J.K. Rowling needs to stop messing with Harry Potter - A general STFU J.K. Rowling MegaThread <3

Graffiti canvas

True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
In the continuing, non-stop saga of the millennial generation being unable to move beyond a fictional series of books they read when they were kids...

EDIT- This thread has now been converted into a J.K Rowling Megathread. Because she just WONT fucking go away.



https://kotaku.com/j-k-rowling-needs-to-stop-messing-with-harry-potter-1829503693


I grew up reading Harry Potter, and it shaped my life to the extent that I have a Deathly Hallows tattoo. As an adult, I wish J.K. Rowling would just me enjoy her books in peace.

Harry Potter hit me at just the right age—namely, ten, when I still had time to hope that I’d get a Hogwarts acceptance letter in the mail. I started reading the series around the time the third book was released, and family friends brought me back an early copy from their visit to England. Like a lot of children at the time, I was hooked on Rowling’s vision of magic, and her righteous hero, the eponymous Harry Potter. Seeing the strength of this literal child’s convictions was inspiring to me. He always tried to do the right thing, even if he was at times a bit dim. Also, just like Harry’s friend Hermione Granger, the brightest witch of her age, I also had buck-teeth, bushy hair, and was an insufferable know it all. I was destined to become an incorrigible Harry Potter fangirl.


I stayed a fan as an adult, too. Years later, my then-boyfriend brought over a friend of his who had been training to become a tattoo artist, and I decided to take advantage of the opportunity. The relatively simple design of the Deathly Hallows, a plot point from the final books, seemed like an obvious choice for me. It’s a vertical line encased in a triangle and a circle, a simple enough design for someone still learning to tattoo people. Also, at that point, my love of Harry Potter had stayed with me through my twenties. I’ll probably like it forever, I thought, or at least be able to justify that the series had been a significant enough part of my life.

Now, nearing 30, that tattoo is as much a source of embarrassment as it is a source of pride. It’s not like Harry Potter is any less a part of my life, or that the books suddenly got bad. I have some quibbles with Rowling’s world building—how does magic work, exactly?—but they’re the same funny, readable books they always were. The issue is that Rowling can’t seem to help herself from tacking more details on to the books after the fact, and as far as I’m concerned, her additions have only made the series worse.

For me, the trouble started with Rowling’s declaration, after the series was finished, that Hogwarts headmaster Dumbledore was gay. This was not an unwelcome piece of knowledge, but Rowling’s method of delivering the information did puzzle me. If Dumbledore’s sexuality was important to understanding him as a character, why wasn’t that explicit in the books? There aren’t any characters in the Harry Potter series that have a same-sex partner, and Dumbledore was beloved. Up until his death, he had largely seemed to be celibate, and the only hint that he might have gotten close with anyone at all was in the final book, which described his relationship with the dark wizard Grindelwald. When I read that book, Dumbledore’s closeness with Grindelwald did strike me as possibly romantic, at least on Dumbledore’s part. But I also knew that other readers could come away thinking that it was just a close friendship, especially because Grindelwald didn’t appear to be as devoted to Dumbledore as he was to him. If the message of Harry Potter was about tolerance and acceptance, then why not just make him gay in text?

Since that Dumbledore reveal, Rowling has added even more details to her series retroactively. When Rowling came under fire from fans for not supporting a cultural boycott of Israel (some fans told her Harry would be disappointed in her), she wrote a Twitlonger explaining her stance and implied that, by the end of the books, Harry would be on her side. “There comes a moment in the final book, though, when Harry, whose natural inclination is to fight, to rush to action, to lead from the front, is forced to stop and consider the cryptic message the dead Dumbledore has left him,” she wrote. In this moment, Harry knows there is a powerful weapon that he could use, but ultimately opts not to. “Harry cannot understand why using that weapon would be harmful, yet—grudgingly—he decides to act against his own instinct, and according to what he believes are Dumbledore’s wishes,” she continued.

A cultural boycott of a country is hardly the same as a powerful magic weapon. That’s beside the point, though. Harry Potter has many allegorical elements, and Rowling is using her books to explain her point of view. In the process, though, she’s also giving us Harry’s supposed stance on Israel and Palestine, and because she’s the author, does that mean it’s canon? This question came up again when Rowling was annoyed that fans of her work kept comparing Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn to Dumbledore.

Rowling is free to dislike Corbyn, but her readers are also free to draw parallels from her books into their own lives. At least, that’s the logic behind the literary criticism practice of “Death of the Author,” although in this case, the author has seemingly made Harry Potter a living document, since she keeps on tweeting more additions to the text. Her insistence that Harry Potter must be read one way—her way—and her continuing to add on revisions to the text has only made me like the books less. It also reveals problems within the text that I was able to overlook, at least until Rowling kept pointing out the extent to which her own politics are supposedly supported by her characters.

When she talks about whether or not her characters are like Corbyn, who campaigns for a Labour party that supports the many and not the few, I can’t help but remember that while she criticizes the classism of old, rich families like the Malfoys, similar prestigious families like the Potters don’t get the same scrutiny. When she waffles on whether or not to boycott Israel (and claims Harry would have felt the same way), I recall the strange portrayal of race is portrayed in her books—both the portrayal of her “fantasy” races and the human races from our actual world. There’s the house elves, who are totally okay with their perpetual enslavement, and then there’s the human characters of color, who are simply not given the same amount of character development as other characters in Harry Potter.

The major characters of color, like Dean Thomas, Cho Chang or Parvati Patil, rarely take the spotlight. In Thomas’ case, the official Harry Potter lore website Pottermore reported that Rowling had intended for him to have a bigger part in the first book, but that “his backstory was cut to make way for Neville Longbottom’s (necessary) storyline.” Patil and Chang both serve as short-term love interests for Potter and Ron Weasley respectively, until both heroes end up with the (white) girls that they eventually marry. Patil and Chang’s affections are portrayed as either over-emotional and draining or superficial and flighty. None of these characters get the growth or empathy that Rowling’s main trio do. As much as I related to Hermione growing up, I wished there was a major character that turned the tides of the Second Wizarding War that was also black, like I am.

Notably, in the play Harry Potter and the Cursed Child, Hermione is portrayed by a black actress. The play has also sparked debate among Potter fans who think that aspects of it don’t line up with the accepted canon. Those additional elements, including the question of Hermione’s race in the books, remain in limbo. Rowling, meanwhile, has pointed out that “white skin was never specified” for Hermione in the books. So, it’s perfectly conceivable that Hermione could be black, but she’s also portrayed in the movies by Emma Watson, whose sleek curls are a far cry from the bushy hair that comes out of my head.

It’s also weird that there are no explicitly Jewish characters in a series of books that makes analogues to and draws on the imagery of the Holocaust. The prison that Grindelwald built to house his opponents, in which he was later jailed, is called Nurmengard. That name sounds very similar to Nuremberg, a site of Nazi rallies that later became the site of a prison for Nazi war criminals. The villainous Voldemort also preaches about the purity of blood and his intentions to wipe out wizards from mixed families. The ethos of the Death Eaters, his followers, also echoes that “blood purity” ethos of real-life white supremacist groups, as well as Nazi Germany, which introduced blood purity laws.

Now, Rowling has said that Anthony Goldstein was Jewish in the series, although it’s not mentioned in the books at all. If she can include a tutorial on how to pronounce “Hermione” disguised as a conversation between the heroine and her then boyfriend Viktor Krum in the fourth book, you’d think Rowling would have found a way to include one Jewish character.

In Fantastic Beasts 2, the next entry in the Harry Potter franchise, Rowling has yet again introduced a new element to her text. Nagini, Voldemort’s pet snake and a macguffin late in the series, has been revealed to be an East Asian woman that was cursed to be a snake. Rowling has explained that her inspiration for this came from Indonesian mythology, as well as Betawi, Chinese and Javanese cultures. Yet the actress who plays this character is South Korean. She will eventually be an evil white man’s pet, and retroactively, this disturbing piece of information about Nagini is now canon.

The Harry Potter books feel like an ever-growing house of cards. Rowling can’t seem to help herself from adding more and more cards to the tower, and even though all I want to do is cherish my memories of reading these books as a child, I can’t look away from the impending disaster.
 
Last edited:

Positron

Ready to explain photosynthesis to Bill Nye
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
Harry Potter has many allegorical elements, and Rowling is using her books to explain her point of view. In the process, though, she’s also giving us Harry’s supposed stance on Israel and Palestine.
I pity the ones tasked with educating this generation.

If she can include a tutorial on how to pronounce “Hermione”
Teachers don't teach Shakespeare anymore.

It’s also weird that there are no explicitly Jewish characters in a series of books that makes analogues to and draws on the imagery of the Holocaust. The prison that Grindelwald built to house his opponents, in which he was later jailed, is called Nurmengard. That name sounds very similar to Nuremberg, a site of Nazi rallies that later became the site of a prison for Nazi war criminals. The villainous Voldemort also preaches about the purity of blood and his intentions to wipe out wizards from mixed families.
This is not "allegory"; this is just Rowling being a hack.
 
Last edited:

SiccDicc

Ratatatatatatatatatat!
kiwifarms.net
Now, Rowling has said that Anthony Goldstein was Jewish in the series, although it’s not mentioned in the books at all.
>anthony goldstein
>no mentioning of him being jewish
>goldstein

:thinking:

Seriously, though, I'm starting to feel like I was the only one reading non-fiction stuff growing up and/or fiction like the Chronicles of Prydain -- which regrettably I've forgotten a great deal about.
 
Last edited:

MembersSchoolPizza

kiwifarms.net
You know what?

The Harry Potter books feel like an ever-growing house of cards. Rowling can’t seem to help herself from adding more and more cards to the tower, and even though all I want to do is cherish my memories of reading these books as a child, I can’t look away from the impending disaster.
I'll agree with this. Fuck it, I read Harry Pottery (in high school, granted, but they were quick and fun reads, so why not?), and I've seen the movies. It wasn't the Best Thing Ever or nothing, but it was a fun work. Why the fuck Rowling herself needs to keep fucking with it, I dunno... I thought she was already a frooptillionaire from them.

Just let the damned books be books. They were fun. Both Rowling and Millennials need to take a step back. Rowling needs to... I dunno, go buy a yacht and get in a sex scandal, or whatever else rich people do. Millennials need to stop trying to replace religion with Harry Potter. The world would be a better place for both things.
 

Vrakks

Please... I go by Gold Diamond now.
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
I mostly agree with the article tbh. The view they're espousing seems to be 'don't shoehorn all this diversity in if you didn't originally write it that way', which is sane. The reasoning is probably different - I just don't like the idea of having addenums to a novel, of all things, while the author seems disappointed that the diversity wasn't there to begin with - but I don't see how this is a bad article. Except that it's about Harry Potter in 2018 AD.
 

Some Manajerk

kiwifarms.net
Rowling is acting very much like Anne Mccafrey did back in the 90's. It seems she wants people to have only one view of her world and throws a snit fit if anything different pops up. I suspect he only reason she hasn't gone after fan boards like Anne did is that the net is too big for her to police.
 

Graffiti canvas

True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
Rowling needs to... I dunno, go buy a yacht and get in a sex scandal, or whatever else rich people do.
She can't help herself. It's her only source of relevance in the world and she's a spergy bitch. I was done with her and the series in general when she suddenly made Dumbledore gay for no reason what so ever other than to pander to LGBTQ bullshit years after the books were done.
 

Nekromantik

I was phone!
kiwifarms.net
As an adult, I wish J.K. Rowling would just me enjoy her books in peace.
I don't know just read the books, and don't pay attention to anything else. Or maybe read something other then Harry Potter. I guess that may be too scary for Potter heads.

Now, nearing 30, that tattoo is as much a source of embarrassment as it is a source of pride.
It's not Rowling fault that you got a silly tattoo.
 

Tigerwatch

kiwifarms.net
She can't help herself. It's her only source of relevance in the world. I was done with her and the series in general when she suddenly made Dumbledore gay for no reason what so ever other than to pander to LGBTQ bullshit years after the books were done.
This. She just wants to stay relevant and m.ilk Harry Potter until she's six feet underground. If it was actually anything more than virtue signaling, she'd actually write new books.
The only reason she does it is because these manchildren keep giving her publicity for sperging on Twitter anyways.
 

_blank_

The Charles Dickens of Disco
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
And that, my sadsack Kotaku writer (whose name I do not know because I'm not going to give Kotaku a click to find out), is called the rule of diminishing returns.

JK Rowling and her children and her children's children could very easily just live the rest of their lives off the royalties of Harry Potter, but Rowling seems hellbent on not letting something stand the way it is. She appears compelled to pander to the social justice crowd and bend over backwards and make what made her famous as all inclusive as possible. And of course, this pisses off the hardcore fanbase, the ones that helped build Rowling's ivory tower because this betrays what they had envisioned in their head.

But this is how cash cow fandom properties live and die - just can't let a good thing be. Gotta keep going back and try to capture some of that magic but in turn all they're doing is diluting the foundation. Same thing has happened to Star Wars, comic books, and basically every AAA game franchise. That's how this works, sadsack Kotaku writer.
 

DieselBoogaloo

kiwifarms.net
It’s also weird that there are no explicitly Jewish characters in a series of books that makes analogues to and draws on the imagery of the Holocaust.
Imagine the outcry if there were:

"It’s also weird that there are explicitly Jewish characters in a series of books that makes analogues to and draws on the imagery of the Holocaust, yet the Jewish characters are not the victims. It looks like Rowling tries to downplay the Holocaust."
 

Graffiti canvas

True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
Another reason why Tolkien's work is infinitely superior in every way

He had the common courtesy to die before he thought of changing his works years after they were published
Not to mention his estate is hardcore conservative and militant about who and how his IP is presented. Although it will be a dark day indeed when the SJW's run out of shit to REE about and turn their focus on LOTR for it's Cis normative story that excludes trans hobbits.
 

Sperglord Dante

Useless Guato
kiwifarms.net
Exhibit n+1 on nerd hobby news sites fabricating bogus controversy for more outraged clicks. This business model can't die fast enough.
I hate to defend Kotaku, but this isn't manufactured outrage, it's organic.

Plenty of people have complained about Rowling's bullshit additions over the years from different angles, like how Dumbledore being gay either should've been incorporated on the main story or not brought up at all later. When the latest Fantastic Beasts trailer came out I saw with my own two eyes not just die hard Potter spergs complain about Nagini being an asian woman, but normies as well (because seriously, what the fuck).

That being said I don't think an author expanding the universe they've created and adding new details is a bad thing on itself; Rowling's additions to the Potter canon are bad because she's a bad writer and the original books were bad even though her fans can't accept this.
 

Judge Holden

Corpsefucker
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
Ah the sweet smell of tard-on-tard fire. On the one hand we have Kotaku in full "MUH PROBLEMATIC!!! MUH REPREEEESENTASHUN!!" mode, and on the other hand we have JK rowling in full on Woke-Marketing mode in such an inept way that only a spoiled middle aged rich white woman desperate to be trendy can be.

Another reason why Tolkien's work is infinitely superior in every way

He had the common courtesy to die before he thought of changing his works years after they were published
On the contrary. He kept on making revisions and discussing aspects in his books with fellow academics, family, friends, and fans for years.....its just these revisions and "retcons" were entirely due to him wanting to improve the totality of his work for sheer love of it, and for the world he created.

He didnt fucking have aragorn become a socialist or frodo be revealed to be a distant ancestor of MLK. Infact one of the last things he was grappling with before he died was trying to reconcile the always-evil orcs with both his own catholic belief that "anyone can be redeemed" and the unfairness of such a concept in the books given how they had no choice to be created, and was edging towards subverting this by saying they could be redeemed and live in peace with the other races before he died

This really shows the difference between the two writers.

Tolkein is so troubled by the philosophical unfairness of a major aspect in his books that he tries to subvert this very trope he helped create and make the story richer with only death itself stopping him making this more concrete

Rowling makes half the characters niggers in order to get asspats on twitter, and winds up getting shrieked at for both being insufficiently super-woke, and for being really fucking stupid with how she goes about it
 
Tags
None

About Us

The Kiwi Farms is about eccentric individuals and communities on the Internet. We call them lolcows because they can be milked for amusement or laughs. Our community is bizarrely diverse and spectators are encouraged to join the discussion.

We do not place intrusive ads, host malware, sell data, or run crypto miners with your browser. If you experience these things, you have a virus. If your malware system says otherwise, it is faulty.

Supporting the Forum

How to Help

The Kiwi Farms is constantly attacked by insane people and very expensive to run. It would not be here without community support.

We are on the Brave BAT program. Consider using Brave as your Browser. It's like Chrome but doesn't tell Google what you masturbate to.

BTC: 1EiZnCKCb6Dc4biuto2gJyivwgPRM2YMEQ
BTC+SW: bc1qwv5fzv9u6arksw6ytf79gfvce078vprtc0m55s
ETH: 0xc1071c60ae27c8cc3c834e11289205f8f9c78ca5
LTC: LcDkAj4XxtoPWP5ucw75JadMcDfurwupet
BAT: 0xc1071c60Ae27C8CC3c834E11289205f8F9C78CA5
XMR: 438fUMciiahbYemDyww6afT1atgqK3tSTX25SEmYknpmenTR6wvXDMeco1ThX2E8gBQgm9eKd1KAtEQvKzNMFrmjJJpiino