Law Judge jails father for blaming her for son's death - Mother killed son after being given custody

Your Weird Fetish

Intersectional fetishist
Yeah and honestly I have to take the "deep dark secrets" shit with a grain of salt. If there was a there, there, he would cough it up already. This just sounds like a lot of standard idiot divorce drama. I think most likely scenario is both parents were overgrown teenagers and the kid was pretty doomed regardless.
Even so, shitposting cannot be illegal.


We need to build a wall to keep out the Autobots
The fact that she was able to keep the kid is sickening. I believe there is more to the story than he is letting on, but a child dying spontaneously given the low risk prognosis of hydrocephalus and no issues with current treatment is bewildering. If I was the residing doctor and heard of the previous reports from doctors, my first thought would be fallicide. The fact that he was imprisoned for insulting a judge online for effectively killing a child and then had the bail increased to make it impossible for bail to be posted is sickening and every judge involved should be disbarred.

ETA: Prognosis for an infant with a shunt is about 50 years life expectancy with only about a 1.5-2% 5 year mortality rate. None of these cases are rapid onset following review by medical professionals. This bitch is lying like crazy and the child never died of hydrocephalus disorder.

Fixed a mistake
Last edited:


رنج آمریکایی ها
True & Honest Fan


رنج آمریکایی ها
True & Honest Fan
The trial of Jonathan Vanderhagen for criticizing the judge who allowed his son to be murdered has been going on for a couple days now.

Mr. Vanderhagen has rejected a plea bargain that (of course) the prosecutor offered at the last possible minute to save face and stop him criticizing the system that killed his son, and the case has gone to a jury.

Reportedly he intends to testify, so with a bit of luck the correct outcome (jury nullification) will be achieved. The latest reports confirm that Mrs Rancilio was the judge responsible for overseeing the legal failure that allowed Jonathan's son to be murdered.
Jonathan Vanderhagen took to Facebook with a storm of criticism, with one post containing profanities, against a Macomb County judge and the court system that he believes failed his young son, who died nearly two years ago during a custody case.

The judge notified the sheriff's office when she was alerted to some of his posts like this one: "Exposing bad, corrupt & shady people like you is what the (expletive) I do ;) Get this (expletive) out of our court system," according to a police report.

Two days later, the Chesterfield Township man was charged with a misdemeanor — malicious use of telecommunications services. He posted a $1,000 bond and was ordered not to have any contact with the judge.

But Vanderhagen continued to make Facebook posts about the system and his son, many including images of Snoopy and Batman, which were the boy's favorite characters, his lawyer says...

When the 35-year-old returned to District Court on July 24 on the misdemeanor, a different judge decided Vanderhagen had violated the no-contact part of his bond. He ordered him held on a $500,000 cash surety bond and to undergo a mental health examination while he was in the jail.

"This is unheard of — a $500,000 cash (bond) is for somebody who is very dangerous or who has the means to leave the country," said Vanderhagen's attorney, Nicholas Somberg of Bloomfield Hills. He said Vanderhagen is neither.

Other legal experts agreed the bond does appear to be high, while pointing out that few judges like to see their orders ignored.

Somberg said Vanderhagen has no prior criminal record, no firearms and no concealed pistol license.

Vanderhagen's mother, Deborah, said her son, who lived with her and who she describes as an artist and a musician, is "holding on" since being jailed July 24 in the Macomb County lockup.

She said he's told her: "I will not break. I'm not guilty of anything."...

The case was assigned to Circuit Court Judge Rachel Rancilio, but Killian died while in his mother's care in Genesee County in September 2017. No charges were filed in his death.

Rancilio contacted the Macomb County Sheriff's Office on July 8 of this year after some "troubling posts" she was alerted to on Facebook, according to a police report. The posts appeared that Vanderhagen was unhappy with the outcome of the case.

The Sheriff's Office report states there were multiple posts on Vanderhagen's page regarding Rancilio, many of them screen shots of her personal Facebook posts as well as items she had pinned on her Pinterest app.

There also were two videos and a post that it was time for him to speak about his personal experience of corruption in the Friend of the Court and how he believes his ex-girlfriend is responsible for their son's death.

One of the posts from July 8 reads: "Dada back to digging & you best believe im gonna dig up all the skeletons in this court's closet." There is a photo of Vanderhagen holding a shovel with the initials RR on the handle and MD on the shovel, with Families Of Corruption on his shirt, and the words: "The misuse of public power (by elected politician or appointed civil servant) for private gain." The Macomb County logo appears in the background.

According to the police report: "At no time does he threaten harm or violence toward Rancilio" or another person he identified as being involved. "However, he does appear to be very upset with them and feels they are to blame for not helping him."

A warrant charging Vanderhagen with the misdemeanor was authorized July 10. Vanderhagen was arraigned and posted 10% of a $10,000 bond.

On July 24, he returned for a pretrial. The prosecution had filed an emergency motion to raise Vanderhagen's bond for a violation after it said he continued to intimidate and harass those who filed the initial report by continuing to post about being mistreated by the system.

But Somberg argued that Vanderhagen "has an absolute constitutional right to redress his grievances against the government publically." He said Vanderhagen's posts are about his son, digging up the truth and exposing that he feels that has been wronged by the system.

"There's no threats. There's no reaching out to Judge Rancilio. There's been no contact. There's inadvertent messages. All the messages after the no contact are all very innocuous," he told the court.

The judge responsible for putting the $500,000 bond on Mr. Vanderhagen for engaging in constitutionally protected speech is a Sebastian Lucido. Judge Lucido is a member of a family that is prominent among Detroit's Italian-American community, with his father being one of the co-founders of a 'golf club' seized by the FBI over its connections to gambling and money laundering operations:
Lucido stated there are limits to First Amendment and freedom of speech, saying in a court transcript: "There cannot be anything of a threatening nature. ... We're talking about threatening a sitting Circuit Court Judge is the original allegation against Mr. Vanderhagen. When there's a no contact, it's a no contact directly, indirectly or social media. These are all though he likes to hint around the fringes of it, in my opinion they are of a threatening nature after the no contact was put in place."

Lucido raised Vanderhagen's bond to $500,000 cash surety. Vanderhagen has been unable to post that bond.

The pigs who locked up Vanderhagen for criticizing the system that allowed his son to be murdered, and the prosecutors attacking him for speaking out against it, had nothing to say to the media about it.
Sgt. Renee Yax said the sheriff's office does not have a comment on the case against Vanderhagen.

Derek Miller, chief of operations for county Prosecutor Eric Smith, said: "We're not commenting on a pending matter that's scheduled for trial on Friday."

Messages were left at the offices of Rancilio; Lucido, and Circuit Court Chief Judge James Biernat Jr., who denied Vanderhagen's appeal of the higher bond last month.

On July 11, Biernat signed a personal protection order request that Rancilio filed in the circuit court against Vanderhagen. The order is in effect until Jan. 20, according to court records.

On the first day of court, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney Elizabeth Rittinger described Vanderhagen's stated intent to investigate the failings of the Macomb County justice system as akin to shouting fire in a crowded theater, while admitting that Vanderhagen was not making a threat.
Rittinger related his commentary to an often-used analogy of yelling “fire” in a crowded theater. She said the most concerning was an image of Vanderhagen holding a shovel over his shoulder with the Rancilio’s initials scrawled over the handle.

“I think all of this behavior, especially in its totality, and some of the specifics -- like the shovel posting – on their own create this violation of the law,” Rittinger said. “You can speak freely, say all you want against the system … but when it comes to this level, you’ve crossed over into yelling ‘fire’ in a theater, and that’s not appropriate. It’s a violation of the law.”

Rittinger referred to the probable defense claim that Vanderhagen was merely digging up information about Rancilio.

“That’s possible, quite possible,” she said. “But there’s a threat in there as well, as perceived by the victim.”

Vanderhagen’s attorney, Nicholas Somberg, in his opening statement said his client’s comments were not threatening but came from a “grieving father.”

“This is a grieving father who went to the internet and talked about his experience with a court system that absolutely failed him,” Somberg told the jury of four women and three men. “He believed that the Friend of the Court contributed to the death of his son. … His intent is to expose the people who didn’t listen so he can save more children in the future.”

He said Rancilio complained because she was “embarrassed” by Vanderhagen’s reposting of her posting of about three dozen cartoons, some of which contained questionable content for a judge, on the social-media site [Pintrest].

“This case is about power and privilege,” he said. “If someone was making these Facebook posts about you, they would laugh in your face. The only reason we’re here is because a judge with all the power and privilege in the world who can go send people to go arrest people.”

The shovel image posted July 8 was accompanied by Vanderhagen’s comment, “Dada back to digging & you best believe im gonna dig up all the skeletons in this court's closet.”

That same day, he posted a photo of Rancilio embracing her father in 2018 and criticized her appointment to the Governor’s Task Force for Abuse and Neglected Children.

On July 7, he wrote, "I won't stop till changes are made, people are held accountable, careers are ended, & these kids get the justice they deserve.”

Earlier today, Judge Rancilio testified about how her fee-fees were hurt when Vanderhagen started digging into the circumstances around the murder of his son, and attempted to blame Vanderhagen for people being mad at her for getting his son killed and imprisoning him for criticizing her for allowing it. She claimed that people were threatening her, and her children (who she hasn't allowed to be murdered, unlike Mr. Vanderhagen's son).
Rancilio said she was concerned about a posting of a photo of Vanderhagen holding a shovel over his shoulders with Rancilio’s initials scrawled on the handle and other posts mentioning her family. She said the culmination of posts created fear...

That image was accompanied by Vanderhagen’s comment, “Dada back to digging & you best believe im gonna dig up all the skeletons in this court's closet.”... Vanderhagen’s attorney, Nicholas Somberg, during questioning of Rancilio called the comment a figure of speech, meant to indicate he was researching the judge, allowed under the First Amendment...

“It wasn’t just one post,” she said, at one point appearing to choke back tears. “It was a compilation of it all. … I was scared something was going to happen to myself, my children.”

“The death threats I’ve been getting as a result of this stuff is horrifying. I’m terrified. It continues to this day.”

The Macomb County Sheriff’s Office was contacted about the threats and are “monitoring” the situation, according to a court spokeswoman.

She said threats may have been inspired in part by a Youtube video made by another person that included Rancilio's home address following publicity surrounding Vanderhagen's second jailing in late July.

Rancilio was particularly offended that Vanderhagen reposted images she had published online in poor taste, and criticized her appointment to a panel tasked with child protection given her role in the death of his son.
Rancilio said she became most disturbed about postings mentioning her family and information that “indicates he dug up all this stuff about me,” including a repost of a series of cartoon panels on her Pinterest account.

Also on July 8, he posted a photo of Rancilio embracing her father on her wedding day and criticized her appointment to the Governor’s Task Force for Abuse and Neglected Children.

Rancilio said she was upset by a video she viewed in which Vanderhagen mentions her "elite group of family," “mansions” “yacht clubs” and “silver spoons. In a post, he mentions “show time” and “judgment day.”

“That crossed the line from being angry at the system … to personally attacking me,” she said. “Now he’s coming after my family, which made me feel harassed and personally attacked.”

As is always the case, Vanderhagen was set up by a lying cop.

Sheriff’s Detective Mark Morfino testified Vanderhagen admitted during his police interview that he could see how someone could view the posts as threatening.

Under questioning by Somberg, Morfino admitted he told Vanderhagen he didn’t think Vanderhagen intended to threaten.

However, under questioning by Rittinger, Morfino agreed he uses interview techniques to “minimize” a defendant’s actions to improve their rapport.

The trial will resume Thursday.
Judge Sebastian Lucido rejected Somberg’s request for a directed verdict after the prosecution rested, arguing his clients posts were not one of nine exceptions to the First Amendment.

The trial is scheduled to resume and conclude Thursday with Vanderhagen taking the stand in his defense.

The best and greatest
View attachment 924833
Nothing good ever comes from anywhere near Detroit.
In the grand scheme of things aren't we all comparatively near Detroit?

Really though poor guy, hope he sues and donates to an opposition candidate for her in the following election cycle.

He's literally in jail for calling a judge a cunt on facebook you bootlicker.
I can appreciate that he violated bond, and that a smarter man would have abided after his release and just confined his battle to the court, maybe try and find his way onto syndicated radio to air his grievances if he really had to. That particular charge will probably stick unfortunately. Still, in the big picture dude is totally in the right and I hope she is removed from office.

Is there anything stating that the judge he criticized is the same one that set his bond conditions? Or that the one setting the draconian half a mil bail for violating is the same?

Or is everyone being exceptional?
Eh its not all that surprising. Regardless of the specific circumstances, if he did violate his bond then it wouldn't make sense for the courts to show much leniency just so he'd have the chance to do it a second time no matter how ultimately in-the-right he is outside of this particular topic. At that point he's practically just harming himself, losing more bond money to the state for standing up.
Last edited:


رنج آمریکایی ها
True & Honest Fan
We have some further coverage with some legal documents and some quotes from the man's lawyers from top child prostitution and open borders publication Reason Magazine. Certainly doesn't cast Judge Lucido in a particularly good light. Here's the most ludicrous part;
The Facebook post in question shows Vanderhagen holding a shovel with the photoshopped initials R.R. and M.D., believed to be Rancillio and Duross, respectively. The caption says, "Dada back to digging [and] you best believe [I'm] gonna dig up all the skeletons in this court's closet."

The post was published to Facebook on July 8. Somberg explains to Reason that the date of this particular post should have jeopardized the case brought against Vanderhagen.

Vanderhagen received a letter from Sgt. Morfino, dated July 10, informing him that there was a warrant for his arrest for malicious use of telecommunications. The letter says the actions occurred "on or about" July 7. Vanderhagen was arraigned before the Macomb County District Court on July 11.

Vanderhagen was released on a $10,000 bond under the condition that he would not engage in direct or third-party contact with Rancilio. Vanderhagen was also prohibited from sending "inadvertent messages by way of Facebook" to Rancilio.

Following the arraignment, Vanderhagen continued to use Facebook to post about his son, his son's mother, and his case, topics Somberg argues are not in violation of the bond conditions set on July 11. Regardless, Vanderhagen was summoned to appear before District Judge Sebastian Lucido at the end of July for an emergency bond hearing, allegedly for "posting messages" about Rancilio.

A list of exhibits presented to the court highlights Facebook posts calling his son a hero, criticisms of his son's mother, and criticisms of "the system," none of which directly referenced Rancilio.

The only reference to Rancilio is found in Exhibit 1, which features screenshots of Vanderhagen's July 8 Facebook post. Considering Vanderhagen did not receive his bond conditions until three days after that Facebook post was published online, however, its inclusion seems like an inappropriate attempt to paint Vanderhagen as more of a threat than he actually is.

So, the post where Vanderhagen suggested he would dig up information about Rancilio's role in the death of his son was made two days prior to the pigs informing him that he was being charged with "malicious use of telecommunications", and three days prior to bail conditions being imposed on him that restricted him from exercising his First Amendment rights to criticize Rachel Rancilio and Mary Duross for their role in the killing of his son.

The only way he could be said to have violated those bail conditions would be if any criticism of the system that allowed his son to be killed constituted 'indirect threats' against those who are part of it. Now, I can see that argument making sense to a guy like Seb Lucido who allegedly grew up in the mob, but it doesn't sound especially reasonable to me.

I recommend checking out the complaint, it seems boomered even by the standards of other police reports featuring technical evidence that I've seen in the past. I especially like the landscape screenshots of the Facebook page resized to portrait to really fill up the pages. He somehow managed to make less readable screenshots than I've ever seen before. And in this case, 'before' is when I was working sales for an accounting software reseller, and the ancient receptionist at a courier company that used it would copy me in on emails to support where she would somehow print out full page screenshots (in grayscale on their fucked old laser printer), scan them in and send them to herself, and then forward them on.



رنج آمریکایی ها
True & Honest Fan
Wow. According to the 'Terrorism Research & Analysis Consortium', Mr. Vanderhagen is now a terrorist. For asking why a judge let his son be murdered.

This obviously isn't a credible group, but it would be interesting to know why these guys posted this. Do they just pick random stories from the news and call them 'white supremacist terrorism'? Or did the baby-killing judge or the mafia judge make a phone call to these guys?
Last edited:


We need to build a wall to keep out the Autobots
It pisses me off how people that are a part of this are so ambivalent to this when they played an immediate role in it.

Nearly everybody is part of incompetence that led to a child’s death. Own up to your personal responsibility and accept you played a part in the role. I understand that saying you weren’t responsible is better for your boss’s day legally, but when a life is at stake, accept responsibility. You fucked up, do better in the future instead of diverting blame and accept that you’re accountable for this happening.

About Us

The Kiwi Farms is about eccentric individuals and communities on the Internet. We call them lolcows because they can be milked for amusement or laughs. Our community is bizarrely diverse and spectators are encouraged to join the discussion.

We do not place intrusive ads, host malware, sell data, or run crypto miners with your browser. If you experience these things, you have a virus. If your malware system says otherwise, it is faulty.

Supporting the Forum

How to Help

The Kiwi Farms is constantly attacked by insane people and very expensive to run. It would not be here without community support.

BTC: 1DgS5RfHw7xA82Yxa5BtgZL65ngwSk6bmm
ETH: 0xc1071c60Ae27C8CC3c834E11289205f8F9C78CA5
BAT: 0xc1071c60Ae27C8CC3c834E11289205f8F9C78CA5
XMR: 438fUMciiahbYemDyww6afT1atgqK3tSTX25SEmYknpmenTR6wvXDMeco1ThX2E8gBQgm9eKd1KAtEQvKzNMFrmjJJpiino