ASPI(E) puts out sponsored articles from the MIC, sure, but that one wasn't sponsored by any defence contractor. Sponsored articles are blatantly stated to be sponsored. It's not explicitly pro-MIC, but it doesn't comment on it either. Most of their sponsors aren't primarily in the MIC, either.Here's an interesting, albeit biased, article from the Australian military-industrial complex about a site that exposed a number of the CIA operatives operating in Hong Kong.
From the Australian Strategic Policy Institute (sponsored by Lockheed Martin (TM)):
The real crime here is spelling doxing with two x's.