Yeah, but that usually entails that you still want the real thing at some point.Drawings are not classified as people therefore cannot be abused.
The UK banned loli/shota art, and that had no discernible effect at all on the statistics over the years from what I've heard. Art isn't the only catalyst that drives degenerates to prey upon children.Yeah, but that usually entails that you still want the real thing at some point.
Banning it is a whole other matter since well, it isn't technically real children being depicted (unless it's Shadman), but ethically it's still the same thing as real CP and should be treated as such by not only the internet at large, but law enforcement as well. I mean, if they got drawn CP on their hard drives, what's stopping them from downloading the real thing?
Says the person with an avatar of a known child predatorContemporary pedohaters are by and large Moderns who swallowed the cultural Marxist pill without question and have been doing so since birth. These are really just people who blindly accept what I see to be the axioms of modern anti-pedoism; pedohebesexuality is necessarily centered on violence (hence the oft-repeated and patently absurd anti-pedoist motto that 'only adults can consent'), pedohebesexuality/pedoheberomance is abnormal (the coinage of the word 'pedophile' is a reflection of this; by reduction to *philos* contra *eros* the phenomenon is trivialised, rendered fetishistic, demeaned, pathologised, *etc.* (similar to the historically Marxist pathologisation implicit in the inception of the word 'racist')), *etc.* The campaign against what is know called 'pedophilia' has its roots in the Marxist-feminist campaign against man-girl relationships (as natural tokens of dominant patriarchal heterosexual institutions, whose very existence challenged and will always challenge cultural-Marxist progressivism) which saw a benchmark in the raising (close to doubling, in some instances) of the Age of Consent in the West. It was not your stereotypical Christian social conservatives responsible, but the progressives, for they have nothing to gain and plenty to lose from the continued existence of the traditional and naturally stable marriages which organically result (and historically resulted) from pedoheberomantic relationships.
The same Jewish revolutionary spirit which brought us degenerative cultural subversion in the West, made anti-nativist open-border policy fashionable and gave social and legal rights to all manner of abnormal, unnatural LGBTQ+ individuals and unions suppressed the most obvious token of traditional heterosexual romance. To reject Modernity is to reject anti-pedoist hysteria and to call it what it is, as we do with globalist immigration efforts and atheistic cultural subversion.
The number of mass shootings/violent acts influenced by video games does not nearly equal the amount of pervs and pedos who have acted on their desires which started from 'innocent' loli. Video games don't normalise violence in the same way porn does normalise kinky, rough violent sex. People who are into CP will be subconsciously drawn to (no pun intended) loli and be making justifications for it just like you are, and then go from there. Just look at furries."These findings challenge the frequent assertion that child-pornography offenders are “only” involved with “pictures,” such that they pose no significant risk of direct commission of a sexual offense against a child. The findings indicate the importance of online criminal investigations that target so-called “Internet sex offenders,” since such investigations are likely to result in the apprehension of child molesters. Although these men may attribute their search for child pornography to “curiosity” or a similar unthreatening motivation, the findings of the current study suggest the likelihood that they have also engaged in the sexual abuse of children."
You're whipping out the fallacies today buddy.
I never said that everyone follows their sexual fantasies to a T, you claim I do (strawman).
What I did say is that your sex life is influenced by your sexual fantasies, are you claiming they're always 100% seperate in every case?
Alright, here's my proof.
I say: Loli might influence people to become predators.
You say: That can't be true, videogames don't influence people to become murderers, that proves it!
That's some nice thoughtcrime you've got there, comrade.I mean, if they got drawn CP on their hard drives, what's stopping them from downloading the real thing?
Moral concerns aside, I unironically think that porn is bad for people. Browse /r9k/ for a bit and you'll see what I'm talking about.Porn itself should already be banned and the production thereof prosecuted by anti-obscenity laws. Children, adults, animals—the content of pornography does not matter. Pornography itself is a grave sin and a cancer to society.
Paying lip service to the immorality of child pornography is just a pathetic way for people that masturbate to virtue signal. The topic of child porn is just a scapegoat for self-loathing perverts to attempt to excuse their own sins. Do not fall into this stupid trap. Understand the base premise of pornography.