Katelyn Burns / Katelyn Anne Garrett / Kyle Burns Garrett / Transscribe / ClosetTransGirl / tabz_ftw - Jesse Singal Stalker and balding plagiarist LARPing as a Journalist

[break these cuffs]

Oh well you see......... [Kyle throws his wig at you]
View attachment 2124446

He could have concocted a believable lie that the neighbors never saw them together and the wig was enough to fool them when he wore it had he said he worn a wig on and off, Also, he made a great decision ditching the wig. It looked so fake. Now he has that natural hairline of a balding man that so many women in their 30s have.

 

[Oh Long Johnson]

The confusing part for the neighbor must have been what Mrs. Doubtfire was doing driving Kyle's car to work every morning.

 

[Chan the Wizard]

Just AGP things.
View attachment 2124412

 

[Trianon]

View attachment 2124603

"Where's your boyfriend?" "I swallowed him."

This photo always kills me because the little girl is Sophie Ellman-Golan from the Women's March, and she is also a total nut. Haven't checked on her in forever, but she was their token Jewish spokesperson while the NOI leaders burned the org down around them. So, like, viscerally bad reaction to both these humans.

 

[AirdropShitposts]

New article about how trans people are hardest hit by Caitlyn Jenner running for governor: https://www.vox.com/22409461/caitlyn-jenner-california-governor-recall

It was late June 2015 when I asked my mom a question that carried much more weight than she perhaps realized at the time. Struggling with the duel burdens of gender dysphoria and the closet, I asked her what she thought of Caitlyn Jenner’s Vanity Fair cover, which had been revealed just days earlier.

I had been struggling with whether I should transition, which would undoubtedly blow up my relatively comfortable life. I had no idea how my family would react to my coming out — growing up, LGBTQ issues weren’t discussed at the dinner table. I was pretty sure my mom would be supportive, but I wasn’t certain. Countless trans people had been unexpectedly let down by their parents before me.

I held my breath as I waited for her response.

“Good for her if it makes her happy,” my mom replied. It was a short but promising signal that maybe, possibly, I could safely come out to her at some point. Caitlyn Jenner’s coming out became a catalyst for gauging my family’s feelings about trans people.

Jenner’s politics and controversial existence as a self-professed trans advocate has long put trans Americans in a double bind, forcing them to defend her from transphobic attacks while deploring her political views. And her gubernatorial run, however successful, is amplifying those tensions once again.

The trans Californians who spoke with Vox worry Jenner’s campaign may stir the transphobia pot ever further. Kleinbach said she’s had to defend Jenner from transphobia before, “mainly with respect to pronouns and people calling her [by her deadname] instead of Caitlyn,” she said. “My actions in speaking up for someone that’s being harassed are separate from my feelings about that person’s actions.”

But for Kleinbach, the bigger frustration has been with Jenner’s actions than with those who attack her. “She’s had such a soapbox. She’s had such an opportunity to reach people,” Kleinbach said. “It’s more irritating, in a way, that she has chosen not to not use her platform to educate people and to help people understand.”

Jenner’s campaign, representing a party that is now forcing families with trans kids to potentially flee conservative states, puts trans people in an awkward spot — feeling like they must defend her identity while Jenner does nothing but promote herself in return.

Her run could also serve to kick up transphobia on the left. Liberals and Democrats have shown no hesitation to attack a conservative political figure’s perceived identity. One homophobic example are online liberals calling Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) “Lady G,” a reference to an obscure and unverified online accusation that he frequently visits with gay sex workers in DC. Just last week, The View cohost Joy Behar misgendered Jenner as she talked about Jenner’s gubernatorial run (she subsequently apologized).

There’s a risk that Jenner, running as a conservative in liberal California, could generate liberal transphobia in a similar way, causing progressives to conflate their annoyance with Jenner’s Hollywood persona and politics with her trans identity. “If you throw insults or slurs at celebrities because you’re upset with them, what are you saying to the people next to you?” asked Hauptman.

Six years after her Vanity Fair cover, the question that carries so much weight is: What will the trans people in your life have to deal with because Caitlyn Jenner is running for governor?

 

[Trianon]

New article about how trans people are hardest hit by Caitlyn Jenner running for governor: https://www.vox.com/22409461/caitlyn-jenner-california-governor-recall

They absolutely hate it when it becomes possible for the right to play identity politics too.

If being trans really has nothing to do with anything, stop writing 1,500 word articles about it?

 

[Next Task]

New article about how trans people are hardest hit by Caitlyn Jenner running for governor

Ah, another pure example of the perfect SJW article, a type that troons in general and Kyle in particular specialise in: 'Here's how what this stranger is doing affects me personally, and they should stop.'

Another one for the pile, along with those articles that have been published where women (always women) complain that celebrities like Adele and Rebel Wilson losing weight makes them feel bad about themselves and it's implicitly fat-shaming them. Such esteemed company.

If being trans really has nothing to do with anything, stop writing 1,500 word articles about it?

Another favourite. 'Treat trans people as normal people.'
'Why do you keep going on about it then?'
'REEEEEEEEEEEEE'

 

[AirdropShitposts]

Got interviewed for some blog: https://discourseblog.com/katelyn-burns-what-now/

So there’s this “anti-trans legislation 2.0,” as you called it. What has led to this second wave?

The things they’re trying to do now, especially around medical care for kids, they’ve been planning since the earliest days of the modern anti-trans movement, that started around 2015, in Houston. It was fresh off of legalized marriage equality. And people were saying, “Oh, is this the end of the social conservative movement?” Houston had a referendum on an LGBT anti-discrimination ordinance, [which the city voted against]. And the talking point was “No men and women’s bathrooms.” So that kicked off the bathroom bill.

But around that time, you started to see the social conservatives in the U.S. switch gears away from gay people and towards trans people. The Family Research Council wrote a document saying that their goal is to eventually restrict or outright ban medical care for transgender people, especially kids.

The “Anti-trans bills 1.0” were the bathroom bills in North Carolina and Texas. It almost backfired on them because the more the public learned about trans people, they [responded,] “This is kind of ridiculous. Why is the government so concerned with this?” So 2017, 2018, these bills are proposed. They have no chance of passing, and people are saying, “Okay, well, I guess the social conservative movement is [next].” Well, no, they just reformed.

In late 2019, back in Texas, there’s this custody battle that goes viral. The mom supports the child’s trans identity. The father outright rejects it, and is all over conservative media whipping up all this panic, saying, “My ex wants to castrate my child,” which is not at all true. But when you see stuff like that and you’re uninformed, you’re like “Well, this is an outrage,” right? So he’s getting all this attention. He’s raising money. The conservative media is getting clicks. The story had a lot of right-wing politicians going, “I’m going to put a stop to this.” You saw Gov. Abbott, Ted Cruz, and countless state-level legislators tweet about it. And that’s what kicked off this focus on banning medical care for adolescents.

And so it’s sort of this arms race to see which state could be the most grotesque and overbearing in passing these bills so they can appear to be protecting children, when really it’s an outright attack. It’s an assertion of the state in a medical process that the state has no reason to be interfering with.

What’s your reporting been like when you’re speaking to children and parents?

It’s heartbreaking. I spoke with a mom of a trans kid who is from Arkansas, and her entire life is in Arkansas. And now she’s looking at moving out of state, but then she looks at the states that are trying to make it illegal for her child to exist, and it’s all the states around Arkansas.

You’re asking somebody to leave some place where their family has been for generations, just for the sake of their child, and that feels un-American to me, in a lot of ways, even though I know it’s not. Lots of different groups of Americans have been forced to move from state to state in the past, but I thought that this is something that stayed in the past, but clearly not.

I think it’s also one of those things that the people who wield that rhetoric of what it means to be an American and the freedom you have to do whatever you want, then get to do this cherry picking of who exactly that America is for.

Yeah. Joe Biden while addressing Congress said, trans people, especially young trans people, I want you to know the President has your back. Well, how? What are you gonna do to keep their parents out of jail just for supporting their trans kids?

I really desperately wish that we could move beyond words with trans rights. Like allies saying “trans people are valid” is the most meaningless statement on the planet. Like, gee, thanks, you acknowledge that I’m alive? Pat yourself on the back, give yourself a big ally medal, you’ve done all the work. No. There’s more work to be done. Like people could be going to jail! Trans people need more.

 

[break these cuffs]

Got interviewed for some blog: https://discourseblog.com/katelyn-burns-what-now/

The whole article is disingenuous. We know Kyle doesn't give a hot fuck about kids, his own included.

 

[ConSluttant]

Got interviewed for some blog: https://discourseblog.com/katelyn-burns-what-now/

That's a whole lot of words just to say "I don't like their opinions and they are meanie pants for protecting the most innocent among us - children - from things that they don't understand or the long ranging effects that result from those things (but they are good because I like them). You know. Like adults have been doing to children for centuries.

 

[Trianon]

Got interviewed for some blog: https://discourseblog.com/katelyn-burns-what-now/

But at the same time, immediately after Obergefell, trans groups started demanding to be allowed in bathrooms, gyms, sports leagues. The left and gay rights activists also looked around for the new cultural issue, which drove the right's shift in focus, because all they really do is play defense (poorly). The problem is with political groups gobbling up every small issue to entrench opposition and stoke division. Nobody wants to actually care about this, but they're pushed to it when the media en masse starts being REALLY concerned about 0.05% of the population or whatever. But no, American politics insists that we all pick a side because that exhausts you enough to not focus on real issues.

 

[break these cuffs]

But at the same time, immediately after Obergefell, trans groups started demanding to be allowed in bathrooms, gyms, sports leagues. The left and gay rights activists also looked around for the new cultural issue, which drove the right's shift in focus, because all they really do is play defense (poorly). The problem is with political groups gobbling up every small issue to entrench opposition and stoke division. Nobody wants to actually care about this, but they're pushed to it when the media en masse starts being REALLY concerned about 0.05% of the population or whatever. But no, American politics insists that we all pick a side because that exhausts you enough to not focus on real issues.

I don't believe the dividing the nation is a primary motivation for a lot of these activists. There are 100% people who want to it to happen and exploit it but, I think the boots on the ground are just useful idiots as in most cases. These full time activists and their NGOs have to do something or their funding dries up. Why do department heads in in the business world and the government always use their entire budget no matter how much they don't need? You get less budget allocated if you don't.

The gay marriage people had to start caring about trannies because the gay marriage fight was winding down. How were they going to solicit donations without a cause? How are they going to give handjobs to congressman at $25k a plate fundraising dinners if they aren't shrieking about something on TV. Are they going to get real jobs? Not fucking likely. It's shekel grubbing. Why do you have big pharma and professional organizations for plastic surgeons supporting this tranny shit? I'm sure some are true believes, but there's a fuckton of money to be made and they're fighting so they can get on the insurance and Medicaid teats. Getting someone hooked on medication for life that will never solve their issue is a golden goose and plastic surgeons had been left out in the cold for decades.

 

[Trianon]

Kyle you ignorant slut. The likes are so depressing, everyone is stupid.

 

[OttoWest]

View attachment 2156119

Kevin you ignorant slut. The likes are so depressing, everyone is stupid.

Archive

This is some stupidity for the ages.

 

[Internet's Boyfriend]

View attachment 2156119

Kevin you ignorant slut. The likes are so depressing, everyone is stupid.

This tweet is so stupid I lost a few IQ points from reading it.

 

[kazuhiro]

Perhaps failing journos in a decaying industry should #learntocook

 

[Trianon]

You have to scroll so long to even find people telling Kyle it's dumb.

One guy finally brought up the table distribution of ages of restaurant workers and ages of COVID mortalities, and this is the discussion THAT generated.

"Grandparents died, no child care." Hey, are the schools open? "..........."

"People are so traumatized they don't want to make money to live. "

Basically all the comments are making different arguments that, while specious, make more sense than Kevin's brainlet take.

 

[Mealy Mouth Spittle]

How many people aged 65 and up does he think were employed by restaurants? In my experience, seeing old folks working as a waiter or even just a host/hostess or kitchen staff is pretty rare. Maybe the fine dining establishments of the rich and famous like Kyle only hire geriatrics, but most of the places peasants like me patronize are staffed with youngsters. Maybe a middle aged single mom or two. But retirement age folks? Rarer than hen's teeth.

 

[MirnaMinkoff]

Where is Kyle’s usual Mother’s Day rant? Mother’s Day is his day to be assblasted about how he isn’t being properly honored as a mother, but that bitch who gave birth to his kids and takes care of them 99.999% of the time gets all the glory.

 

[OttoWest]

Where is Kyle’s usual Mother’s Day rant? Mother’s Day is his day to be assblasted about how he isn’t being properly honored as a mother, but that bitch who gave birth to his kids and takes care of them 99.999% of the time gets all the glory.

He’s probably still high off the fumes from that galactically stupid coof take.