No, he was given a time-out not for disagreeing but for derailing. Every other post would be this guy taking 1500 words to say the same thing, contradicting himself and not doing the research he demanded of others.Your overarching point seems to be about people working due to needing money. But you're skipping a step. Why do people need money? It's because they have certain unavoidable needs to survive, along with a very strong drive to survive.
Would a person living off subsistence farming stop doing all that backbreaking labor if they could get the food without it? Of fucking course they would. Does that make farming evil?
WTF was this for? He was engaged in good faith debate, what, he didn't agree with you so out of the hugbox?
For fucking negrating? Are you fucking serious?
Let's talk about the fact that discussions of anything to do with feminism need a heavy hand from the moderation to make sure the correct opinions are highlighted.
Surrogacy is something some women do voluntarily. Some women do it for money where it's allowed. Like ANY labor at all, it has permanent consequences. Do you think farmers are born with bent spines and aching knees?
Also, WTF is with the fact that @Terribleideas got threadbanned for "derailing and negrating", look at fucking @SourDiesel jumping all over the place and trying to completely control the entire conversation.
Also, not for nothing, this is a fucking bait thread started by Dynastia for bait purposes.
I talked about porn. Someone challenged some examples I made that showed they had an understanding of the subject matter. I went to the cites that person provided and came back with analysis. Whereas TerribleIdeas when confronted with evidence simply dismissed it as unimportant or even "anti-porn" instead of looking into it and coming back with what he thought about it. He asserted, too, that he might be engaging a surrogate, then contradicted his own theses statement "women should be free to choose whatever" by stipulating that he believed an enforceable surrogacy contract should have an anti-abortion clause but provided few details as to what overall he would think fair in a surrogacy contract. He then started sperging about unrelated game characters.
He was time-outed for derailing. That's not censorship, that's putting someone on mute so that a discussion can take place.