Louis Le Vau / Thomas Nelson / TomApollo / Tehblasta / Fuu-sama - The last of the TRUE anti-SJWs, one of Sargon's lackeys, "the King of Loli Hill"

[Jmz_33]

View attachment 657287

If I remember correctly, Louis was salty about RDR2 because of “something something SJW something” and wanted Cyberpunk to overshadow it because of it.

However, Cyberpunk is going to allow you to play as a non-binary or a trans person, witch kind falls in line with the “SJW agenda something something.”

Has he made any comment on this?

I just took a quick look at his twitter and here is what I could find.

Lol he also made a poll or something.

Spoiler: Poll

 

[Goku 1000000 O]

Yesterday, Thomas Nelson (the pedophile) and Carl Benjamin (fellow pedophile) did a stream and Louis kvetched about Tim Pool using hyperbolic language on his videos. Well the first ten seconds seem to be addressing that and defending his use of that language.

I find it interesting because Louis is far from a notable figure in the youtube sphere so I’d think this wouldn’t get under Pool’s skin. Gotta wonder what the behind the scenes shit looks like sometimes.

 

[Vlad Transylvania Mai]

Oh yeah, I remember that gay shit. He had a livestream debate with Count Dankula over it.

I remember trying to stomach my way through it because the Count was in it but Louis just makes the dumbest and most cringeworthy arguments & Dankula rolls over for almost all of them, both of them walking away with nothing for their trouble.

defending lolicon is this the hill this faggot wants to die on.

 

[Shaka Brah]

defending lolicon is this the hill this faggot wants to die on.

Defending the hill of some gay shit is always the first choice of the conservative. Everyone in the skeptosphere/"radical centrism" is like this because they are unwilling to address the issues of the times lest they endanger their income. In order to continue their meaningless crusade they need to pick more and more niche topics to discuss or they'll become irrelevant, and it usually ends up being something the system doesn't care about.

For Republicans this issue is black abortions. "Why does PP/the Dems kill so many black babies?!" is conceptually just as impotent of an issue as "Why don't people accept underage art!?" Both are just missing the real problems and arguing for the sake of appearing like they oppose something.

 

[Woke Blue Muttlema]

Defending the hill of some gay shit is always the first choice of the conservative. Everyone in the skeptosphere/"radical centrism" is like this because they are unwilling to address the issues of the times lest they endanger their income. In order to continue their meaningless crusade they need to pick more and more niche topics to discuss or they'll become irrelevant, and it usually ends up being something the system doesn't care about.

For Republicans this issue is black abortions. "Why does PP/the Dems kill so many black babies?!" is conceptually just as impotent of an issue as "Why don't people accept underage art!?" Both are just missing the real problems and arguing for the sake of appearing like they oppose something.

This really applies to almost every political commentator on YT if not all, the only limit is any sense of morality.

 

[InsolentGaylord]

Industry of Cowards

If terrorism wasn’t effective why would it even exist? SubscribeStar - https://www.subscribestar.com/louislevau Social Media: Twitter - https://twitter.com/L...

www.youtube.com

Just bumping the thread. Also a daily reminder that Louis doesn't consume much media in general these days and doesn't support games that go against SJW ideology because he only plays the really mainstream shit.

 

[Judiac Cyber Criminal]

A common trope I've noticed with these political rant content creators is that they give the most out of touch worst advice on essentially anything.
Specifically, with Louis Le Vau it's his advice on bullying, since his advice echos that of the typical trope you hear about gaining respect from other prisoners by fighting back or randomly attacking the prisoner.

or as he put it "during lunch, attack the bully, use unfair tactics, use a chair if you have to" which translate: If you want to fuck your school life spitroast style, my advice is sound and sane.

His content is very similar to BPS/Felix (they certainly do look the perfect autism duo) where it might include 1 or 2 sources and the rest is just him either throwing a tantrum or going on a tirade about how libs are.
With nothing of value for the genuine viewer.

 

[Wodanaz]

A common trope I've noticed with these political rant content creators is that they give the most out of touch worst advice on essentially anything.
Specifically, with Louis Le Vau it's his advice on bullying, since his advice echos that of the typical trope you hear about gaining respect from other prisoners by fighting back or randomly attacking the prisoner.

or as he put it "during lunch, attack the bully, use unfair tactics, use a chair if you have to" which translate: If you want to fuck your school life spitroast style, my advice is sound and sane.

Actually his advice is good. Too many mothers hug their boys and tell them it's going to be okay, and too many fathers echo these sentiments.
Your school life is already fucked up if you're getting bullied, I guess the question is how much are you willing to take?
A lot of adults don't remember what it was like to be a kid. Further consideration on the topic:
A word on bullying. - Louis Rossmann

 

[Judiac Cyber Criminal]

Actually his advice is good. Too many mothers hug their boys and tell them it's going to be okay, and too many fathers echo these sentiments.
Your school life is already fucked up if you're getting bullied, I guess the question is how much are you willing to take?
A lot of adults don't remember what it was like to be a kid. Further consideration on the topic:
A word on bullying. - Louis Rossmann

If the mother/father cares enough to even say to "bite the bullet", that's miles better than when you come from a messy household and your parents/guardians don't pay attention what so ever to your issues in school/life.
Louis Rossman's advice is in the polar opposite of what LLV is saying, Rossman talks about standing up for yourself and fight back physically only if your life is threatened (and make sure you're fit to do so), since as Rossman says in the video otherwise you let others manipulate you and cause you to become a person you don't want to be (easily agitated, resorts to unnecessary violence instead of banting back and arbitrary respect driven).
And he really stresses the point of making sure you do not appear to be weak or vulnerable, to show you have something to protect yourself against the predator (he gives multiple examples both in the video you linked and in his part 2), such as strength, awareness or connections.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5gduH9yM7sY

LLV advice is to attack a bully to make the bully stop bullying you, not with the hope of inflicting damage but to gain "prison respect" (i.e. the bully was so shocked by your retaliation that they leave you alone) with the bully and other students.
This tactic can work if you're larger/stronger, other students view it as positive but you might feel as if the bully manipulated you into going as low as the bully which is something you never ever would in normal circumstances.
Something you tend to see when it's a 1v1 mutually agreed fight.
When it doesn't work, it's going to escalate the bullying (if the bully is stronger than you, as was the case with Rossman), it might turn students against you (shun you or bully you) and the school staff will now consider you to be just as much guilty as the bully and thus work against you.

Hell using LLV's advice when it comes to multiple bullies would mean either train to become like bruce lee or do a school stabbing/shooting as a means to make the bullying stop.

 

[Schway]

If the mother/father cares enough to even say to "bite the bullet", that's miles better than when you come from a messy household and your parents/guardians don't pay attention what so ever to your issues in school/life.
Louis Rossman's advice is in the polar opposite of what LLV is saying, Rossman talks about standing up for yourself and fight back physically only if your life is threatened (and make sure you're fit to do so), since as Rossman says in the video otherwise you let others manipulate you and cause you to become a person you don't want to be (easily agitated, resorts to unnecessary violence instead of banting back and arbitrary respect driven).
And he really stresses the point of making sure you do not appear to be weak or vulnerable, to show you have something to protect yourself against the predator (he gives multiple examples both in the video you linked and in his part 2), such as strength, awareness or connections.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5gduH9yM7sY

LLV advice is to attack a bully to make the bully stop bullying you, not with the hope of inflicting damage but to gain "prison respect" (i.e. the bully was so shocked by your retaliation that they leave you alone) with the bully and other students.
This tactic can work if you're larger/stronger, other students view it as positive but you might feel as if the bully manipulated you into going as low as the bully which is something you never ever would in normal circumstances.
Something you tend to see when it's a 1v1 mutually agreed fight.
When it doesn't work, it's going to escalate the bullying (if the bully is stronger than you, as was the case with Rossman), it might turn students against you (shun you or bully you) and the school staff will now consider you to be just as much guilty as the bully and thus work against you.

Hell using LLV's advice when it comes to multiple bullies would mean either train to become like bruce lee or do a school stabbing/shooting as a means to make the bullying stop.

Every situation has it's peculiarities, so not all approaches will have the same result every time but fundamentally what LLV is saying is a decent enough approach. Most "bullies" especially if they're in a group, don't hate your guts specifically, they're just picking on the weak kid to show off and because they can, fighting back is a solid choice.

Of course this comes with the caveat of not being utterly spineless and completely weak, if you try to fight back but the best you can do is tickle the guy you're gonna get fucked with, no helping it. You've gotta get smart or strong enough to show the guy that fucking with you means you fuck with him, no two ways about it. I believe LLV basically points this out when he says to pull out the guys chair. If you can't fight him straight up, do what you can.

And yes, there's times when fighting back will end up making things worse but just letting things go on as they usually do is arguably almost always worse in the long run.

I think LLV brings this up in the vid but a big thing about this is that school is pretty much the only period of life that men/boys have to be able to fight each other directly without huge consequences. Fighting back against a bully and giving him a good hook, even if he beats your ass afterwards and you get reprimanded is a way better choice than getting fucked with at your workplace 15 years later because you never learned to stand up for yourself. The main difference being that if you fight back at your workplace there's a good chance you'll get fired or arrested depending on the exact scenario.

"Going as low as the bully" is a very modern and broken view. You are fighting back against someone who fucked with you and giving as good as you got, as long as you don't go too overboard you've got no reason to feel ashamed. No different than cussing out someone who cusses at you. If you do feel ashamed then that's a good time to get rid of that mentality because it's the kind of shit that will cripple you more than most bullies ever could.

 

[Judiac Cyber Criminal]

Every situation has it's peculiarities, so not all approaches will have the same result every time but fundamentally what LLV is saying is a decent enough approach. Most "bullies" especially if they're in a group, don't hate your guts specifically, they're just picking on the weak kid to show off and because they can, fighting back is a solid choice.

Of course this comes with the caveat of not being utterly spineless and completely weak, if you try to fight back but the best you can do is tickle the guy you're gonna get fucked with, no helping it. You've gotta get smart or strong enough to show the guy that fucking with you means you fuck with him, no two ways about it. I believe LLV basically points this out when he says to pull out the guys chair. If you can't fight him straight up, do what you can.

And yes, there's times when fighting back will end up making things worse but just letting things go on as they usually do is arguably almost always worst in the long run.

I think LLV brings this up in the vid but a big thing about this is that school is pretty much the only period of life that men/boys have to be able to fight each other directly without huge consequences. Fighting back against a bully and giving him a good hook, even if he beats your ass afterwards and you get reprimanded is a way better choice than getting fucked with at your workplace 15 years later because you never learned to stand up for yourself. The main difference being that if you fight back at your workplace there's a good chance you'll get fired or arrested depending on the exact scenario.

"Going as low as the bully" is a very modern and broken view. You are fighting back against someone who fucked with you and giving as good as you got, as long as you don't go too overboard you've got no reason to feel ashamed. No different than cussing out someone who cusses at you. If you do feel ashamed then that's a good time to get rid of that mentality because it's the kind of shit that will cripple you more than most bullies ever could.

Of course, you can't apply a catch-all solution to bullying, but neither can you do so with the outcome of the solution, school is not a consequence-free zone for kids, depending on where you're from and how your peers interpret your action, it can lead to further bullying, getting expelled, being sued or being sent to a juvenile correction facility, all of which can permanently fuck over your life.

As I said, LLV main point is regardless of how the bully is (physically) you should hit him unfairly because it'll automatically give you respect, at least that's my interpretation of it.

The general rule is to only use necessary force when needed and make the odds be in your favor.
Know why you're being bullied (what is the weakness you have), get friends within/outside school.
And if the bullying is only verbal, learn how to bant, if it's physical, workout (+ train in MMA/boxing), and then do self-defense when needed or at worse setup one of those 1v1 fights.

When it comes to "going as low as the bully" I meant that as in it can change your personality into one of the stereotypical "FIGHT ME BRO" types, that gets easily agitated and resort to actions that could've easily been dealt with a simple comeback/bant since that's how you learned how to "stand up" for yourself.

 

[Wodanaz]

Of course, you can't apply a catch-all solution to bullying, but neither can you do so with the outcome of the solution, school is not a consequence-free zone for kids, depending on where you're from and how your peers interpret your action, it can lead to further bullying, getting expelled, being sued or being sent to a juvenile correction facility, all of which can permanently fuck over your life.

This is the biggest takeaway for me personally. It's all fine and dandy for us to sit around and pontificate about what to do if you're being bullied, but there's really no response adequate for every situation, except perhaps "learn how to defend yourself" but that's easier said than done. Obviously both Rossmann and Louis' (lel, they're both named louis) strategies worked for them, as they have stories to tell, but it's not going to turn out that way for everyone.

Anyway, thoughts on his latest video? Tithing to Father Gibber
I tend to agree with him. His father worked to secure a better future for his family. Even he put his nose to the grindstone for a couple years doing PI work and managed to buy a house. I have no sympathy for blacks who protest that it's impossible for them to do much the same because of "systemtic racism". I know plenty of successful black people. Enough with the gibs.

 

[Not Really Here]

"Bully" is a useless word at this point, it's used to describe everything from mild smack talk to someone else about you, to actual violent physical attack.

Advocating beating someone with a blunt instrument over bullying is stupid.

 

[Judiac Cyber Criminal]

This is the biggest takeaway for me personally. It's all fine and dandy for us to sit around and pontificate about what to do if you're being bullied, but there's really no response adequate for every situation, except perhaps "learn how to defend yourself" but that's easier said than done. Obviously both Rossmann and Louis' (lel, they're both named louis) strategies worked for them, as they have stories to tell, but it's not going to turn out that way for everyone.

Anyway, thoughts on his latest video? Tithing to Father Gibber
I tend to agree with him. His father worked to secure a better future for his family. Even he put his nose to the grindstone for a couple years doing PI work and managed to buy a house. I have no sympathy for blacks who protest that it's impossible for them to do much the same because of "systemtic racism". I know plenty of successful black people. Enough with the gibs.

Skipped his rant about christians and optics ("sjw" questions, fake pastor, a woman asking questions) if anyone wanna skip that:

https://youtu.be/_hpAcyBUZK0?t=458

Holy shit, I remember him screaming sometimes, but this was on the same level as Naked ape's videos, with the difference being a total lack of effort.
I'll admit I haven't watch Louis since around 2016, almost unsurprisingly he's as much of a sperg back then as he is now.
He doesn't try to create cohesive solutions/arguments nor doesn't seem to want to acknowledge the other person's issue because it's "retarded".
When he brings up his father, but he doesn't give the reason he manages to make it, he never gives out a thorough background of who his father is, not which generation nor his race or how close he was to his community, the closest is "he moved away from the project and got a job".

His only point/solution to poverty is to get a job and work hard and hope you make it.

The only somewhat point he makes is that if you got a job that is paying less than what you can afford you need to reassess your living situation/spending.

And when it comes to his comment about black people being the biggest enemy of black people, he completely glosses over issues such as:

• redlining
• job application discrimination
• housing discrimination
• zoning laws, like say what this vice news vid highlighted: video

When it comes to his claim about the "white lefty" puppeteering black people, he doesn't throw a specific date (if he said in modern times, it would have some merit in that a lot of leftists are gullible enough to allow extreme racist/accelerationist groups as long as they are against the capitalistic/patriarchal establishment) so you can easily then interpret this as to mean during the civil rights movement, which is gonna be a very hard position to argue against.

His lack of substance in his arguments and ranting would even make a semi-sentient breadtuber able to refute Louis's lackluster arguments (saying this as someone that find breadtubers slightly more insufferable than the skeptics/gamergaters/alt-righters).

Overall his takes are very shallow, he only points to the most surface-level issue and deliberately stops there, dismisses studies as "politically charged" or just saying "it just shows x".

Sometimes I do wonder if this is just a character he plays, because of how astute he thinks he is and because of how confident he is of his analysis of the opponent's argument/ideology.
To then think his counter-arguments/questions will "trigger" them or destroy their entire position (like his big brainy question to the pastor "can you be satisfied living in a white majority country"), it reminds me very much of Coach Red Pill.

Point is that his arguments/points lack any substance and thus are ripe for anyone that is somewhat politically knowledgable could pick apart, I can understand if you just want to hear someone rant about """current""" social issue, but honestly, you might as well just subscribe to 4 different news outlet and do some Wikipedia reading and get a better understanding of said social issue.

It would be hilarious if he were to ever do debates against people that disagree with him beyond lolicon, but given his constant beating up a cardboard copy of either his opponent or their argument, I highly doubt he would for his own sake.

 

[Angelos32]

I honestly couldn’t believe my eyes when he posted this

 

[Shaka Brah]

I honestly couldn’t believe my eyes when he posted this

That's the kind of take that any honest atheist-materialist would have. It's only surprising he's willing to say it out loud.

 

[Angelos32]

That's the kind of take that any honest atheist-materialist would have. It's only surprising he's willing to say it out loud.

But for someone who is apparently so against degeneracy in society, seems a bit hypocritical to take this stance

 

[Shaka Brah]

But for someone who is apparently so against degeneracy in society, seems a bit hypocritical to take this stance

If you're a materialist who doesn't believe in the dignity of human life, you can extend the prevention of social degeneracy further to negative eugenic policies. I don't think it's hypocritical at all, he's just coming from a morally and intellectually bankrupt philosophy.

 

[Angelos32]

If you're a materialist who doesn't believe in the dignity of human life, you can extend the prevention of social degeneracy further to negative eugenic policies. I don't think it's hypocritical at all, he's just coming from a morally and intellectually bankrupt philosophy.

One that lacks any empathy at all, I wonder why he has no future prospects as far as a wife and family goes

 

[naught sock account 1]

there might be some links worthy of adding to the Op...

Known usernames: LouisLeVau, TomApollo, Tehblasta, thomas.nelson.96, Fuu-sama

Real name: Thomas Nelson

Education: Started at Buffalo State in 2013, graduated in 2015. Political Science degree (lol)

Birthday: June 30th 1990

Information Leading to and Resulting from info:

https://archive.fo/LyUhl (favs deviantart)

https://archive.fo/ZqeuI (main deviantart)

https://archive.fo/hscKR (commission)

https://archive.fo/1TerT (kickstarter)

https://archive.fo/53SuF (Facebook)

https://archive.fo/izOCZ (about, education)

https://archive.fo/rdPMT (Commission facebook)

https://archive.fo/9C4oJ (steam, shit taste)

https://archive.fo/0Y3eP (steam games)

https://archive.fo/Kpbog (wordpress)

https://archive.fo/uilmq (Searching Nelson as a surname gives the Thomas N. page, with no further links)

https://archive.fo/aWKuk (Thomas Nelson facebook. Up to 2013)

http://archive.fo/Vt8X2 (Nelson submits article for website, links defunct YT channel called "Blastatube"

http://archive.fo/8g2HC (Wrote at a site called TechRaptor CONFIRMS HE SWITCHED MAJOR FROM CRIMINAL LAW TO POLSCI at some point)

https://premium.whitepages.com/resu...e_address_line_1=&people_postal_code=&button= (White Pages linking a Thomas Nelson to the exact age of Louis)