Filed & Entered: 05/23/2017 Terminated: 05/30/2017
Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer Summary: Zaiger's attorney's first motion requests a time extension to respond, claiming that Zaiger is a layperson and he needed the original time grant just to find an attorney.
Filed & Entered: 05/26/2017
Answer to Complaint Summary: This is the first substantive motion by Zaiger's attorney. It contests all claims and countermotions that Monsarrat is a vexatious litigant and knowingly committing perjury by submitting before the court a frivolous DMCA complaint that the attorney alleges he should have, and did in fact, know was not a valid complaint.
Filed & Entered: 05/26/2017
Opposition to Motion Summary: Jonathan Monsarrat (a cunt) and his lawyer (also a cunt) attempts to throw out the entire answer to complaint given by the attorney, saying that the fact zaiger has never been in court before and was seeking out counsel, quote: "does not allow an inference that he carelessly neglected the deadline, must less constitute the requisite minimum "convincing explanation as to why the neglect was excusable." "
Filed & Entered: 05/31/2017
Opposition to Motion Summary: "Plaintiff’s counsel describes his own motion as “silly” and “wasteful” (Dkt. No. 27 at 2; Dkt. 27-1 at 2). Defendant concurs with this characterization."