I believe I posted a lot of good information about how I think Holly runs her channels when I think of the entertainment she is bringing to YouTube using all of her channels.
Holly Bone ("FuturisticHub") v. Wyde, et al (2021) -
- Thread starter komedian
- Start date
-
Sister services, email, and search will continue to be negatively effected by the attacks. I made a thread to talk about it, if you're into networking.
I would like to know what Holly and her lawyer talk about because her lawyer is very convinced that Holly is the owner. I also am very convinced too and I think Hollys defendants in her federal lawsuit have a lot of explaining to do when trying to take her intellectual property away from her.
Leonard Helplessness
kiwifarms.net
As I said. You haven’t posted shit to back up your claims. You’re just screaming “Holly is the owner” over and over.
I’m up for debate but would you please tell me what I haven’t posted? Should I quote myself from two pages back? I broke down the case as I saw it and still see it.
Leonard Helplessness
kiwifarms.net
Literally any evidence supporting your claims at all.
There appears to be a CEO who runs the YouTube network Freedom and he had what’s called an affidavit filed stating that holly is the actual owner. That means Holly is backed by business and professionals.
My research shows that nobody but google has these YouTube channels and further research shows that google order was vacated Friday. Google should as I understand it by law return the channels back to Holly.
You should do your research better as I see a lot of falsities here.
pearlslam
kiwifarms.net
You're right, we don't know that. But then again, the Monetization would be almost automatic in 2012 provided that requirements are met.
This shows that you are VERY ignorant of how MCN's actually work back then. If you join an MCN, then they would take a portion of your ad revenue to protect you from copyright claims. That obviously isn't the case anymore and it is more beneficial to a YouTuber to NOT join an MCN.
Nope. (Giving you the benefit of the doubt here) IF Holly was the owner, then it is Ultimately HER responsibility to make sure that she abides by TOS. If Brian was some sort of manager for her channel, then who's Adsense was used? That is the heart of the whole entire argument. Even if what was claimed in the Brian thread was true and this whole orchestration started back in December, AND if what that YouTube lawyer said is true about changing ownership of a Google account, (again opens a new set of worms that I won't go into) the fact of the matter is that the account was around since 2012, and there is no way in "what the unholy fuck" would any 13-year-old GIRL would associate herself with a softcore minecraft porn if her parents actually did their jobs and parent. This is called Grooming in some cases.
Get a dictionary. No such word.
Welp, where is the document vacating the order?
Leonard Helplessness
kiwifarms.net
Freedom! Family Ltd would have been managing the disputed youtube channels for a cut and wouldn’t want to lose that cut. Their motives in filing any said affidavit will be called into question. If they’re colluding with Brian to hide Brian’s assets, that could come back to bite them.
Also, link or attach any sources you use.
I will see about downloading documents but in the affidavit freedom said they do business with holly and holly only. People should really respect holly as a person and stop trying to align Brian with her. Holly has every right to claim her property outright and if her network says they do business with her then that is the end game, I believe you have no grounds legally to state what type of business they do with holly the owner of Futuristichub channel and freedom is not ignorant to collude with anyone as I’ve read the case and Brian has stated he has no assets. Also I believe after hearing google or youtubes lawyer they stated a YouTube channel isn’t an asset at all. So there are a lot of things pointing to Holly winning her cases
Last edited:
Retard#7822
kiwifarms.net
Of course, any and all docs that you have would be welcome. Much easier to believe when we see and aren't just told.
Well she married a sideshow who made videos that were both in the realm of disgusting and cringe. Not a good combo. I mean, I know you say that that's not the case, but all the evidence thus far says that you were the owner and you're trying to have your wife claim shes the owner now.
I'm not a youtuber, so I'm genuinely curious, does adsense give you statement or anything like that? If so wouldn't it just be a pretty simple matter of pulling bank info from those statements and seeing who owned those accounts? Feel free not to incriminate yourself Brian, I'm asking everyone else.
pearlslam
kiwifarms.net
You forgot the important thing, scrutinized. Obviously, we won't take these at face value.
Retard#7822
kiwifarms.net
Yeah you're right, that's what I meant. I'm not a law guy so I don't fully explain shit like I should haha...on top of being half retarded of course.
Green Acreage
kiwifarms.net
This is the equivalent of me having my girlfriend write a letter saying I am a millionaire
What fucking law are you referring to? You want to make claims, you can support them.
I can't imagine
kiwifarms.net
Unless I'm missing something, according to her claim, her relationship with Freedom began in 2019, well after the creation of the channel.
So I'm not sure they would know, or have any reason to know, if she was the original owner of the channel anyway.
And if the couple were lying when they got into that business relationship, the company would most likely be off the hook for liability, even if they didn't check it more than a cursory amount. Any affidavit probably starts with "To the best of our knowledge..."
Does this belong to Holly?
According to Holly's attorney during the contempt hearing, the Multi Channel network (MCN) that FuturisticHub was a part of is who got any AdSense money and disbursed it, and further the owner of it is willing to testify under oath that Holly owned the channel at all times, and all checks were cut to her. It should be noted that the MCN in question was allegedly cut by YouTube for being shady as all hell, which would come up most certainly during any deposition.
That being said it won't get to that point. All the posturing form this vapid bimbo's Mr. Magoo-looking attorney doesn't obfuscate from the fact that Brian himself is on record saying during court proceedings that he owned the channel, not Holly. If Holly had actually owned it, he couldn't have entered into any business deals with anyone else to begin with. The court was right to 100% hand Brian his ass the way it did, and all this fuck can do is hide from the law for the moment.
I say "for the moment" because there is no way that the State Department doesn't go through the extradition process against someone who has a $20-million judgment against him and he's fled the country to evade it. They've gotten involved for less, and the UK isn't going to want to harbor his fugitive ass. His wife may get off scot-free because she's a UK citizen but I can pretty much guarantee you Brian's ass is fucked, and his mother may be in some shit too now.
Retard#7822
kiwifarms.net
I'll certainly have to re-listen to that, as the first time I was more focused on Brian and I must not have heard that. Has FuturisticHub always been a part of this MCN, or is this just a recent thing? Because, as you stated, Brian has been on record saying he owned the channel. So either the MCN is going to lie, or Brian has been lying about owning the channel since it's inception, which is highly unlikely.
DragoonSierra
kiwifarms.net
Its funny. Brian could have had his wife make a youtube channel where he uploads all his animations and it probably wouldnt be touchable.
So why are you here?
Its not a good strategy to say you lied during a previous deposition
Last edited:
Similar threads
Vic's lawsuit against Funimation, VAs, and others, for over a million dollars.
