Is drawn child pornography (loli) bad? -

Is OP a pedophile?

  • yes

    Votes: 598 73.9%
  • no

    Votes: 132 16.3%
  • it should be regulated, not outright banned

    Votes: 79 9.8%

  • Total voters
    809

The Demon Pimp of Razgriz

Still Pimpin
kiwifarms.net
Somehow, someway it leads back to the exploitation of children or abuse of family photos.
I mean, there are plenty of online and print guides on how to draw child characters, along with artbooks and the like. Creating Loli does not at all require the artist to do something illegal or disgusting.

The Assigned Male artist's furry cub fetish art was a trace of an innocent family photo and other artists have used real CP as reference material before. Just because the depicted subject is fictional doesn't make the evil nature of the reference material any less exploitative and vile.
First of all, everybody knows furries are the greatest degenerates on Earth. Even anime fans can't stand them, for good reason. Second of all, just because some people may have done shit like this to draw their work, does not mean that all artists have. Most them just drew what came to their mind, which artists have literally been doing for hundreds of years. You can't take one or two fringe examples and just extrapolate that all loli artists work that way.
 

NyQuilninja

drink me
kiwifarms.net
I was on 4chan they post that shit all the time, dont even remember the names or anything only that the girls definitely didnt look like real underage girls, not with those big tatas

And again how does the culture aspect of japan works into your theory if they were so rapey before porn?
So ethier your being disingenuous or out right lying when you describe what lolicon porn looks like. Because it's not just images of "big breasted midgets" its realistic visual representations of children in sexual situations.
So fuck off back to 4chan
 

Cool Dog

A goodboi denied his Wendy's
kiwifarms.net
So ethier your being disingenuous or out right lying when you describe what lolicon porn looks like. Because it's not just images of "big breasted midgets" its realistic visual representations of children in sexual situations.
So fuck off back to 4chan
Havent been on 4chan in years, and you seem to know a lot about how this loli shit is, got a private stash you sick fuck?

Your entire argument about japan was shit you retard, just admit it
 

NyQuilninja

drink me
kiwifarms.net
Havent been on 4chan in years, and you seem to know a lot about how this loli shit is, got a private stash you sick fuck?
Nice reflecting
And dodging
However you might just be fucking retard and not understand what lolicon exactly is. And understandably one should be embarrassed and ashamed to have admitted looking at it once you know what it really is.
Also nice false fallacy I dont have to see something to know what is. There's perfectly good detailed descriptions on the subject if you know how to use a fucking search engine.
Go back 4chan you niggerfaggot and stop posting retarded shit here
...................................
Edited to further to prove that you a fucking retard
Loli is a form of Japanese anime. It depicts underage cartoon characters in sexually explicit situations. The cartoons are focused on sexualized plots and characters.

Lolicon is anime that depicts underage girls. Loli involving underage boys is called shotacon.Possessing child pornography is illegal in the United States. Under the PROTECT Act of 2003, any obscene images depicting a minor is considered child pornography. The act was passed in part to make virtual child pornography illegal, even though it did not depict an actual child.

 
Last edited:

💗Bitchstopher Columbitch💗

* unintelligible retard noises *
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
These images aren't "victimless" like loli/shota scyophants say. All of the artists responsible have to look at some kind of reference material. Somehow, someway it leads back to the exploitation of children or abuse of family photos. The Assigned Male artist's furry cub fetish art was a trace of an innocent family photo and other artists have used real CP as reference material before. Just because the depicted subject is fictional doesn't make the evil nature of the reference material any less exploitative and vile.

CP is monstrous and tarting it up with anime styling is akin to redecorating John Wayne Gacy's basement. That new lick of pain won't change the fact that just under the dirt floor there are dozens of rotting corpses.
I assumed their reference material was usually other loli art or cartoons. It's not like there's a shortage of it. Heck, Donald Duck's nephews have been walking around with no pants for nearly a hundred years now.

That being said, CP is bad and I can think of no reason a non-pedo would specifically look for loli/shota.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • Poll
Deadbeat Wannabe-Actor MGTOW Pedo-zoophile - Divorced father of 2 sons. Tried grooming them as infants to be furries. Tried to groom a 17yo into sex. Ex-wife cucked him for a pedo. She took the kids. He fucked the family dog.
Replies
3K
Views
256K
Top