Why do so many people (even those who "support equality" and the like) think that racism and sexism don't exist anymore and that everyone who fights for it "just want to be victims/oppressed for attention"? Like, I don't even..
Because most people want to believe the world/universe/etc is just (look up "just world hypothesis/fallacy"). They feel that if life is going badly for someone, there must be something they're doing to cause it. Factors like institutional racism or sexism are scary, because they imply that the trajectory of someone's life may be entirely out of their own control (or not under the control of their deity of choice).
Also, acknowledging such -isms casts their own prosperity or accomplishments in a dubious light. Who wants to believe that the reason they may be better off in life isn't because they're naturally more talented or smarter or stronger, but because their "competition" is handicapped from the outset? (And let's not even go into the problem with seeing every other human being as competition).
Finally, privileged people also have problems, and they don't like being made to feel like maybe their problems are less important. Particularly when you're life *doesn't* have the challenges associated with institutional sexism or racism, it's easy to become bitter about certain problems you have. Additionally, because they hide themselves so well, people tend to blame the wrong things. For example, if someone is having a hard time finding a job, it's easy to lash out about a black guy getting a job because of affirmative action rather than understand that a black person is going to have a harder time *in general* getting a foot in the door because of their blackness -- they don't care about the attempt to mitigate prejudice, they just see someone getting a job in a way that seems "preferential". The economy, or even a huge corporation, seem like "enemies" that are too intimidating to take on -- but a black man, or a specific policy? That's an easier target. It's "safer" to be angry and rail against the disadvantaged than against larger, more difficult adversaries.
I'm legit curious: since feminism is all about equality for everyone, why is the term "feminist"? Wouldn't the term "equalist" be better because it describes what it actually is to avoid misunderstandings and straight hateful ignorance (like right now tbh) or would that not make it any better?
http://fembotmag.com/2015/02/06/so-if-its-for-everyone-why-is-it-called-feminism/
Additionally, I'll say this: I think people (mostly men) debate the term so much because they imagine the tables turning. I think they start imagining a world where women (as a social power, not individually) treat them as poorly as patriarchy has treated women. And yet most want to claim ignorance when anyone talks about patriarchy, like it's not real. They can only imagine turnabout (or "revenge"), rather than a total paradigm shift. I think that's why they're afraid of he feminism label.
I tuned in this stream for a moment and one of the first things i heard besides TB blaming his team and bitching about overtime and how much it sucked (mind its the same exact system that tf2 uses and no one has problems with iirc) was him going off about how he wasnt going to play more warframe because the subreddit are fucking idiots.
I turned it off, the echochamber that followed that was too much for me.
Wasn't hard for me to find the problem. TB is extremely arrogant in this video, "don't play with 3 tanks" (himself a tank), "healer, stop dying" (charging in 1v3+ and dies) and so on. It's basicly TB telling everyone what they do wrong while doing stuipd moves on his own at the same time.