Jacob S. Blaustein / ryu238 / ryu289 / 87Blue - Brony, furry, gets banned everywhere, defends pedophiles, transexuals, and pedophile transexuals, to his last breath and needs others to do the arguing for him

[Spoonomancer]

yo @ryu289 how would you feel about Chris-Chan? He identifies as a trans woman, and you love those right

 

[Doppio Vinegar]

I for one can't wait for our next massive wall of text. How exciting!

 

[Newman's Own]

I for one can't wait for our next massive wall of text. How exciting!

Me too but I think we'd all get a lot more mileage out of it if we stopped feeding his circular arguement generator and focused on those questions about his family and what not.

I suspect there's a treasure trove there waiting to be uncovered Chris Chan style.

Perhaps even a Chris Chan outcome.

 

[A Gay Retard]

Me too but I think we'd all get a lot more mileage out of it if we stopped feeding his circular arguement generator and focused on those questions about his family and what not.

Spoiler: Unverified family dox

A David H. Blaustein has been employed by the office of the public defender in New Jersey as a librarian.
A phone number tied to this name is (201) 656-2066. This is indeed a NJ area code.
He is roughly 73 years old.

He is listed as a former or (likely) current resident of 46 Reynolds Dr., Eatontown NJ, which is tied to the previously mentioned Irene Sanborn. Regardless of Jacob's claim that Jacob does not reside at this address, there is a tie between Ms. Sanborn and David H. Blaustein. It is possible that Jacob lives elsewhere but receives mail at 46 Reynolds Dr. Information is iffy on Lydia but I do not believe that the Lydia and David I. Blaustein, residents of Cape Coral, FL, are related to the case.

https://archive.md/6j960

https://archive.md/CXowR

DO NOT WEEN OUT ON THESE PEOPLE YOU MOTHERFUCKERS

 

[IKOL]

I suspect there's a treasure trove there waiting to be uncovered Chris Chan style.

Then, we need the trans-kid.

 

[GenociderSyo]

 

[IKOL]

Wait a minute, a redditor using our weapon? That's legal?

 

[GenociderSyo]

Wait a minute, a redditor using our weapon? That's legal?

Coffey can use it he's dealt with ryu enough that he is an honoray kiwi by now.

 

[Newman's Own]

Wait a minute, a redditor using our weapon? That's legal?

Coffey can use it he's dealt with ryu enough that he is an honoray kiwi by now.

If you want to beat Hitler you might have to give Stalin air support.

That doesn't mean you endorse the Holodomor.

 

[Inquisitor_BadAss]

View attachment 2598904

That seals it! Now I know for sure Coffey25 is reading this thread since I’ve twice asked @ryu289 about his relationship with his family.

 

[GenociderSyo]

 

[NerdShamer]

View attachment 2599644View attachment 2599640

I won't be surprised if he claims that consuming child porn is an healthy outlet because he's not the one doing it with the child.

That argument feels familiar, for some reason.

 

[GenociderSyo]

I won't be surprised if he claims that consuming child porn is an healthy outlet because he's not the one doing it with the child.

That argument feels familiar, for some reason.

Technically he already used that argument when he was trying to argue with me that looking at that stuff was non-offending.

 

[Cilleystring]

"I have already shown that even your sources agree that pedophilia is defined as an attraction to children. Not the act of CSA"

I recall Jacob earlier saying that his definition of pedophilia is someone who is exclusively attracted to children (someone correct me if I am mistaken). Taking into context that quote above, his whole argument is that the act of child sexual assault does not determine if one is defined as a pedophile, but one has to be exclusively attracted to children to be labelled as such.

So basically his mental gymnastics is this- because he is also attracted to things besides children (adult trannies, animals etc. ) this means he cannot be labelled a pedophile, even if he has committed sexual acts on children in the past.

@ryu289 there's definitely something heinous you've done in your past you fucking diddler, and we're gonna get to the bottom of it

Edit:

 

[Newman's Own]

I recall Jacob earlier saying that his definition of pedophilia is someone who is exclusively attracted to children (someone correct me if I am mistaken). Taking into context that quote above, his whole argument is that the act of child sexual assault does not determine if one is defined as a pedophile, but one has to be exclusively attracted to children to be labelled as such.

Narrow the definition enough and he can say there is no such thing as a pedophile.

And he's just autistic enough to give that tact a try.

 

[Marvin]

"I have already shown that even your sources agree that pedophilia is defined as an attraction to children. Not the act of CSA"

I recall Jacob earlier saying that his definition of pedophilia is someone who is exclusively attracted to children (someone correct me if I am mistaken). Taking into context that quote above, his whole argument is that the act of child sexual assault does not determine if one is defined as a pedophile, but one has to be exclusively attracted to children to be labelled as such.

So basically his mental gymnastics is this- because he is also attracted to things besides children (adult trannies, animals etc. ) this means he cannot be labelled a pedophile, even if he has committed sexual acts on children in the past.

@ryu289 there's definitely something heinous you've done in your past you fucking diddler, and we're gonna get to the bottom of it

Edit:View attachment 2599743

I don't think he insists on exclusivity necessarily, but his argument is just as stupid anyway: he argues that some people can molest kids without being sexually attracted to them at all.

He says some child molesters are just opportunistic and would molest anyone, adults, men, women or children. He claims it's motivated by sadistic, non sexual urges, not a genuine sexual attraction.

Maybe this is correct in some spergy, academic psych context, but (and this is Jacob's poor grasp of language) that's not what the word means in English in general.

It's like the dumb gotcha reddit nerds try to pull with tomatoes being a fruit. Yes, tomatos are botanically/anatomically the fruit of the plant but that's not what the word means by default. That's only what the word means in a narrow, non-standard context.

Now take fruit vs veggie and apply it to his gross, horrifying sexual interests.

 

[A Gay Retard]

It's like the dumb gotcha reddit nerds try to pull with tomatoes being a fruit. Yes, tomatos are botanically/anatomically the fruit of the plant but that's not what the word means by default. That's only what the word means in a narrow, non-standard context.

It’s also worth noting that all fruits are vegetables, just as all people with any attraction to children are pedophiles.

 

[Oxous]

@ryu289 I just tried to read through the last 15 pages and couldn't because you're a kiddy fucker who can't even cite his sources correctly. Could you list your citations in MLA8 format please? Thanks.

E: For reference it should look like this.
Syntaxion. “Jacob S. Blaustein / Ryu238 / ryu289.” Kiwi Farms, Kiwi Farms, 5 Oct. 2021, kiwifarms.net/threads/jacob-s-blaustein-ryu238-ryu289.99675/.

 

[GenociderSyo]

He is far too busy on his playdate with Coffeey today to play here.

 

[fishercat]

He is far too busy on his playdate with Coffeey today to play here.
View attachment 2600147View attachment 2600143View attachment 2600141View attachment 2600138

Hang in there, Coffey. You'll survive, I know you will.