days without being mocked for being a faggot. If someone's going to necro this thread, by god you're going to learn something for it.