Lolcows that cannot be A-Logged -
- Thread starter BILLY MAYS
- Start date
If you have to a-log a cow, you should probably just stay away.
A-Logging is never acceptable but what constitutes A-Logging is very individualistic and flexible. In general, you never want to be mad at someone we have a thread on in this forum. If you're using this website and you're angry, you're using the website wrong, and should probably stop using it.
Nick Bate is a popular example of someone who "cannot be A-Logged" because he is a convicted child molester with extremely grotesque fetishes, but I would still say he can be A-Logged. If you let negative emotions stop you from having fun on the online and bawl tearfully and angrily in his thread, you're A-Logging, even though most people will probably give it a pass.
So like 21% of forum users?
null is, the more you fuck with him he'll put it up on his website so other people can mock you
hes too strong
hes too strong
and am not one of them
I'd say anyone who "can't be A-Logged" isn't really a lolcow but usually shades over into horrorcow material, like Nick Bate. Also, whether or not you can "A-Log" him, what you can do is post low quality posts that shit up the thread.
There are also relatively repellent people like Samuel Collingwood Smith. He can still be A-Logged because his primary characteristic is still that he is a ridiculous and pathetic individual. His hare-brained schemes may be evil, but are usually comically inept.
There are also relatively repellent people like Samuel Collingwood Smith. He can still be A-Logged because his primary characteristic is still that he is a ridiculous and pathetic individual. His hare-brained schemes may be evil, but are usually comically inept.
As long as you say it without anger, it's o-kay!
James Terry Mitchell Jr
The better question is, why is "A-log" or "A-logging" the term? How did that come to be?
if you have to do it to get them to freak out, it's worth it sometimes. expressing anger in writing doesn't always represent anger in reality, and a lot of these cows respond really well to the right kind of outrage.
Tommy tooter will rant for pages if you give him a simple "she was a child you are disgusting" post. you should be having fun doing it though, I think. why else would you read or post here? if it makes comedy flow, I like a-log posts. edit: I think this is why I like the beauty parlour and horrorcows best.
it sucks when half of a thread is just people doing it with no response from the subject though. it's good only when it gets an exaggerated response.
Tommy tooter will rant for pages if you give him a simple "she was a child you are disgusting" post. you should be having fun doing it though, I think. why else would you read or post here? if it makes comedy flow, I like a-log posts. edit: I think this is why I like the beauty parlour and horrorcows best.
it sucks when half of a thread is just people doing it with no response from the subject though. it's good only when it gets an exaggerated response.
Did you not read the link in the post you quoted?
>tfw nobody answered with Alex "idominatio" Figueroa
Jan. The man loves it, absorbs it like nourishment. It's amazing.
I know of a person: Roketsune/@Field Marshal Crappenberg. A-Logging only makes him harder and it's obvious his "You guis are bullies!" ranting is just a facade.
In all seriousness, Null's right when it's a person-by-person thing. Especially when it comes to people like Nick Bate, JTM or Vordrak. I'd say mock them, but not to the point of wanting to kill them.
In all seriousness, Null's right when it's a person-by-person thing. Especially when it comes to people like Nick Bate, JTM or Vordrak. I'd say mock them, but not to the point of wanting to kill them.
