Is Shrek 2 the worst film of all time? -

  • Sustained Denial of Service attacks. Paid for botnet. Service will continue to be disrupted until I can contact other providers and arrange a fix.
Solution
Shrek 1 was nice as a start point about showing the other side of a typical "fairy-tale" villain.
Shrek 2 was pretty good, expanding more of the world they live and even having the classical hero as a villain (that blonde piece of shit man).
Shrek 3 derailed too much but is a fun movie.
Shrek 4 is strange and really a filler movie.
I did love Shrek 1 when I first saw it when I was 12, I enjoyed Shrek 2 a lot as well, but I was 14, just young enough to still care, when Shrek 3 came out I was 17 and Shrek 4 I was 20, I think you can imagine I no longer cared about Shrek by that point lol.

Not that I'm not still an adult that consumes children's media sometimes and I think...

Prophetic Spirit

You can't stand a chance against my smugness
kiwifarms.net
Shrek 1 was nice as a start point about showing the other side of a typical "fairy-tale" villain.
Shrek 2 was pretty good, expanding more of the world they live and even having the classical hero as a villain (that blonde piece of shit man).
Shrek 3 derailed too much but is a fun movie.
Shrek 4 is strange and really a filler movie.
 

Dom Cruise

I'll fucking Mega your ass, bitch!
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
Shrek 1 was nice as a start point about showing the other side of a typical "fairy-tale" villain.
Shrek 2 was pretty good, expanding more of the world they live and even having the classical hero as a villain (that blonde piece of shit man).
Shrek 3 derailed too much but is a fun movie.
Shrek 4 is strange and really a filler movie.
I did love Shrek 1 when I first saw it when I was 12, I enjoyed Shrek 2 a lot as well, but I was 14, just young enough to still care, when Shrek 3 came out I was 17 and Shrek 4 I was 20, I think you can imagine I no longer cared about Shrek by that point lol.

Not that I'm not still an adult that consumes children's media sometimes and I think that's fine, but some stuff really is just more interesting when you're younger and doesn't really work as well when you're above a certain age.

Like Hoodwinked?
Tons of movies adopted Shrek's snarky tone, that snark felt so bold and refreshing for a kid's movie when it debuted in 2001, you also have to remember that CGI animation was still very much a novelty in itself 20 years ago.

But as time went on and 3D replaced 2D more and more and so many 3D animated movies adopted Shrek style snark as the default tone the novelty got old quick, at least for me, but that's why I still went to see movies like Up in the theater after I had stopped caring about Shrek and I think that's why Pixar has the following it has is because they always had more genuine emotional content (or least they used to)

Also, dance party endings, remember when every non-Pixar CGI film had to have dance party endings?
 
Solution

Overcast

She will always be in my heart...
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
I like the first two Shreks (never bothered with the others) but they set a bad tone for animated films in the US, so many movies for so long have used Shrek's style of humor and tone as the default baseline for an animated movie.

What once felt fresh quickly felt stale.
I consider Shrek 1 one of my favorite films ever, but yeah, I agree. It was created as satirical and pokes fun at conventional animations at the time. Most notably Disney. Unfortunately, like most popular things, people only saw the superficial details such as the irreverent and gross out humor and applied it to everything made since then.
 
Top