Man Dogs and Dog Men - humanity is furries vs. monky??

[Milkis]

It has been theorized that humans underwent some behavioural changes when the Eurasian wolf was domesticated, a "reverse" domestication (of man by wolf) or "convergent evolution". Supposedly, human-wolf cooperation created evolutionary pressure to organize , cooperate, and structure ourselves in big groups, things that wolves naturally do, but primates cannot. Of course the other effect was to turn the majestic grey wolf into a chihuahua.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Origin_of_the_domestic_dog#Human_adoption_of_some_wolf_behaviors

(PDF) Dogs make us human.

PDF | Yes Yes | Find, read and cite all the research you need on ResearchGate

www.researchgate.net

http://nldogs.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/coevolution03.pdf

The life of chimpanzees, especially their sociality, as revealed by the pioneering work of Jane GOODALL and others (GOODALL 1986;DE WAAL 1997) appears as a frightful caricature ofhuman egoism. Even in their maternal behavior, warmth and affection are apparently reduced to nursing and an occasional comforting hug; cooperation among group members is limited to occasional hunting episodes, or the persecution of a competitor, always aimed for one’s own advantage and executed with MACHIAVELLIAN shrewdness.

This domestication happened in Eurasia between roughly 41,000 - 23,000 years before present (YBP). However, in another section of that Wikipedia article, it states that (from Origins and genetic legacy of prehistoric dogs):

In 2020, the sequencing of ancient dog genomes indicates that the lineage of modern dogs in sub-Sahara Africa shares a single origin from the Levant, where an ancestral specimen was dated to 7,000 YBP.

Does anyone else see an inconsistency here? Is 7,000 years enough time for those wolf-like behaviours to develop in man? Or did convergent evolution only happen over the longer 20,000 year period, and only in those humans who formed a cooperative society with canines?

In other words, are there maybe exactly two subspecies of human: (1) those who passed through Eurasia, encountered and domesticated the Eurasian wolf, and underwent behavioural changes, and (2) those who did not?

 

[Fireman Sam]

Imagine thinking that we came from apes.
Who the fuck walks around on two legs anyway?

 

[From The Uncanny Valley]

BUT WHAT ABOUT THE PIG MAN, JERRY?

 

[Clorox Cowboy]

If you aren't a highly intelligent Lizard-Person I don't know what to tell you.

 

[Agent Nahman Jayden]

Um I'm stardustkin and my pronouns are star/stars/starself. Check your wolfkin privilege, shitlord

 

[Bad Gateway]

Some dogs are doggos, some are puppers, and others may even be pupperinos. There are corgos and clouds, fluffers and floofs, woofers and boofers. The chunky ones are thicc, and the thin ones are long bois. When they stick out their tongues, they're doing a mlem, a blep, a blop. They bork. They boof. Once in a while they do each other a frighten.

 

[Un Platano]

This also explains why only white girls fuck dogs, because black girls did not coevolve attraction of the canine persuasion.

 

[Michael Jacks0n]

You're the man now, dog.

 

[AcidityLiquidity]

In other words, are there maybe exactly two subspecies of human: (1) those who passed through Eurasia, encountered and domesticated the Eurasian wolf, and underwent behavioural changes, and (2) those who did not?

Yes and the answer is as clear as black and white!

Or whites and basically everyone else, since Asians eat dogs and dogs hate blacks.

 

[TFT-A9]

"majestic gray wolf"

 

[ZeCommissar]

That's.....not how evolutionary pressure works. A animal or group of animals don't "think"themselves into evolving in a certain way.

Did dogs have a profound impact on most cultures? Certainly, but I would say having drafting animals is far more important to advanced civilizations than dogs.

Yes and the answer is as clear as black and white!

Or whites and basically everyone else, since Asians eat dogs and dogs hate blacks.

Bruh

Native Americans also regularly used dogs and incan nobles were known to bury dogs with royals like how Egyptians would cats.


All of this sounds like a really elaborate excuse as to why OP is a furry.

 

[Penis Drager]

Supposedly, human-wolf cooperation created evolutionary pressure to organize , cooperate, and structure ourselves in big groups, things that wolves naturally do, but primates cannot.

Bonobos are about as closely related to us as chimps, and they have quite the copacetic (albeit, matriarchal) social structure.

 

[Milkis]

That's.....not how evolutionary pressure works. A animal or group of animals don't "think"themselves into evolving in a certain way.

I recommend you the article from the third link in the OP and tell me what you think.