JK Rowling and the Use of Pseudoscience to Justify Transphobia -

[theshep]

i'm way too busy right now doing things that generate revenue to spend a lot of time researching anything for this site for the next three weeks unless somebody wants to feed my PayPal (drwhatsthis@hotmail.com) . i have CashApp too if somebody wants to use that and if nothing else is safe enough, there's always WU.

Have you thought about opening an OnlyFans? I hear it's a good way to make money.

 

[Positron]

Rowling's books have always had subliminal transphobic themes and her latest is focused on a transvestite serial killer.

Yo dawg I think you'll enjoy this film. Ask your hobo friends if they can find you a copy in the landfills.

 

[Tragi-Chan]

You have lied about me being a "fetishist facist". I have no wish to be civil towards you as you are not only uncivil. you are actively participating in standard woke progressive abusive language. As you lie and abuse people, you don't deserve politeness.

His demands for politeness are dishonest. As you say, he demands behaviour from others that he doesn’t follow himself, and it’s very clear that it’s a distraction technique. If he was so offended by his deadname, how could he stand to be on a forum that routinely dissects his sins and mocks him for them?

This attempt to win an argument by force is 100% chauvinistic male behaviour. I don’t doubt that he used similar techniques to pressure Sabrina into bed.

He probably did come across as fairly intellectual among other deadbeat hippies in the pre-Internet days, but now he’s outclassed.

In conclusion:
GALILEO: “I was arrested by the Spanish Inquisition, had my works suppressed, was placed under house arrest for life and was forced to recant my life’s work!”
TOM: “You called me Tom BAWWWWWWW!”

 

[WhatIsThePunchline]

that was no lie. you are lunatic fringe as are the people you are talking about. they are not "my movement" . i am a member of HRC and a loose association of facebook group owners. we do not abuse anybody and we are real fucking patient with misinformed millennial mental midgets and totally deranged boomers and gen X ers who are pointing out "critical flaws" in the entire transgender experience, completely beyond any political considerations, that are based in shitty scripture interpretations, debunked pseudoscience and paranoid delusions. What happened to ideas like "live and let live?" and all that Jesus stuff about judging not lest you be judged and sinners casting first stones?

I also think the militant TRA's self defeating assholes and a greater existential threat to the community well being than any haters outside the community , but you fucking bigots are denying the legitimacy of our entire community's existence, so you can't hardly blame them for getting upset. if I have misappraised you and lumped you in with the rest of the fetishistic fascists around here, i apologize. which do you deny, fetishism, fascism or both?

Rowling's books have always had subliminal transphobic themes and her latest is focused on a transvestite serial killer. I'm hunting for somebody's blog that broke it all down.

https://www.vox.com/culture/21449215/troubled-blood-review-jk-rowling-transphobia-controversy

You are a woke-progressive. This thread is a textbook woke progressive tactic. Your arguments are textbook woke progressives. Your lies and the abuse you heap on your opponents are woke progressive in nature. You support abusive behaviors such as the harassment campaign directed towards JK Rowling. You are lying about her critique being pseudo scientific, you have lied about her being a 'white supremacist' and you have lied about her being a transphobe.

I do not accept your apology. The 'rest of the people around here' are not 'fetishistic fascists either. JK Rowling is not a transphobe, does not believe in white supremacy, and is not 'pseudoscientific'. Apologize to her and acknowledge her critique as legitimate.

There are no 'subliminal transphobic themes' in her books. Writing a transvestite as a bad guy in a work of fiction is not inherently transphobic. Your entire argument is based of lies intended to mischaracterize JK Rowling exactly so that you have an excuse to harass her. This is why your movement is exclusionary at its core.

 

[Mariposa Electrique]

If he was so offended by his deadname, how could he stand to be on a forum that routinely dissects his sins and mocks him for them?

As well, if he's so offended by his actual name why choose something so close to it and why have a long Internet history of being a pants shitting hobo getting arrested, and having your name plastered on criminal websites for the world to see? His whole trans narrative is nothing but a sick, disgusting grab at power.

 

[Solid Snek]

i didn't say that Rowling was committing genocide. I am saying that she and all of you are complicit in carrying forward a genocidal agenda by embracing all this pseudoscience and paranoid delusions as valid. I'm also saying that trans people exist as a marginalized minority within every single one of those other demographics.

But we're not doing a genocidal anything, though. Per the UN Convention on Genocide, which you brought into this, trans are not a group that is eligible to be genocided.

Even if JK Rowling was personally going around killing trans people with her bare hands, she would still not be "carrying forward a genocidal agenda". Unless and until the trans community becomes a religion, ethnicity, or nation-state, then using the word "genocide" in any context relating to trans (whether you are describing the actual killing of trans, which no one is doing, or simply the mild criticism of trans, as Rowling is doing), is defamatory, ridiculous, and - according to the very sources which you yourself chose to cite - demonstrably incorrect.

 

[BigTodd]

I am not a "he". If you wish to communicate with me and get a civil , reasoned response, you will refer to me as "Tommie" , "she" or "they" and never "Tom" or "him"

One of my favorite trender sayings. Nevermind that it makes no sense to refer to a person with pronouns "she", "he", or "they" when communicating with them. Nay, this demand isn't about communication with the person but an effort to compel speech when the person receiving the demand communicates with a third party about the trender.

 

[Schmoochers]

What's this got to do with JK Rowling. You're just going on a pity rant?

 

[Tragi-Chan]

I don’t know why troons whine so much about genocide. Between suicide, poor health and voluntary sterilisation, they’re not really in the best position.

 

[ThatOneLurker]

Yo dawg I think you'll enjoy this film. Ask your hobo friends if they can find you a copy in the landfills.
View attachment 2066375

Silence of the Lambs too.

 

[Solid Snek]

I don’t know why troons whine so much about genocide. Between suicide, poor health and voluntary sterilisation, they’re not really in the best position.

That's a good point. They're essentially trying to genocide themselves, totally voluntarily and without any input from the outside world.

Maybe it's just some weird, collective fetish? An entire community of sexual masochists, built on self-mutilation and erotic genocide LARPing?

 

[The Spice boi]

Sure, but now you're asking me to work and I will require a $200 dollar retainer to do your research for you. I would need to go back on our conversation to see what false notions you're clinging to and I'm just not in the mood to do that much work for free, chum. Rowling is opposing access to gender care for minors.. The bills trying to outlaw that and ban transgender people from school sports are genocidal in nature.

Lol no one has to pay you shit, you fucking mong.

You came here to argue your point, we didn't ask you to come here and shit up the joint

 

[Dee Price]

Show me a gender. Physically show me one. Measure one for me objectively.
You can't, becuase it's a 'social construct.' I.E. It doesn't exist.

I don't need a "peer reviewed" paper for that. I can reason all by myself.

There is two genders. male and female. Now the slop tom is talking is found at Tumblr. Now none of them are medical doctors. Most at the time this started were not even out of high school. Well with the exception of tom who had not been in high school for around 50 years.

Think girl so ugly that even if mom hung a steak around her neck the family dog would not play with her. a boy so limp that he claims to be a lesbian in a male body.

Then you get what tom is Low IQ screeching tard, just like the rest of the tumblr tards.

Nice projection, vidiot who is almost certain to die violently. how many times do you need to be told that I AM NOT A TRANSSEXUAL? I have no intention of modifying my body at all besides trying to drop about 50 pounds of fat.

Die stupid then. We're done here. You're a waste of bandwidth; nothing more than another transphobic talking turd to ignore.

If you were actually properly informed about the dynamic between transgender children, their parents and their physicians, you would understand that forcing transgender children into cisgender roles is child abuse, but you're not. We are witnessing the first generation of happy transgender children in the history of western civilization. Why do you want to take their happiness away? How does a person's gender expression have any impact on you that you should be so hostile toward transgender children's parents?

It was respectful enough, but you got stuck on stupid on several points. I'm not the only one who dares call it genocide either.​

​

Anybody who supports the anti-trans legislation is complicit in a genocidal agenda. Trans people are being killed for being transgender and in some countries it's open season on them. In Brazil, the police kill them pretty regularly. Some 3/4 of all transgender people in the US report being assaulted for being transgender at least once in their lives. All five conditions of the UN definition of genocide apply to the gender non-conforming community, which has representatives in ever other demographic. ​

​

Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide​

Article II
In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:

1. Killing members of the group;
2. Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
3. Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
4. Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
5. Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

Elements of the crime​

The Genocide Convention establishes in Article I that the crime of genocide may take place in the context of an armed conflict, international or non-international, but also in the context of a peaceful situation. The latter is less common but still possible. The same article establishes the obligation of the contracting parties to prevent and to punish the crime of genocide.

The popular understanding of what constitutes genocide tends to be broader than the content of the norm under international law. Article II of the Genocide Convention contains a narrow definition of the crime of genocide, which includes two main elements:

1. A mental element: the "intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such"; and
2. A physical element, which includes the following five acts, enumerated exhaustively:
   • Killing members of the group
   • Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group
   • Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part
   • Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group
   • Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group

The intent is the most difficult element to determine. To constitute genocide, there must be a proven intent on the part of perpetrators to physically destroy a national, ethnical, racial or religious group. Cultural destruction does not suffice, nor does an intention to simply disperse a group. It is this special intent, or dolus specialis, that makes the crime of genocide so unique. In addition, case law has associated intent with the existence of a State or organizational plan or policy, even if the definition of genocide in international law does not include that element.

Importantly, the victims of genocide are deliberately targeted - not randomly – because of their real or perceived membership of one of the four groups protected under the Convention (which excludes political groups, for example). This means that the target of destruction must be the group, as such, and not its members as individuals. Genocide can also be committed against only a part of the group, as long as that part is identifiable (including within a geographically limited area) and “substantial.”

Shut up Thomas. You make things worse not better with your deluded halfwit garbage.

You said "Gender is determined by a mosiac of brain structures" -- determined, not merely associated -- I ask you to name them. You then said "There are numerous sexually dimorphic structures in the brain" -- You made a cause-and-effect statement and then switch to a mere correlation statement. Something that is different between the two sexes does not necessarily mean that gender is determined by these things. You may as well said gender is determined by the presence or absence of the beard.

You are not answering my question and tried to throw me off with a paper you obviously didn't read, much less understand.


The Sexually Dimorphic Nucleus is NOT located in the hippocampus.

Tom has no clue. Now the brain is a mosaic but that is about ease of connection. It has nothing to do with the sexually dimorphic nucleus and there are many of them. In fact all of them are sexually dimorphic. That is what Thomas does not get. the first found that deals with transsexuals is the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis. There are many many more. Like this one the biological clock both gay and trans share this sexually dimorphic nucleus.

Now see this shows tom is a moron. and it is the BSTc that goes from the hypothalamus to amygdala by traveling all the way around the limbic system showing this cluster formed before the brain folded over.

lol. Keep bloviating , mean, stupid , false bullshit at me, you mean, stupid, worthless fetishistic fascist. I neve raped a dog . I never molested a child and you would do the world a great service if you would kill yourself , you pitiful , self loathing, jellied jagoff.

My error; hypothalmus. You sir, are far too aggressive to communicate with and far too committed to the only two sexes fallacy to even rationally consider any of the evidence to the contrary, so bye bye , mr. AmeriKKKan Pig.

Project much tom? You really are a retard. Do get you have no clue about science. and how many times have i caught you making mistakes in biology? Mr FSH/LSH.... Which is really FSH/LH. But Mr durr Thomas the retard dog fucker knows all but can not keep it all straight in his bent twisted half of head of rotten cabbage brainlet.

Hippocampus the part of the brain used for memory allocation. You stupid old retarded man.

Sorry, forgive the confusion, but... could you remind me again, which of the bolded groups trans happen to be?

Are trans a national group? Ethnicity? Religion, maybe?

No we are a group of people with a neurological crosswire.

Transgender people are a minority class that exist in all demographics. The transgender condition is a genetic anomaly that results in a mismatch between a person's sex and gender. It is only recent that transgender people could even unify enough to call ourselves an actually defined minority, so the UN is just catching up on that. If you search the UN site on Intersex and Transgender rights, you'll likely see the term used in those position papers.

Sure, but now you're asking me to work and I will require a $200 dollar retainer to do your research for you. I would need to go back on our conversation to see what false notions you're clinging to and I'm just not in the mood to do that much work for free, chum. Rowling is opposing access to gender care for minors.. The bills trying to outlaw that and ban transgender people from school sports are genocidal in nature.

No stupid trans is not a genetic anomaly. It is a rare secondary genetic trait. You are so stupid and totally ignorant of biology. there is no extra genetic material. What there is you fool is a double repeat length polymorphic AR receptor. You are so full of shit and have no clue what you are talking about.

You do get i enjoy showing you how stupid you are and totally unable of actual biological work. You can not research it due to you not being able to comprehend it. So much so you do not even know the names of the clusters. Or anything about the genetics or even the basics slip past that shit slop mound of stupidity you try to call a brain.

The things you state as fact about transgender people are genocidal in nature, transphobic talking turd.

The things you say come from the deformed brain of a totally ree'd out pinhead.

that was no lie. you are lunatic fringe as are the people you are talking about. they are not "my movement" . i am a member of HRC and a loose association of facebook group owners. we do not abuse anybody and we are real fucking patient with misinformed millennial mental midgets and totally deranged boomers and gen X ers who are pointing out "critical flaws" in the entire transgender experience, completely beyond any political considerations, that are based in shitty scripture interpretations, debunked pseudoscience and paranoid delusions. What happened to ideas like "live and let live?" and all that Jesus stuff about judging not lest you be judged and sinners casting first stones?

I also think the militant TRA's self defeating assholes and a greater existential threat to the community well being than any haters outside the community , but you fucking bigots are denying the legitimacy of our entire community's existence, so you can't hardly blame them for getting upset. if I have misappraised you and lumped you in with the rest of the fetishistic fascists around here, i apologize. which do you deny, fetishism, fascism or both?

Rowling's books have always had subliminal transphobic themes and her latest is focused on a transvestite serial killer. I'm hunting for somebody's blog that broke it all down.

https://www.vox.com/culture/21449215/troubled-blood-review-jk-rowling-transphobia-controversy

REEEEEEEEEEE boo hoo REEEEEE Hush tom stop with all the tard screeching.

 

[deso2y]

Grandpa, if it's about hearts not parts, why do you insist on the whole pronouns thing? shouldn't you look inside for validation?

 

[EmpireOfTheClouds]

I am not a "he".

Yes, you are.

 

[Mariposa Electrique]

if I have misappraised you and lumped you in with the rest of the fetishistic fascists around here, i apologize. which do you deny, fetishism, fascism or both?

Who has ever fetishized anything about you? You're the one who constantly drones on about the age of consent being 12 and about how dogs need noogies. You're not attractive in an objective or subjective sense and just because some disgusting hobo left you with a mouth full of semen without payment, you think you have the sexual magnetism of Pamela Anderson Lee or Ava Gardner.

You're literally a pants shitting, hideous, bald, overweight , ugly chain-smoking hobo, who on video has admitted to molesting children and dogs, being a pedophile, and eating your own fucking boogers.

You're mad at TRAs because even mentally ill troons have standards that pants shitting skizos, who molest children, like you do not meet.

 

[discombobulate]

Mean, stupid transphobic people who are totally misinformed about the true facts of transgender athletes in sports really should not be calling other people "retarded" when they are so obviously learning impaired themselves. Your facts are nonsense. Back them with a peer reviewed paper published after 2015 or STFU.

tl;dr version: fuck off, you transphobic talking turd.

Peer-reviewed papers about the state of the law on Title IX? That's not really how law works. But here you go: the DoJ submitted this document last year in support of some girls seeking relief. You can bet your ass it's "peer-reviewed" in the best sense, in that the OCR agreed with them and declared CIAT's policy illegal. In it, it's pointed out that Title IX is about sex discrimination and other laws that do include trans people also include "gender identity" or a similar phrase somewhere in the text, which Title IX does not.

If you want facts about bad male athletes identifying as male and then beating women at their own game you could look at the original complaint. If you want facts about women's national soccer teams losing to schoolboys: https://www.cbssports.com/soccer/ne...-the-u-s-womens-national-team-in-a-scrimmage/ Just look at those boys: under 15 and still towering over grown women who happen to be some of the most athletic women in the world. The boys are only in the middle of puberty and the difference is already clear: they aren't, and never could be, women.

 

[MediocreMilt]

Real trans activists haven't been threatening her. That' s been militant armchair activists and keyboard commandos.

Aren't you that guy who keeps saying you hope someone from here or AMB will threaten you so that you can tell the cops and have these sites shut down (because in your mind that's how things work)?

But threatening words on the internet don't count when they're directed at people you don't like now?

Make sure to explain the distinction to the nice detective the next time you waste police resources with one of your phone calls.

 

[FierceBrosnan]

It's probably already been said, but way more pseudoscience goes into justifying going trans than it does being transphobic.

 

[Miss Tommie Jayne Wasserberg]

Peer-reviewed papers about the state of the law on Title IX? That's not really how law works. But here you go: the DoJ submitted this document last year in support of some girls seeking relief. You can bet your ass it's "peer-reviewed" in the best sense, in that the OCR agreed with them and declared CIAT's policy illegal. In it, it's pointed out that Title IX is about sex discrimination and other laws that do include trans people also include "gender identity" or a similar phrase somewhere in the text, which Title IX does not.

If you want facts about bad male athletes identifying as male and then beating women at their own game you could look at the original complaint. If you want facts about women's national soccer teams losing to schoolboys: https://www.cbssports.com/soccer/ne...-the-u-s-womens-national-team-in-a-scrimmage/ Just look at those boys: under 15 and still towering over grown women who happen to be some of the most athletic women in the world. The boys are only in the middle of puberty and the difference is already clear: they aren't, and never could be, women.

i'm not downloading any pdfs from this site onto my machine. put that in html form please.


your argument about the 15 year old cisgender males is a false equivalence fallacy. The DOJ report from last year was drafted by a transphobic administration as an Amicus Curiae. I have no idea what they cited, but it has no validity today. i'm not going to do your research for you unless you want to pay me about the physical differences between transgender girls who were raised female and started blockers by Tanner Stage 2 and cisgender boys. You are demanding an unfair solution to a problem that doesn't exist using invalid facts as your reasons for doing it.

It's probably already been said, but way more pseudoscience goes into justifying going trans than it does being transphobic.

Perhaps by the militant TRAs, but not by the big advocacy groups. Your perception of the trans reality is limited to a cartoon section of the community making a lot of noise on the social networks. Tune into the science being expressed by all the medical authorities that the ACLU , HRC and the rest of them are filing to support protective legislation and oppose dangerous discriminatory legislation.