Culture 'Long Time, No See' Is Racist Against Asians, Colorado State Warns Students - "How, White Man" is still acceptable


Trust in The Lord
True & Honest Fan

'Long Time, No See' Is Racist Against Asians, Colorado State Warns Students

"It has gotten to the point where students should carry around a dictionary of words they cannot say."

Administrators at Colorado State University have apparently deemed the saying "Long time, no see" to be non-inclusive language.

Student Katrina Leibee reported in an op-ed for the campus newspaper that the common greeting appeared on a list of taboo phrases that she was shown by the student association's director of diversity and inclusion, Zahra Al-Saloom.

According to Leibee, the phrase was included on the list because it was seen as "derogatory toward those of Asian descent" and thus contrary to the university's commitment to fostering inclusion.

Leibee said that the university also instructs students to avoid gendering each other by using traditional pronouns, the word "freshman," or the phrase "you guys." "First year" and "y'all" are the preferred nomenclature, she explained.

While Leibee averred that she and most of her classmates "actively respect people’s gender pronouns," she complained that the university was getting carried away.

"A countless amount of words and phrases have been marked with a big, red X and defined as non-inclusive," she said. "It has gotten to the point where students should carry around a dictionary of words they cannot say."

Al-Saloom did not respond to a request for a comment.

The actual etymology of "Long time, no see" is unclear. But there are two leading theories.

One is that the phrase came from the broken English of Chinese or Native American speakers. However, the earliest usages are by American writers describing the supposed speech of foreigners, and those descriptions could be inaccurate.

The other main theory is that "Long time, no see," is a literal translation of a Mandarin phrase.

In a 2012 investigation of the phrase, the Applied Applied Linguistics blog concluded that it was probably originally "a way to mock people for not speaking standard American English." However, the blog suggested, the phrase likely has real Chinese roots of some kind, which would explain why it seems to have been embraced by Chinese learners of English "as a kind of symbolic victory for Chinglish."

In other words, Chinese English speakers may have been proud that "Long time, no see" was adopted into common usage.

Is it really a good idea, then, to make what is now a characteristically American phrase racist again?

Some would no doubt argue that "Long time, no see" is essentially a lesser version of blackface, an artifact of America's racist past that is best discarded along with its oppressive baggage.

But for others, it is the policing of language that is the problem. They could point to Jordan Peterson's concerns about free speech, Jonathan Haidt's warnings about the coddling of American youth, and Francis Fukuyama's manifesto against identity politics.

As Leibee put it in her op-ed: "We should all consider the possibility that these words were not a problem until we made them a problem. These phrases were not exclusive until we decided they were."


Yeah there are real problems we could be solving in the world but we better double pad the hallway so no "adults" get their feelings hurt. Don't think bad thoughts, that's punishable by a rat mask. Are they gonna outlaw the phrase "chink in the armor" too?

I'd guess this is one of those "colleges" that is only one in name, basically one of those coddling diploma-mills?

We can't just take words from years ago that may of have an iffy past and then change them just because of a vague context. Many terms we use today come from things that weren't good to use as phrases in the past. But words can evolve with time. If you go into history to cleanse every single vaguely offensive phrase because you find some iffy context, you have too much time on your hands and need help.

student association's director of diversity and inclusion, Zahra Al-Saloom.
Fucking why. Why have this position. Eliminate it and 99.99% of these problems go away. It only exists to create and inflame tensions by "finding" problems and manufacturing controversy which they then use to get all their asshole buddies hired on who then "find" more issues. It's a scam. Stahhhhhp.


Greerotica Ghostwriter
True & Honest Fan
Always sounded like laid-back surfer or hippie talk to me. These people really stretch for this stuff.

This is like when they were calling the doge meme racist because they insisted it was mocking Asians with its broken English and saying it was meant to be read in a pidgin accent.

I'm pretty sure that if you see a Shiba dog saying wow and the first thing that pops in your head is "Asian dog, ching chang chong!" You're probably the racist.

I didn't think anything would top that, but here we are...


Lost in an endless void of stupid.
It's a calque of Chinese 好久不见。
Stop fucking getting triggered at languages. They spread shit all over all the time. At this rate they'll make everyone learn fucking Lojban because English is the bastard child of French deep-throating German.
Oh wait, Lojban used statistical practices that only included the top most spoken languages in the world? That's racist.
Guess everyone is going to have to learn how to speak Nǁŋǃke now to communicate. Oh, no its from Africa nevermind thats verbal blackface.
Well we're stuck with communicating nonverbally now. Oops thats offensive to monkeys, check your evolutionary privelege shitlord.

God, where does this end. Humanity was a mistake.


Are you now, or have you ever been?
"It's a beautiful thing, the Destruction of words. Of course the great wastage is in the verbs and adjectives, but there are hundreds of nouns that can be got rid of as well. It isn't only the synonyms; there are also the antonyms. After all, what justification is there for a word, which is simply the opposite of some other word? A word contains its opposite in itself. Take ‘good,’ for instance. If you have a word like ‘good,’ what need is there for a word like ‘bad’? ‘Ungood’ will do just as well – better, because it's an exact opposite, which the other is not. Or again, if you want a stronger version of ‘good,’ what sense is there in having a whole string of vague useless words like ‘excellent’ and ‘splendid’ and all the rest of them? ‘Plusgood’ covers the meaning or ‘doubleplusgood’ if you want something stronger still. Of course we use those forms already, but in the final version of Newspeak there'll be nothing else. In the end the whole notion of goodness and badness will be covered by only six words – in reality, only one word. Don't you see the beauty of that, Winston? It was B.B.'s idea originally, of course," he added as an afterthought.


About Us

The Kiwi Farms is about eccentric individuals and communities on the Internet. We call them lolcows because they can be milked for amusement or laughs. Our community is bizarrely diverse and spectators are encouraged to join the discussion.

We do not place intrusive ads, host malware, sell data, or run crypto miners with your browser. If you experience these things, you have a virus. If your malware system says otherwise, it is faulty.

Supporting the Forum

How to Help

The Kiwi Farms is constantly attacked by insane people and very expensive to run. It would not be here without community support.

BTC: 1DgS5RfHw7xA82Yxa5BtgZL65ngwSk6bmm
ETH: 0xc1071c60Ae27C8CC3c834E11289205f8F9C78CA5
BAT: 0xc1071c60Ae27C8CC3c834E11289205f8F9C78CA5
XMR: 438fUMciiahbYemDyww6afT1atgqK3tSTX25SEmYknpmenTR6wvXDMeco1ThX2E8gBQgm9eKd1KAtEQvKzNMFrmjJJpiino