- Highlight
- #1
I've noticed a recent trend in the modern cultural discourse where there is an increasing glut of accusations and "proofs" that various big pop cultural properties are "actually" plagiarized from earlier, more obscure properties. The big pop culture properties are never just inspired from or influenced by the earlier obscurities, their similarities can never just be mere coincidences, no no no, they are straight-up rip-offs of them.
This of course, leads to some incredibly misleading "evidence" being thrown around to prove the similarities. One example is the Lion King-Kimba plagiarism controversy, in which people have claimed that the Lion King is a rip-off of Kimba the White Lion. To put it bluntly, that's completely false (and in some cases, Kimba is a rip-off of the Lion King), primarily because the Kimba series is fucking insane, and the fundamental storylines between it and the Lion King are very often completely different, with any similarities being very selectively defined in nature.
One can only imagine how many other such plagiarism controversies are based on lies, misinformation, and false pretenses.
What are your thoughts on this phenomenon? Personally, I think a lot of these plagiarism controversies are overblown garbage, and any new plagiarism controversy that comes out should have serious doubt placed on it unless real and unquestionable proof comes out in favor of it.
This of course, leads to some incredibly misleading "evidence" being thrown around to prove the similarities. One example is the Lion King-Kimba plagiarism controversy, in which people have claimed that the Lion King is a rip-off of Kimba the White Lion. To put it bluntly, that's completely false (and in some cases, Kimba is a rip-off of the Lion King), primarily because the Kimba series is fucking insane, and the fundamental storylines between it and the Lion King are very often completely different, with any similarities being very selectively defined in nature.
One can only imagine how many other such plagiarism controversies are based on lies, misinformation, and false pretenses.
What are your thoughts on this phenomenon? Personally, I think a lot of these plagiarism controversies are overblown garbage, and any new plagiarism controversy that comes out should have serious doubt placed on it unless real and unquestionable proof comes out in favor of it.
Last edited: