Jacob Stuart Harrison Storytelling Thread - FSTDT Forums Pet Lolcow

@Corbin Dallas Multipass Here is something mysterious that I have seen when walking on a certain trail in the woods behind my college. How did all this junk and concrete building pieces get in the middle of the woods in the first place? It’s as if a UFO picked up all this stuff and dropped it in the woods.


This evidence of alien activity in the area is further evidence that the janitor was abducted by aliens.
Sigh...

You know what? You're obviously right. There's simply no way some random debris could have ended up in the woods except aliens. And obviously all random things are connected, so obviously those same aliens that like to move piles of garbage around for fun also like stealing janitors. And clearly those aliens must be working for the Catholic God, and all this weird behavior is to get you to convert back to his religion.

There's simply no other explanation. It's probably the false monarchs of england putting catholic god up to this because they know you're onto them...
 

Jacob Harrison

Ultimate Catholic Anglo American
kiwifarms.net
Sigh...

You know what? You're obviously right. There's simply no way some random debris could have ended up in the woods except aliens. And obviously all random things are connected, so obviously those same aliens that like to move piles of garbage around for fun also like stealing janitors. And clearly those aliens must be working for the Catholic God, and all this weird behavior is to get you to convert back to his religion.

There's simply no other explanation. It's probably the false monarchs of england putting catholic god up to this because they know you're onto them...
But the Catholic God would send angels, not aliens. I do agree that the aliens are doing these weird things for me to notice. Perhaps the janitor is one of them, and he disappeared for the purpose of getting me to investigate and spread this information on the internet.

The fact that they were able to track where I was walking on the day where the traffic lights started acting weird, indicates that they are beings from the real world, who have been doing these things to spread the message that we are programs in an advanced video games. The coming era where humanity gains knowledge of the fact that we are made out of computer code is the Age of Aquarius.
 
Angels, aliens, what's the difference? God's just an alien from a really big planet anyway. Planet Cathol, I would think, that'd explain the catholics.

Err... you think they're beings from the real world... as opposed to the simulation/video game we live in? Why are they fucking with their own simulation then? The last think you want to do is fuck up the experiment by letting the subjects know they're in an experiment.
 

Jacob Harrison

Ultimate Catholic Anglo American
kiwifarms.net
Angels, aliens, what's the difference? God's just an alien from a really big planet anyway. Planet Cathol, I would think, that'd explain the catholics.

Err... you think they're beings from the real world... as opposed to the simulation/video game we live in? Why are they fucking with their own simulation then? The last think you want to do is fuck up the experiment by letting the subjects know they're in an experiment.
Well if you bought an advanced video game that simulated an entire universe, would you think that the programs in the video game have a right to eventually learn the truth about their universe?
 
Last edited:
Well if you bought an advanced video game that simulated an entire universe, would you think that the programs in the video game have a right to eventually learn the truth about their universe?
How can software algorithms have rights? Especially if it's a video game, an entertainment product.

But I suppose that's a pretty subjective question. And I guess if it's a video game, there must be a bunch of instances. So those would be... parallel universes? I suppose it depends if the game can import characters from other copies of the game...

It's an interesting philosophical question or thought experiment, but as its not disprovable it's not really a "theory". Any given event could be explained just using the internal logic of the universe, or you could explain it using the external logic of the thing doing the simulating.

As such, you can't use it to draw any conclusions because it can be used to support any conclusion you want.

Have you ever heard of "Roko's Basilisk"? It's a thought experiment as well... Although I am a little hesitant to mention it to you as maybe it would stress you out... But it's basically an extremely sinister version of what you're talking about.

If I were personally playing the 'game' maybe I'd find some way to let the people in the game know, or maybe not, probably depends on whether I'd find it interesting. But it's not like we think about letting the units in a game of starcraft know they're in a game, why would they think that about us?
 

Jacob Harrison

Ultimate Catholic Anglo American
kiwifarms.net
How can software algorithms have rights? Especially if it's a video game, an entertainment product.
It is up to the players to determine what rights the characters have. Some players grow so attached to the characters that they want to have a relationship with us which they are able to do since the game is so advanced.
But I suppose that's a pretty subjective question. And I guess if it's a video game, there must be a bunch of instances. So those would be... parallel universes? I suppose it depends if the game can import characters from other copies of the game...
Characters being transferred between copies explains the Mandela Effect. At the same time, the game seems to be online, because as I said earlier, the reason why there is both evidence for and against Catholicism and other religions is because the gods of the religions are players. This indicates that the players compete online over gaining worshippers. Now I am confused on how the game works.
Have you ever heard of "Roko's Basilisk"? It's a thought experiment as well... Although I am a little hesitant to mention it to you as maybe it would stress you out... But it's basically an extremely sinister version of what you're talking about.
I have not. Luckily, I found how improbable it is. https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Roko's_basilisk#So_you.27re_worrying_about_the_Basilisk
 
It is up to the players to determine what rights the characters have. Some players grow so attached to the characters that they want to have a relationship with us which they are able to do since the game is so advanced.
Would you think the players would be more complex than we are? I mean, in the video games we play, the characters are much, much simpler than us. We don't consider them to have any agency, they just follow the rules of the game. Wouldn't these hypothetical alien gamers probably have the same attitude about us?

Characters being transferred between copies explains the Mandela Effect. At the same time, the game seems to be online, because as I said earlier, the reason why there is both evidence for and against Catholicism and other religions is because the gods of the religions are players. This indicates that the players compete online over gaining worshippers. Now I am confused on how the game works.
In this hypothetical made up game, it can work any way you want. But any version of parallel universes would allow an explanation of the Mandela effect, as well as the much simpler explanation, memory isn't as good as we like to think it is. I mean, sure, the game could actually be about influencing the characters within the game to worship you, I imagine there are flash games with similar goals. It could be about just making your characters as confused as possible. It could be a horror game the player is playing all wrong. We could be in a dog's dream.


I wouldn't necessarily put a ton of stock in either rationalwiki, or the general ability to come up with probabilities of theoreticals like that, but on this particular issue, yeah, it's obviously not actually the case. But, at the same time, you could imagine a tiny, tiny possibility. And since the repercussions are so utterly horrible standard risk calculation might suggest you should take steps to prevent it anyway, even given the tiny odds. It's essentially the same as pascal's wager (Rational Wiki actually has a pretty good article on this too), which is how the concept of hell works so well as a deterrent to people leaving religion or breaking their rules. Basically, hell is just so bad that even though the odds of it being real are nonexistent, you might think it's worth following the rules just in case. I think this is relevant to you.
 

Jacob Harrison

Ultimate Catholic Anglo American
kiwifarms.net
Would you think the players would be more complex than we are? I mean, in the video games we play, the characters are much, much simpler than us. We don't consider them to have any agency, they just follow the rules of the game. Wouldn't these hypothetical alien gamers probably have the same attitude about us?


In this hypothetical made up game, it can work any way you want. But any version of parallel universes would allow an explanation of the Mandela effect, as well as the much simpler explanation, memory isn't as good as we like to think it is. I mean, sure, the game could actually be about influencing the characters within the game to worship you, I imagine there are flash games with similar goals. It could be about just making your characters as confused as possible. It could be a horror game the player is playing all wrong. We could be in a dog's dream.



I wouldn't necessarily put a ton of stock in either rationalwiki, or the general ability to come up with probabilities of theoreticals like that, but on this particular issue, yeah, it's obviously not actually the case. But, at the same time, you could imagine a tiny, tiny possibility. And since the repercussions are so utterly horrible standard risk calculation might suggest you should take steps to prevent it anyway, even given the tiny odds. It's essentially the same as pascal's wager (Rational Wiki actually has a pretty good article on this too), which is how the concept of hell works so well as a deterrent to people leaving religion or breaking their rules. Basically, hell is just so bad that even though the odds of it being real are nonexistent, you might think it's worth following the rules just in case. I think this is relevant to you.
But we are far more advanced than the characters in the video games we play, as we have artificial intelligence so we could be as intelligent as the players, and even if we aren’t, we are still sentient and therefore can comprehend the true nature of our existence.
 
Last edited:

Jacob Harrison

Ultimate Catholic Anglo American
kiwifarms.net
I studied more English history and discovered the actual true monarchs of the British Isles.

King John was one of England's worst monarchs. He was very cruel and tyrannical. He got into a dispute with Pope Innocent III over the appointment of the Archbishop of Canterbury, causing the pope to lay an interdict on England and excommunicate John.

In 1213, when he was facing a French invasion, he repented and surrendered England to the papacy, making it a papal fief which the pope accepted.

This offer and concession so piously and wisely made we regard as acceptable and valid, and we take under the protection of Saint Peter and of ourselves your person and the persons of your heirs together with the said kingdoms and their appurtenances and all other goods which are now reasonably held or may in future be so held: to you and to your heirs, according to the terms set out above and by the general advice of our brethren, we grant the said kingdoms in fief and confirm them by this privilege, on condition that any of your heirs on receiving the crown will publicly acknowledge this as a fief held of the Supreme Pontiff and of the Roman Church, and will take an oath of fealty to them. Let no man, therefore, have power to infringe this document of our concession and confirmation, or presume to oppose it. If any man dare to do so, let him know that he will incur the anger of Almighty God and of SS Peter and Paul, His apostles. Amen, amen, Amen.

Edward I and later monarchs did not publicly acknowledge England as a papal fief and do homage and thus forfeited the crown. In 1792, Pope Pius VI recognized George III as king. This means that Elizabeth II is the rightful Queen of England after all.

However she is not the rightful Queen of Scotland because in 1688, the rightful king of Scotland, James VII was illegally overthrown, so his heir Franz of Bavaria is the true heir to the Scottish throne. As for Ireland, in 1175, the Treaty of Windsor between Henry II of England and Ruaidrí Ua Conchobair, High King of Ireland made the Irish kingdoms vassals of England, so my society will restore the true heirs to the thrones of the Irish kingdoms.
 
  • Autistic
Reactions: Absolute Brainlet

Jacob Harrison

Ultimate Catholic Anglo American
kiwifarms.net
Now I discovered the real true heir to the throne of England. As I explained before, King John surrendered England to the papacy, making England a papal fief where his heirs would be kings of England on condition that they acknowledge England as a papal fief and pay annual tribute. Due to conflicts with the papacy, Edward I and Edward II paid the tribute only irregularly, and the last payment was made by Edward III in 1333. In 1365, the king and parliament defied Pope Urban V and rejected papal suzerainty, and therefore forfeited his crown. The throne of England was therefore vacant for over a century.

I recently discovered however, that in 1486, Pope Innocent VIII in a bull recognized Henry VII as King of England which he had the authority to do since England was a papal fief and the throne was vacant. Here is text I found online from the bull which is in Middle English.

And in lyke wise his holmes co[n]fermeth stablishith and approueth the right and title to the Crowne of England of the sayde oure souerayn lorde Henry the seuenthe, and the heires of his body laufully begoten to hym [ ] p[er]teynig aswel by reason of his nyghest and vndouted title of succession as by the right of his most noble [ ] and by eleccyon of the lordes spyrituales and temporales, and other nobles of his Realme and by the naunce and auctorite of parlyament made by the iij. states of this lande

As you can see, the pope also acknowledged the authority of parliament.

Henry VII's son and successor Henry VIII who was England's worst king, committed apostasy because he wanted to annul his marriage to Catherine of Aragon but the pope wouldn't let him. He therefore caused England to have a Protestant reformation, establishing the Church of England which he was the head of, and he tyrannically persecuted Catholics who would not acknowledge the annulment or his supremacy over the Church of England.

He married Anne Boleyn and had Parliament make an Act of Succession, confirming her as Queen of England and the right of her children to succeed to the throne.

A famous Catholic that was martyred for his faith was Sir Thomas More.

In addition to refusing to support the King's annulment or supremacy, More refused to sign the 1534 Oath of Succession confirming Anne's role as queen and the rights of their children to succession. More's fate was sealed.[57][58] While he had no argument with the basic concept of succession as stated in the Act, the preamble of the Oath repudiated the authority of the Pope.[47][59][60]

The 1543 Act of Succession made Henry VIII's daughters Mary and Elizabeth the next in line after his son Edward. After Edward VI died childless in 1553, Mary became Queen and restored the Catholic Church. Unfortunately, she did not help the cause of Catholicism in England because she persecuted Protestants, increasing anti Catholic sentiment. After she died childless, her Protestant sister Elizabeth I succeeded to the throne, and she wickedly persecuted Catholics like her father did which caused Pope Pius V to justly call for her overthrow.

Elizabeth I also did not do her royal duty of naming her successor. The 1543 Act of Succession which was never repealed, excluded the Scottish House of Stuart from the succession and a parliamentary statute in the 1300s excluded foreigners from the throne. Therefore, the rightful heirs after Elizabeth I died childless in 1603 are the descendants of Henry VII's daughter Mary Tudor and the current monarch is Lady Caroline Child-Villiers (b. 9 April 1934).

In 1497, the explorer John Cabot discovered lands in Canada and claimed it for England. In 1585, England established a colony in Roanoke Virginia. Since those territories were not legally relinquished by the rightful monarchs, the United States, and Canada therefore have been illegally ruling over territory that rightfully belongs to Lady Caroline Child-Villiers.
 

Jacob Harrison

Ultimate Catholic Anglo American
kiwifarms.net
Now I discovered the actual true heir to the throne of England and the true government of the United States.

In 1365, when the pope demanded payment as part of the deal when John surrendered England as a papal fief, the English parliament rejected it because they considered the surrender invalid because it wasn’t done with the consent of the great councils and was contrary to John’s coronation oath to protect the rights of the crown.

That means that Edward III did not forfeit the English crown. That means that the descendants of John Holland are the true heirs after all as explained here.
I originally thought that Richard III was the rightful king when I made this post, however, I did further research on the succession system of Richard II before he was overthrown by Henry of Bolingbroke. These previous comments show my further research on the matter.
As for the United States, I realized that the Articles of Confederation was a treaty between sovereign states, but that it lost its binding force when states violated it. Therefore, the Constitution was a legitimate legal replacement of the Articles of Confederation after all.

However the US government has been illegitimate since 1845, when they illegally admitted Texas into the Union, having them gain representation in Congress and allowing them to vote in Presidential elections. It was illegal because Texas is rightful territory of Spain as explained here.
I discovered the true heir to the Southwest region of the United States, Mexico, Cuba, and most of Central and South America.

The territory of the Southwest region, Mexico, Cuba, and most of Central and South America was ruled by the Spanish Empire.

When Phillip V became the first Bourbon King of Spain, he introduced Salic law in Spain which excluded women from inheriting the throne.

Ferdinand VII changed this with the Pragmatic Sanction of 1830 which made his daughter Isabella the next in line. However his brother Carlos /Charles considered the act to be illegal because it was a change in fundamental law without the support of the Cortes. Therefore, he claimed the throne as Charles V after his brothers death in 1833. His supporters were called Carlists so the wars were called the Carlist wars.

Since Isabella II was not the legitimate Queen of Spain, the treaty in 1836 when Spain officially recognized the independence of it's former colonies in the America's is invalid because it was not signed by the rightful King Charles V.

The current rightful Carlist heir to Spain is this guy https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prince_Sixtus_Henry_of_Bourbon-Parma. Right-wing Carlists consider him the rightful heir because his older brother's embrace of socialism made him disqualified from the succession for going against traditional Carlist values.

This means that Mexicans and Southwestern Americans are really citizens of Spain. This will anger conservative Southwestern Americans who don't want undocumented Hispanics coming over, but the rightful king of Spain can enact Affirmative Action laws to protect their rights to not have their jobs taken by Hispanics.
This means that every law and constitutional amendment in the US made after 1845 is invalid. Unfortunately that means that slavery is still legal and women can’t vote so once the Southwest region is given back to Spain, the United States needs to ratify those amendments again.
 
Last edited:
  • Autistic
Reactions: Syaoran Li

Jacob Harrison

Ultimate Catholic Anglo American
kiwifarms.net
@Corbin Dallas Multipass I think I found a better theory for what happened to the janitor. Not that far away from the college I go to, there is a mysterious windowless building. According to google maps, it is a records storage facility but it it doesn't explain what kind of records. I think that it is a government research facility that has been researching alien activity in the area such as the mysterious junk in the woods that was dropped there by a UFO. The Russian that I saw is a spy who was trying to investigate the UFO activity and US involvement.

One day, the janitor went on a walk in the woods after his work shift was over and he saw the pile of junk and came to a similar conclusion that it was alien activity and that the mysterious building is a research facility. He therefore broke into the building pretending to be a janitor that works there and discovered top secret information about the government's knowledge about aliens, however the people at the facility caught him and they are now holding him captive to prevent him from disclosing the information to the public.
 
  • Autistic
Reactions: AnOminous

Jacob Harrison

Ultimate Catholic Anglo American
kiwifarms.net
I now did further research of the Kings of England and discovered something.

When Edward III issued Letters Patent, restricting the crown to those in the male line, it made no provision for females inheriting upon extinction of the male line.

As I said before, Richard II modified the entail to exclude his cousin Henry of Bolingbroke from the throne because Henry was once part of the rebel group called the Lords Appellant. His uncle Edmund was therefore the next in line, but Edmund and his son Edward forfeited their rights when they betrayed Richard and joined Henry’s usurpation of the throne.

Therefore, after Richard was murdered, there was no legitimate male-line heir to the throne so ever since then, England has no monarchy De jure.

However, there are rightful heirs to other titles of nobility who have been deprived of their titles. A good example are the descendants of Thomas le Despenser who was made Earl of Gloucester by Richard II but was attainted by the false king Henry IV because of his role in the righteous execution of Richard’s treasonous uncle Thomas.

So my society plans to restore all the rightful heirs to the English nobility. Then the heirs to the parliament under Richard II can choose what form of government England will be. If they choose to have the House of Windsor to be the reigning dynasty, then I will finally accept them as legitimate. However they are not the legitimate heirs to Scotland so my society will give Scotland independence and restore the true heir to the Scottish throne.
 

Syaoran Li

Cyberpunk 2019
kiwifarms.net
@Jacob Harrison how can a guy like you know so much about history yet be so stupid?

You're missing the forest for the trees. The English are not going to name you their King based on homeopathic claims of royal blood and even if they did, you'd be nothing more than a living tourist attraction like the Windsors currently are.

Seriously, you'd be a lot happier if you let this one go.
 

Senior Lexmechanic

Shitposting displeases the Omnissiah
kiwifarms.net
@Jacob Harrison how can a guy like you know so much about history yet be so stupid?

You're missing the forest for the trees. The English are not going to name you their King based on homeopathic claims of royal blood and even if they did, you'd be nothing more than a living tourist attraction like the Windsors currently are.

Seriously, you'd be a lot happier if you let this one go.
Over in his DT thread, he's upgraded to proclaiming himself a saint and prophet, appointed by God to this task.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Syaoran Li
Tags
None

About Us

The Kiwi Farms is about eccentric individuals and communities on the Internet. We call them lolcows because they can be milked for amusement or laughs. Our community is bizarrely diverse and spectators are encouraged to join the discussion.

We do not place intrusive ads, host malware, sell data, or run crypto miners with your browser. If you experience these things, you have a virus. If your malware system says otherwise, it is faulty.

Supporting the Forum

How to Help

The Kiwi Farms is constantly attacked by insane people and very expensive to run. It would not be here without community support.

BTC: 1DgS5RfHw7xA82Yxa5BtgZL65ngwSk6bmm
ETH: 0xc1071c60Ae27C8CC3c834E11289205f8F9C78CA5
BAT: 0xc1071c60Ae27C8CC3c834E11289205f8F9C78CA5
LTC: LSZsFCLUreXAZ9oyc9JRUiRwbhkLCsFi4q
XMR: 438fUMciiahbYemDyww6afT1atgqK3tSTX25SEmYknpmenTR6wvXDMeco1ThX2E8gBQgm9eKd1KAtEQvKzNMFrmjJJpiino