I haven't been able to find out what was exactly in the post Jamie was responding to. I did find the who but the account she replied to was deleted.I'm kind of late to the KF party so I'm curious, what kind of discussion was there around the 'I want his head and balls' tweet? ' I'm honestly surprised that wasn't a bigger issue than a lot of other things. The woman basically broadcasted to like 20k people, probably more due to retweeting, that she wanted a man dead, with context of who the person was attached.
I'm sure there's plenty of autistic groups online that would be more than glad to issue such statements without legal/criminal consequences Off topic with all of today's shenanigans, just some that really bothered me today for some reason.
In this archive, you can see she was replying to the individual @alishanico within an @rialisms (Monica's) thread.
archived 21 Feb 2019 14:49:48 UTC
Unfortunately, as stated:
This is the only lead at a first glance:
As much as I'd like say "you could infer, based who these ladies were talking about in early January/February, that the topic of Jamie's post was in regards to Vic Mignogna," inference isn't enough for Judge Chupp. I don't know if an archive exists with Alisha's tweet. Maybe TUG or somebody recorded a video and glanced over the tweet with context.