Holly Bone ("FuturisticHub") v. Wyde, et al (2021) -

  • We are being DDoS attacked still and 12,000 people are reading about incest. Expect weird errors. Most should go away by refreshing. Emails (registration / password reset) appear to be working; be sure to check spam.

    THE MERGE IS ON.

Orion66

kiwifarms.net
Following the "videogames" ruling, Brian's channels 'FuturisticHub' as well as another called 'CreamWorks Animation' were confiscated, and given to defendants following a turnover order.
My research shows that nobody but google has these YouTube channels and further research shows that google order was vacated Friday. Google should as I understand it by law return the channels back to Holly.
You should do your research better as I see a lot of falsities here.
 

pearlslam

kiwifarms.net
How do we even know holly was making money when she created the channels? We don’t know that.
You're right, we don't know that. But then again, the Monetization would be almost automatic in 2012 provided that requirements are met.

I am making the claim that YouTube networks link their Adsense to a YouTube channel in their network and it is not a personal Adsense by what I know. That is not against the terms of service.
This shows that you are VERY ignorant of how MCN's actually work back then. If you join an MCN, then they would take a portion of your ad revenue to protect you from copyright claims. That obviously isn't the case anymore and it is more beneficial to a YouTuber to NOT join an MCN.

Fair enough but I still think networks and channel managers if Brian was some manager for her would be exempt
Nope. (Giving you the benefit of the doubt here) IF Holly was the owner, then it is Ultimately HER responsibility to make sure that she abides by TOS. If Brian was some sort of manager for her channel, then who's Adsense was used? That is the heart of the whole entire argument. Even if what was claimed in the Brian thread was true and this whole orchestration started back in December, AND if what that YouTube lawyer said is true about changing ownership of a Google account, (again opens a new set of worms that I won't go into) the fact of the matter is that the account was around since 2012, and there is no way in "what the unholy fuck" would any 13-year-old GIRL would associate herself with a softcore minecraft porn if her parents actually did their jobs and parent. This is called Grooming in some cases.

Holly is plaintiffing her channels.

Get a dictionary. No such word.

My research shows that nobody but google has these YouTube channels and further research shows that google order was vacated Friday.
Welp, where is the document vacating the order?
 

Leonard Helplessness

kiwifarms.net
There appears to be a CEO who runs the YouTube network Freedom and he had what’s called an affidavit filed stating that holly is the actual owner. That means Holly is backed by business and professionals.
Freedom! Family Ltd would have been managing the disputed youtube channels for a cut and wouldn’t want to lose that cut. Their motives in filing any said affidavit will be called into question. If they’re colluding with Brian to hide Brian’s assets, that could come back to bite them.

Also, link or attach any sources you use.
 

Orion66

kiwifarms.net
Freedom! Family Ltd would have been managing the disputed youtube channels for a cut and wouldn’t want to lose that cut. Their motives in filing any said affidavit will be called into question. If they’re colluding with Brian to hide Brian’s assets, that could come back to bite them.

Also, link or attach any sources you use.
I will see about downloading documents but in the affidavit freedom said they do business with holly and holly only. People should really respect holly as a person and stop trying to align Brian with her. Holly has every right to claim her property outright and if her network says they do business with her then that is the end game, I believe you have no grounds legally to state what type of business they do with holly the owner of Futuristichub channel and freedom is not ignorant to collude with anyone as I’ve read the case and Brian has stated he has no assets. Also I believe after hearing google or youtubes lawyer they stated a YouTube channel isn’t an asset at all. So there are a lot of things pointing to Holly winning her cases
 
Last edited:

Gay Crippled Alligator

Average western culture downfall enjoyer.
kiwifarms.net
I will see about downloading documents but in the affidavit freedom said they do business with holly and holly only.
Of course, any and all docs that you have would be welcome. Much easier to believe when we see and aren't just told.
People should really respect holly as a person and stop trying to align Brian with her.
Well she married a sideshow who made videos that were both in the realm of disgusting and cringe. Not a good combo. I mean, I know you say that that's not the case, but all the evidence thus far says that you were the owner and you're trying to have your wife claim shes the owner now.

I'm not a youtuber, so I'm genuinely curious, does adsense give you statement or anything like that? If so wouldn't it just be a pretty simple matter of pulling bank info from those statements and seeing who owned those accounts? Feel free not to incriminate yourself Brian, I'm asking everyone else.
 

Green Acreage

kiwifarms.net
There appears to be a CEO who runs the YouTube network Freedom and he had what’s called an affidavit filed stating that holly is the actual owner. That means Holly is backed by business and professionals.

This is the equivalent of me having my girlfriend write a letter saying I am a millionaire

My research shows that nobody but google has these YouTube channels and further research shows that google order was vacated Friday. Google should as I understand it by law return the channels back to Holly.
You should do your research better as I see a lot of falsities here.

What fucking law are you referring to? You want to make claims, you can support them.
 

I can't imagine

kiwifarms.net
Freedom! Family Ltd would have been managing the disputed youtube channels for a cut and wouldn’t want to lose that cut. Their motives in filing any said affidavit will be called into question. If they’re colluding with Brian to hide Brian’s assets, that could come back to bite them.

Also, link or attach any sources you use.
Unless I'm missing something, according to her claim, her relationship with Freedom began in 2019, well after the creation of the channel.

In 2019, Ms. Bone transferred management of FuturisticHub and CreamWorks Animation to Freedom! Family, Ltd, a YouTube MultiChannel Network. With the assistance given her from Freedom! Family, Ltd., Ms. Bone’s business prospered.
So I'm not sure they would know, or have any reason to know, if she was the original owner of the channel anyway.
 

Shaka Brah

Patriotic Ass-Blasting Poster
kiwifarms.net
So I'm not sure they would know, or have any reason to know, if she was the original owner of the channel anyway.
And if the couple were lying when they got into that business relationship, the company would most likely be off the hook for liability, even if they didn't check it more than a cursory amount. Any affidavit probably starts with "To the best of our knowledge..."
 

Snowflake Buster

Bustin' special snowflakes makes me feel good
kiwifarms.net
Does this belong to Holly?
1617394661128.png
 

Spectre_06

My views do not reflect the Kiwi Farms in any way.
Person of Interest
kiwifarms.net
In the zoom call hearing, the youtube lawyer basically said that signup info and current info on the channel doesn't really matter, as that can be changed at any time and you don't have to use your real name. He then proceeded to say that you have to follow the money, look at where the adsense money is going to, and that will tell you who actually owns the channels. To that affect, Brian is basically fucked, as there is zero percent chance that Holly had a bank account attached to FuturisticHub when she was 13. That being said, you never know what the boomers in the courtroom are going to decide, look at what happened to DSP lol.
According to Holly's attorney during the contempt hearing, the Multi Channel network (MCN) that FuturisticHub was a part of is who got any AdSense money and disbursed it, and further the owner of it is willing to testify under oath that Holly owned the channel at all times, and all checks were cut to her. It should be noted that the MCN in question was allegedly cut by YouTube for being shady as all hell, which would come up most certainly during any deposition.

That being said it won't get to that point. All the posturing form this vapid bimbo's Mr. Magoo-looking attorney doesn't obfuscate from the fact that Brian himself is on record saying during court proceedings that he owned the channel, not Holly. If Holly had actually owned it, he couldn't have entered into any business deals with anyone else to begin with. The court was right to 100% hand Brian his ass the way it did, and all this fuck can do is hide from the law for the moment.

I say "for the moment" because there is no way that the State Department doesn't go through the extradition process against someone who has a $20-million judgment against him and he's fled the country to evade it. They've gotten involved for less, and the UK isn't going to want to harbor his fugitive ass. His wife may get off scot-free because she's a UK citizen but I can pretty much guarantee you Brian's ass is fucked, and his mother may be in some shit too now.
 

Gay Crippled Alligator

Average western culture downfall enjoyer.
kiwifarms.net
According to Holly's attorney during the contempt hearing, the Multi Channel network (MCN) that FuturisticHub was a part of is who got any AdSense money and disbursed it, and further the owner of it is willing to testify under oath that Holly owned the channel at all times, and all checks were cut to her.
I'll certainly have to re-listen to that, as the first time I was more focused on Brian and I must not have heard that. Has FuturisticHub always been a part of this MCN, or is this just a recent thing? Because, as you stated, Brian has been on record saying he owned the channel. So either the MCN is going to lie, or Brian has been lying about owning the channel since it's inception, which is highly unlikely.
 

DragoonSierra

kiwifarms.net
In the zoom call hearing, the youtube lawyer basically said that signup info and current info on the channel doesn't really matter, as that can be changed at any time and you don't have to use your real name. He then proceeded to say that you have to follow the money, look at where the adsense money is going to, and that will tell you who actually owns the channels. To that affect, Brian is basically fucked, as there is zero percent chance that Holly had a bank account attached to FuturisticHub when she was 13. That being said, you never know what the boomers in the courtroom are going to decide, look at what happened to DSP lol.
Its funny. Brian could have had his wife make a youtube channel where he uploads all his animations and it probably wouldnt be touchable.

You can say all you want it does not affect me and honestly this website is obviously for trolling and spreading lies about things so have your fun?
So why are you here?

I'll certainly have to re-listen to that, as the first time I was more focused on Brian and I must not have heard that. Has FuturisticHub always been a part of this MCN, or is this just a recent thing? Because, as you stated, Brian has been on record saying he owned the channel. So either the MCN is going to lie, or Brian has been lying about owning the channel since it's inception, which is highly unlikely.
Its not a good strategy to say you lied during a previous deposition
 
Last edited:
Top