MAP/NOMAP community - "Virtuous Pedophiles" has a prodigy

  • Apologies for the site issues. The server's shipment was delayed. I'll ask again about it and if they can't provide it I'll source another.

Ningen

The new n-word
kiwifarms.net
Pedos are either pretending not to understand this or are straight fucking exceptional individuals.
Pedos have lower IQs on average, so there is that.
Wait, wait, wait...

So, those guys are all admittingly literal paedophiles?

How does it come they're not in jail? Seriously, I mean, paedophilia is illegal basically everywhere.
Because in most countries thoughts are not crimes.
On one hand fuck Groypers and Nickers alike, on the other hand fuck Twitter pedos.
 

TalmudSperg

New Zealander & Agriculturalist
kiwifarms.net
paedophilia is illegal basically everywhere.

You're wrong.
Pedophilia isn't illegal. Child sexual abuse is illegal. Child porn is illegal.

Just like being a Nazi, a communist, a Jew, a Christian, a homosexual, a transgender or a zoophile isn't illegal.
And none of these ever have been.

They are all thoughts and beliefs.
The state can restrict speech and action and writing and expression.

But if people are perverted pedophiles in their mind and never act on their kid fucking desires, it is legal. Disgusting and perfectly legal.
 

Man vs persistent rat

A good egg is a nice person
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
I just think they prefer pedos being out in the open rather than forcing them underground. If I owned Twitter I'd probably walk the same line, if people want to paint giant flashing arrows to themselves screaming "PEDO" then it's that much easier for the cops to eventually bust them with 6 encrypted terabyte drives of CP, and hopefully everyone knew to keep their kids away from them in the meantime.
I wish that were the case, it's be a fantastic honey pot, but I don't believe in the current climate that a big social media company would risk the PR catastrophe of this hitting mainstream media. Their lawyers would probably have advised them complying (unless legally forced - I don't see how) would be reneging their risk-management obligation to their shareholders, since the more they get known as a save haven, the more widespread the pedos will become, and all sorts of knock-on scandals could occur from there. It's more likely just to be an absolutely fucktarded and misguided policy, but I hope I'm wrong.
 

Dustlord

Resident MENA expert
kiwifarms.net
I do have to admit the one pedo fuck has a point about people declining to go into certain professions because they're afraid of being stereotyped/accused as a pedo (I've heard a lot of men who wanted to go into pediatric nursing or early childhood ed but didn't for this reason). Of course their idea of addressing this problem is to accept pedophilia, because of fucking course it is. Admittedly I don't have any ideas how to address this problem but I know that is the worst possible way to go about it.
I suppose one solution is to fight the stereotype that men are more likely to be pedophiles, but at least from what I've seen, that is largely true - at least when it comes to younger children, and that doesn't address the potential problem anyway, just spreads it out to include more people. Obviously it's ignorant to make someone feel awkward about helping kids because there's a 0.0001% chance they're a pedo though.
Either way it's being used as a political talking point to normalize pedophilia rather than genuine concern for either the men or the kids.
 

Great Dane

I'm here for a good time
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
Are you sexually attracted to clowns? There's a flag for that now.
1579550655128.png

1579550673151.png


1579550890170.png

1579550915588.png


By the way, this user's AOA is 0-13 years old.
1579550962043.png
 

6thRanger

kiwifarms.net
I don't even get what the point of this would be. Aren't these exceptional individuals begging to be doxed? Look at the # of pedos in power worldwide, they don't declare themselves. What the fuck is the point of this disgusting shit?
 

Dustlord

Resident MENA expert
kiwifarms.net
I don't even get what the point of this would be. Aren't these exceptional individuals begging to be doxed? Look at the # of pedos in power worldwide, they don't declare themselves. What the fuck is the point of this disgusting shit?
These people consider themselves to be in a similar class to gays, and think that they can normalize pedophilia until it gains relative tolerance comparable to that. Between them being delusional and some SJW types taking the bait, it's empowered them to organize and be semi-open about it.

It's not even a recent occurrence. nambla has been around for quite a long time, for example.
 

Shaka Brah

Hang ten, my dudes.
kiwifarms.net
These people consider themselves to be in a similar class to gays, and think that they can normalize pedophilia until it gains relative tolerance comparable to that. Between them being delusional and some SJW types taking the bait, it's empowered them to organize and be semi-open about it.

It's not even a recent occurrence. nambla has been around for quite a long time, for example.
And NAMBLA began funding the gay liberation movement specifically to get pederasty legalized via gay rights.
 

Jolyne-but-thicc

The hacker known as Kiwi Farms
kiwifarms.net
Are you sexually attracted to clowns? There's a flag for that now.
View attachment 1106647
View attachment 1106649

View attachment 1106654
View attachment 1106655

By the way, this user's AOA is 0-13 years old.
View attachment 1106657
> age 13
> has an nsfw account

I'M SCARED, SCOOB.
 

Dustlord

Resident MENA expert
kiwifarms.net
kevinliar.jpg

Just because they might have denied being a pedophile or engaged in adult relationships doesn't exclude them from that. You can be a closeted pedophile that is in a position of power. Normal people do not molest kids, simple as that. Only someone with sexual attraction towards children would even think of such.
kevinreviews.jpg

mappincic.jpg

 

Mein Garten

No dogs allowed
kiwifarms.net
Are you sexually attracted to clowns? There's a flag for that now.
View attachment 1106647
View attachment 1106649

View attachment 1106654
View attachment 1106655

By the way, this user's AOA is 0-13 years old.
View attachment 1106657
Of course it's in Kaiserslautern. God dam liberal weeb trash.
 

Captain Manning

Tears in the rain.
kiwifarms.net
From OP:

Despite that, they will get extremely anal with you if you call somebody a pedophile, because their common belief is that "pedophile" is not a blanket term for people sexually attracted to underage kids. They explicitly differentiate between various kinds of "sexualities", such as ephebophilia (attraction to late adolescents), hebephilia (early adolescents), pedophiles (pre-pubescent children) and infantophilia (infants/toddlers).
That's actually not just a phenomenon you see among the MAP/NOMAP community, but a fairly common refrain I've heard uttered by lolbertarians too.

They have a bug up their ass about the government setting a fixed age of consent, because they argue it doesn't give weight to the "emotional maturity" of the individual. Teenagers usually being more mature than pre-teens, etc.

I might entertain their bitching, but for the fact that nobody has explained to me HOW you're supposed to fairly determine at a criminal trial whether a variable age of consent applies in any given situation, or doesn't. Meanwhile, everybody should be able to fathom the fixed chronological ages we use in current laws.
 
Last edited:

Mangcho

That's a very nice hat.
kiwifarms.net
Prostasia could really use its own topic. There's a wealth of material there, would be great to have it in one place.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Dustlord

GethN7

True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
They have a bug up their ass about the government setting a fixed age of consent, because they argue it doesn't give weight to the "emotional maturity" of the individual. Teenagers usually being more mature than pre-teens, etc.
That argument is such arrant bullshit you could use it as high-grade fertilizer.

They say fixed age laws don't take into account the emotional maturity of people, but that's simple: WE CAN'T DO THAT.

It is simply impossible to make a law covering a broad group without setting a discrete bar for when something is and is not okay. Humanity is not psychic, we cannot all sense when someone is "mature" enough for something, all we can do is set a fixed age when the overwhelming majority of us are expected to be physically and mentally mature based on a broad consensus.

It's not ideal, but the ideal is just not possible, so it's the best we got. Further, since we live in a world where some idiots and assholes try the "feels before reals" nonsense, if we gave them what they wanted, any immature person who said they felt otherwise would have to be catered to despite all good sense and reason, and fixed age laws are in force specifically to prevent that because the possibility of disaster is so high.

TL;DR: This is a "feels before reals" argument that needs pissed on and defiled because it's utterly naive at best and a wedge of deviants to get a loophole at worst.
 

Dustlord

Resident MENA expert
kiwifarms.net
That argument is such arrant bullshit you could use it as high-grade fertilizer.

They say fixed age laws don't take into account the emotional maturity of people, but that's simple: WE CAN'T DO THAT.

It is simply impossible to make a law covering a broad group without setting a discrete bar for when something is and is not okay. Humanity is not psychic, we cannot all sense when someone is "mature" enough for something, all we can do is set a fixed age when the overwhelming majority of us are expected to be physically and mentally mature based on a broad consensus.

It's not ideal, but the ideal is just not possible, so it's the best we got. Further, since we live in a world where some idiots and assholes try the "feels before reals" nonsense, if we gave them what they wanted, any immature person who said they felt otherwise would have to be catered to despite all good sense and reason, and fixed age laws are in force specifically to prevent that because the possibility of disaster is so high.

TL;DR: This is a "feels before reals" argument that needs pissed on and defiled because it's utterly naive at best and a wedge of deviants to get a loophole at worst.
There's always going to be an exception to any rule, but you don't make laws on the exception. Is there a 15 year old that is mature enough for sex with an adult? It's theoretically possible but it's idiotic to open the flood gates like that when the vast majority of them are not. As you said, emotional/mental maturity is not something that can be quantified anyway so we have to work with generalizations.
normapmap.jpg

Just because someone has some normal traits does not make them normal. Jeffrey Dahmer could also be called normal by this measure. He was, by most metrics, an average person....yet he was also a vicious killer with severe mental problems.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: GethN7