They have their own police agency dedicated to close protection and securing the Supreme Court itself, DC is chock full of niche police forces.Do Supreme Court justices get secret service protection too? Asking because with the fire the Dems have worked up in their base there is a realistic chance of Kavanaugh getting shot.
Pretty Sure Kamala is House of Representatives, not Senate. Along with the rest of the nuts like Pelosi.Indeed, if it were I who was having newspapers just casually suggesting that I was molesting my children because at worst I coped a feel 30 years ago I know I would just smile and not get angry.
Anyway, this vote may end up being the most watch-worthy vote in Senate history. I refuse to believe that someone like Kamala Harris isn't going to try some "last minute heroics" that will be utterly embarrassing.
Yep. My favorite part is that the soyboys just don't understand that everyone gets bullied a little, and that they are not specially persecuted. Everyone has to roll with the punches, and the soyboy shit you do to people is also bullying. When you scoff at chad for being simple (he often isn't), make nasty jokes about him, or tattle on teachers about minor rule-breaking he does you are bullying him. Guess what he is gonna do about it?I'm pretty convinced a not-insignificant portion of the soyboys vigorously opposing Kavanaugh are projecting their chad bullies onto him.
Thank you for being a spergy autist and making democrats like myself look bad. Since you're too exceptional to make a coherent argument against him I'll do it for you.I'm not a Democrat by any means, but I will say this, Kavanaugh does NOT have the temperament to be on the highest court in the land. I don't give a shit if you want to feel superior to lefties or who is to blame or whatever bullshit. He's not right for the role. Period. It's not just lefties who will be hurt by this just like it won't be just lefties hurt by the tax bill and loss of the ACA when that inevitably comes. I like to think of what is good for ALL of us in this country and not a tribal, win/lose bullshit scenario because right now, we're all fucking losing whether you realize it or not. I'll take all my negative bullshit ratings, but this is the fucking truth. This is a frat bro with a substance abuse problem and poor impulse and emotional control. That is not someone you want on a lifetime appointment deciding precedent for the next 30-40 years. I don't care if you want to stick it to lefties or feminists or what the fuck ever, I really don't care what your position is, but ultimately, this foolishness is making us all weaker and smaller.
Yes it’s Susan Collins that’s the disgrace, not anti-Semitic, Sharia Now, sexual assault enabler Linda Sarsour.Sharia NOW!
View attachment 559895
NopePretty Sure Kamala is House of Representatives, not Senate. Along with the rest of the nuts like Pelosi.
Look I get thinking abortion probably not even going to be kicked back to the states (as a worst case scenario) and affirmative action are going away, and I personally hope they are struck down and are done away with. What I don't get is this whole birth control thing. Nobody wants to take birth control away. It's not gonna happen.View attachment 559880
Wait, I thought 11/9/2016 was a sad day in American history. How many sad days has America been having since then?
>We can say goodbye to affirmative action
Not sure what that has to do with anything, but I hope that fucking dies regardless if it goes to the Supreme Court.
Oh wait, this explains why they're so fixated on affirmative action:
View attachment 559890
>All because people were led to believe that Trump and Hillary would be equally bad.
Because it was "her turn". Sure thing, buttercup.
Honestly if you're in DC and you're not travelling in a armoured, jet black SUV that ignores speed limits you're basically a peasant.They have their own police agency dedicated to close protection and securing the Supreme Court itself, DC is chock full of niche police forces.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supreme_Court_Police
Sometimes I can't believe this woman isn't a rightwing plant.Sharia NOW!
View attachment 559895
lol, renting for a year. You can buy em for less than half that depending on the package.. Like 5 years ago there was a lot of I think 6 up-armored Suburbans that were supposed to go to Iraq, but the firm's contract was cancelled so they welched on the vics or something like that. Some intermediary was trying to offload them for the low price of $90k a pop. I still kick myself sometimes for not buying one.Honestly if you're in DC and you're not travelling in a armoured, jet black SUV that ignores speed limits you're basically a peasant.
Apparently you can rent them for a mere $1600 a day or about $593,000 a year.
https://armoredcarsforrent.checkfront.site/inventory/armored-chevrolet-suburban-4x4-suv-washington-dc-usa
This is an opinion I can respect. To be fair, as far as environmental issues being a legislative issue, I do agree there, mostly to limit the executive power. Have them create the penalties.Thank you for being a spergy autist and making democrats like myself look bad. Since you're too exceptional to make a coherent argument against him I'll do it for you.
Judge Kavanaugh has a relatively consistent track record (Not surprising cause he's a candidate for fucking SCOTUS) but there are a few things that as a liberal I fundamentally disagree about:
- He's in favor of metadata collection program by the US which basically allows the US to monitor the duration of your calls and who you're calling without a warrant. Can't see how that can be abused.
- He's against Net Neutrality.
- He's for allowing more public funds go to Religious School and other Religious "Educational" Institutions.
- He isn't a complete autist like the other Republicans when it comes to climate change but he says that should be an issue for the legislative branch to handle because he thinks new laws should be created to tackle it. The executive branch should be the one in charge of this issue because their are already laws to handle this issue and the executive should be enforcing it (my opinion is a lot more nuance on this but just gonna simplfy so I don't have a long tism spasm.)
She's a US Senator on the Judiciary Committee from California.Pretty Sure Kamala is House of Representatives, not Senate. Along with the rest of the nuts like Pelosi.
He's pretty much a relatively generic neocon judicially, but saying that he probably won't overturn Citizens United doesn't get people as fired up as HE'S AN ALCOHOLIC LITERAL RAPIST AND PROBABLY A PEDOPHILE TOO AND HE'S GOING TO MAKE THE HANDMAID'S TALE REALThank you for being a spergy autist and making democrats like myself look bad. Since you're too exceptional to make a coherent argument against him I'll do it for you.
Judge Kavanaugh has a relatively consistent track record (Not surprising cause he's a candidate for fucking SCOTUS) but there are a few things that as a liberal I fundamentally disagree about:
- He's in favor of metadata collection program by the US which basically allows the US to monitor the duration of your calls and who you're calling without a warrant. Can't see how that can be abused.
- He's against Net Neutrality.
- He's for allowing more public funds go to Religious School and other Religious "Educational" Institutions.
- He isn't a complete autist like the other Republicans when it comes to climate change but he says that should be an issue for the legislative branch to handle because he thinks new laws should be created to tackle it. The executive branch should be the one in charge of this issue because their are already laws to handle this issue and the executive should be enforcing it (my opinion is a lot more nuance on this but just gonna simplfy so I don't have a long tism spasm.)
Nope
She was part of the group of senators that walked out of the committee meeting and started REEEEEing in the halls. Either here or Cory Boker are probably going to start shouting LISTEN AND BELIEVE when the votes are being cast
Sigh, and here I was hoping she was on the level of Sheila Jackson Lee and Hank Johnson. Sorry.She's a US Senator on the Judiciary Committee from California.
Maybe they've been living the same day over and over like this guy:Wait, I thought 11/9/2016 was a sad day in American history. How many sad days has America been having since then?
"For working people"View attachment 559880
Wait, I thought 11/9/2016 was a sad day in American history. How many sad days has America been having since then?
>We can say goodbye to affirmative action
Not sure what that has to do with anything, but I hope that fucking dies regardless if it goes to the Supreme Court.
Oh wait, this explains why they're so fixated on affirmative action:
View attachment 559890
>All because people were led to believe that Trump and Hillary would be equally bad.
Because it was "her turn". Sure thing, buttercup.
Sharia NOW!
View attachment 559895