Law Justice Brett Kavanaugh Megathread - Megathread for Brett Kavanaugh, US Supreme Court Justice

Fapcop

kiwifarms.net
http://www.prosecutorintegrity.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/ABA-Resolution-114-2019.pdf

Do you guys think this recent American Bar Association resolution has anything to do with Kavanaugh?

View attachment 887522View attachment 887523View attachment 887524

I'm no legal expert, so I want to see what you guys think about it.
Hmm... “American Bar Association....”? This must be important!

“...Civil Rights and Social Justice section” Aaaand in the trash it goes!

Nah, it has little to do with Kavanaugh, it’s just some new thought and behavior policing-scheme that the ABA’s Cultural Marxism department has thought up.
 

XYZpdq

fbi most wanted sskealeaton
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
Hmm... “American Bar Association....”? This must be important!

“...Civil Rights and Social Justice section” Aaaand in the trash it goes!

Nah, it has little to do with Kavanaugh, it’s just some new thought and behavior policing-scheme that the ABA’s Cultural Marxism department has thought up.
It'll be funny if this turns out to be linked to "super lawyers" or any of the dummies attached to the orbit of that voice actor's legal drama.
 
How exactly can you have a social justice segment of the Bar Association? Doesn't social justice take place, by definition, in society and thus outside of the courts? The moment you bring it into the courts doesn't it become civil or legal justice?
I'm sure the bar association would prefer all human interaction to require a team of lawyers. Bloodsucking parasites... Actually lately nobody seems to hate on lawyers anymore. We gotta bring that back!
 

Wargarbl

kiwifarms.net
Keep this thread open until Christine Blasey is held accountable for her sick lies.








Article quote:
“Female classmates and friends at area schools recalled a heavy drinker who was much more aggressive with boys than they were,” Hemingway and Severino write of Ford. “‘If she only had one beer’ on the night of the alleged assault, a high school friend said, ‘then it must have been early in the evening.’ Her contemporaries all reported the same nickname for Ford, a riff on her maiden name and a sexual act.
Does that mean her nickname was Christine Blowie? LOL!
 

Matthew216

kiwifarms.net
Well, this is a thing now.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/senate-dems-deliver-stunning-warning-to-supreme-court-heal-or-face-restructuring

Senate Dems deliver stunning warning to Supreme Court: ‘Heal’ or face restructuring
By Ronn Blitzer | Fox News
Several high-profile Senate Democrats warned the Supreme Court in pointed terms this week that it could face a fundamental restructuring if justices do not take steps to "heal" the court in the near future.

The ominous and unusual warning was delivered as part of a brief filed Monday in a case related to a New York City gun law. Sens. Sheldon Whitehouse, D-R.I., Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., Mazie Hirono, D-Hawaii, Richard Durbin, D-Ill., and Kirsten Gillibrand, D-N.Y., referenced rulings by the court's conservative majority in claiming it is suffering from some sort of affliction which must be remedied.

"The Supreme Court is not well. And the people know it," the brief said. "Perhaps the Court can heal itself before the public demands it be 'restructured in order to reduce the influence of politics.'"

The last part was quoting language from a Quinnipiac University poll, in which 51 percent favored such restructuring. In the same poll, 55 percent believed the Supreme Court was "motivated by politics" more than by the law.

Dramatic changes to the Supreme Court have been proposed by several Democrats vying for their party's 2020 presidential nomination, with "court-packing" being a common -- though highly controversial -- suggestion. Increasing the number of justices on the court would allow the president to shift the balance on the bench by loading up justices of his or her preference.

Democratic candidates, including former Rep. Beto O’Rourke of Texas, and Sens. Cory Booker of New Jersey, Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts, Kamala Harris of California, and Gillibrand, all have signaled an openness to expanding the number of judges on the court should they reach the White House.

South Bend, Ind., Mayor Pete Buttigieg has also supported expanding the court, proposing a plan to have some justices appointed by the president and others selected by the other justices in order to "depoliticize" the court. He's admitted that the only way he can think of to make this work would be to increase the size of the court from nine justices to 15, while stressing that simply "adding more justices onto the court who agree with you" would be a bad idea.

Yet other candidates such as former Vice President Joe Biden have come out against court-packing, as has Bernie Sanders, though the Vermont senator has suggested rotating judges to other courts.

Liberal Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg has also spoken out against court-packing, telling NPR in July, "Nine seems to be a good number."

he Democratic senators' brief was filed in the case of New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. City of New York, which dealt with legal limitations on where gun owners could transport their licensed, locked, and unloaded firearms. They are urging the court to stay out of the case brought by the NRA-backed group, claiming that because the city recently changed the law to ease restrictions, the push to the Supreme Court is part of an "industrial-strength influence campaign" to get the conservative majority to rule in favor of gun owners.

If the court still decides to hear the case, a ruling against New York City could prevent other cities and states from passing similar gun control laws.

Conservatives currently outnumber liberals on the Supreme Court 5-4, but the past year featured a multitude of cases where conservatives -- including President Trump's picks Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh -- sided with the liberal bloc.

What do they mean really, by "heal?" I think I know.
 

Burned Man

Trans-Legion burnedgender Mormankin
kiwifarms.net
Well, this is a thing now.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/senate-dems-deliver-stunning-warning-to-supreme-court-heal-or-face-restructuring

Senate Dems deliver stunning warning to Supreme Court: ‘Heal’ or face restructuring
By Ronn Blitzer | Fox News
Several high-profile Senate Democrats warned the Supreme Court in pointed terms this week that it could face a fundamental restructuring if justices do not take steps to "heal" the court in the near future.

The ominous and unusual warning was delivered as part of a brief filed Monday in a case related to a New York City gun law. Sens. Sheldon Whitehouse, D-R.I., Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., Mazie Hirono, D-Hawaii, Richard Durbin, D-Ill., and Kirsten Gillibrand, D-N.Y., referenced rulings by the court's conservative majority in claiming it is suffering from some sort of affliction which must be remedied.

"The Supreme Court is not well. And the people know it," the brief said. "Perhaps the Court can heal itself before the public demands it be 'restructured in order to reduce the influence of politics.'"

The last part was quoting language from a Quinnipiac University poll, in which 51 percent favored such restructuring. In the same poll, 55 percent believed the Supreme Court was "motivated by politics" more than by the law.

Dramatic changes to the Supreme Court have been proposed by several Democrats vying for their party's 2020 presidential nomination, with "court-packing" being a common -- though highly controversial -- suggestion. Increasing the number of justices on the court would allow the president to shift the balance on the bench by loading up justices of his or her preference.

Democratic candidates, including former Rep. Beto O’Rourke of Texas, and Sens. Cory Booker of New Jersey, Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts, Kamala Harris of California, and Gillibrand, all have signaled an openness to expanding the number of judges on the court should they reach the White House.

South Bend, Ind., Mayor Pete Buttigieg has also supported expanding the court, proposing a plan to have some justices appointed by the president and others selected by the other justices in order to "depoliticize" the court. He's admitted that the only way he can think of to make this work would be to increase the size of the court from nine justices to 15, while stressing that simply "adding more justices onto the court who agree with you" would be a bad idea.

Yet other candidates such as former Vice President Joe Biden have come out against court-packing, as has Bernie Sanders, though the Vermont senator has suggested rotating judges to other courts.

Liberal Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg has also spoken out against court-packing, telling NPR in July, "Nine seems to be a good number."

he Democratic senators' brief was filed in the case of New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. City of New York, which dealt with legal limitations on where gun owners could transport their licensed, locked, and unloaded firearms. They are urging the court to stay out of the case brought by the NRA-backed group, claiming that because the city recently changed the law to ease restrictions, the push to the Supreme Court is part of an "industrial-strength influence campaign" to get the conservative majority to rule in favor of gun owners.

If the court still decides to hear the case, a ruling against New York City could prevent other cities and states from passing similar gun control laws.

Conservatives currently outnumber liberals on the Supreme Court 5-4, but the past year featured a multitude of cases where conservatives -- including President Trump's picks Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh -- sided with the liberal bloc.

What do they mean really, by "heal?" I think I know.
I'm sure they just mean they want Ruth to get well again is all.

So the court is divided with a 5 conservative 4 liberal split and sometimes the conservatives side with the liberals? Isn't that kind of evidence that the only thing at work isn't politics and that we don't need to cram as many judges as possible into this mess? Seems kind of blatant their idea to depoliticize the court is just to add as many judges as possible they get to appoint when they're in power.
 

Jigglyjogglers

The Doctor Bashir guy
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
I'm sure they just mean they want Ruth to get well again is all.

So the court is divided with a 5 conservative 4 liberal split and sometimes the conservatives side with the liberals? Isn't that kind of evidence that the only thing at work isn't politics and that we don't need to cram as many judges as possible into this mess? Seems kind of blatant their idea to depoliticize the court is just to add as many judges as possible they get to appoint when they're in power.
For them the issue is "sometimes". They don't want fair rulings, they basically just want the Supreme Court to rubberstamp Democrat policy and be done with it. I mean I don't doubt that the Republicans would rather enjoy such a state too, the difference is that you don't see them bitching that they want to radically overhaul it, do away with it, or in this case outright threaten it when they don't get their way, they tend to just do some kvetching about "activist judges" and call it a day.
 

Matthew216

kiwifarms.net
For them the issue is "sometimes". They don't want fair rulings, they basically just want the Supreme Court to rubberstamp Democrat policy and be done with it. I mean I don't doubt that the Republicans would rather enjoy such a state too, the difference is that you don't see them bitching that they want to radically overhaul it, do away with it, or in this case outright threaten it when they don't get their way, they tend to just do some kvetching about "activist judges" and call it a day.
The Supreme Court was their primary way to get their agenda through without running it through all those mouth-breathing, rednecked, not-college-educated, morons they're supposed to be representing. They didn't get into government to REPRESENT people! They did it to show how their crisp, smart, college-educated ideas are better for the country, and if they have to create a tyranny to do it, so be it.
 

Whatthefuck

kiwifarms.net
No no, the stupid bastards meant "Heel," they think they can choke out the USSC. They're in for a rude surprise.
No, they literally meant "heal" as in they think it's broken and needs to heal. Let's be fucking honest, is there any branch of our government that isn't fucking broken?
 

AnotherPleb

kiwifarms.net
Who said that? Do I think he's an incompetent hack, absolutely, but he's the least of what should be our concerns as a country about this bullshit system.
Everyone that bitched about him being nominated did, but that's more due to them never being able to take a loss. There wouldn't be Clinton Derangement Syndrome.
 
Tags
None

About Us

The Kiwi Farms is about eccentric individuals and communities on the Internet. We call them lolcows because they can be milked for amusement or laughs. Our community is bizarrely diverse and spectators are encouraged to join the discussion.

We do not place intrusive ads, host malware, sell data, or run crypto miners with your browser. If you experience these things, you have a virus. If your malware system says otherwise, it is faulty.

Supporting the Forum

How to Help

The Kiwi Farms is constantly attacked by insane people and very expensive to run. It would not be here without community support.

BTC: 1DgS5RfHw7xA82Yxa5BtgZL65ngwSk6bmm
ETH: 0xc1071c60Ae27C8CC3c834E11289205f8F9C78CA5
BAT: 0xc1071c60Ae27C8CC3c834E11289205f8F9C78CA5
LTC: LSZsFCLUreXAZ9oyc9JRUiRwbhkLCsFi4q
XMR: 438fUMciiahbYemDyww6afT1atgqK3tSTX25SEmYknpmenTR6wvXDMeco1ThX2E8gBQgm9eKd1KAtEQvKzNMFrmjJJpiino