Is drawn child pornography (loli) bad? -

Is OP a pedophile?

  • yes

    Votes: 598 73.9%
  • no

    Votes: 132 16.3%
  • it should be regulated, not outright banned

    Votes: 79 9.8%

  • Total voters
    809

sifareh592

Proud bigotanyphobe
kiwifarms.net
Degenerate and perverse certainly, illegal hell no.

5415a4cb624924da1bb17c14ffe5c39b5ea0303b5b3467963c719ab9e0bd5781.png
 
Last edited:

Slap47

Hehe xd
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
I think the utter failure and tragedy that was Gay Conversion Therapy proves that sexuality can't be conditioned.

Sadly we're now seeing it from the liberal end with some parents trying to make their kids gay/trans to virtue signal.

Gay conversion therapy is hardly scientific. We haven't really done any experiments on sexuality that are meaningful - it is a taboo topic. Most sexual scientists just say conjecture based on theory instead of actually doing experiments and tests.
 

GreatGrandGeneralAutismo

Leader of the Autism Liberation Army
kiwifarms.net
I'm pretty sure pedophiles are always going to exist just like gays, rapists, and every other sort of sexual deviant are always going to exist. Just like with the gays, I don't think there will ever be any sort of treatment or therapy to "fix" pedophiles, and imprisoning/executing people who haven't actually committed a crime goes against western beliefs. Pedophiles are born the way they are for whatever reason. If wacking off to fictional art keeps them from hurting another person, even though its disgusting, I think it should be legal. Gay porn is legal even though the majority of people find it disgusting. I think "legal but heavily frowned upon" is the best place for loli/shota porn.

Disclaimer: I am in no way suggesting that being gay is as bad as being a rapist or a pedophile, but until relatively recently in human history it was considered a serious crime in many cultures. I stand by my statement that gay sex is disgusting but as long as people aren't fucking in front of me you can do what you want
 

kuniqsX

my pronouns are go / fuck / yourself
kiwifarms.net
Fucking a child is disgusting but as long as people aren't fucking in front of me you can do what you want
 

Lilly Philly Burnelli

Complaints? Call me at (425) 496-8821
kiwifarms.net
I hate to pull the Digibro defense but what's the difference in drawing two stick figures fucking and then saying "one of them is actually underage." At the end of the day it is all art regardless of what someone thinks of what is being depicted.

I don't give a shit what people think about or what things they get off to cause that is by definition thought-crime. You can't help what you are attracted to or what fetishes you have. If you think about raping women or do roleplay with your partner, does that mean you want to rape women? Maybe, but until you act on it and actually rape someone I could give a fuck. Someone could pull out a K-Mart catalogue full of children in their underwear and go to town, what is stopping those people from doing that? I think if some creep is doing that, it is detestable but until they are downloading child pornography of REAL children being exploited or actively molesting children then all you can do is criticize the people who jerk off to that material. You can criticize people who like loli all you want cause that's your freedom of speech but as long as those people aren't molesting actual children, I don't care what they jerk off to.
 

SigSauer

kiwifarms.net
OP is one brave SOB to post something like this here on this website. But to answer your question, no. It isn't good. It implies the same thing: raping kids. What is the difference between drawn CP and the real thing? Proponents of drawn stuff argue that no child was harmed in the making of it, but I just think that if you're a pedo you should simply not be fapping at all. Because you're sick. Somewhere along the line you're gonna find yourself looking at the real stuff because that won't be satisfying enough for you even years after cooming to underage cartoon characters. The two options are either therapy or becoming a eunuch. Pick one. There is no "I'm gonna use harm reduction techniques". It's a mental illness. And honestly, while I know this opinion isn't too popular, but if you understand what you're doing is wrong and want to correct it, then honestly all the power to you. But on the other hand, you have dangerous psychopaths like Peter Scully who just don't seem to care who they hurt or offend. Those are the people that should be taken out in the streets and shot.
 

Forever Sunrise

Avatar? I don't need no stinkin' avatar.
kiwifarms.net
You can't help what you are attracted to or what fetishes you have.

A lovely argument that diminishes personal responsibility. You poor dear, you don't need to worry, you were just born that way. Nah, I don't subscribe to that at all. You choose to be what you are. Anything else is an admission that you're scared of the effort that change involves.

But to answer your question, no. It isn't good. It implies the same thing: raping kids. What is the difference between drawn CP and the real thing? Proponents of drawn stuff argue that no child was harmed in the making of it, but I just think that if you're a pedo you should simply not be fapping at all. Because you're sick. Somewhere along the line you're gonna find yourself looking at the real stuff because that won't be satisfying enough for you even years after cooming to underage cartoon characters. The two options are either therapy or becoming a eunuch. Pick one. There is no "I'm gonna use harm reduction techniques". It's a mental illness.

It genuinely depresses me that this seems to be a revelation to some people, instead of the obvious, intrinsic logic that it is.
 

kuniqsX

my pronouns are go / fuck / yourself
kiwifarms.net
If Chinese cartoons of 12yo girls having hot lesbian sex is pornography then cartoon drawings of Trump sucking off Netanjahu is treason.
 

Dwight Schrute

Murder, not mukduk.
kiwifarms.net
If you draw child figures doing sexual acts, then say it follows a lore of being 9000 years old, I should have the legal right to pelt you with bricks.

The terms lolicon and shotacon are not names for children. It is a term for the appearance of a character that looks young. So it is basically used to dodge the bullet and say "Nono. That is not a child. My personal lore for this character is that she is 200 years old."

Some lolicon/shotacon content is that. Dodging the child pornography laws. But a lot of the content out there, doesn't even try. They just draw a child sucking a dick or screwing another child. In my eyes, that is child pornography, lore or not.

And that really begs the question on why people are okay with allowing pedophiles to jack it to this content. You would think that people would rather encourage the pedophile to ditch their disgusting addiction. Have them stop fapping it to drawing of little children. But a lot of these people, they encourage them! And that is something I just cannot wrap my head around.

If you're someone who faps it to that specific content, with no guilt, no will to quit, no want to quit, you are just as bad as the people who sit in the bushes and make films of children playing at the playground. Both scenarios don't have children getting hurt, and it is some type of media for the pedophile to wack it to.

I feel like there should be some sort of program set in place for people like this. A place for people to go to in order to get aid in quitting their addiction to this unhealthy attraction. It is possible to ditch an attraction, it's just all in the will on how badly you wanna correct yourself as a person.
 

Ozma (ZeTrannyJanny)

"I remember drinking Kool-Aid"-Buzz Osbourne
kiwifarms.net
I have no idea if anyone has pointed out this hypocrisy in search engines, but it is very worrying.

So for any of you sick fucks who tried to look up loli and (insert sexual thing here) you will realise that it shows results of "child pornography laws" and "is loli legal". (which is very smart of companies to do)....

HOWEVER! Whenever you look up shota and (insert sexual thing here), Google or any other search engine is completely A-ok!

(I will obviously not be showing screenshots of looking up pedo shit cause I don't want to look or sound like the OP).

But what's worse is if you have the misfortune of looking at this shota crap. They quite literally mention and draw the characters as underaged. (Being something that people criticise lolicon for but shota seems to do this pedo shit even more).

So then, what should be done with this obvious hypocrisy?

If you draw child figures doing sexual acts, then say it follows a lore of being 9000 years old, I should have the legal right to pelt you with bricks.

The terms lolicon and shotacon are not names for children. It is a term for the appearance of a character that looks young. So it is basically used to dodge the bullet and say "Nono. That is not a child. My personal lore for this character is that she is 200 years old."

Some lolicon/shotacon content is that. Dodging the child pornography laws. But a lot of the content out there, doesn't even try. They just draw a child sucking a dick or screwing another child. In my eyes, that is child pornography, lore or not.

And that really begs the question on why people are okay with allowing pedophiles to jack it to this content. You would think that people would rather encourage the pedophile to ditch their disgusting addiction. Have them stop fapping it to drawing of little children. But a lot of these people, they encourage them! And that is something I just cannot wrap my head around.

If you're someone who faps it to that specific content, with no guilt, no will to quit, no want to quit, you are just as bad as the people who sit in the bushes and make films of children playing at the playground. Both scenarios don't have children getting hurt, and it is some type of media for the pedophile to wack it to.

I feel like there should be some sort of program set in place for people like this. A place for people to go to in order to get aid in quitting their addiction to this unhealthy attraction. It is possible to ditch an attraction, it's just all in the will on how badly you wanna correct yourself as a person.


There obviosuly should be something done with people who jack off to loli and shota. Though the reason for people well not caring for this "act of expression" is because of I guess the first ammendment.

Pornography and especially fiction by U.S law is considered to be "freedom of expression". Loli and Shota are in some sick way these 2 things: Porn and Fiction. Given both mediums are obviously legal (since in most cases no actual harm is being done with legal porn and fiction is indeed fiction) just like drugs, loli/shota-con does harm the person consuming the material. (We all know that pedos have some sort of mental problem and people looking at 30 year old cartoon series of a 12 year old are on the borderline of being pedo and mentally ill).

In other words, I wasted my life explaining how shota and lolicon are essentially reggie as shit.
 

Dwight Schrute

Murder, not mukduk.
kiwifarms.net
There obviosuly should be something done with people who jack off to loli and shota. Though the reason for people well not caring for this "act of expression" is because of I guess the first ammendment.

Pornography and especially fiction by U.S law is considered to be "freedom of expression". Loli and Shota are in some sick way these 2 things: Porn and Fiction. Given both mediums are obviously legal (since in most cases no actual harm is being done with legal porn and fiction is indeed fiction) just like drugs, loli/shota-con does harm the person consuming the material. (We all know that pedos have some sort of mental problem and people looking at 30 year old cartoon series of a 12 year old are on the borderline of being pedo and mentally ill).

In other words, I wasted my life explaining how shota and lolicon are essentially reggie as shit.
I dunno man. I just get so tired of seeing people pat them on the back and say "you go, champ!" It feels so unnatural cuz you would think that people would hate people attracted to kiddies. Hell, child rapists go through hell and back when found out in prison!
 

Ozma (ZeTrannyJanny)

"I remember drinking Kool-Aid"-Buzz Osbourne
kiwifarms.net
I dunno man. I just get so tired of seeing people pat them on the back and say "you go, champ!" It feels so unnatural cuz you would think that people would hate people attracted to kiddies. Hell, child rapists go through hell and back when found out in prison!
I also do get weirded out as well. Could be a combination of people trying not to themselves wrapped into this obviously big brained conversation, or libertarians. 🦍
 

Dwight Schrute

Murder, not mukduk.
kiwifarms.net
I also do get weirded out as well. Could be a combination of people trying not to themselves wrapped into this obviously big brained conversation, or libertarians. 🦍
Who knows anymore. Feels like everyone you see is a cow in some way, shape, or form.
 

Ozma (ZeTrannyJanny)

"I remember drinking Kool-Aid"-Buzz Osbourne
kiwifarms.net
Who knows anymore. Feels like everyone you see is a cow in some way, shape, or form.
Technically since everyone is an idiot, everyone is basically a cow. And since everyone is a cow, and everyone can lacate (yes mean have milk), anyone can be milked for lulz.
 

Dwight Schrute

Murder, not mukduk.
kiwifarms.net
Technically since everyone is an idiot, everyone is basically a cow. And since everyone is a cow, and everyone can lacate (yes mean have tard cum), anyone can be milked for lulz.
True true. But hey. At least we aren't shitting ourselves and posting pics of it online calling ourselves fudgebutts or whatever cringy shit furries say. LMAO
 

Similar threads

  • Poll
Deadbeat Wannabe-Actor MGTOW Pedo-zoophile - Divorced father of 2 sons. Tried grooming them as infants to be furries. Tried to groom a 17yo into sex. Ex-wife cucked him for a pedo. She took the kids. He fucked the family dog.
Replies
3K
Views
256K
Top