- Joined
- Feb 25, 2015
I think suicide is a stupid idea but others are autonomous individuals who make their own decisions so it is none of my concern. I will try to convince someone to not commit suicide if I would benefit though
Thinking about it logically, talking someone out of suicide is selfish in most regards. Most family members, for example, would typically do it because they don't want to lose them. Their (the suicide-ee) existence has a continued benefit to the family, and the family would lose that, making they're desire to keep them selfish.
This would only apply in the optimal situation where a suicide is an entirely rational decision made by someone facing an otherwise intolerable situation, like a painful, terminal illness. Even in most of those cases, family members who stand to inherit money from them will usually actually have a selfish motive to do nothing and allow them to die in order to collect immediately.
In many if not most cases, suicide is a decision made with an unsound mind by someone who would not make that choice if they were firing on all cylinders.
It is entirely ethical and in fact an ethical obligation to intervene in such a situation, just as one would pull back someone about to walk blindly off a cliff.
I've had this thought for awhile now and haven't been able to broach it with any of my friends but considering how many lolcows seem to make suicide threats, this might be an appropriate place for it.
Is it really ethical to talk someone out of suicide? Is it really appropriate to tell someone that their pain and suffering isn't great enough to want end their lives? If someone came to me saying they were suicidal I would try to talk them out of it, but honestly I don't think it's a great idea, philosophically. Maybe they should do it. I don't know what lies on the other side. Perhaps it's a pain and misery free world ("Heaven") or some sort of reincarnation. Or just eternal darkness. It's a roll of the dice but who am I to tell someone not to take the risk? I'm not suicidal myself but I just don't really see anything wrong with wanting to experience whatever comes next in the human experience. It seems arrogant to tell someone else not take the chance.
Christianity, for example, makes no explicit mention of suicide being a negative at all. If you, as a Christian, feel you've lived a pious life and are in terrible pain and expect to be for the rest of your life, isn't suicide the logical move?
Yes. Unless it's a more or less 100% deadly and extremely painful disease which is not treatable (e.g. AIDS is not curable, but if your country has a good healthcare system (*wink, wing, nudge, nudge*), you can get the treatment, which prolongs your life considerably compared to not taking this treatment), it doesn't solve problems, it just ends them (by making the person deader than a doornail).
I'm sympathetic with people who kill themselves specifically because of an untreatable mental illness, though. Anyone who has ever experienced a deep clinical depression knows it is a mental state more painful than actually dying, but usually it's treatable. Imagine that you've gone through every possible treatment, though, and it responds to nothing. I believe it would be entirely rational to choose death over a permanent absolutely intolerable state.
The difficulty is that someone in that state will often, perversely, actively resist the very treatment that would save them.
Another problem is that philosophical justifications for despair are actually pretty convincing. I have yet to see them refuted. Well, unless you count Kierkegaard, but he has to have the most depressing argument against despair I've ever seen, c.f. The Sickness Unto Death.