Jonathan vs Amy Hamm (@preta_6) - Jonathan claims Post Millennial reporter sexually assaulted him in a courthouse restroom.

yesthatanna

kiwifarms.net
Could shit like there lead to a perjury charge or must in actually be in court? Of course someone from the Crown would actually have to be proactive.
A

Amy should add it to her civil lawsuit. It's another lie to damage her reputation
Oh I 100% encouraged her to tell her legal team. Don’t you worry about that.

I think it’s psychotic the dried up sponge can just fling terms around like that with no consequence.

A CHARGE is a very specific thing. And this time, Yaniv implicated the RCMP in his shenanigans, suggesting THEY were the locus of this charge. Not a private prosecution like with Donald Smith. But the RCMP themselves.

I was very clear when I stated that to the RCMP today on the phone.

I’m fuming about it.
 

Just Gillsby

kiwifarms.net
I rerun my search and still get 22, as evidenced below. Of course I didn't use a first name or initial in my search.

View attachment 1181348View attachment 1181344



So I start wondering if there could possibly be another Yaniv 'laying an information' in BC. My guess was that it is not that Dan guy. So I run another search and lo and behold - the other Yaniv.

View attachment 1181354
Yes, it's in Yaniv's preferred location, too... Taking it a step further, The potato has a tendency to file these in fits, so I did a brute-force breakdown of possibilities. I scanned ahead a fair bit, and it looks like these files all arereasonably probable of being connected with Yaniv.

CSO-SUR-PA-SEARCH-20200310-185055EDT-NUMBER-237804-1.jpg

#237804 Feb 3rd 0930H in #310 opened 2020Jan13 Application by Yaniv Stay of Proceeding

CSO-SUR-PA-SEARCH-20200310-185104EDT-NUMBER-237804-2.jpg

#237804 Feb 3rd 0930H in #310 opened 2020Jan13 Application by Yaniv Stay of Proceeding

CSO-SUR-PA-SEARCH-20200310-185253EDT-NUMBER-237805-1.jpg

#237805
Informant Application by Yaniv Opened 2020Jan15
Originally scheduled for Feb3rd 1400PST in #310
Rescheduled for Mar16th at 0930PDT in #310

CSO-SUR-PA-SEARCH-20200310-185306EDT-NUMBER-237805-2.jpg

#237805
Informant Application by Yaniv Opened 2020Jan15
Originally scheduled for Feb3rd 1400PST in #310
Rescheduled for Mar16th at 0930PDT in #310

CSO-SUR-PA-SEARCH-20200310-190742EDT-NUMBER-237805-3.jpg

#237805
Informant Application by Yaniv Opened 2020Jan15
Originally scheduled for Feb3rd 1400PST in #310
Rescheduled for Mar16th at 0930PDT in #310

CSO-SUR-PA-SEARCH-20200310-175718EDT-NUMBER-237809.jpg

CSO-SUR-PA-SEARCH-20200310-175751EDT-NUMBER-237813.jpg

CSO-SUR-PA-SEARCH-20200310-175800EDT-NUMBER-237814.jpg

CSO-SUR-PA-SEARCH-20200310-175810EDT-NUMBER-237815.jpg

CSO-SUR-PA-SEARCH-20200310-175820EDT-NUMBER-237816.jpg

CSO-SUR-PA-SEARCH-20200310-175828EDT-NUMBER-237817.jpg

CSO-SUR-PA-SEARCH-20200310-175837EDT-NUMBER-237818.jpg

CSO-SUR-PA-SEARCH-20200310-175845EDT-NUMBER-237819.jpg

CSO-SUR-PA-SEARCH-20200310-175853EDT-NUMBER-237820.jpg

CSO-SUR-PA-SEARCH-20200310-175901EDT-NUMBER-237821.jpg

CSO-SUR-PA-SEARCH-20200310-175909EDT-NUMBER-237822.jpg

CSO-SUR-PA-SEARCH-20200310-175916EDT-NUMBER-237823.jpg

CSO-SUR-PA-SEARCH-20200310-175924EDT-NUMBER-237824.jpg


I don't think there's a 1:1 ratio, but it's damn close. Should be able to do more clarification in the next couple days, but at least these are the reasonably probable file numbers now.

Naming scheme is:
CSO = repo for Court Services Online
SUR = Surrey Provincial Court location
PA = Provincial Adult section.. omiting the usual hyphen because most CMS strip 'A' out of strings, but leave 'PA'
SEARCH = Results designation (versus a file number)
20200310-185055EDT = Date-Time
NUMBER = Search by number, person, or date, etc
237804 = The respective number
1 = the sequence
 
Last edited:

C4605

kiwifarms.net
Could shit like there lead to a perjury charge or must in actually be in court? Of course someone from the Crown would actually have to be proactive.
It would be obstruction of justice, but yes, it's a crime. However, as you pointed out, the Crown would have to take it on. The Crown wouldn't usually prosecute something like this unless it was part of a wider fraud (e.g. real estate fraud, securities fraud, etc.). Frankly, the provincial Crown in Surrey is horrifically under-resourced and has much more important things to worry about, like gang shootings.
 

Surrey Cleric B

kiwifarms.net
It would be obstruction of justice, but yes, it's a crime. However, as you pointed out, the Crown would have to take it on. The Crown wouldn't usually prosecute something like this unless it was part of a wider fraud (e.g. real estate fraud, securities fraud, etc.). Frankly, the provincial Crown in Surrey is horrifically under-resourced and has much more important things to worry about, like gang shootings.
There could be another avenue available, if this makes any sense. The concept of a "malicious prosecution" is kinda foreign to most though, including yours truly.
 

C4605

kiwifarms.net
There could be another avenue available, if this makes any sense. The concept of a "malicious prosecution" is kinda foreign to most though, including yours truly.
That's a very interesting idea. Canadian courts do not recognize a tort of malicious prosecution in civil cases. It is only used where prosecutors go crazy, and occasionally regulatory bodies (e.g. College of Physicians and Surgeons). The seminal case is when a nurse was charged with killing four babies in a ridiculous vendetta; quite the scandal. Malicious proseuction is often pleaded but rarely proved.

However, Yaniv is attempting a private prosecution under the Criminal Code. The point of that is to step into the shoes of the prosecutor, which would theoretically include responsibilities along with prerogatives. Conceptually, I think it could convince a judge. I looked for precedent, but this is such an unusual case that there wasn't any. As usual, JY is breaking new ground in being a real nutter.

Edit: Forgot to mention that the usual remedy for ridiculous civil actions is costs on a solicitor-client basis (essentially to recover 90%+ of costs)
 
Last edited:

Norman B. Normal

I probably shouldn't be here.
kiwifarms.net
Yes, it's in Yaniv's preferred location, too... Taking it a step further, The potato has a tendency to file these in fits, so I did a brute-force breakdown of possibilities. I scanned ahead a fair bit, and it looks like these files all arereasonably probable of being connected with Yaniv.

View attachment 1182090
#237804 Feb 3rd 0930H in #310 opened 2020Jan13 Application by Yaniv Stay of Proceeding

View attachment 1182092
#237804 Feb 3rd 0930H in #310 opened 2020Jan13 Application by Yaniv Stay of Proceeding

View attachment 1182093
#237805
Informant Application by Yaniv Opened 2020Jan15
Originally scheduled for Feb3rd 1400PST in #310
Rescheduled for Mar16th at 0930PDT in #310

View attachment 1182094
#237805
Informant Application by Yaniv Opened 2020Jan15
Originally scheduled for Feb3rd 1400PST in #310
Rescheduled for Mar16th at 0930PDT in #310

View attachment 1182095
#237805
Informant Application by Yaniv Opened 2020Jan15
Originally scheduled for Feb3rd 1400PST in #310
Rescheduled for Mar16th at 0930PDT in #310















I don't think there's a 1:1 ratio, but it's damn close. Should be able to do more clarification in the next couple days, but at least these are the reasonably probable file numbers now.

Naming scheme is:
CSO = repo for Court Services Online
SUR = Surrey Provincial Court location
PA = Provincial Adult section.. omiting the usual hyphen because most CMS strip 'A' out of strings, but leave 'PA'
SEARCH = Results designation (versus a file number)
20200310-185055EDT = Date-Time
NUMBER = Search by number, person, or date, etc
237804 = The respective number
1 = the sequence
Man, fuck this "Access Restricted" shit. This is exactly the kind of shit that made us go to war against George III.
 

Just Gillsby

kiwifarms.net
That's exactly why they do it. It could needlessly damage someone's reputation when some asshole (Yaniv) keeps filing false attempts at prosecutions.
But they prevent publication and notification of the public about predatory litigants (Yaniv) who are loose in the community and orchestrating or fabricating the circumstances to propersecute vulnerable or not individuals in the community.
This is some Star Chamber bullshit, and the fact that they force you to pay to ensure transparency in our publicly funded judicature is disturbing, not to mention that their systems are severely dated. The system has acted to enable Yaniv to prey on vulnerable members of society, be they immigrant aestheticians or domestic tards, the AG has acted as party to the abuse and harassment of individuals, even whilst shielding the fat troon from public scrutiny.

Enough I say, let that motherfucker burn.

EDIT: Remember, the court is allowing Yaniv to submit information under the shroud of "Restricted Access". Do you know how fucking hard it was to extract the time and date of those fucking "Private Persecution" events?
There is no possible justification for protecting the identity of an informant. It's not a fucking election. There is a principle called "Access to Justice".
 
Last edited:

Surrey Cleric B

kiwifarms.net
That's a very interesting idea. Canadian courts do not recognize a tort of malicious prosecution in civil cases.
The malicious prosecution is 237805 (against Hamm), which coincided with 237804 (against Bexte, presumably, staid by Crown). Another malicious prosecution (what gave him the confidence to spread his wings and flaunt his prowess) was when breached Smith on a fabricated/synthesized Private Information. The files from the VAN registry were posted elsewhere here in early Jan, I believe.

Yaniv previously attempted (and succeeded) in a facilitating a malicious prosecution against Smith, based upon a breach of Recog, that apparently occurred on or about 2019Dec11.

CSO-SUR-PA-237538-20200102-0005EST-CHARGES-BREACH-COMMIT.jpg

CSO-VAN-PA-237538-20191230-1611PST-RESULTS-ARREST-ORDER-FOR-DONALD-FRANCIS-SMITH-1.jpg

CSO-VAN-PA-237538-20191230-1611PST-RESULTS-ARREST-ORDER-FOR-DONALD-FRANCIS-SMITH-2.jpg

CSO-VAN-PA-237538-20191230-1611PST-RESULTS-ARREST-ORDER-FOR-DONALD-FRANCIS-SMITH-3.jpg

CSO-VAN-PA-237538-20191230-1611PST-RESULTS-ARREST-ORDER-FOR-DONALD-FRANCIS-SMITH-4.jpg

CSO-VAN-PA-237538-20191230-1611PST-RESULTS-ARREST-ORDER-FOR-DONALD-FRANCIS-SMITH-5.jpg

CSO-VAN-PA-237538-20191230-1611PST-RESULTS-ARREST-ORDER-FOR-DONALD-FRANCIS-SMITH-6.jpg

Yaniv put in the effort and got a Peace Bond issued, then facilitated Donald's breach of said Recog. Overly confident, he did the same thing to Bexte and Hamm. Bexte's was thrown out right away, but Hamm's has lingered, and that's where I'm drawing the "activation" of the Malicious Prosecution mechanism. Not only did Yaniv fail to backstop his private information, but he immediately tried to use it as proof of an Order like CSO-VAN-PA-237538-20191230-1611PST-RESULTS-ARREST-ORDER-FOR-DONALD-FRANCIS-SMITH.pdf (attached).

So he got lazy and didn't properly construct the information, then placed a 'bet' on the probability of its results being the same as 237538. That is where I'm bring in the malicious prosecution aspect, which incidentally, also applies to Smith's defence for the upcoming trial. He tried the same thing with Bexte and Hamm, but got lazy.

Note: Smith spent his birthday in custody, and Jonathan gloated over Twitter I think.
 

Attachments

Choose carefully

kiwifarms.net
WAIT....JY had to go to the rape crisis center
BY AMBULANCE
Because Amy looked at him?

Am I missin something?
Jessie claims Amy took sexually explicit pictures of Jessie by putting her phone over the top of the toilet stall.

Given that Jessie hasn't been able to see their own genitalia without the strategic use of mirrors for a number of years, we can conclude that the only way Amy would have been able to take such sexually explicit photos from above is if Jessie was performing some form of semi-naked handstand in the cubicle.

If that was the case, then whether Amy was looking or not, I think an ambulance was always going to be involved. I'm just surprised the fire brigade weren't also involved.
 

pr3nt177

kiwifarms.net
[
Jessie claims Amy took sexually explicit pictures of Jessie by putting her phone over the top of the toilet stall.

Given that Jessie hasn't been able to see their own genitalia without the strategic use of mirrors for a number of years, we can conclude that the only way Amy would have been able to take such sexually explicit photos from above is if Jessie was performing some form of semi-naked handstand in the cubicle.

If that was the case, then whether Amy was looking or not, I think an ambulance was always going to be involved. I'm just surprised the fire brigade weren't also involved.
How could anyone see anything over the top of the stall? - yaniv's fat belly overhangs that much I doubt very much he can see anything himself and yet we're expected to believe Amy got an eyeful? LMAO
 

fuzakeru na

ふざけるな
kiwifarms.net
so Hamm is looking at being arrested by the RCMP now. How fucked is Canada. Check her twitter for her legal response to the cops, which she was forced to do "so we dont have to arrest you just yet"


cant archive because my connection is on cloudflare and they hate each other