I'm kind of late to the KF party so I'm curious, what kind of discussion was there around the 'I want his head and balls' tweet? ' I'm honestly surprised that wasn't a bigger issue than a lot of other things. The woman basically broadcasted to like 20k people, probably more due to retweeting, that she wanted a man dead, with context of who the person was attached.
I'm sure there's plenty of autistic groups online that would be more than glad to issue such statements without legal/criminal consequences Off topic with all of today's shenanigans, just some that really bothered me today for some reason.
I haven't been able to find out what was exactly in the post Jamie was responding to. I did find the who but the account she replied to was deleted.
In this archive, you can see she was replying to the individual @alishanico within an @rialisms (Monica's) thread.
archived 21 Feb 2019 14:49:48 UTC
Unfortunately, as stated:
This is the only lead at a first glance:
As much as I'd like say "you could infer, based who these ladies were talking about in early January/February, that the topic of Jamie's post was in regards to Vic Mignogna," inference isn't enough for Judge Chupp. I don't know if an archive exists with Alisha's tweet. Maybe TUG or somebody recorded a video and glanced over the tweet with context.